User talk:GreekParadise

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, GreekParadise. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, GreekParadise. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

I wasn't able to determine with certainty that you have not been delivered this notice before. Please accept my apology if you have. Zero^talk 03:47, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

Zero, my edits are reflected in the cited sources. Respectfully, yours are not. If you have a specific claim that anything I wrote was inaccurate, what is it?

Do you deny any of the following?

1) The West Bank Arab leaders at the Jericho Conference were specifically invited by King Abdullah;

2) The Arab League never recognized Jordan's annexation of the West Bank (and in fact condemned it strongly;

3) The USA never recognized the Jordanian annexation; and

4) There was well documented discrimination against West Bank Palestinians in Jordan.

If you agree these are well-documented facts, let's reflect them accurately in the article. Your edits claim or suggest all four of these facts are not true.GreekParadise (talk) 18:05, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Furthermore, you have made many other changes without citing sources. Please cite sources for your claims. For example you claim that King Abdullah commanded the armies of all seven Arab nations that invaded Israel in 1948. I'd like to see your source for that. He commanded the Arab Legion (the TransJordanian forces).

If you don't have a source that suggests something is incorrect, let's rely on sourced materials instead. GreekParadise (talk) 18:22, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Please keep discussion about article content on the talk page of the article. Otherwise it gets lost. Zero^talk 02:27, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Bare URLs

Please read Wikipedia:Bare URLs and try to avoid them. That page explains why. Zero^talk 03:42, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

I'm an occasional Wikipedia editor. I always carefully verify sources before adding them, but I'm well aware that other Wikipedians are far more adept at converting Bare URLs to their proper format than I am. When I've done it in the past, I've often not gotten the formula exactly right. I apologize for leaving it to more adept editors to fix. But the sources are absolutely accurate.GreekParadise (talk)

Thank you for directing me to Wikipedia: Bare URLs. I found this there:

"What is right with bare URLs? Adding a bare URL reference to Wikipedia is much more helpful than no reference. If you only have time and inclination to copy the reference URL you found, that is a helpful first step, and we thank you for your contribution!

However, please note that a bare URL reference is also much less helpful than a fully formatted citation. Please help readers and editors by using full citations instead."

So when I don't know exactly how to source something, I only provide the "helpful first step."  ;-) GreekParadise (talk) 17:10, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

1R breach

You have breached the one revert rule at Golan Heights article. Kindly self revert. Selfstudier (talk) 15:02, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

I didn't revert. I changed it as a compromise.

But if you refuse to compromise, let's go to arbitration.GreekParadise (talk) 15:04, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

That will definitely happen next time, luckily for you, another editor has undone your editing. Selfstudier (talk) 15:05, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

Violation of 1rr

You have violated the 1rr 3 times at Golan Heights, please self revert. Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 19:54, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

Considering that you was warned above and then continued, I think its to late now. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 20:28, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

A REVERT is not the same as a CHANGE. I did not revert more than once in any 24-hour period. I did make several changes in response to info on the talk page. Where did I ever revert to the same language? I didn't.

Working through compromise language by posting different formulations and then accepting another editor's post is not a violation of 1RR. But if it is, then several editors (including Selfstudier and Nableezy) did the same. Are you going to report them too? GreekParadise (talk) 18:36, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is GreekParadise. Thank you. Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 20:53, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

August 2024

To enforce an arbitration decision, and for 1RR violations, you have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 1 week. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard, I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. 

ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 20:55, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

---

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

@ScottishFinnishRadish: Diff Selfstudier (talk) 18:18, 2 August 2024 (UTC)