Jump to content

Labor Party (United States, 1996): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{about|the now defunct Labor Party formed in the United States in 1996|other Labor parties|Labor Party (disambiguation)|a list of workers parties|Workers' Party (disambiguation)}}
{{about|now defunct Labor Party formed in the United States in 1996|other Labor parties|Labor Party (disambiguation)|a list of workers parties|Workers' Party (disambiguation)}}

{{Infobox political party
{{Infobox political party
| name = Labor Party
| name = Labor Party
Line 6: Line 5:
| colorcode = #19194A
| colorcode = #19194A
| foundation = {{start date and age|1996}}
| foundation = {{start date and age|1996}}
| dissolved = {{end date and age|2007}}
| dissolved = {{end date and age|2007}}
| successor = [[South Carolina Workers Party]]
| successor = [[South Carolina Workers Party]]
| ideology = {{ubl|[[Social democracy]]|[[Progressivism]]|[[Trade unionism]]|[[Democratic socialism]]|[[Left-wing populism]]}}
| ideology = {{ubl|[[Social democracy]]|[[Progressivism]]|[[Trade unionism]]|[[Democratic socialism]]|[[Left-wing populism]]}}
| position = [[Center-left politics|Center-left]] to [[Left-wing politics|left-wing]]
| position = [[Center-left politics|Center-left]] to [[Left-wing politics|left-wing]]
Line 14: Line 13:
}}
}}


The '''Labor Party''' was an American [[Social democracy|social democratic]] [[political party]] advocating workers' interests<ref name="CPPofSC">{{Cite web|title=Certified Political Parties of South Carolina {{!}} SCVotes|url=https://www.scvotes.gov/certified-political-parties-south-carolina|access-date=2021-12-16|website=www.scvotes.gov}}</ref> and active in the state of [[South Carolina]].<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.scvotes.gov/certified-political-parties-south-carolina | title=Certified Political Parties of South Carolina &#124; SCVotes}}</ref>
The '''Labor Party''' was an American [[Social democracy|social democratic]] [[political party]] advocating workers' interests<ref name="CPPofSC">{{Cite web|title=Certified Political Parties of South Carolina {{!}} SCVotes|url=https://www.scvotes.gov/certified-political-parties-south-carolina|access-date=2021-12-16|website=www.scvotes.gov}}</ref> and

== History ==

=== Origins ===
In the 1990s, a Committee to


The party was formed in 1996 by the [[Oil, Chemical, and Atomic Workers International Union]], [[United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America]], [[United Mine Workers]], [[International Longshore and Warehouse Union]], [[American Federation of Government Employees]], [[Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes]], [[California Nurses Association]], [[Farm Labor Organizing Committee]] and hundreds of other local [[labor union]]s. Delegates to the founding convention adopted a 16-point program called "[http://thelaborparty.org/d_program.htm A Call for Economic Justice]."
The party was formed in 1996 by the [[Oil, Chemical, and Atomic Workers International Union]], [[United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America]], [[United Mine Workers]], [[International Longshore and Warehouse Union]], [[American Federation of Government Employees]], [[Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes]], [[California Nurses Association]], [[Farm Labor Organizing Committee]] and hundreds of other local [[labor union]]s. Delegates to the founding convention adopted a 16-point program called "[http://thelaborparty.org/d_program.htm A Call for Economic Justice]."


From the beginning a dispute over the Party's running of candidates arose with many of the official unions totally opposed to running candidates that might cause the defeat of their normal [[Democratic Party (United States)|Democratic]] allies. Smaller locals and left union activists on the other had pushed for a clean break with the Democratic Party. This issue was debated internally for years until 1999 when the Party's leadership agreed to some endorsements of Labor Party members running. In 2001 the Labor Party endorsed labor sponsored independent candidates in San Francisco and Ohio local elections. After the 2000 elections even symbolic support dripped away. The future of the party remains uncertain, particularly after the 2002 death of [[Tony Mazzocchi]], the founding national organizer.
From the beginning a dispute over the Party's running of candidates arose with many of the official unions totally opposed to running candidates that might cause the defeat of their normal [[Democratic Party (United States)|Democratic]] allies. Smaller locals and left union activists on the other had pushed for a clean break with the Democratic Party. This issue was debated internally for years until 1999 when the Party's leadership agreed to some endorsements of Labor Party members running.{{cn}}
In 2001 the Labor Party endorsed labor sponsored independent candidates in San Francisco and Ohio local elections.{{cn}}

=== Demise ===
After the 2000 elections, even symbolic support dripped away. In 2002, founding national organizer [[Tony Mazzocchi]] died. [[Mark Dudzic]] confirmed that the national party had suspended operations in 2007.<ref>[http://www.thelaborparty.org/d_lp_time.htm "Labor Party Time? Not yet"]</ref>

=== South Carolina ===
Despite national decline, the [[South Carolina]] chapter remained active.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.scvotes.gov/certified-political-parties-south-carolina | title=Certified Political Parties of South Carolina &#124; SCVotes}}</ref>


In December 2005, the South Carolina Labor Party announced that it would seek ballot status in [[South Carolina]] and run a candidate in the 2006 legislative elections. ''Labor Party News'' quoted Leonard Riley, President of the [[Charleston, South Carolina|Charleston]] [[International Longshoremen's Association]] Local 1422 as saying, "Given the results of the past few elections, I think the workers of South Carolina would jump at the opportunity to consider a Labor Party which would guarantee an uncompromising voice for working people on their issues."[http://www.thelaborparty.org/n_1205.pdf] Although South Carolina law permitted [[electoral fusion]], the Labor Party pledged not to endorse candidates of any other party.
In December 2005, the South Carolina Labor Party announced that it would seek ballot status in [[South Carolina]] and run a candidate in the 2006 legislative elections. ''Labor Party News'' quoted Leonard Riley, President of the [[Charleston, South Carolina|Charleston]] [[International Longshoremen's Association]] Local 1422 as saying, "Given the results of the past few elections, I think the workers of South Carolina would jump at the opportunity to consider a Labor Party which would guarantee an uncompromising voice for working people on their issues."[http://www.thelaborparty.org/n_1205.pdf] Although South Carolina law permitted [[electoral fusion]], the Labor Party pledged not to endorse candidates of any other party.
Line 24: Line 36:
Party officials acknowledged that the choice of South Carolina may have seemed unusual due to the fact that the state had the second lowest concentration of union workers in the United States. However, party officials said that the relatively high unemployment rate, the decline in the textile industry, and the indifference of the state Democratic and Republican parties to the interests of working people, African-Americans and women created a political space for the Labor Party.<ref name=":1">[http://www.thelaborparty.org/a_orange.html Labor Party<!-- Bot generated title -->] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060906183657/http://www.thelaborparty.org/a_orange.html |date=2006-09-06 }}</ref> The party submitted 16,500 signatures on July 11, 2006. If 10,000 of the signatures were valid, the party would be qualified for the 2007 and 2008 elections.<ref name=":2">http://www.ballot-access.org/2006/080106.html#16 ''Labor Party launches petition drive to gain ballot access'', South Carolina Times and Democrat, Orangeburg, S.C.</ref> This effort was apparently unrelated to the concurrent attempt of the [[Working Families Party]] to gain ballot access in South Carolina, a state that allows [[electoral fusion]].<ref name=":3">[http://www.ballot-access.org/2006/07/21/south-carolina-working-families-party-will-sue-to-get-on-2006-ballot/ Ballot Access News » Blog Archive » South Carolina Working Families Party Will Sue to Get on 2006 Ballot<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> In July 2007 ''[[Ballot Access News]]'' reported that the SCLP was attempting to recruit candidates.<ref>[http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/07/31/south-carolina-labor-party-recruiting-candidates/ "South Carolina Labor Party Recruiting Candidates"]</ref>
Party officials acknowledged that the choice of South Carolina may have seemed unusual due to the fact that the state had the second lowest concentration of union workers in the United States. However, party officials said that the relatively high unemployment rate, the decline in the textile industry, and the indifference of the state Democratic and Republican parties to the interests of working people, African-Americans and women created a political space for the Labor Party.<ref name=":1">[http://www.thelaborparty.org/a_orange.html Labor Party<!-- Bot generated title -->] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060906183657/http://www.thelaborparty.org/a_orange.html |date=2006-09-06 }}</ref> The party submitted 16,500 signatures on July 11, 2006. If 10,000 of the signatures were valid, the party would be qualified for the 2007 and 2008 elections.<ref name=":2">http://www.ballot-access.org/2006/080106.html#16 ''Labor Party launches petition drive to gain ballot access'', South Carolina Times and Democrat, Orangeburg, S.C.</ref> This effort was apparently unrelated to the concurrent attempt of the [[Working Families Party]] to gain ballot access in South Carolina, a state that allows [[electoral fusion]].<ref name=":3">[http://www.ballot-access.org/2006/07/21/south-carolina-working-families-party-will-sue-to-get-on-2006-ballot/ Ballot Access News » Blog Archive » South Carolina Working Families Party Will Sue to Get on 2006 Ballot<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> In July 2007 ''[[Ballot Access News]]'' reported that the SCLP was attempting to recruit candidates.<ref>[http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/07/31/south-carolina-labor-party-recruiting-candidates/ "South Carolina Labor Party Recruiting Candidates"]</ref>


The party suspended active operations in 2007 but a group said to be affiliated with the party nominated one candidate for the [[South Carolina State House]] for 2010. The candidate, Brett Bursey, received 442 votes, or 3.06%.<ref>[http://www.scvotes.org/files/2010%20Convention%20Party%20Candidates.pdf 2010 Convention Party Candidates.]{{Dead link|date=March 2024}}</ref>
In 2010, the South Carolina nominated Brett Bursey for the [[South Carolina State House]], who received 442 votes, or 3.06%.<ref>[http://www.scvotes.org/files/2010%20Convention%20Party%20Candidates.pdf 2010 Convention Party Candidates.]{{Dead link|date=March 2024}}</ref>

In December 2012, [[Mark Dudzic]] wrote an article in which he confirmed that the party had suspended operations in 2007. While some have taken this to mean that he said that the time was currently not right for the Labor Party to exist, others have seen this as a start of a discussion about the future of the Labor Party.<ref>[http://www.thelaborparty.org/d_lp_time.htm "Labor Party Time? Not yet"]</ref>


In the [[2020 South Carolina House of Representatives election]], Labor Party candidate Willie Legette ran for District 95. Legette won 12.1% of the vote, coming in second place to incumbent Democrat [[Jerry Govan Jr.]]'s 86.6% of the vote.
In the [[2020 South Carolina House of Representatives election]], Labor Party candidate Willie Legette ran for District 95. Legette won 12.1% of the vote, coming in second place to incumbent Democrat [[Jerry Govan Jr.]]'s 86.6% of the vote.


In 2023 members of the SC branch called a convention in which their name was changed to the '''[[South Carolina Workers Party]]''', ending their affiliation with the now-defunct Labor Party.
In 2023 members of the SC branch called a convention in which their name was changed to the [[South Carolina Workers Party]], ending their affiliation with the now-defunct Labor Party.


== National conventions ==
⚫
==External links==
{| class="wikitable"
⚫
*[https://thelaborparty.org/ Official site]
|+ Caption text
|-
! Name
! Date
! Place
! Program
|-
| 1st Convention
|
|
| [https://thelaborparty.org/d_program.htm 1996 Program]
|-
| 2nd Convention
| Washington, DC
| July 25-28, 2002
|
|}


⚫
== External links ==
⚫
==References==
⚫
*[https://thelaborparty.org/ Official site]


⚫
== References ==
<references/>
{{reflist}}


{{United States political parties}}
{{United States political parties}}

Revision as of 13:57, 10 August 2024

This article is about now defunct Labor Party formed in the United States in 1996. For other Labor parties, see Labor Party (disambiguation). For a list of workers parties, see Workers' Party (disambiguation).
Labor Party
Founded1996; 28 years ago (1996)
Dissolved2007; 17 years ago (2007)
Succeeded bySouth Carolina Workers Party
Ideology
Political positionCenter-left to left-wing
Website
thelaborparty.org

The Labor Party was an American social democratic political party advocating workers' interests[1] and

History

Origins

In the 1990s, a Committee to

The party was formed in 1996 by the Oil, Chemical, and Atomic Workers International Union, United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America, United Mine Workers, International Longshore and Warehouse Union, American Federation of Government Employees, Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes, California Nurses Association, Farm Labor Organizing Committee and hundreds of other local labor unions. Delegates to the founding convention adopted a 16-point program called "A Call for Economic Justice."

From the beginning a dispute over the Party's running of candidates arose with many of the official unions totally opposed to running candidates that might cause the defeat of their normal Democratic allies. Smaller locals and left union activists on the other had pushed for a clean break with the Democratic Party. This issue was debated internally for years until 1999 when the Party's leadership agreed to some endorsements of Labor Party members running.[citation needed]

In 2001 the Labor Party endorsed labor sponsored independent candidates in San Francisco and Ohio local elections.[citation needed]

Demise

After the 2000 elections, even symbolic support dripped away. In 2002, founding national organizer Tony Mazzocchi died. Mark Dudzic confirmed that the national party had suspended operations in 2007.[2]

South Carolina

Despite national decline, the South Carolina chapter remained active.[3]

In December 2005, the South Carolina Labor Party announced that it would seek ballot status in South Carolina and run a candidate in the 2006 legislative elections. Labor Party News quoted Leonard Riley, President of the Charleston International Longshoremen's Association Local 1422 as saying, "Given the results of the past few elections, I think the workers of South Carolina would jump at the opportunity to consider a Labor Party which would guarantee an uncompromising voice for working people on their issues."[1] Although South Carolina law permitted electoral fusion, the Labor Party pledged not to endorse candidates of any other party.

Party officials acknowledged that the choice of South Carolina may have seemed unusual due to the fact that the state had the second lowest concentration of union workers in the United States. However, party officials said that the relatively high unemployment rate, the decline in the textile industry, and the indifference of the state Democratic and Republican parties to the interests of working people, African-Americans and women created a political space for the Labor Party.[4] The party submitted 16,500 signatures on July 11, 2006. If 10,000 of the signatures were valid, the party would be qualified for the 2007 and 2008 elections.[5] This effort was apparently unrelated to the concurrent attempt of the Working Families Party to gain ballot access in South Carolina, a state that allows electoral fusion.[6] In July 2007 Ballot Access News reported that the SCLP was attempting to recruit candidates.[7]

In 2010, the South Carolina nominated Brett Bursey for the South Carolina State House, who received 442 votes, or 3.06%.[8]

In the 2020 South Carolina House of Representatives election, Labor Party candidate Willie Legette ran for District 95. Legette won 12.1% of the vote, coming in second place to incumbent Democrat Jerry Govan Jr.'s 86.6% of the vote.

In 2023 members of the SC branch called a convention in which their name was changed to the South Carolina Workers Party, ending their affiliation with the now-defunct Labor Party.

National conventions

Caption text
Name Date Place Program
1st Convention 1996 Program
2nd Convention Washington, DC July 25-28, 2002

References

  1. ^ "Certified Political Parties of South Carolina | SCVotes". www.scvotes.gov. Retrieved 2021-12-16.
  2. ^ "Labor Party Time? Not yet"
  3. ^ "Certified Political Parties of South Carolina | SCVotes".
  4. ^ Labor Party Archived 2006-09-06 at the Wayback Machine
  5. ^ http://www.ballot-access.org/2006/080106.html#16 Labor Party launches petition drive to gain ballot access, South Carolina Times and Democrat, Orangeburg, S.C.
  6. ^ Ballot Access News » Blog Archive » South Carolina Working Families Party Will Sue to Get on 2006 Ballot
  7. ^ "South Carolina Labor Party Recruiting Candidates"
  8. ^ 2010 Convention Party Candidates.[dead link‍]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Labor_Party_(United_States,_1996)&oldid=1239624476"