Jump to content

Talk:History of artificial intelligence: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Removing some spam
Line 40: Line 40:
In 2001, AI founder [[Marvin Minsky]] asked "So the question is why didn't we get HAL in 2001?"<ref>He goes on to say: "The answer is, I believe we could have ... I once went to an international conference on neural net[s]. There were 40 thousand registrants ... but ... if you had an international conference, for example, on using multiple representations for common sense reasoning, I've only been able to find 6 or 7 people in the whole world." {{Harvnb|Minsky|2001}}</ref> Minsky believed that the answer is that the central problems, like [[commonsense reasoning]], were being neglected, while most researchers pursued things like commercial applications of [[neural nets]] or [[genetic algorithms]]. [[John McCarthy (computer scientist)|John McCarthy]], on the other hand, still blamed the [[qualification problem]].<ref>{{Harvnb|Maker|2006}}</ref> For [[Ray Kurzweil]], the issue is computer power and, using [[Moore's Law]], he predicted that machines with human-level intelligence will appear by 2029.<ref>{{Harvnb|Kurzweil|2005}}</ref> [[Jeff Hawkins]] argued that neural net research ignores the essential properties of the human [[cerebral cortex|cortex]], preferring simple models that have been successful at solving simple problems.<ref>{{Harvnb|Hawkins|Blakeslee|2004}}</ref> There were many other explanations and for each there was a corresponding research program underway.
In 2001, AI founder [[Marvin Minsky]] asked "So the question is why didn't we get HAL in 2001?"<ref>He goes on to say: "The answer is, I believe we could have ... I once went to an international conference on neural net[s]. There were 40 thousand registrants ... but ... if you had an international conference, for example, on using multiple representations for common sense reasoning, I've only been able to find 6 or 7 people in the whole world." {{Harvnb|Minsky|2001}}</ref> Minsky believed that the answer is that the central problems, like [[commonsense reasoning]], were being neglected, while most researchers pursued things like commercial applications of [[neural nets]] or [[genetic algorithms]]. [[John McCarthy (computer scientist)|John McCarthy]], on the other hand, still blamed the [[qualification problem]].<ref>{{Harvnb|Maker|2006}}</ref> For [[Ray Kurzweil]], the issue is computer power and, using [[Moore's Law]], he predicted that machines with human-level intelligence will appear by 2029.<ref>{{Harvnb|Kurzweil|2005}}</ref> [[Jeff Hawkins]] argued that neural net research ignores the essential properties of the human [[cerebral cortex|cortex]], preferring simple models that have been successful at solving simple problems.<ref>{{Harvnb|Hawkins|Blakeslee|2004}}</ref> There were many other explanations and for each there was a corresponding research program underway.


{{realist-talk}}
{{reflist-talk}}
}} [[User:CharlesTGillingham|CharlesTGillingham]] ([[User talk:CharlesTGillingham|talk]]) 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
}} [[User:CharlesTGillingham|CharlesTGillingham]] ([[User talk:CharlesTGillingham|talk]]) 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

পিক

[[Special:Contributions/202.86.218.6|202.86.218.6]] ([[User talk:202.86.218.6|talk]]) 23:51, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

Stkcar [[Special:Contributions/118.179.0.50|118.179.0.50]] ([[User talk:118.179.0.50|talk]]) 13:49, 25 August 2023 (UTC)


== Deep Blue and Garry Kasparov match ==
== Deep Blue and Garry Kasparov match ==
Line 93: Line 87:


<span class="wikied-assignment" style="font-size:85%;">— Assignment last updated by [[User:Lotsobear555|Lotsobear555]] ([[User talk:Lotsobear555|talk]]) 15:38, 18 November 2023 (UTC)</span>
<span class="wikied-assignment" style="font-size:85%;">— Assignment last updated by [[User:Lotsobear555|Lotsobear555]] ([[User talk:Lotsobear555|talk]]) 15:38, 18 November 2023 (UTC)</span>

== Computer ==

modern use of AI [[Special:Contributions/103.100.7.208|103.100.7.208]] ([[User talk:103.100.7.208|talk]]) 14:39, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

== Mathematics science class nine ==

Engineering [[Special:Contributions/103.253.19.46|103.253.19.46]] ([[User talk:103.253.19.46|talk]]) 06:05, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

== Math class nine science ==

Engineering [[Special:Contributions/103.253.19.46|103.253.19.46]] ([[User talk:103.253.19.46|talk]]) 06:10, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:46, 31 July 2024

Former good articleHistory of artificial intelligence was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 28, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
October 18, 2008Good article nomineeListed
July 13, 2023Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

GA Reassessment

History of artificial intelligence

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review
Result: Consensus to delist. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 08:28, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The talk page of this 2008 listing was tagged by SandyGeorgia as requiring a GAR; I must agree. The article has not been updated to the sufficient standard after 2010; this is especially egregious considering the massive leaps in AI over the last decade.

Thus, I'll tag it as needing an {{update}}, and nominate this for delisting as failing GA criterion 3. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 18:50, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that this article needs huge amounts of work and updating to be at standard. Should be delisted unless someone takes that on. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:21, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
agree, should be delisted. Section for 2011 is really outdated and needs a huge amount of work Artem.G (talk) 06:21, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delist. Needs significant effort. If anyone steps forward to work on this article, please ping me. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 13:28, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Cutting a section for brevity

Don't think this section was essential to the article, and I'm getting ready to add a bunch of material about 21st century. ---- CharlesTGillingham (talk) 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

===Predictions (or "Where is HAL 9000?")===

In 1968, Arthur C. Clarke and Stanley Kubrick had imagined that, by the year 2001, a machine would exist with an intelligence that matched or exceeded the capability of human beings. The character they created, HAL 9000, was based on a belief shared by many leading AI researchers that such a machine would exist by the year 2001.[1][2]

In 2001, AI founder Marvin Minsky asked "So the question is why didn't we get HAL in 2001?"[3] Minsky believed that the answer is that the central problems, like commonsense reasoning, were being neglected, while most researchers pursued things like commercial applications of neural nets or genetic algorithms. John McCarthy, on the other hand, still blamed the qualification problem.[4] For Ray Kurzweil, the issue is computer power and, using Moore's Law, he predicted that machines with human-level intelligence will appear by 2029.[5] Jeff Hawkins argued that neural net research ignores the essential properties of the human cortex, preferring simple models that have been successful at solving simple problems.[6] There were many other explanations and for each there was a corresponding research program underway.

References

  1. ^ Newquist 1994, pp. 134
  2. ^ Crevier 1993, pp. 108–109
  3. ^ He goes on to say: "The answer is, I believe we could have ... I once went to an international conference on neural net[s]. There were 40 thousand registrants ... but ... if you had an international conference, for example, on using multiple representations for common sense reasoning, I've only been able to find 6 or 7 people in the whole world." Minsky 2001
  4. ^ Maker 2006
  5. ^ Kurzweil 2005
  6. ^ Hawkins & Blakeslee 2004

CharlesTGillingham (talk) 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deep Blue and Garry Kasparov match

Under History of artificial intelligence#Milestones and Moore's law, we can find the following:

> The event was broadcast live over the internet and received over 74 million hits.

I think this is incorrect on two counts, at least according to the source cited, [1]http://www.research.ibm.com/deepblue/meet/html/d.3.shtml I think the event was broadcast over television rather than the Internet. The source also claims that "about 500 people" watched the event live on television in a basement theater, while it adds that

> The media attention given to Deep Blue resulted in more than three billion impressions around the world.

I am not sure how this translates into the number of viewers, but it is certainly distinct from the number given in the article. Fato39 (talk) 18:12, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. ---- CharlesTGillingham (talk) 23:59, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Class9 shree JK public school test paper say 2023

Paper Sst 2402:8100:2703:7279:DDDB:1A80:EC74:7A03 (talk) 12:13, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Technology and Culture

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 August 2023 and 15 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ferna235 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Thecanyon (talk) 05:33, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

19th century fiction

Shouldn't E. T. A. Hoffman's stories ( The Sandman (1816) and Automata (1814) ) be mentioned? Kdammers (talk) 21:08, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion, this article has too many fictional and mythological precursors already. CharlesTGillingham (talk) 08:44, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AI has surpassed human intelligence in some specific fields

Why is it no relevant?

By 2023, generative artificial intelligence has already surpassed human intelligence in some specific areas such as the search for new proteins and strategy games.[1] 176.200.82.175 (talk) 08:33, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "The scientists' appeal". A paper by work of various university researchers ... in very narrow fields such as protein folding or strategy games, AI has surpassed human capabilities.
I think this belongs in the article progress in artificial intelligence. This article is very long and we can only cover the most notable developments. ---- CharlesTGillingham (talk) 02:29, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - FA23 - Sect 202 - Thu

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 6 September 2023 and 14 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Lotsobear555 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Lotsobear555 (talk) 15:38, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:History_of_artificial_intelligence&oldid=1237749642"