User talk:Janabanigu: Difference between revisions

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Janabanigu, good luck, and have fun. User:Significa liberdade (talk) 15:05, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 14:35, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Qazi Muhammad Asad Khan has been accepted

Qazi Muhammad Asad Khan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Saqib (talk I contribs) 18:41, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Akhtar Hayat Khan, Inspector General of Police of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Article

Help expanding this article on Akhtar Hayat Khan, Inspector General of Police of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. If anyone has access to additional information or sources about his career, achievements, or notable operations led by him. Janabanigu (talk) 19:57, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:GNG. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 21:59, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Saqib if someone adds more things it might meet gng. Janabanigu (talk) 04:10, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Akhtar Hayat Khan (July 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Saqib was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Akhtar Hayat Khan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Saqib (talk I contribs) 21:58, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Janabanigu! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Saqib (talk I contribs) 21:58, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shehla Bano has been accepted

Shehla Bano, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 07:02, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anita Mehsud has been accepted

Anita Mehsud, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 08:01, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nadeem Aslam Chaudhry (July 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Saqib was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nadeem Aslam Chaudhry and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Saqib (talk I contribs) 08:45, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Saqib Thank you for the feedback, If anyone has more info on the role of the Chief Secretary in the KP province, please feel free to add more to the article, As per the law, constitution, the Chief Secretary is indeed the boss of the province and plays a crucial role in its administration additional details on their responsibilities, powers, and significance in the provincial government would be greatly appreciated. Janabanigu (talk) 08:54, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Simply being Chief Secretary of a province doesn't automatically qualify someone for a WP bio. They must meet the GNG, which, in this case, doesn't seem to be met. On another note, it seems you may have edited under different accounts previously. Right? — Saqib (talk I contribs) 08:58, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Saqib I appreciate your help in improving my previous editAnd like to clarify i have not edited from any other account previouslythis is my only account Janabanigu (talk) 09:03, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, but I'm not casting aspersions. For the record, I'm stating here that I suspect you could be Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Thekhyberboypk. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 09:14, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Saqib, I think you brought this up on my TP. I am sorry I haven't responded, however, from the sourcing and content of the draft during that period, it had no link or statement of being a Member of the Legislature (India). While it said "won an election", it wasn't descriptive of which election and position, hence, my decline. I also saw you helped them fix tht before accepting, you did well and believe me, if you see such, don't forget to call my attention. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 16:32, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SafariScribe, I'm glad you didn't take offense to my message, especially after all the commotion about this article. Firstly, Nisar Baaz is a member of the Pakistani parliament, not India. Drafts are typically submitted by newbies and may not always be perfect, so as reviewers, we should sometimes assist in getting their articles approved if there's a good indication of meeting WP:N. In this case, I agree with you that they failed to mention the subject's parliamentary membership, although they did cite some English-language sources which, I assume, you overlooked. If you had checked those sources, as all reviewers generally should, you might have found that the subject is a member of parliament. But anyway. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 16:21, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Qudisa Lodhi has been accepted

Qudisa Lodhi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Youknow? (talk) 12:16, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I notice you've added a lot of WP:OR into BLPs which is against Wikipedia's policies. Continued violations may result in a block. In one case, you've stated Qudisa Lodhi is the spouse of Qazi Muhammad Asad Khan without providing a source. Could you please provide a source to verify these claims ? --— Saqib (talk I contribs) 14:23, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hi, I'll add reference regarding the matter , and the fact is she is the wife. Janabanigu (talk) 16:39, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Qazi Muhammad Asad Khan. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 14:24, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for the correction. Janabanigu (talk) 16:19, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Janabanigu. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Mohammad Shiraz, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Janabanigu. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Janabanigu|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 20:39, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Saqib i have not been approached by anyone nor for any financial stake things. I'm writing for wikipedia with faith and discipline. as far your concern is why i make this page. the reference which i included says everything regarding the entity you pointed out the mentioned entity is more popular in Pakistan. i respect every single policy of wikipedia and want to say i will never use these fake things on wikipedia. i will edit latest things on politicians, new profiles with proper research data. thanks Janabanigu (talk) 20:49, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK but popularity does not imply notability here; it's determined by significant coverage in independent RS, a criterion this subject fails to meet. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 20:55, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Saqib Thanks for the guidance. Janabanigu (talk) 20:56, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nisar Baaz Khan (July 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nisar Baaz Khan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 19:15, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SafariScribe Nisar baaz khan just elected today. He is now a parliament member. Janabanigu (talk) 19:22, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Re-submit it for review!. By the way, I'm still waiting for you to add references to Qudisa Lodhi. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 20:58, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Saqib I'm finding the best sources I'll update Janabanigu (talk) 04:17, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nisar Baaz Khan has been accepted

Nisar Baaz Khan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Saqib (talk I contribs) 06:29, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Saqibi see this also with the same now Nisar Baaz please check. Janabanigu (talk) 06:34, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SheriffIsInTown: One of them needs to be redirected. I’ll leave it up to you to figure out which one. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 11:17, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zubair Ali (July 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zubair Ali and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 16:19, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SafariScribe thanks for the review, zubair is the mayor of Peshawar with the electoral record of 62,000. References include his profile in government pages.can we do assessment? Janabanigu (talk) 16:23, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Janabanigu, I don't think winning/being a Mayor of a small community does merit a Wikipedia article per WP:NPOL. I am pinging @Theroadislong for any opinion on that? Breath, and calm down until he responds. By the way, I war to specially appreciate your contributions so far to Wikipedia, it doesn't go unnoticed. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 16:34, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SafariScribe thanks for the kind words together we can create good things on wiki. Janabanigu (talk) 17:39, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

could you please check these also Draft:Nadeem Aslam Chaudhry Draft:Akhtar Hayat Khan @SafariScribe Janabanigu (talk) 17:44, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I tend to agree though a previous mayor Haji Ghulam Ali has an article, they also served in the senate which would pass WP:NPOL. Theroadislong (talk) 16:45, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Theroadislong, does that mean I should go ahead and accept Zubair Ali. While I can't question the notability, I think the draft is mostly about the family and the sources, about the won election. I may see this as WP:TOOSOON and WP:INHERITED. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 17:19, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No... I would decline as WP:TOOSOON. Theroadislong (talk) 17:23, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Theroadislong should i add more references? Janabanigu (talk) 17:26, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SafariScribe Draft:Zubair Ali fails NPOL. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 20:42, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nadeem Aslam Chaudhry (July 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nadeem Aslam Chaudhry and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 21:16, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Akhtar Hayat Khan (July 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Saqib was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Don't see much improvement since last decline. Still fails GNG.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Akhtar Hayat Khan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Saqib (talk I contribs) 18:50, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Saqib thanks saqib for the review, hayat is currently the IGP of KP. He's also an award winning police officer (Sitara-e-Shujaat) second-highest civil award for bravery bestowed by the Islamic Republic of Pakistan. Even every article mentioned his name and work still gng fails? Janabanigu (talk) 18:57, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Akhtar Hayat Khan (July 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The Mashriq Vibe piece is the only one that may contribute towards notability per WP:GNG, and it alone isn't enough. The rest are a mix of primary sources, passing mentions, routine appointment etc. reporting, and the subject commenting on things.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Akhtar Hayat Khan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:07, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Muhammad Ali Swati for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Muhammad Ali Swati is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad Ali Swati until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

— Saqib (talk I contribs) 19:34, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Saqib Hi , thanks for the notice i assure i will look at the article again and add more strong references regarding the entity. i hope you will remove the notice. together we can create a best place for the people who work for the humanity. Janabanigu (talk) 07:25, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Ehsan Zafar Abbasi

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Ehsan Zafar Abbasi, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:10, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Hello Janabanigu. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Janabanigu. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Janabanigu|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 08:48, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the above statement. I'm editing with faith and discipline as per your above statement regarding the matter, the entity is already famous in Pakistan. With faith i have no affiliation with the entity the entity is already famous on TV's, Web. Janabanigu (talk) 08:53, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 08:48, 25 August 2024 edit 331dot (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Administrators 182,929 edits General note: Disclosure requirements for paid editing under the Wikimedia Terms of Use. Tag: Twinkle ← Previous edit		Revision as of 08:53, 25 August 2024 edit undo Janabanigu (talk \| contribs) 150 edits →August 2024: Reply Tag: Reply Next edit →
Line 293:		Line 293:

	Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are '''<u>required</u> by the [[wmf:TOU#paid-contrib-disclosure\|Wikimedia Terms of Use]] to disclose your employer, client and affiliation.''' You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at [[User:Janabanigu]]. The template {{tl\|Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{tlc\|paid\|2=user=Janabanigu\|3=employer=<var>InsertName</var>\|4=client=<var>InsertName</var>}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, '''do not edit further''' until you answer this message. <!-- Template:Uw-paid1 --> [[User:331dot\|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot\|talk]]) 08:48, 25 August 2024 (UTC)		Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are '''<u>required</u> by the [[wmf:TOU#paid-contrib-disclosure\|Wikimedia Terms of Use]] to disclose your employer, client and affiliation.''' You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at [[User:Janabanigu]]. The template {{tl\|Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{tlc\|paid\|2=user=Janabanigu\|3=employer=<var>InsertName</var>\|4=client=<var>InsertName</var>}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, '''do not edit further''' until you answer this message. <!-- Template:Uw-paid1 --> [[User:331dot\|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot\|talk]]) 08:48, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

			:Thanks for the above statement. I'm editing with faith and discipline as per your above statement regarding the matter, the entity is already famous in Pakistan. With faith i have no affiliation with the entity the entity is already famous on TV's, Web. [[User:Janabanigu\|Janabanigu]] ([[User talk:Janabanigu#top\|talk]]) 08:53, 25 August 2024 (UTC)