Template talk:Infobox historic site: Difference between revisions
Kaliforniyka (talk | contribs) →Request renovation fields: new section |
Kaliforniyka (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
== Request renovation fields == |
== Request renovation fields == |
||
Would it be possible to add fields for Renovated/Renovated by/Renovated date? Sometimes with older buildings like castles and stately homes, there are significant additions over the centuries, often by notable architects. There is the "Rebuilt" |
Would it be possible to add fields for Renovated/Renovated by/Renovated date? Sometimes with older buildings like castles and stately homes, there are significant additions over the centuries, often by notable architects. There is the "Rebuilt" field, but this implies the original was destroyed. Thank you! [[User:Kaliforniyka|<b>—Kaliforniyka</b>]]<sup>[[User talk:Kaliforniyka|Hi!]]</sup> 06:06, 21 July 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:07, 21 July 2024
Template:Infobox historic site is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories.
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. Functionality of the template can be checked using test cases. |
This template was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Not sure why param 6s are not working
I recently added all the parameters to support a sixth designation. But they are not appearing on pages. See for example Statue of Liberty. Does anyone have any ideas? Ergo Sum 19:33, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
Edit request 5 August 2023
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Adding 'event' and 'associated people' parameters
Hello! I'm just wondering if it would be possible to add the above parameters, both of which are inspired by Template:Infobox military installation. 'Event' would allow editors to list any notable events which took place at a site, and 'associated people' would allow the same for notable people. For example, a castle infobox might list a major siege and a famous castellan. The exact names of the parameters don't matter, feel free to suggest alternatives.
On a separate note, templates which use 'native name' or similar rarely bother to subtitle the section as it's typically obvious from the context that any alternative name is from another language (example). Does this template therefore need the "Native name" subtitle?
I would lay all this out in wikitext but I'm not particularly good with templates, apologies. Thank you, A.D.Hope (talk) 09:03, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- The addition of two parameters and deletion of one parameter requires a consensus to put into effect. Please garner a consensus before reactivation of this request. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 01:18, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
- What should I do when nobody seems interested in forming a consensus? This discussion was opened 17 days ago and hasn't attracted any input besides yours. A.D.Hope (talk) 08:49, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
- The consensus link presents editors with options, for example, starting an RFC discussion will often attract editors and result in consensus. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 09:11, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
- I'd support the addition, and I don't think it's controversial enough to require an RfC. ɱ (talk) 15:43, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
- The consensus link presents editors with options, for example, starting an RFC discussion will often attract editors and result in consensus. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 09:11, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
- What should I do when nobody seems interested in forming a consensus? This discussion was opened 17 days ago and hasn't attracted any input besides yours. A.D.Hope (talk) 08:49, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
Edit request 20 October 2023 Location Map Label + Map Mark Size
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Description of suggested change: add Template:Location_map label and label parameters, and mark size parameter, currently they are not available, no label parameter available. Ideally add all Location Map parameters to template.
Diff:
− | + | CHANGED_TEXT |
KarmaKangaroo (talk) 16:44, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
- Already done See the documentation, where the
|locmapin=
and related parameters are explained. To see an example of how they are used, look at the infobox at State Thomas, Dallas. I have added documentation for|map_dot_label=
. For a mark size option, there should probably be a discussion about allowing non-standard sizing. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:08, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
Request renovation fields
Would it be possible to add fields for Renovated/Renovated by/Renovated date? Sometimes with older buildings like castles and stately homes, there are significant additions over the centuries, often by notable architects. There is the "Rebuilt" field, but this implies the original was destroyed. Thank you! —KaliforniykaHi! 06:06, 21 July 2024 (UTC)