User talk:Berchanhimez: Difference between revisions
LokiTheLiar (talk | contribs) →ANI Notice: new section |
Samuelshraga (talk | contribs) →Berchanhimez: new section |
||
| Line 90: | Line 90: | ||
[[File:Information icon4.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] There is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.<!--Template:Discussion notice--><!--Template:ANI-notice--> [[User:LokiTheLiar|Loki]] ([[User talk:LokiTheLiar|talk]]) 22:15, 11 August 2024 (UTC) |
[[File:Information icon4.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] There is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.<!--Template:Discussion notice--><!--Template:ANI-notice--> [[User:LokiTheLiar|Loki]] ([[User talk:LokiTheLiar|talk]]) 22:15, 11 August 2024 (UTC) |
||
== Berchanhimez == |
|||
Hi. As your co-defendant, I just wanted to thank you, for your vigour in pointing out what is the absolute truth, to apologise that I don't have the inclination or the energy to pursue this much farther, and to offer a word or two of advice. |
|||
You are right on the basic facts, but I think you've fallen down the same rabbit hole I have, which is to err on the side of indignant over-reaction. I'm not only talking about the ANI thread. |
|||
Loki's dishonesty, the egregious supervote close, the open gamesmanship from editors like Liliana etc. - these have been most effectively fought by contributions that have been forensic, like Chess and Astaire's early rebuttals, and less by those that were indignant. I don't consider it impossible that Loki is gaslighting for the purpose of generating outrage, in order to distract from the cool dismantling of his arguments earlier. So my advice is to take a breath, and maybe a break. Even if this travesty of a close isn't overturned, the subject can always be revisited later. There are reams of evidence on reliability that weren't even explored at all (like IPSO findings for and against the Telegraph) that can be brought up at any future RfC. |
|||
In the meantime, I think arguing on this forum on these terms is counterproductive, even though you are right. [[User:Samuelshraga|Samuelshraga]] ([[User talk:Samuelshraga|talk]]) 06:39, 13 August 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 06:39, 13 August 2024
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.For the forseeable future, I will be quite busy in real life which limits my ability to check Wikipedia and even more so to respond to queries. If I am needed for anything urgently, please email me and I will do my best to find time to respond. Thanks -bɜ:ʳkənhɪmez (User/say hi!) 23:31, 30 December 2020 (UTC) |
 Archives (Index) |
|
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
Welcome to my talk page. Here are some tips to help you communicate with me:
- Please continue any conversation on the page where it was started.
- Thus, if I have left a message on your talk page please DO NOT post a reply here. You may feel free to ping me using the
{{ping|Berchanhimez}}template to ensure I see your response.
- Add or respond to an existing conversation under the existing heading.
- Indent your comment when replying by using an appropriate number of colons ':'.
- Create a new heading if the original conversation is archived.
- To initiate a new conversation on this page, please click on this link.
- You should sign your comments. You can do this automatically by typing four tildes (~~~~).
Edit Request Tool changes
Hello, I just made some significant changes to User:Terasail/Edit Request Tool. Since you have the tool active, I am informing you of this since it may affect you. To open the tool you will now have to click the "respond" button. The tool will load a similar interface as before. There is now a live preview of the response. These changes might have introduced some bugs so if you have any concerns / suggestions or run into problems please leave a note at User talk:Terasail/Edit Request Tool Thanks, Terasail[✉️] 15:18, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
WikiProject Medicine Newsletter - August 2022
- Issue 18—August 2022
- WikiProject Medicine Newsletter
Back (for now) by popular demand, it's the WP:MED Newsletter! Pardon the 9-month hiatus. This month features a catch-up list of promoted GAs since the last newsletter, and some calls to action for those looking to add to their todo lists. I hope this finds you well. Enjoy.
|
Since last newsletter (Nov. 1, 2021) |
|
|
WP:MED News
- Since last newsletter, frightfully few medicine articles have passed through our main content review processes, Good Article and Featured Article. While we can agree there's more to editing than chasing bronze stars and green blobs, it would be nice to see the catalog of "Good" and "Featured" medicine articles growing rather than just aging. If you're interested in taking on a project but would like some light guidance or a helping hand, feel free to post your plans at WT:MED and you may find others willing to join.
- An ongoing effort seeks to review/update our oldest featured articles. Major depressive disorder, Lung cancer, and Schizophrenia are next on the chopping block (so to speak). If you're interested in helping to update any, please post at WT:MED or at those articles' talk pages. If you're new to the FA process, I'd encourage you to enlist the help of someone(s) who has been through the process before, as they can help clarify expectations and save you time.
- Got a minute? Running low on inspiration/motivation and need a simple task? Check out the 247 medicine articles tagged as citing no sources!
News from around the site
- The Reading/Web team has rolled out a new skin called "Vector 2022" that will soon become the default. Opt-in in your Preferences to try it out. As with any visual update, it'll take some getting used to. If you hate it, don't panic; once it becomes default you'll still be able to opt-out in your Preferences.
- The folks who brought us the nifty "Reply" button have now rolled out a "Subscribe" button to be notified of comments in a particular thread. I believe it's turned on for everyone now. Try it on a busy talk page (e.g. WT:MED).
- Voting is open for the community nominees to the WMF Board of Trustees, until September 6th.
Newsletter ideas, comments, and criticisms welcome here.
You are receiving this because you added your name to the WikiProject Medicine mailing list. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.
Ajpolino (talk) 21:28, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
WikiProject Medicine Newsletter - October 2022
- Issue 19—October 2022
- WikiProject Medicine Newsletter
Hello all. A short newsletter reflecting a quiet month in recognized content. If there's other types of content you'd like to see in the newsletter feel free to post suggestions here. Otherwise, here's your update for the month:
|
|
|
|
WP:MED News
- No news, which may be good news. Happy editing.
Newsletter ideas, comments, and criticisms welcome here.
You are receiving this because you added your name to the WikiProject Medicine mailing list. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.
Ajpolino (talk) 03:32, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
WikiProject Med Newsletter - Issue 21
- Issue 21—June 2023
- WikiProject Medicine Newsletter
Hello all. Another irregular edition of the newsletter; pardon the six-month gap. I was inspired to collect this after seeing how much activity there is in the GA space on the medicine front. Please review a GAN if you have time, and help to welcome more medicine editors into the fold:
|
|
|
|
WP:MED News
- Wikipedia:Good article reassessment is back in business, with a new process and new coordinators. If you see medicine-related GAs that may no longer meet the GA criteria, feel free to nominate them for attention/reassessment (please, not too many at once, lest we get overwhelmed). I'll incorporate them into the listings above.
- Major depressive disorder, Schizophrenia, and Dengue fever are featured articles that need updating. Feel free to chime in at the talk pages or WT:MED if you have the time/bandwidth to help update. They'll likely go to featured article review for more feedback in the near(ish) future (probably in the order listed).
Newsletter ideas, comments, and criticisms welcome here.
You are receiving this because you added your name to the WikiProject Medicine mailing list. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.
Ajpolino (talk) 04:10, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
Wikiproject Medicine May 2024 Newsletter
- Issue 22—May 2024
- WikiProject Medicine Newsletter
Hello all. Another irregular edition of the newsletter. I was inspired to collect this after seeing several medicine-interested editors nominate their first good article. Please review a GA nomination if you have time, and help support our colleagues' efforts:
|
|
|
|
WP:MED News
- Wikipedia:Good article reassessment is back in business, with a new process and new coordinators. If you see medicine-related GAs that may no longer meet the GA criteria, feel free to nominate them for attention/reassessment (please, not too many at once, lest we get overwhelmed). I'll incorporate them into the listings above.
- Maintenance category of the month: Articles with topics of unclear notability (I've listed just the 36 that start with "A"; there are 398 total).
- Note for the curious: 24,211 of the 57,554 articles (42%) tagged as part of WP:MED have some maintenance tag.
Newsletter ideas, comments, and criticisms welcome here.
You are receiving this because you added your name to the WikiProject Medicine mailing list. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine at 21:22, 25 May 2024 (UTC).
ANI Notice
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Loki (talk) 22:15, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
Berchanhimez
Hi. As your co-defendant, I just wanted to thank you, for your vigour in pointing out what is the absolute truth, to apologise that I don't have the inclination or the energy to pursue this much farther, and to offer a word or two of advice. You are right on the basic facts, but I think you've fallen down the same rabbit hole I have, which is to err on the side of indignant over-reaction. I'm not only talking about the ANI thread.
Loki's dishonesty, the egregious supervote close, the open gamesmanship from editors like Liliana etc. - these have been most effectively fought by contributions that have been forensic, like Chess and Astaire's early rebuttals, and less by those that were indignant. I don't consider it impossible that Loki is gaslighting for the purpose of generating outrage, in order to distract from the cool dismantling of his arguments earlier. So my advice is to take a breath, and maybe a break. Even if this travesty of a close isn't overturned, the subject can always be revisited later. There are reams of evidence on reliability that weren't even explored at all (like IPSO findings for and against the Telegraph) that can be brought up at any future RfC.
In the meantime, I think arguing on this forum on these terms is counterproductive, even though you are right. Samuelshraga (talk) 06:39, 13 August 2024 (UTC)