User talk:Eyedentification

Lil Snvrk moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Lil Snvrk. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ... discospinster _talk 19:19, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

• The AIV report: https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrator_intervention_against_vandalism&diff=1237209610&oldid=1237209416 PhilKnight (talk) 17:57, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Eyedentification (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am not a sockpuppet, I do know Lil Snvrk personally though. IF it counts as conflict of interest, then the Draft:Lil Snvrk page can wait until further sources are made. There are many verifiable sources relating to Lil Snvrk actually being signed to the Opium label. It was not vandalism. Eyedentification (talk) 18:49, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I am not a sockpuppet, I do know Lil Snvrk personally though. IF it counts as conflict of interest, then the Draft:Lil Snvrk page can wait until further sources are made. There are many verifiable sources relating to Lil Snvrk actually being signed to the Opium label. It was not vandalism. [[User:Eyedentification|Eyedentification]] ([[User talk:Eyedentification#top|talk]]) 18:49, 28 July 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I am not a sockpuppet, I do know Lil Snvrk personally though. IF it counts as conflict of interest, then the Draft:Lil Snvrk page can wait until further sources are made. There are many verifiable sources relating to Lil Snvrk actually being signed to the Opium label. It was not vandalism. [[User:Eyedentification|Eyedentification]] ([[User talk:Eyedentification#top|talk]]) 18:49, 28 July 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I am not a sockpuppet, I do know Lil Snvrk personally though. IF it counts as conflict of interest, then the Draft:Lil Snvrk page can wait until further sources are made. There are many verifiable sources relating to Lil Snvrk actually being signed to the Opium label. It was not vandalism. [[User:Eyedentification|Eyedentification]] ([[User talk:Eyedentification#top|talk]]) 18:49, 28 July 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Eyedentification (talk) 18:49, 28 July 2024 (UTC)