Slouching Towards Gomorrah: Difference between revisions
Citation bot (talk | contribs) Altered first1. Added date. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Jay8g | Category:CS1 maint: extra punctuation | #UCB_Category 9/17 |
|||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
Bork first traces the rapid expansion of modern leftism that occurred during the 1960s, arguing that this legacy of radicalism demonstrates that the precepts of modern leftism are antithetical to the rest of the U.S. political tradition. He then attacks a variety of social, cultural, and political experiences as evidence of U.S. cultural decline and degeneracy. Among these are [[affirmative action]], increased violence in and sexualization of [[mass media]], the legalization of [[abortion]], pressure to legalize [[assisted suicide]] and [[euthanasia]], [[feminism]] and the decline of [[religion]]. Bork, himself a rejected nominee of President [[Ronald Reagan Supreme Court candidates|Ronald Reagan]] to the [[Robert Bork Supreme Court nomination|United States Supreme Court]], also criticizes that institution and argues that the judiciary and liberal [[judicial activism]] are catalysts for U.S. cultural corruption. |
Bork first traces the rapid expansion of modern leftism that occurred during the 1960s, arguing that this legacy of radicalism demonstrates that the precepts of modern leftism are antithetical to the rest of the U.S. political tradition. He then attacks a variety of social, cultural, and political experiences as evidence of U.S. cultural decline and degeneracy. Among these are [[affirmative action]], increased violence in and sexualization of [[mass media]], the legalization of [[abortion]], pressure to legalize [[assisted suicide]] and [[euthanasia]], [[feminism]] and the decline of [[religion]]. Bork, himself a rejected nominee of President [[Ronald Reagan Supreme Court candidates|Ronald Reagan]] to the [[Robert Bork Supreme Court nomination|United States Supreme Court]], also criticizes that institution and argues that the judiciary and liberal [[judicial activism]] are catalysts for U.S. cultural corruption. |
||
In ''Slouching Towards Gomorrah'' Bork advocates for an amendment to the [[United States Constitution]] which would allow Congress to override any federal court decision by simple majority vote.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Vile |first1=John R |
In ''Slouching Towards Gomorrah'' Bork advocates for an amendment to the [[United States Constitution]] which would allow Congress to override any federal court decision by simple majority vote.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Vile |first1=John R |title=Encyclopedia of Constitutional Amendments, Proposed Amendments, and Amending Issues, 1789-2023 |date=19 October 2023 |publisher=Bloomsbury Publishing |isbn=9798216170662 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=FQvbEAAAQBAJ}}</ref> |
||
==Reception== |
==Reception== |
||
Revision as of 00:39, 12 August 2024
 | This article needs additional citations for verification. (February 2009) |
 | |
| Author | Robert H. Bork |
|---|---|
| Language | English |
| Genre | Liberalism in the United States |
| Published | 1997 |
| Publisher | ReganBooks |
| Publication place | United States |
| Media type | Print (hardback & paperback), audiobook, e-book |
| Pages | 382 (hardcover) |
| ISBN | 978-0060987190 |
| OCLC | 37126415 |
| 306.0973 | |
Slouching Towards Gomorrah: Modern Liberalism and American Decline is a 1996 non-fiction book by Robert H. Bork, a former United States Court of Appeals judge. Bork's thesis in the book is that U.S. and more generally Western culture is in a state of decline and that the cause of this decline is modern liberalism and the rise of the New Left. Specifically, he attacks modern liberalism for what he describes as its dual emphases on radical egalitarianism and radical individualism. The title of the book is a play on the last couplet of W. B. Yeats's poem "The Second Coming": "And what rough beast, its hour come round at last, / Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?" Bork contends that the "rough beast of decadence … now sends us slouching towards our new home, not Bethlehem but Gomorrah." More directly, the title borrows from Joan Didion's Slouching Towards Bethlehem.
Overview
Bork first traces the rapid expansion of modern leftism that occurred during the 1960s, arguing that this legacy of radicalism demonstrates that the precepts of modern leftism are antithetical to the rest of the U.S. political tradition. He then attacks a variety of social, cultural, and political experiences as evidence of U.S. cultural decline and degeneracy. Among these are affirmative action, increased violence in and sexualization of mass media, the legalization of abortion, pressure to legalize assisted suicide and euthanasia, feminism and the decline of religion. Bork, himself a rejected nominee of President Ronald Reagan to the United States Supreme Court, also criticizes that institution and argues that the judiciary and liberal judicial activism are catalysts for U.S. cultural corruption.
In Slouching Towards Gomorrah Bork advocates for an amendment to the United States Constitution which would allow Congress to override any federal court decision by simple majority vote.[1]
Reception
The book received a negatively critical response by libertarian The Mises Review, which stated that "Bork's failure to set forward his arguments rigorously leads to a crucial error in his approach to constitutional interpretation" and that the "omni-competent state is, for Bork, not a monster to be dispatched but a tool to be used. Whether the state is likely to enforce the values he favors is a question he leaves un-examined".[2]
References
- ^ Vile, John R (19 October 2023). Encyclopedia of Constitutional Amendments, Proposed Amendments, and Amending Issues, 1789-2023. Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN 9798216170662.
- ^ "The Mises Review: Slouching Towards Gomorrah: Modern Liberalism and American Decline by Robert Bork". Mises.org. 1 April 1997. Retrieved 11 July 2018.