Jump to content

User talk:Photon2003: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
<div class="user-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid var(--border-color-base, #a2ab91); background-color: var(--background-color-warning-subtle, #fef6e7); color:inherit; min-height: 40px">[[File:Stop x nuvola.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon]]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking_policy#Indefinite_blocks|indefinitely]]''' from editing because it appears that you are [[Wikipedia:Here to build an encyclopedia#Clearly not being here to build an encyclopedia|not here to build an encyclopedia]]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. --><code><nowiki>{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}</nowiki></code>. &nbsp;'''<span style="font-family: Arial;">[[User:Acroterion|<span style="color: black;">Acroterion</span>]] <small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<span style="color: gray;">(talk)</span>]]</small></span>''' 13:53, 2 September 2024 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:Uw-nothereblock -->
<div class="user-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid var(--border-color-base, #a2ab91); background-color: var(--background-color-warning-subtle, #fef6e7); color:inherit; min-height: 40px">[[File:Stop x nuvola.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon]]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking_policy#Indefinite_blocks|indefinitely]]''' from editing because it appears that you are [[Wikipedia:Here to build an encyclopedia#Clearly not being here to build an encyclopedia|not here to build an encyclopedia]]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. --><code><nowiki>{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}</nowiki></code>. &nbsp;'''<span style="font-family: Arial;">[[User:Acroterion|<span style="color: black;">Acroterion</span>]] <small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<span style="color: gray;">(talk)</span>]]</small></span>''' 13:53, 2 September 2024 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:Uw-nothereblock -->


{{unblock|reason=As someone who is devoted to building a fair and neutral encyclopedia, i have respected the Wikipedia rules and have tried to engage in discussion and conflict resolution during editing disagreements, yet i have never gotten any feedback on it, and "not being here to build an encyclopedia" sounds to be absurd and unfounded due to my many unsuccessful attempts that have gone ignored by the users i had conflicts with (See [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Third_opinion&diff=prev&oldid=1236885012|here] for example). Since my intentions are honest and proved to be so, the ban, or at the very least, the ban's very short and unhelpful reason, or its infinite duration, appear to me as pointless. If, by my editing process, i seem to have misinterpreted the rules, i would like to be informed of this, and how i did so, so that it cannot occur again. I am acting in good faith, i merely get no clear indication of my actions' correctness. [[User:Photon2003|Photon2003]] ([[User talk:Photon2003#top|talk]]) 10:34, 4 September 2024 (UTC)}}
{{unblock|reason=As someone who is devoted to building a fair and neutral encyclopedia, i have respected the Wikipedia rules and have tried to engage in discussion and conflict resolution during editing disagreements, yet i have never gotten any feedback on it, and "not being here to build an encyclopedia" sounds to be absurd and unfounded due to my many unsuccessful attempts that have gone ignored by the users i had conflicts with (See here -> https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Third_opinion&diff=prev&oldid=1236885012 for example). Since my intentions are honest and proved to be so, the ban, or at the very least, the ban's very short and unhelpful reason, or its infinite duration, appear to me as pointless. If, by my editing process, i seem to have misinterpreted the rules, i would like to be informed of this, and how i did so, so that it cannot occur again. I am acting in good faith, i merely get no clear indication of my actions' correctness. [[User:Photon2003|Photon2003]] ([[User talk:Photon2003#top|talk]]) 10:34, 4 September 2024 (UTC)}}

Revision as of 10:35, 4 September 2024

Absolutely no comments will be tolerated in here

Since as you've made it clear that you regard your fellow editors with contempt and don't wish to communicate or collaborate with them, I've removed your editing privileges. Communication isn't something you can regulate as you, and only you deign. ~!Acroterion (talk)

September 2024

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Acroterion (talk) 13:53, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Photon2003 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

As someone who is devoted to building a fair and neutral encyclopedia, i have respected the Wikipedia rules and have tried to engage in discussion and conflict resolution during editing disagreements, yet i have never gotten any feedback on it, and "not being here to build an encyclopedia" sounds to be absurd and unfounded due to my many unsuccessful attempts that have gone ignored by the users i had conflicts with (See here -> https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Third_opinion&diff=prev&oldid=1236885012 for example). Since my intentions are honest and proved to be so, the ban, or at the very least, the ban's very short and unhelpful reason, or its infinite duration, appear to me as pointless. If, by my editing process, i seem to have misinterpreted the rules, i would like to be informed of this, and how i did so, so that it cannot occur again. I am acting in good faith, i merely get no clear indication of my actions' correctness. Photon2003 (talk) 10:34, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=As someone who is devoted to building a fair and neutral encyclopedia, i have respected the Wikipedia rules and have tried to engage in discussion and conflict resolution during editing disagreements, yet i have never gotten any feedback on it, and "not being here to build an encyclopedia" sounds to be absurd and unfounded due to my many unsuccessful attempts that have gone ignored by the users i had conflicts with (See here -> https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Third_opinion&diff=prev&oldid=1236885012 for example). Since my intentions are honest and proved to be so, the ban, or at the very least, the ban's very short and unhelpful reason, or its infinite duration, appear to me as pointless. If, by my editing process, i seem to have misinterpreted the rules, i would like to be informed of this, and how i did so, so that it cannot occur again. I am acting in good faith, i merely get no clear indication of my actions' correctness. [[User:Photon2003|Photon2003]] ([[User talk:Photon2003#top|talk]]) 10:34, 4 September 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=As someone who is devoted to building a fair and neutral encyclopedia, i have respected the Wikipedia rules and have tried to engage in discussion and conflict resolution during editing disagreements, yet i have never gotten any feedback on it, and "not being here to build an encyclopedia" sounds to be absurd and unfounded due to my many unsuccessful attempts that have gone ignored by the users i had conflicts with (See here -> https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Third_opinion&diff=prev&oldid=1236885012 for example). Since my intentions are honest and proved to be so, the ban, or at the very least, the ban's very short and unhelpful reason, or its infinite duration, appear to me as pointless. If, by my editing process, i seem to have misinterpreted the rules, i would like to be informed of this, and how i did so, so that it cannot occur again. I am acting in good faith, i merely get no clear indication of my actions' correctness. [[User:Photon2003|Photon2003]] ([[User talk:Photon2003#top|talk]]) 10:34, 4 September 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=As someone who is devoted to building a fair and neutral encyclopedia, i have respected the Wikipedia rules and have tried to engage in discussion and conflict resolution during editing disagreements, yet i have never gotten any feedback on it, and "not being here to build an encyclopedia" sounds to be absurd and unfounded due to my many unsuccessful attempts that have gone ignored by the users i had conflicts with (See here -> https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Third_opinion&diff=prev&oldid=1236885012 for example). Since my intentions are honest and proved to be so, the ban, or at the very least, the ban's very short and unhelpful reason, or its infinite duration, appear to me as pointless. If, by my editing process, i seem to have misinterpreted the rules, i would like to be informed of this, and how i did so, so that it cannot occur again. I am acting in good faith, i merely get no clear indication of my actions' correctness. [[User:Photon2003|Photon2003]] ([[User talk:Photon2003#top|talk]]) 10:34, 4 September 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}