Talk:Glucosamine: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Verificity (talk | contribs) →Not approved as a prescription medicine is wrong: new section |
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Glucosamine/Archive 1) (bot |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| minthreadstoarchive=1 |
| minthreadstoarchive=1 |
||
}} |
}} |
||
== Sorry this page sounds like a hit piece == |
|||
Sorry, this page sounds like a hit piece on glucosamine. There's ample medical evidence that it helps relieve arthritis pains and injuries, and it does not convey this. Instead it sounds like a disclaimer. I call this a hit piece. This is one of the worst pages if come to on wikipedia in years, so biased. Somebody's been paid to do this. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/85.151.139.15|85.151.139.15]] ([[User talk:85.151.139.15|talk]]) 20:29, 26 July 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:It is completely unfounded to claim that this article is the result of someone being paid to write it. In its current state, it has developed over the course of years through the contributions of many editors who voluntarily add to Wikipedia's medical content. (Please see [[Wikipedia:Assume good faith]].) If you would like to suggest specific changes to the article's content, please feel free to do so here. -- [[User:Edgar181|Ed]] ([[User talk:Edgar181|Edgar181]]) 21:04, 26 July 2016 (UTC) |
|||
:Very late to the game here, but no. There isnt. The "best" result of multigenerational studies show that there is zero proof it helps with injuries and its effect on osteoporosis is so limited you might as well not bother. [[Special:Contributions/219.88.172.162|219.88.172.162]] ([[User talk:219.88.172.162|talk]]) 04:28, 3 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
== Not approved as a prescription medicine is wrong == |
== Not approved as a prescription medicine is wrong == |
Latest revision as of 15:15, 5 August 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Glucosamine article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 12 months |
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Not approved as a prescription medicine is wrong
[edit]That statement in the second paragraph is only true for the United States. I haven't looked at all EU countries, but stronger glucosamine medicines are available in Finland with a doctor's prescription. Verificity (talk) 11:40, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia articles that use British English
- Start-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
- Start-Class chemicals articles
- Mid-importance chemicals articles
- B-Class Molecular Biology articles
- Unknown-importance Molecular Biology articles
- B-Class MCB articles
- Mid-importance MCB articles
- WikiProject Molecular and Cellular Biology articles
- All WikiProject Molecular Biology pages
- Start-Class Skepticism articles
- High-importance Skepticism articles
- WikiProject Skepticism articles
- B-Class Alternative medicine articles
- B-Class pharmacology articles
- Mid-importance pharmacology articles
- WikiProject Pharmacology articles
- B-Class medicine articles
- Mid-importance medicine articles
- All WikiProject Medicine pages