Talk:Polypore: Difference between revisions
Tag: |
→Classification: new section |
||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
Bracket tree using for [[Special:Contributions/223.228.58.171|223.228.58.171]] ([[User talk:223.228.58.171|talk]]) 02:22, 28 June 2022 (UTC) |
Bracket tree using for [[Special:Contributions/223.228.58.171|223.228.58.171]] ([[User talk:223.228.58.171|talk]]) 02:22, 28 June 2022 (UTC) |
||
== Classification == |
|||
Having 2 different tabs named Classification feels sloppy [[Special:Contributions/50.5.240.91|50.5.240.91]] ([[User talk:50.5.240.91|talk]]) 06:26, 6 August 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:26, 6 August 2024
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
I changed the definition of polypore since the old definition regarding continuous hymenium over the pore mouths is not a good character to differentiate boletes from polypores. For instance Gloeoporus spp. have continuous hymenium like many boletes. No single character does the job.
I also took the liberty of deleting the genus list, which to me appeared arbitrary. It's a good idea to have a genus list on the site, but it should either be comprehensive (e.g. based on Ryavarden's Genera of Polypores + recently described genera) or include a subset of well-known/important genera. In my view the genus listing is not a priority.
Antrodiella (talk) 03:41, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
Ecology
that section is listed twice, I hope some expert can merge it — Preceding unsigned comment added by MilanCela (talk • contribs) 21:25, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
Minor correction needed
Deciduous is not a simile for angiosperm. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spydoo (talk • contribs) 21:16, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
Bracket tree
Bracket tree using for 223.228.58.171 (talk) 02:22, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Classification
Having 2 different tabs named Classification feels sloppy 50.5.240.91 (talk) 06:26, 6 August 2024 (UTC)