League and Self-Defense: Difference between revisions

League and Self-Defense

*Liga i Samoobrona* (Polish)
League and Self-Defense Liga i Samoobrona (Polish)
	Fox plush toy presented by Lepper and Giertych as the logo of LiS in July 2007.
Abbreviation	LiS (Fox)
Leader	Andrzej Lepper; Roman Giertych
Presidium	Radosław Parda; Mirosław Orzechowski; Wojciech Wierzejski; Genowefa Wiśniowska; Krzysztof Sikora
Founded	16 July 2007
Registered	17 July 2007
Dissolved	7 September 2007
Headquarters	ul. Kinowa 19 U1,; 04-030 Warsaw
Membership (2007)	~100,000; (Samoobrona); ~14,000; (League of Polish Families)
Ideology	National agrarianism; Catholic nationalism; Left-wing populism; Anti-capitalism; Catholic left
Political position	Left-wing; League of Polish Families:; Far-right; Samoobrona:; Far-left
Religion	Roman Catholic
Colours	Orange; (customary); Yellow; (Samoobrona); Blue; (League of Polish Families)
Slogan	Strong as a lion, cunning as a fox; (Template:Lang-pl)
	Politics of Poland; Political parties; Elections; ^ A: League and Self-Defense was a combination of a far-left and a far-right party, but the dominance of left-wing elements, especially on economic issues, was noted. The coalition was also considered "not very right-wing".; The far-left Samoobrona dominated LiS, as it had more recognition, MPs, popularity and was 7 times larger than LPR. Polish media noted that within LiS, the far-right LPR was dependent on Samoobrona. To accentuate it, some referred to LiS as Lepper i Spółka ("Lepper and others"). International media also observed that Samoobrona held a hegemonic position in LiS.; Polish commentator Krzysztof Wołodźko described the party as Catholic left, stating that it followed the tradition of "social[ist] left" as its main message, mixing it with religion and moral conservatism.;

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 03:09, 7 September 2024

League and Self-Defense (Template:Lang-pl, LiS — lis also means fox in Polish) was a short-lived Polish political alliance between the left-wing populist Self-Defense of the Republic of Poland (Samoobrona) and the national conservative Christian right League of Polish Families (LPR) in July 2007. The alliance was directed against right-wing populist Law and Justice (PiS) that first formed a coalition with both parties, but then gradually marginalized them and shuffled away their ministers.^[5] The coalition was marked by mutual distrust as the parties had radically different outlooks, tied together by Euroscepticism, opposition to capitalism and aversion to PiS.^[23] The coalition was only polling 6% (below the 8% threshold for coalitions), and was dissolved by September 2007, shortly before the election. In the 2007 Polish parliamentary election, both LPR and Samoobrona failed to reach the 5% electoral threshold, losing all their 92 Sejm and 10 Senate seats.^[5] The downfall of both parties is considered to have been caused by PiS appropriating their political rhetoric.^[24]

Despite being a coalition of a far-left Samoobrona and a far-right LPR, League and Self-Defense produced a coherent program that emphasized the common points of both parties, such as their opposition to the European Union, NATO, the Iraq War and War in Afghanistan. Both parties also shared a voter base that wished for the return of security of the socialist welfare state and protection from the risks of open markets. This allowed the coalition to position itself as anti-capitalist.^[11] The coalition had a basic social program based on "protection of life from the moment of conception until natural death", anti-corruption and "zero tolerance" reforms for schools. Economically, the coalition sought a halt to privatization, empowering trade unions and greatly expanding welfare, social pensions and the minimum wage, as well as tackling foreign capital and big business.^[1] Given its higher amount of seats and popular support,^[25]^[26] the left-wing Samoobrona dominated the coalition,^[19] which gave League and Self-Defense an ideologically left-wing profile, especially economically.^[12]

Origins

LPR and Samoobrona

Initially, the two parties that would found League and Self-Defence had nothing in common. Self-Defence of the Republic of Poland (Samoobrona) was considered a far-left, socialist party similar to neocommunism ideologically.^[27] Polish political scientist Jarosław Tomasiewicz described it as a "radical-populist" party that combined agrarianism, nationalism and "Soviet-style" communism.^[28] Samoobrona cooperated with fellow left-wing parties, first in the anti-austerity coalition Social Alliance for the 1998 Polish local elections,^[29] and then by supporting the 2001-2003 government of social-democratic, post-communist Democratic Left Alliance (SLD) and agrarian Polish People's Party (PSL), as well as forming local coalitions with the SLD.^[30] Samoobrona withdrew its support of the SLD-PSL government and broke all of its agreements with SLD following the decision of the SLD to forcefully break up farmer protests and continue privatization measures.^[31]^[32] PSL itself also withdrew from the coalition after SLD lifted custom duties meant to protect Polish agriculture.^[33]

In contrast, the League of Polish Families was a far-right, Catholic nationalist party that was a continuation of the National Party, an idiosyncratic party that attempted to unite nationalist movements and continue the legacy of Roman Dmowski and his movement of National Democracy. LPR mostly focused on social, cultural and moral issues, along with opposition to the European Union.^[34] In contrast to the traditionally laissez-faire, free-market outlook of Dmowski and his nationalist movement, the LPR denounced the post-communist transition to capitalism in Poland as a "socio-economic experiment" that had "greatly deleterious effects on the Polish families".^[35] LPR campaigned on an unambiguously right-wing, Catholic nationalist and traditionalist program, appealing to patriotic, nationalist and anti-capitalist values; it promoted Catholic values as "moral and material protectors" and presented itself as the defender of Polish national interests which, according to the party, were compromised by the EU, foreign capital, big companies, privatization and social welfare cuts.^[36]

Ideological overlap

The anti-capitalism of LPR allowed for some overlap, on both partisan and voter level. According to political scientists, Tomasz Zarycki and George Kolankiewicz, LPR "held objectively left-wing views on issues such as privatisation, state intervention in the economy and redistribution of wealth", combined with "strong opposition to Polish EU membership and, more generally, a nationalist and anti-cosmopolitan worldview."^[37] Samoobrona, meanwhile, presented itself as the defender of the working class, the weak, and the needy; Polish farmers and the poor began to consider Lepper their advocate. To this end, both Samoobrona and LPR appealed to those who considered themselves "losers" of the capitalist transformation and felt marginalized and excluded by the socioeconomic changes that dismantled the socialist system in Poland.^[38] Samoobrona focused almost exclusively on socioeconomic interests and had a vague cultural outlook that attempted to appeal to socially marginalized groups, including LGBT (along with SLD, Samoobrona was the only party to support same-sex civil unions in 2004),^[39] but at the same time avoid alienating the socially conservative working class. However, Samoobrona and LPR shared their opposition to the European Union and globalization. Given how Samoobrona considered SLD to have betrayed left-wing values by 2003, both LPR and Samoobrona began to see themselves as the only alternative to the establishment and economic liberalism.^[38]

People's National Bloc

League and Self-Defense came directly from the Samoobrona's concept of "People's National Bloc", or "National-Agrarian Bloc" (Template:Lang-pl). The concept of this bloc first appeared in 1999 and was actively pursued with Samoobrona until 2001; it initially referred to a possible alliance of Samoobrona with Polish People's Party as well as left-wing trade unions, such as August 80.^[40] Alliance talks were temporarily abandoned after the decision of Polish People's Party to form a government with SLD, although Samoobrona supported this government. After the SLD-PSL government fell in 2003, the concept was again brought up by Samoobrona. In the 2004 European Parliament election in Poland, LPR massively overperformed, finishing second. At this point, the concept of the "National-Agrarian Bloc" was modified to be a coalition of Samoobrona, Polish People's Party and League of Polish Families. Between 2004-2005, the prospect of this coalition appeared likely as even the leader of PSL, Janusz Wojciechowski, was supportive of the idea. However, this plan was foiled by the 2005 Polish parliamentary election, in which LPR and PSL underperformed; a Samoobrona-PSL-LPR would only have 115 seats, half of the amount needed to form a majority government.^[41]

Before Samoobrona and LPR agreed to form a coalition with Law and Justice in May 2006, Law and Justice ruled as a minority government, which sparked suggestions of early elections to allow a majority government. Law and Justice tried to form a coalition with neoliberal Civic Platform, in what would have been known as POPiS. In January 2006, Samoobrona and LPR declared that they would run together in case of early election, calling it "People's National Self-Defence-LPR Bloc" (Template:Lang-pl), effectively becoming the "proto-LiS" coalition. PSL was initially hesitant towards reactivating the concept of the "People's National Bloc", stating that it would not run together with LPR and Samoobrona to Sejm, but that it is interested in organizing such coalition for the Senate.^[42] The coalition was mocked by Donald Tusk, the leader of Civic Platform, who called it "the coalition of the weak" and stated that in case talks with PiS fail, early election would take place on 26 March 2006.^[43] Ultimately, PSL changed its stance and stated it interest in forming the "People's National Bloc" together with Samoobrona and LPR.^[44] While the early 2006 election ultimately did not take place and both Samoobrona and LPR formed a coalition with PiS, this made both parties consider themselves 'natural partners'. LPR was greatly influenced by its talks with Samoobrona, abandoning its ties to National Democracy, moderating its image and putting an emphasis on agrarian issues.^[38]

History

Background

The decision for the synthesis of the two parties arose following a crisis within Poland's ruling three party coalition, of the dominant Law and Justice (PiS) party, and junior partners Samoobrona and LPR. On 9 July, the leader of Samoobrona, Andrzej Lepper, was dismissed from his position as Minister for Agriculture following a secret investigation by the Central Anticorruption Bureau (CBA) which attempted to link him and his department to corruptive practices. Lepper protested his innocence and claimed to have been the victim of a politically motivated 'sting' operation, initiated by PM Kaczynski and PiS. He demanded that a parliamentary inquiry be conducted to investigate the legality and motivation of the CBA operation mounted against him.^[16]

Following his dismissal, Lepper participated in numerous conferences in which he accused Law and Justice politicians of illegal actions. He also filed a denunciation lawsuit against the minister coordinator of services Zbigniew Wassermann, while also stating that the head of the Central Anticorruption Bureau, Mariusz Kamiński, broke the law by initiating the sting operation against him. He lastly attacked the leader of Law and Jutice and prime minister Jarosław Kaczyński of "unbelievable cynicism", as Kaczyński had long talks with Lepper about the future of the coalition, knowing that he would soon dismiss him.^[16]

Formation

Lepper's stance drew him support from his own Samoobrona party and the LPR. On 16 July 2007, a merger of the two parties was announced at a press conference conducted by Lepper and his LPR counterpart, Roman Giertych. The nature of this new 'LiS' was not made clear, and the leaders could not give any specifics as to whether LiS would take the form of a newly unified party or simply an electoral alliance of two autonomous parties. It was indicated however, that the platform of this new alliance would be mainly eurosceptic and anti-privatization.^[1]

According to the declarations of both parties involved, the new grouping would preserve the identity of both parties.^[2] On the creation of the new party, Lepper stressed that "great injustice has been done to Samoobrona" and that one of the demands of the new grouping will be to investigate the circumstances regarding the sting operation against him.^[45] On 16 July 2007, the presidencies of both political groupings met. On 17 July 2007, the party's executive board was appointed, with Andrzej Lepper as president and Roman Giertych as chairman. On the same day, the documents for the registration of the new party were filed with the court. Party board members from the LPR included Radosław Parda, Deputy Education Minister Mirosław Orzechowski, Deputy Leader of the League Wojciech Wierzejski, while from the side of Samoobrona, board members included Deputy Speaker of the Sejm Genowefa Wiśniowska and acting head of the club Krzysztof Sikora.^[4]

After the formation of the League and Self-Defense, Law and Justice began making demands that both Samoobrona and LPR withdraw from the idea of setting up a commission to investigate the CBA action, after which Andrzej Lepper lost his deputy prime minister's seat. Law and Justice then started replacing the ministers of the parties in the government, stripping LPR and Samoobrona of influential positions such as labour ministry ad minister of agriculture. The government lost a lot of support, especially since it also abolished ministries created specifically for the LPR and Samoobrona, such as the ministry of maritime economy and the ministry of construction. Law and Justice defended the dismissals as "these were routine resignations unrelated to politics", but the media attacked the party for nepotism.^[46] In July 2007, only 31% of voters were satisfied with the Prime Minister Jarosław Kaczyński and his Law and Justice party.^[47]

Reactions

The reaction to the coalition within both parties were mixed, with the more radical members of LPR objecting to forming a coalition with a left-wing party; others admitted the idea of a temporary alliance, but feared integration.^[16] Some members within the party nevertheless praised the idea and claimed that they got along, especially stressing the "pro-social" stance of both groups, especially when referring to the shared opposition to privatization and deregulation measures.^[48]

The media greatly emphasized the seemingly absurd nature of the coalition. Gazeta Wyborcza wrote that Lepper is a "former communist, radical trade unionist, once an SLD ally, with fond memories of collective farms", while Giertych was described as "an heir to the National Democrats, a right-winger and a fan of Margaret Thatcher". The media also noted that Samoobrona promoted nostalgia towards the communist Polish People's Party, praising the communist secretary Edward Gierek while greatly opposing the Polish transition to capitalism, which Samoobrona emphasized by its famous slogan "Balcerowicz must go!". However, the media noted that despite the ideological conflicts, both parties were now united by their opposition to Law and Justice, along with their populist and Eurosceptic appeal; the 2006 formation of "National Agrarian Bloc" was also noted.^[49]

Amongst international media, the reaction was relatively positive. Austrian daily newspaper Der Standard argued that League and Self-Defense had great potential as long as it focused on the Samoobrona's socioeconomic appeal, namely its socialist orientation, protectionism and nostalgic feelings towards communist Poland. The presence of League of Polish Families, Der Standard argued, would not shock voters because of the existence of PiS, which already tried to combine left-leaning economics with social conservatism, although with a strong dominance of the latter. Andrzej Rychard argued that by reversing the configuration of PiS and instead greatly emphasizing socioeconomic issues and presenting a staunchly left-wing economic profile, League and Self-Defense could become "a better PiS". Rychard also noted that LiS polled as much as 23% in the polls.^[50]

Internal disputes

However, from the very beginning, relations between the leaders of the two groupings were marked by a high degree of distrust, and Lepper himself admitted that the coalition was situational and tactical in nature, calculated to strengthen both groupings in the eyes of the largest coalition partner. Cooperation with the LPR resulted in Samoobrona's acceptance of a proposal to table a constructive vote of no-confidence with J. Kaczmarek's candidacy for prime minister, which was Giertych's idea. As it turned out, it did not produce the expected results and the idea was soon finally abandoned.^[23]

The coalition was dominated by Samoobrona and its left-wing program. In comparison to the far-right League of Polish Families, Samoobrona had more seats in both the Sejm as well as the Senate,^[25] and had 7 times more members than LPR overall.^[7]^[8] In case of an independent run in the election, August 2007 polls showed that Samoobrona would win 8% of the vote, compared to LPR winning only 3%, which would leave the party short of the 5% electoral threshold needed to enter the Sejm.^[26] Political surveys also showed that Lepper was by far preferable to Giertych as the leader of LiS, although a majority of the surveyed wanted League and Self-Defense to nominate a young, new politician as its leader instead.^[51] To accentuate this, some Polish media commented that "without Samoobrona there is no LPR".^[19] Referencing the slogan of the party given by Lepper, "strong as a lion, cunning as a fox",^[52] Swiss newspaper Neue Zürcher Zeitung remarked that "Lepper is both a lion and a fox, while Giertych is best suited as some moraliser in a provincial church."^[21]

Talks with PiS

In late July, Law and Justice attempted to maintain the ruling coalition with Samoobrona and League of Polish Families, and sent LiS conditions needed to maintain the coalition. League and Self-Defense were to agree to unconditionally support the cabinet's bills, oppose strikes, vote in favor of waiving parliamentary immunity at the request of the prosecutor's office, and abandon the demand to set up a commission of inquiry into the actions of CBA. League and Self-Defense sent a counterproposal, demanding that PiS restore the laid off ministers, depoliticise secret services, fulfill the demands of protesting trade unions, increase pensions and minimum wage, and demand higher EU subsidies for Polish farmers.^[53]

On 1 August 2007, Law and Justice made its last attempt to maintain a coalition by making an offer to Roman Giertych, the leader of League of Polish Families, that would include maintaining the coalition without left-wing Samoobrona. This was to be done with the help of defectors from Samoobrona, such as the People's National Movement and Self-Defence Rebirth. League of Polish Families was to absorb the dissident Samoobrona MPs and become a "pro-PiS version of LiS" that could continue the coalition. While such government would be a minority government, Law and Justice believed that it could convince more Samoobrona MPs to cross the floor by appointing Wojciech Mojzesowicz, a former high-ranking Samoobrona member and a respected farmer activist that defected to PiS, as the Minister of Agriculture.^[54] However, Giertych rejected the proposal, stating that he desires to continue League and Self-Defense together with Samoobrona; he also argued that Law and Justice has its own internal divisions, which the party is desperate to contain by maintaining the coalition.^[55]

End of the coalition

Ultimately, Law and Justice did not agree to the proposals of League and Self-Defense, and on 5 August 2007, the leadership of Samoobrona voted to dissolve the cabinet coalition with Law and Justice, with 61 votes for and 8 against.^[57] On the same day, League of Polish Families also declared the coalition over and called for a new Prime Minister, denouncing Jarosław Kaczyński. However, the party also emphasized that it is open to a new coalition should PiS agree to the conditions of both LPR and Samoobrona and replace Kaczyński. In its party declaration, League of Polish Families accused Law and Justice of breaking the coalition, writing: "PiS broke the coalition - it broke the coalition agreement repeatedly. The appointment of a PiS MP as Minister of Agriculture was the most blatant proof of this. Kaczyński tore up the agreement he had signed with his own hand."^[58] Giertych also assured that League of Polish Families remains committed to League and Self-Defence, and Samoobrona consulted its decision to withdraw from the PiS-LPR-Samoobrona coalition with him. Giertych also acknowledged that early elections were now inevitable.^[59]

After dissolving the coalition, League and Self-Defense started courting the Catholic Church and the Catholic Radio Maryja, including initiating talks with Father Tadeusz Rydzyk, considered the "grey eminence" of the Polish Catholic Church, who was an ardent supporter of Law and Justice.^[60] By 22 August, 57% of Poles wanted the government to call early elections and to hold them before the end of 2007.^[61] The Sejm voted to dissolve itself on 7 September 2007, a move that was opposed by LiS, but supported by PiS as well as the opposition parties.^[62] Despite LiS mainly attacking Law and Justice, the coalition was also deeply opposed to the neoliberal Civic Platform, which was the strongest contender in the upcoming 2007 election. Danuta Hojarska, the MP of Samoobrona, accused Donald Tusk, the leader of Civic Platform, of domestic violence against his wife and drunk driving, claiming to have evidence that incriminated Tusk.^[63]

Rivalry with PiS

League and Self-Defense competed directly with PiS for votes; Samoobrona as well as LPR touted their consistent opposition to the capitalist transformation in Poland. Lepper argued that the transformation had led to misery and poverty for millions of people, the collapse of all areas of the economy except trade, and takeover of the Polish economy by foreign capital. LiS mocked the Law and Justice's slogan of the Fourth Polish Republic, arguing that it was LiS that had first the courage to criticize the changes, and to demand that "the looting of Poland" be stopped. League and Self-Defense particularly criticized PiS for its support of Polish membership in the European Union, stating that the conditions PiS agreed to join the EU were unequal. It particularly noted the bad situation of the Polish farmers, arguing that they receive the lowest production subsidies despite being most affected by the competition of other EU member states. LiS also attacked its former coalition partner for a pro-American foreign policy, and demanded immediate Polish withdrawal from Iraq and Afghanistan.^[64] It also accused PiS of neglecting the poor, and its actual policy stopping short of the universal healthcare that LiS postulated.^[65]

Polish media closely followed the emerging rivalry between both parties, which was likewise encouraged by LiS itself. Andrzej Lepper played into the media's depiction of LiS as a fox (as "lis" means "fox" in Polish) and PiS as a duck (referring to the Kaczyński brothers), using slogans such as "No bird can handle LiS" and "The Prime Minister [Jarosław Kaczyński] is leading the drive to break up LiS, but the fox is not afraid of ducks. In the wild it is that ducks are afraid of the fox."^[66] The wordplay on anthropomorphic representation of both parties was commonly mentioned by journalists, and often gave interviews with representatives of both PiS and LiS a humorous tone. When interviewing Lepper, Jacek Żakowski claimed that foxes do not swim, to which Lepper replied: "Foxes can swim. They swim the rivers, they jump into the water after the ducks and the ducks don't stand a chance." Jarosław Kaczyński responded to Lepper's remark by stating: "Predatory ducks can kidnap the fox and lift it into the air." However, Polish ornithologist Jan Lontkowski noted that it is impossible, ridiculing Kaczyński's response.^[56]

Journalist Tomasz Lis wrote of the atmosphere before the 2007 election: "Law and Justice has come under artillery fire, and from two sides. Self-Defense attacks Kaczynski's party on the social level, explaining that it has duped the voters, that it has not been able to find money to increase wages in the health and education sectors, and that it has remained deaf to the demands of the peasants. At the same time, the liberals of the Civic Platform will accuse the Kaczynski brothers of inefficiency and dictatorial tendencies. They will hold them responsible for the deterioration of political life because of their tendency to quarrel and blackmail, and their desire to destroy everyone and everything."^[67] Mirosława Drozd-Piasecka also noted the prevalence of bon mots that speak of LiS being "a fox that hunts ducks". Polish media observed that the mere survival of LiS (crossing the 8% electoral threshold for coalitions) would be a defeat for Law and Justice.^[68]

Dissolution

While up to mid-August polls gave LiS 23% of popular vote,^[69] this declined to only 6% of support by beginning of September, which was insufficient to pass the 8% electoral threshold for coalition groupings. As a result, on 7 September 2007. Roman Giertych and Andrzej Lepper announced the end of the concept of the League and Self-Defence; this had to do with the opposition of the MPs of the League of Polish Families and their demand that the joint lists of Self-Defence of the Republic of Poland should not include people with legal problems or burdened by moral scandals. By early September it was clear that LiS would not arise. The membership of the two parties had not been properly consulted as to their support for this idea, and the merits of the proposition had not been discussed. Many of the members of both groups saw little common ground between the two parties. Furthermore, opinion polls did not necessarily reflect that there was a significant advantage to an alliance. LPR and Samoobrona therefore decided to start independently of each other at the early 21 October legislative elections.^[5]

Most decisive behind the dissolution of League and Self-Defense was the executive committee of League of Polish Families, majority of which opted to go to the 2007 elections with the Right Wing of the Republic of Marek Jurek and the Real Politics Union instead of Self-Defence of the Republic of Poland. Later commenting on the dissolution of the coalition, Lepper also stated that no agreement has been found amongst the grassroots members of his party, who argued that the Samoobrona brand cannot disappear from the electoral lists. Lepper claimed that the Samoobrona field activists did not agree to collect signatures for LiS electoral lists. Media generally praised the decision to dissolve the party given how Samoobrona had a radically left-wing program whereas League of Polish Families was the trademark radical right populist party in Poland.^[66]

2007 elections

After the coalition was cancelled, Samoobrona moved even further to the left and invited left-wing activists the party, such as Leszek Miller and a socialist Piotr Ikonowicz.^[70] In response, LPR condemned its erstwhile coalition partner, accusing Samoobrona of cooperating with "communist apparatchiks".^[71] LPR joined forces with Real Politics Union and Right of the Republic to form a new alliance called League of the Right of the Republic (Liga Prawicy Rzeczypospolitej). However, both parties sharply dropped in the polls following the dissolution of LiS. LPR's coalition with Real Politics Union and Right of the Republic was seen as even more ideologically inconsistent than LiS - the League of the Right of the Republic was unable to present an economic program, as the LPR held social and anti-capitalist positions, while the Real Politics Union under Janusz Korwin-Mikke presented capitalist libertarian views. This warded off LPR's voters, and the party lost 67% of its 2005 electorate to Law and Justice.^[72]

Elections were held on 21 October 2007, in which the LPR Committee received 209,171 or 1.30% of the vote and did not enter parliament. Polls gave the party a slightly higher support of 3 per cent.^[5] Samoobrona failed to fare much better, as it won 247,335 votes, which amounted to 1.53% of the popular vote, which meant that it also failed to keep any of its seats.^[73] This result devastated the party. Lepper and his party faced significant financial issues, and it was reported that Samoobrona's goal was not crossing the 5% electoral threshold in order to win parliamentary seats, but rather to cross at least the 3% threshold needed for state-paid reimbursement of election campaign costs. This escalated the financial problems of Samoobrona.^[74] After losing all their seats in the 2007 election, neither Samoobrona nor LPR regained political relevance. Andrzej Lepper died in August 2011 in unclear circumstances, with some ruling it as assassination and others as suicide.^[75] The Central Anticorruption Bureau, responsible for the unlawful sting operation against Lepper that ultimately ended his political career, grew unpopular and was disbanded in March 2024.^[76]

Program

The main objectives of the coalition were to create a commission of inquiry into the Central Anticorruption Bureau and its operations, blocking the ratification of the European Union reform treaty that both members of the coalition were opposed to, stop the privatization process and "strengthen the constitutional protection of life", which would include introducing additional restrictions on abortion.^[77] Both Samoobrona and LPR stressed opposition to the European Union as one of the main goals of the party, as both parties did not accept the EU Reform Treaty.^[1] The coalition was ultimately dominated by Samoobrona which had more Sejm and Senate seats than League of Polish Families,^[25] and polled 8% on its own in August 2007, compared to LPR's 3% (which would be below the 5% electoral threshold, thus putting LPR at risk of losing all its seats).^[26] According to the polls, Lepper was also preferred to become the leader of League and Self-Defence over LPR's leader Giertych, though a majority preferred the coalition to put forward a new, "fresh face" politician as its leader instead.^[51] Polish daily Dziennik Polska-Europa-Świat remarked that "Without Samoobrona there is no LPR".^[19]

Foreign issues

Both parties were deeply opposed to the introduction of the Euro currency in Poland and also questioned the rule of supremacy of the EU law over the Polish one. According to League and Self-Defence, the European Union pursues centralization reforms that will lead to "transformation of the Union into a super-state". The coalition speculated that the European Union might plan to introduce the position of an EU president and a foreign minister, which would overrule the policy of individual member states in favor of enforcing one-for-all rulings. Both parties also agreed on their opposition to NATO, and strongly opposed the presence of Polish troops in Iraq and Afghanistan, calling for immediate withdrawal.^[1] League and Self-Defense also sought to improve Polish relations with Russia.^[48]

Social issues

On social issues, League and Self-Defense stressed its anti-corruption stance and referred to the unlawful actions of the Central Anticorruption Bureau that led to the collapse of the PiS-LPR-Samoobrona coalition. The coalition pledged to ensure that special services and authorities in Poland will behave in legal manner. The coalition also proposed to guarantee protection of life from the moment of conception until natural death, as well as an extensive education reform that would introduce "zero tolerance" program for violence and bullying at school. League and Self-Defense also postulated the foundation of a special investigative unit that would persecute and punish individuals and companies for lobbying.^[1]

Economic issues

Economically, League of Self-Defense called itself "solidarist", and envisioned a "solidarist state" that would be based on the principles of Catholic corporatism.^[16] The coalition called itself "pro-social" and was distinguished by its strong hostility towards privatization, which it combined with a proposal to greatly limit foreign capital in Poland and ban foreign individuals from buying Polish companies.^[48] The coalition supported trade unions and strikes, also stressing its support for the health service employees' protest that took place in Poland in 2007, postulated a sharp rise of social pensions and the minimum wage. It also sought to diversify energy supply and develop biofuel production in Poland, which it saw as an opportunity for Polish agriculture to modernize, combined with agrarian protectionist measures and generous subsidies for Polish farmers.^[1]

Other common economic points of both Samoobrona and LPR that were included in the program of LiS were "family-friendly taxes" - these were to be additional taxes on the wealthy, of which the proceeds would be redistributed to low-income families. LiS also postulated an establishment of a special investigative commission that would persecute privatization and focus on halting any further privatization attempts. This commission was also to investigate Polish lobbyists and businessmen, such as Marek Dochnal.^[78] The party also stressed the need to diversify the energy supply of Poland, and opposed the construction of Nord Stream 1, a Russia-Germany Northern Gas Pipeline. The party also criticized Law and Justice for inadequate preparations for UEFA Euro 2012,^[65] and pledged to speed up the preparations.^[78]

Explaining its concept of solidarist economy, the coalition declared: "Our program meets these expectations. It contains important elements hitherto overlooked and ignored by neo-liberal decision-makers. It is a clear programme providing social security for the most vulnerable social groups, giving hope for stabilisation and harmony. It is an incisive programme providing social security for the most vulnerable social groups, giving hope for stabilisation and harmonious development of our country." League and Self-Defense condemned the last 16 years (1991-2007) of economic policies, describing it as neoliberal and capitalist. Solidarist economy, according to LiS, was based on the protection of the poorest and the weakest, as well as disempowering and redistributing the wealth of the rich, which the coalition perceived as corrupt and greedy.^[24]

League of Self-Defense rejected capitalism as a system that causes the "McDonaldization of the planet"; conversely, neoliberalism and the tradition of economic liberalism in general were condemned as "lumpenliberalism" that is characterized by consumptionism and hedonism rather than serving the needs of the poor and disadvantaged.^[79] Both League of Polish Families and Samoobrona were anti-capitalist. League of Polish Families was described as an overtly anti-capitalist party,^[80] and Polish economist Oleg Gorbaniuk even classified LPR as an economically left-wing party.^[81] This was even stronger in case of Samoobrona, which argued that "capitalism is that system which has already outlived itself" and openly declaring itself as an anti-capitalist party, denouncing capitalism as "degenerate consumerism".^[82] The leader of Samoobrona, Lepper, also called for a return of socialism in Poland, arguing that it had "not yet reached full maturity".^[83]

Other stances

LiS accused PiS of obstructionism, and proposed to amend the rules of Sejm's procedures that would allow the chamber presidium to introduce additional entries to bills despite the Speaker of the Sejm opposing them.^[84] It also criticized PiS for the conditions of Polish membership in the EU, denouncing them as unfair and exploitative towards Poland.^[64] Giertych stated that it is one of the main goals of LiS to prevent the ratification of the EU treaty. The party was fiercely opposed to the EU and strongly opposed introduction of the Euro in Poland and the rule of EU's law supremacy over the Polish one, arguing that it would lead to the "transformation of the Union into a super-state". In order to closely regulate Polish relationship with the EU, LiS proposed to introduce a new position known as "EU President and a Foreign Minister", which would be elected for 2.5 years and directly represent Polish interests before the EU.^[78]

Self-description

The coalition referred to itself as "national agrarian" and "people's national", as to stress the right-wing character of LPR as well as the agrarian and leftist nature of Samoobrona.^[9] League and Self-Defense maintained that its creation marks the beginning of "the people's national movement".^[85] The coalition itself was considered "not very right-wing" by Polish media despite the presence of LPR in it, who noted the far-reaching criticism of privatization process in Poland and a clearly left-wing economic program.^[18] The coalition wanted to build a "vast national popular movement".^[86] Samoobrona was considered a "peasant-left" and a far-left^[87] party that sought to look after the rural voters, combined with agrarian socialist demands and an ambition to represent people who struggle financially.^[88] League of Polish Families was a far-right^[14] party described as Catholic nationalist.^[10] Krzysztof Wołodźko, Polish commentator of the Polish state media Polskie Radio, argued that League and Self-Defense marked an important point in the political history of Poland as it represented an alliance of a post-Solidarity (LPR) and a post-communist (Samoobrona) party, thus breaking the lingering elements of the old political anti-communist/post-communist dichotomy. Wołodźko stated that the new coalition, despite its contradictions, represents the Catholic left and has a potential to become "a sovereign entity on the political scene" that integrates the "social[ist] left" with moral conservatism and religion.^[12]

Left-wing identity

Samoobrona positioned itself as strongly anti-neoliberal and ran to the far-left, much left than the social-democratic and post-communist Democratic Left Alliance.^[17] While this threatened the stability of the (ultimately short-lived coalition), it also gave it a discernible left-wing populist leaning. Polish sociologist Andrzej Rychard noted that the coalition was ultimately anti-capitalist and economy-oriented, as the voters of both parties shared longing for the security of the socialist welfare state and protection from the risks of open markets.^[11] LiS responded to this not only through its anti-capitalist rhetoric, but also through its proposals such as higher pensions and minimum wage and special subsidies for the unemployed and subsidies for agriculture.^[89] The coalition also mixed in nationalist rhetoric, proposing a bill that would severely limit foreign land ownership and capital in Poland, especially the German one.^[90]

In the coalition, Samoobrona centered the electoral message of League and Self-Defense on 'human dignity', which Samoobrona aspired to portray itself as its guardian. Despite the presence of League of Polish Families in the coalition, Samoobrona created an image of a left-wing identity for the party, running to the left of the electoral alliance the Left and Democrats and representing the people in need of state support in economic and social terms. Political pundits observed that the Samoobrona tried to maintain its image as an agrarian party representing rural environments, while also affirming its far-left identity and attracting far-left voters. League of Polish Families left the economic imagery to Samoobrona and tried to 'complete' the coalition's image by stressing the importance of tradition, Catholic values and patriotism. LPR appealed directly to PiS voters through law-and-order and anti-corruption rhetoric.^[91] German magazine Stern noted the dominating role of Lepper, which it called "Polish Hugo Chávez" and described his ideology as "populist mixture of socialism and nationalism." Describing his decision to create the LiS coalition, Stern described it as risky, but noted the potential of his rhetoric, writing that Lepper "shouts out loud what the poor and frustrated only dare to whisper."^[92]

Conflicting nature

Commenting on the conflicting nature of the coalition, Kurier Poranny remarked: "Such a marriage, however, is surprising, and above all to the voters of both Samoobrona and LPR. For how can one explain to a farmer from Sokółka that his new party, apart from direct subsidies, is going to fight with some Gombrowicz or argue about the national character of the state in Brussels? On the other hand, how will an LPR activist feel about being soiled in pig mud?"^[93] This referred to the fact that Samoobrona was a left-wing (both by self-identification as well as political classification) and had an almost exclusively economic-oriented rhetoric, wishing to represent the farmers and disadvantaged groups.^[94] Dutch political scientist Gerrit Voerman remarked that Samoobrona sought to represent those who "found themselves on the edge of poverty and despair" as a result of capitalist reforms and described it as "the voice of the poor, deprived and humiliated"."^[95] In contrast, League of Polish Families was a national-Catholic and an ultra-nationalist party that was placed in the far-right.^[94] Both parties nevertheless found common points and accentuated them, such as their opposition to the Polish involvement in Afghanistan and Iraq, along with a denunciation of the foreign policy of the United States.^[96]

There were also some notable differences between the programs of Samoobrona and LPR, beyond their completely different positions on the political spectrum. Samoobrona supported the abolition of Polish Senate, envisioning an alternative chamber that would instead field trade unions and represent their interests; LPR, in contrast, defended the Senate as a symbol of Polish statehood. Samoobrona was also heavily opposed to conscription and postulated a completely professional Polish army. League of Polish Families, however, envisioned compulsory universal military service. Polish sociologist Jacek Wódz also noted the contradictory nature of the party when it comes to its place in Polish politics, as it was unknown what parties LiS could form a coalition with, if any. Wódz concluded that a coalition of LiS with an ideologically incompatible party would be possible. He concluded: "Anything is possible in Polish politics. Since Law and Justice, an extremely anti-communist party, has reached an agreement with Samoobrona, a grouping one hundred percent derived from the previous [communist] system, then further volleys will no longer be a sensation."^[97]

Support base

In August 2007, Centre for Public Opinion Research surveyed the LiS electorate (election forecast - 6%). The electorate of this coalition was of various ages, with the 35-44 age group being relatively the most numerous (10%). The coalition found the greatest acceptance primarily among residents of rural areas and small towns (up to 20,000 inhabitants). The specificity of this group in terms of education and professional profile was clear - more often people with primary education, unskilled workers and farmers, most often working on private farms. A large overrepresentation (in relation to the election forecast) was recorded in the group of housewives (as many as 17% of all housewives). LiS voters are those who declare rather active (1-2 times a month) participation in religious practices (10%).^[98] Less than half of the electorate allowed voting for the parties that make up LiS (Samoobrona's negative electorate - 55%, LPR - 46%). The position of both parties in this context has deteriorated significantly over several months.^[99]

Election results

Sejm

Election year	Party	# of votes	% of vote	# of overall seats won	+/–	Government
2007	Samoobrona	247,335	1.5 (#5)	0 / 460	56	Extra-parliamentary
2007	League of Polish Families	209,171	1.3 (#6)	0 / 460	34	Extra-parliamentary

Senate

Election year	Party	# of votes	% of vote	# of overall seats won	+/–	Government
2007	Samoobrona	345,427	1.1 (#5)	0 / 100	3	Extra-parliamentary
2007	League of Polish Families	293,289	0.9 (#6)	0 / 100	7	Extra-parliamentary

Notes

References

^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h "LPR i Samoobrona razem jako LiS". wp.pl (in Polish). 16 July 2007.
^ ^a ^b "Koalicja rządowa trwa, powstaje nowa partia Liga i Samoobrona". parkiet.com (in Polish). 16 July 2007.
^ Szefs, Slawek (17 July 2007). "LiS – cunning like a fox?". Polskie Radio. Archived from the original on 15 April 2024.
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d "Powołano zarząd LiS-u". wprost.pl (in Polish). 17 July 2007.
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Płoski, Marcin (2016). Liga Polskich Rodzin jako aktor społeczny (in Polish). Wrocław. p. 105. ISBN 978-83-63322-28-1.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
^ "Sprawozdanie o źródłach pozyskania środków finansowych, w tym kredytach bankowych i warunkach ich uzyskania oraz o wydatkach poniesionych ze środków Funduszu Wyborczego w poprzednim roku kalendarzowym" (PDF). gov.pl (in Polish). Państwowa Komisja Wyborcza. 2007.
^ ^a ^b "Lepper czyści partię". wp.pl (in Polish). 8 December 2007.
^ ^a ^b "Liga Prawicy Rzeczpospolitej". money.pl (in Polish). 2 October 2007.
^ ^a ^b "Lepper i Giertych kontra PiS". interia.pl (in Polish). 14 July 2007.
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d Chatzistavrou, Filippa (December 2010). "Early preferences of national political parties in the EU for Turkey's accession". Southeast European and Black Sea Studies. 10 (4). Hellenic Foundation for European and Foreign Policy (ELIAMEP): 403. doi:10.1080/14683857.2010.529991. ISSN 1468-3857.
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d Pallokat, Jan (16 July 2007). "Polens Politschauspiel". dw.com (in German).
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d Wołodźko, Krzysztof [in Polish] (18 July 2007). "Porozumienie ponad słabościami". Polskie Radio 24 (in Polish). Polskie Radio.
^
- Vlastimil Havlik; Anete Pinkova (2012). Populist Political Parties in East-Central Europe. Masaryk University Press. p. 174. ISBN 978-8021061057.
- Kolczyński, Mariusz; Mazur, Marek (2009). Broń masowego wrażenia. Kampania wyborcza 2007 r. w Polsce [Weapons of Mass Impression. The 2007 Election Campaign in Poland] (in Polish). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Sejmowe. p. 323. ISBN 978-83-7059-902-7. W kontekście budowania tożsamości partia określa się jako lewica, którą charakteryzuje, podobnie jak cały ruch socjalistyczny, oddolny, społeczny sprzeciw wobec krzywdzicieli. [In terms of identity-building, the party defines itself as a left-wing party characterised, like the socialist movement as a whole, by grassroots, social opposition to wrong-doers.]
- van Kessel, Stijn (2013). "A Matter of Supply and Demand: The Electoral Performance of Populist Parties in Three European Countries". Government and Opposition. 48 (2). Cambridge University Press: 187. doi:10.1017/gov.2012.14. ISSN 1477-7053. Whereas Self-Defence clearly complied with the characteristics of a populist party, the League of Polish Families was something of a borderline case. Despite the lack of a clearly developed programme, [League and] Self-Defence could be considered to be a left-wing populist party in terms of socioeconomic policies, and the party mainly attracted support in poorer rural areas.
- Górka, Marek; Magierek, Dariusz (2012). "Partie populistyczne na przykładzie wyborów parlamentarnych w 2007 roku". Wrocławskie Studia Politologiczne (in Polish). 13. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego: 113. Lider LPR robił wszystko, by ocalić koalicję PiS—Samoobrona—LPR. I, jak się wydaje, w tej perspektywie należy postrzegać inicjatywę powołania LiS. [...] Mimo że populistyczne rozwiązania programowe oraz roszczeniowa postawa względem państwa zbliżały do siebie obie partie, to jednak wyrastały z odmiennych ideologii politycznych, dlatego fuzja ultrakatolickiej i narodowej retoryki LPR z lewicową mentalnością Samoobrony stanowiły — mówiąc językiem publicystycznym — „zabieg z zakresu inżynierii genetycznej". [The leader of LPR did everything to save the PiS—Samoobrona—LPR coalition. And, it seems, the initiative to establish LiS should be seen in this perspective. [...] While populist programme solutions and a demanding attitude towards the state brought the two parties closer together, they grew out of different political ideologies, which is why the fusion of the ultra-Catholic and nationalist rhetoric of the LPR with the left-wing mentality of Samoobrona constituted - in the journalistic language - a ‘genetic engineering procedure’.]
^ ^a ^b "Regierungskrise: Kaczynskis fordern Neuwahlen". fokus.de (in German). 12 November 2007.
^ Agata Górny; Aleksandra Grzymała-Kazłowska; Piotr Koryś; Agnieszka Weinar (December 2003). "Multiple citizenship in Poland" (PDF). Prace Migracyjne. 53 (1). Institute for Social Studies Warsaw University: 45. We did not consider the populist far-left (Samoobrona) and the nationalistic far right wing (LPR) nor the Polish Peasants' Party: PSL. There were many reasons for such a decision. None of the two extreme parties had representatives in the parliament of the 3rd term, when the debate over citizenship reached its peak.
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Szacki, Wojciech; Grochal, Renata (16 July 2007). "Co LiS zrobi PiS?". wyborcza.pl (in Polish).
^ ^a ^b Rae, Gavin (2008). Poland's Return to Capitalism: From the Socialist Bloc to the European Union. I.B. Tauris. p. 174. ISBN 978-1-84511-474-9.
^ ^a ^b "Nie było LiS-a...zapomniał". salon24.pl (in Polish). 27 June 2010.
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d "Bez Samoobrony nie ma LPR". dziennik.pl (in Polish). 13 October 2007.
^ "Mamba z Ostrołęki rozszyfrowała skrót "LiS"". moja-ostroleka.pl (in Polish). Ostrołęka. 16 July 2007.
^ ^a ^b "Politische Ränkespiele in Polen". Neue Zürcher Zeitung (in German). 17 July 2007.
^ "LiS nie odbiera głosów innym partiom". TVN24 (in Polish). 25 July 2007.
^ ^a ^b Mateusz Piskorski [in Polish] (2010). Samoobrona RP w polskim systemie partyjnym (in Polish) (Dissertation ed.). Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań. p. 172.
^ ^a ^b Figiel, Agnieszka (2009). Języki IV RP: Podziały społeczno-polityczne w dyskursie polityki (in Polish). Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Nauk Społecznych UaM. pp. 110–111. ISBN 978-83-929763-0-1.
^ ^a ^b ^c "Die polnische Regierungskrise". cosmopolis.ch (in German). 9 August 2007.
^ ^a ^b ^c Hreczuk, Agnieszka (2 August 2007). "Koalition als Kartenhaus". ostpol.de (in German).
^ Andrzej Antoszewski [in Polish] (2005). Partie polityczne Europy Środkowej i Wschodniej (in Polish). Poznań-Wrocław: Wyższa Szkoła Zarządzania i Bankowości w Poznaniu. p. 180. ISBN 83-88544-63-2. Jedyne ugrupowanie ekstremalnej lewicy, które nie jest formacją neokomunistyczną, to polska Samoobrona. W wielu momentach jej program gospodarczy, akcentujący głównie konieczność powstrzymania prywatyzacji oraz ochronę narodowych interesów, jest zbieżny z postulatami partii neokomunistycznych. [The only grouping of the extreme left that is not a neo-communist formation is the Polish Samoobrona. At many points, its economic programme, which mainly emphasises the need to stop privatisation and to protect national interests, coincides with the demands of neo-communist parties.]
^ Tomasiewicz, Jarosław [in Polish] (2023). "Populiści w poszukiwaniu tożsamości – ideologiczne inspiracje Samoobrony (1991–2007)". Praktyka Teoretyczna (in Polish). 48 (2): 61. doi:10.19195/prt.2023.2.2.
^ Tomasiewicz, Jarosław [in Polish] (2023). "Populiści w poszukiwaniu tożsamości – ideologiczne inspiracje Samoobrony (1991–2007)". Praktyka Teoretyczna (in Polish). 48 (2): 55. doi:10.19195/prt.2023.2.2.
^ Mudde, Cas (2005). Racist Extremism in Central and Eastern Europe. London and New York: Taylor & Francis Group. p. 149. ISBN 0-203-00237-7.
^ "Samoobrona zerwała kolejną samorządową koalicję z SLD". Gazeta Wyborcza (in Polish). 17 March 2003.
^ "Łódzka Samoobrona rozwodzi się z SLD". wp.pl (in Polish). 12 March 2003.
^ "SLD-PSL: Jak się zaczynało, jak kończyło". tygodnikpowszechny.pl (in Polish). 9 March 2003.
^ Pankowski, Rafał (2010). "Self-Defence: Radical Populism". The Populist Radical Right in Poland: The Patriots. Routledge. pp. 112–125. ISBN 978-0-203-85656-7.
^ Bachrynowski, Szymon (2012). Populism in Central and Eastern Europe – Challenge for the Future? Documentation of an Expert Workshop (PDF). Heinrich Böll Stifung. p. 12.
^ Zarycki, Tomasz; Kolankiewicz, George (2003). Regional Issues in Polish Politics. SSEES Occasional Papers. London: School of Slavonic and East European Studies. p. 137. ISBN 0903425718.
^ Zarycki, Tomasz; Kolankiewicz, George (2003). Regional Issues in Polish Politics. SSEES Occasional Papers. London: School of Slavonic and East European Studies. p. 144. ISBN 0903425718.
^ ^a ^b ^c Moroska, Aleksandra; Zuba, Krzysztof (2010). "Two faces of Polish populism: the causes of the success and fall of Self Defence and the League of Polish Families". Totalitarismus und Demokratie. 7 (1). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht: 123–147. ISSN 1612-9008.
^ "Do parlamentu po raz dziesiąty powraca temat związków partnerskich". 6 June 2018.
^ Tomasiewicz, Jarosław [in Polish] (2023). "Populiści w poszukiwaniu tożsamości – ideologiczne inspiracje Samoobrony (1991–2007)". Praktyka Teoretyczna (in Polish). 48 (2): 48. doi:10.19195/prt.2023.2.2.
^ Mateusz Piskorski [in Polish] (2010). Samoobrona RP w polskim systemie partyjnym (in Polish) (Dissertation ed.). Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań. p. 108.
^ "Lepper i Giertych jednoczą swoje partie". wp.pl (in Polish). 26 January 2006.
^ "Lepper i Giertych razem". interia.pl (in Polish). 26 January 2006.
^ "Lepper z Giertychem razem do wyborów?". wp.pl (in Polish). 26 January 2006.
^ "Lepper: Samoobrona w koalicji, powstaje nowa partia". pb.pl (in Polish). 16 July 2007.
^ "Samoobrona i Liga przełkną upokorzenie". wp.pl (in Polish). 28 August 2007.
^ Schuller, Konrad (20 July 2007). "Kaczynski stellt Bedingungen". faz.net (in German).
^ ^a ^b ^c "Piskorski i Chruszcz o LiS". gazeta.pl (in Polish). 17 July 2007.
^ Szacki, Wojciech (17 July 2007). "Uciec LiS-em przed PiS-em". wyborcza.pl (in Polish).
^ "Experten geben neuer Partei LiS gute Chancen". derstandard.at (in German). 18 July 2007.
^ ^a ^b "Samoobrona i Liga mogą liczyć na większe poparcie razem niż osobno". bankier.pl (in Polish). 16 July 2007.
^ J. Miedzińska (16 July 2007). "Osobisty dowód niewinności". Polskie Radio Program I (in Polish). Polskie Radio.
^ "LiS nie odpowie do piątku PiS". rmf24.pl (in Polish). 24 July 2007.
^ Szacki, Wojciech; Uhlig, Dominik; Załuska, Wojciech (1 August 2007). "PiS kusi Giertycha". wyborcza.pl (in Polish).
^ "Giertych: chcemy z Lepperem dalej budować LiS". wp.pl (in Polish). 5 August 2007.
^ ^a ^b Wieczorek, Hanna; Wosik, Magda; Lontkowski, Jan (23 July 2007). "Cień demonicznej kaczki". Nasze Miasto (in Polish). Wrocław.
^ "Kaczynskis Koalition vor dem Aus - Neuwahlen wahrscheinlich". spiegel.de (in German). 5 August 2007.
^ "Liga chce nowego premiera". tvn24.pl (in Polish). 5 August 2007.
^ "Giertych: wiem, co zrobi Samoobrona". tvn24.pl (in Polish). 5 August 2007.
^ Konicz, Tomasz (8 August 2007). "Die Graue Eminenz". telepolis.de (in German).
^ "Sondaż: ponad połowa Polaków chce jesiennych wyborów". tvn.pl (in Polish). 22 August 2007.
^ "Koniec Sejmu V kadencji". money.pl (in Polish). 7 September 2007.
^ Krzymowski, Michał (20 August 2007). "To LiS a nie PiS szykuje „obyczajówkę" na Tuska". wprost.pl (in Polish).
^ ^a ^b "Andrzej Lepper: To Samoobrona jest twórcą IV RP" (in Polish). 9 June 2007.
^ ^a ^b "Będzie LiS - przystawki się jednoczą". money.pl (in Polish). 16 July 2007.
^ ^a ^b "LiS, czyli krótka miłość Leppera z Giertychem". dziennik.pl (in Polish). 5 November 2007.
^ Lis, Tomasz (27 September 2006). "Indispensable Lepper". Courier International (in French).
^ Drozd-Piasecka, Mirosława [in Polish] (2012). "Wizerunek przywódcy Samoobrony Andrzeja Leppera w przekazie medialnym" (PDF). Ethnografia Polska (in Polish). 56 (1–2): 9. ISSN 0071-1861.
^ "Samoobrona i LPR zostają w koalicji". interia.pl (in Polish). 16 July 2007.
^ Mateusz Piskorski [in Polish] (2010). Samoobrona RP w polskim systemie partyjnym (in Polish) (Dissertation ed.). Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań. p. 173.
^ Kolczyński, Mariusz; Mazur, Marek (2009). Broń masowego wrażenia. Kampania wyborcza 2007 r. w Polsce (in Polish). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Sejmowe. p. 174. ISBN 978-83-7059-902-7.
^ Górka, Marek; Magierek, Dariusz (2012). "Partie populistyczne na przykładzie wyborów parlamentarnych w 2007 roku". Wrocławskie Studia Politologiczne (in Polish). 13. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego: 107–120.
^ Mesežnikov, Grigorij; Gyárfášová, Oľga [in Slovak]; Smilov, Daniel (2008). "Populist Politics and Liberal Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe" (PDF). Working Papers. Bratislava: Institute for Public Affairs: 98.
^ Kącki, Marcin (2013). Lepperiada (in Polish). Wołowiec: Wydawnictwo Czarne. p. 190. ISBN 978-83-7536-583-2.
^ Izabela Kacprzak (27 December 2012). "Jak upadał Andrzej Lepper". rp.pl (in Polish). Retrieved 27 August 2023.
^ Kacprzak, Izabela (19 March 2024). "Centralne Biuro Antykorupcyjne przechodzi do historii. Rząd chce uzdrowić służbę". rp.pl (in Polish).
^ "Liga i Samoobrona". interia.pl (in Polish).
^ ^a ^b ^c "Samoobrona zostaje w koalicji. Powstanie LiS" (in Polish). 16 July 2007.
^ Zając, Ryszard (15 July 2007). "Mapa drogowa Giertycha" (in Polish).
^ Bale, Tim; Szczerbiak, Aleks (December 2006). "Why is there no Christian Democracy in Poland (and why does this matter)?". Party Politics. SEI Working Paper. 14 (4). Sussex European Institute: 13. ISSN 1350-4649.
^ Gorbaniuk, Oleg [in Polish] (2010). "Wpływ katastrofy pod Smoleńskiem na atrybucję cech osobowości ugrupowaniom politycznym" [The Impact of the Smolensk Air Crash on the Attribution of Personality Traits to Political Parties] (PDF). Current Problems of Psychiatry. 11 (2). John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin: 118.
^ Mateusz Piskorski [in Polish] (2010). Samoobrona RP w polskim systemie partyjnym (in Polish) (Dissertation ed.). Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań. p. 363.
^ Gabriele Lesser (3 February 1999). "Polens radikaler Bauernführer". taz.de (in German).
^ "LiS ma sposób na PiS" (in Polish). 6 August 2007.
^ Uhlig, Dominik; Załuska, Wojciech (17 July 2007). "My sie LiS-u nie boimy". Gazeta Wyborcza (in Polish).
^ Pellen, Cédric (2010). "Sociologie d'un groupement politique illégitime. Le mouvement Samoobrona (Autodéfense) en Pologne (1991-2010)" (PDF). Science politique (in French). 4. Université de Bordeaux; Université Montesquieu-Bordeaux: 552.
^ Krzysztof Jasiewicz; Agnieszka Jasiewicz-Betkiewicz (2007). "Poland". European Journal of Political Research. 46 (6–7). European Consortium for Political Research: 1069. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2007.00752.x. In its public statements, Self-Defense has been critical (often harshly) of the legacies of both communism and Solidarity, yet among its leaders there are several individuals formerly associated with the communist regime. Its support for state interventionism and opposition to market mechanisms place it on the political far left.
^ Wojtkielewicz, Wojciech (19 July 2007). "LiS jest pospolitym zdrajcą". poranny.pl (in Polish).
^ Schuller, Konrad (16 July 2007). "„Wir wollen den EU-Vertrag verhindern"". faz.net (in German). Warsaw.
^ Wojciechowska, Joanna (18 July 2007). "LiS zapowiada obronę polskiej ziemi". gazeta.pl (in Polish). Olsztyn.
^ Kolczyński, Mariusz; Mazur, Marek (2009). Broń masowego wrażenia. Kampania wyborcza 2007 r. w Polsce (in Polish). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Sejmowe. pp. 61–62. ISBN 978-83-7059-902-7.
^ Wos, Rafal (20 July 2007). "Der polnische Chavez". stern.de (in German).
^ Kaszuba, Agnieszka (20 July 2007). "Drapieżne Kaczory porwą LiSa?". poranny.pl (in Polish).
^ ^a ^b Gosiewski, Przemysław (17 July 2007). "PiS-owi LiS obojętny". polskieradio.pl (in Polish).
^ Gerrit Voerman [in Dutch]; Dirk Strijker; Ida Terluin (2015). "The Polish Self-Defence party: from agrarian protest to the politics of populism, 1991-2007". In B. Stanley (ed.). Rural Protest Groups and Populist Political Parties. Wageningen Academic Publishers. p. 196. doi:10.3920/978-90-8686-807-0. ISBN 9789086862597.
^ "LiS chce zakończenia zagranicznych misji". rmf24.pl (in Polish). 14 August 2007.
^ Pustułka, Witold (23 July 2007). "Czy LiS przestraszy się PiS?" (in Polish).
^ Kolczyński, Mariusz; Mazur, Marek (2009). Broń masowego wrażenia. Kampania wyborcza 2007 r. w Polsce (in Polish). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Sejmowe. p. 32. ISBN 978-83-7059-902-7.
^ Kolczyński, Mariusz; Mazur, Marek (2009). Broń masowego wrażenia. Kampania wyborcza 2007 r. w Polsce (in Polish). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Sejmowe. p. 29. ISBN 978-83-7059-902-7.

[wp_1-1] ^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h "LPR i Samoobrona razem jako LiS". wp.pl (in Polish). 16 July 2007.

[parkiet-2] "Koalicja rządowa trwa, powstaje nowa partia Liga i Samoobrona". parkiet.com (in Polish). 16 July 2007.

[3] Szefs, Slawek (17 July 2007). "LiS – cunning like a fox?". Polskie Radio. Archived from the original on 15 April 2024.

[zarzad-4] "Powołano zarząd LiS-u". wprost.pl (in Polish). 17 July 2007.

[ploski-5] ^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f Płoski, Marcin (2016). Liga Polskich Rodzin jako aktor społeczny (in Polish). Wrocław. p. 105. ISBN 978-83-63322-28-1.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)

[6] "Sprawozdanie o źródłach pozyskania środków finansowych, w tym kredytach bankowych i warunkach ich uzyskania oraz o wydatkach poniesionych ze środków Funduszu Wyborczego w poprzednim roku kalendarzowym" (PDF). gov.pl (in Polish). Państwowa Komisja Wyborcza. 2007.

[czysci-7] "Lepper czyści partię". wp.pl (in Polish). 8 December 2007.

[liga_prawicy-8] "Liga Prawicy Rzeczpospolitej". money.pl (in Polish). 2 October 2007.

[inter1-9] "Lepper i Giertych kontra PiS". interia.pl (in Polish). 14 July 2007.

[tur-10] Chatzistavrou, Filippa (December 2010). "Early preferences of national political parties in the EU for Turkey's accession". Southeast European and Black Sea Studies. 10 (4). Hellenic Foundation for European and Foreign Policy (ELIAMEP): 403. doi:10.1080/14683857.2010.529991. ISSN 1468-3857.

[dw-11] Pallokat, Jan (16 July 2007). "Polens Politschauspiel". dw.com (in German).

[wolodzko-12] Wołodźko, Krzysztof [in Polish] (18 July 2007). "Porozumienie ponad słabościami". Polskie Radio 24 (in Polish). Polskie Radio.

[13] 
Vlastimil Havlik; Anete Pinkova (2012). Populist Political Parties in East-Central Europe. Masaryk University Press. p. 174. ISBN 978-8021061057.
Kolczyński, Mariusz; Mazur, Marek (2009). Broń masowego wrażenia. Kampania wyborcza 2007 r. w Polsce [Weapons of Mass Impression. The 2007 Election Campaign in Poland] (in Polish). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Sejmowe. p. 323. ISBN 978-83-7059-902-7. W kontekście budowania tożsamości partia określa się jako lewica, którą charakteryzuje, podobnie jak cały ruch socjalistyczny, oddolny, społeczny sprzeciw wobec krzywdzicieli. [In terms of identity-building, the party defines itself as a left-wing party characterised, like the socialist movement as a whole, by grassroots, social opposition to wrong-doers.]
van Kessel, Stijn (2013). "A Matter of Supply and Demand: The Electoral Performance of Populist Parties in Three European Countries". Government and Opposition. 48 (2). Cambridge University Press: 187. doi:10.1017/gov.2012.14. ISSN 1477-7053. Whereas Self-Defence clearly complied with the characteristics of a populist party, the League of Polish Families was something of a borderline case. Despite the lack of a clearly developed programme, [League and] Self-Defence could be considered to be a left-wing populist party in terms of socioeconomic policies, and the party mainly attracted support in poorer rural areas.
Górka, Marek; Magierek, Dariusz (2012). "Partie populistyczne na przykładzie wyborów parlamentarnych w 2007 roku". Wrocławskie Studia Politologiczne (in Polish). 13. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego: 113. Lider LPR robił wszystko, by ocalić koalicję PiS—Samoobrona—LPR. I, jak się wydaje, w tej perspektywie należy postrzegać inicjatywę powołania LiS. [...] Mimo że populistyczne rozwiązania programowe oraz roszczeniowa postawa względem państwa zbliżały do siebie obie partie, to jednak wyrastały z odmiennych ideologii politycznych, dlatego fuzja ultrakatolickiej i narodowej retoryki LPR z lewicową mentalnością Samoobrony stanowiły — mówiąc językiem publicystycznym — „zabieg z zakresu inżynierii genetycznej". [The leader of LPR did everything to save the PiS—Samoobrona—LPR coalition. And, it seems, the initiative to establish LiS should be seen in this perspective. [...] While populist programme solutions and a demanding attitude towards the state brought the two parties closer together, they grew out of different political ideologies, which is why the fusion of the ultra-Catholic and nationalist rhetoric of the LPR with the left-wing mentality of Samoobrona constituted - in the journalistic language - a ‘genetic engineering procedure’.]

[14] Vlastimil Havlik; Anete Pinkova (2012). Populist Political Parties in East-Central Europe. Masaryk University Press. p. 174. ISBN 978-8021061057.

[15] Kolczyński, Mariusz; Mazur, Marek (2009). Broń masowego wrażenia. Kampania wyborcza 2007 r. w Polsce [Weapons of Mass Impression. The 2007 Election Campaign in Poland] (in Polish). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Sejmowe. p. 323. ISBN 978-83-7059-902-7. W kontekście budowania tożsamości partia określa się jako lewica, którą charakteryzuje, podobnie jak cały ruch socjalistyczny, oddolny, społeczny sprzeciw wobec krzywdzicieli. [In terms of identity-building, the party defines itself as a left-wing party characterised, like the socialist movement as a whole, by grassroots, social opposition to wrong-doers.]

[16] van Kessel, Stijn (2013). "A Matter of Supply and Demand: The Electoral Performance of Populist Parties in Three European Countries". Government and Opposition. 48 (2). Cambridge University Press: 187. doi:10.1017/gov.2012.14. ISSN 1477-7053. Whereas Self-Defence clearly complied with the characteristics of a populist party, the League of Polish Families was something of a borderline case. Despite the lack of a clearly developed programme, [League and] Self-Defence could be considered to be a left-wing populist party in terms of socioeconomic policies, and the party mainly attracted support in poorer rural areas.

[17] Górka, Marek; Magierek, Dariusz (2012). "Partie populistyczne na przykładzie wyborów parlamentarnych w 2007 roku". Wrocławskie Studia Politologiczne (in Polish). 13. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego: 113. Lider LPR robił wszystko, by ocalić koalicję PiS—Samoobrona—LPR. I, jak się wydaje, w tej perspektywie należy postrzegać inicjatywę powołania LiS. [...] Mimo że populistyczne rozwiązania programowe oraz roszczeniowa postawa względem państwa zbliżały do siebie obie partie, to jednak wyrastały z odmiennych ideologii politycznych, dlatego fuzja ultrakatolickiej i narodowej retoryki LPR z lewicową mentalnością Samoobrony stanowiły — mówiąc językiem publicystycznym — „zabieg z zakresu inżynierii genetycznej". [The leader of LPR did everything to save the PiS—Samoobrona—LPR coalition. And, it seems, the initiative to establish LiS should be seen in this perspective. [...] While populist programme solutions and a demanding attitude towards the state brought the two parties closer together, they grew out of different political ideologies, which is why the fusion of the ultra-Catholic and nationalist rhetoric of the LPR with the left-wing mentality of Samoobrona constituted - in the journalistic language - a ‘genetic engineering procedure’.]

[fokus-14] "Regierungskrise: Kaczynskis fordern Neuwahlen". fokus.de (in German). 12 November 2007.

[15] Agata Górny; Aleksandra Grzymała-Kazłowska; Piotr Koryś; Agnieszka Weinar (December 2003). "Multiple citizenship in Poland" (PDF). Prace Migracyjne. 53 (1). Institute for Social Studies Warsaw University: 45. We did not consider the populist far-left (Samoobrona) and the nationalistic far right wing (LPR) nor the Polish Peasants' Party: PSL. There were many reasons for such a decision. None of the two extreme parties had representatives in the parliament of the 3rd term, when the debate over citizenship reached its peak.

[gazeta_1-16] Szacki, Wojciech; Grochal, Renata (16 July 2007). "Co LiS zrobi PiS?". wyborcza.pl (in Polish).

[rae-17] Rae, Gavin (2008). Poland's Return to Capitalism: From the Socialist Bloc to the European Union. I.B. Tauris. p. 174. ISBN 978-1-84511-474-9.

[sal_10-18] "Nie było LiS-a...zapomniał". salon24.pl (in Polish). 27 June 2010.

[bez1-19] "Bez Samoobrony nie ma LPR". dziennik.pl (in Polish). 13 October 2007.

[spółka-20] "Mamba z Ostrołęki rozszyfrowała skrót "LiS"". moja-ostroleka.pl (in Polish). Ostrołęka. 16 July 2007.

[nzz1-21] "Politische Ränkespiele in Polen". Neue Zürcher Zeitung (in German). 17 July 2007.

[22] "LiS nie odbiera głosów innym partiom". TVN24 (in Polish). 25 July 2007.

[pis_172-23] Mateusz Piskorski [in Polish] (2010). Samoobrona RP w polskim systemie partyjnym (in Polish) (Dissertation ed.). Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań. p. 172.

[figiel-24] Figiel, Agnieszka (2009). Języki IV RP: Podziały społeczno-polityczne w dyskursie polityki (in Polish). Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Nauk Społecznych UaM. pp. 110–111. ISBN 978-83-929763-0-1.

[cosmo-25] "Die polnische Regierungskrise". cosmopolis.ch (in German). 9 August 2007.

[ostpol-26] Hreczuk, Agnieszka (2 August 2007). "Koalition als Kartenhaus". ostpol.de (in German).

[antoszewski_quote-27] Andrzej Antoszewski [in Polish] (2005). Partie polityczne Europy Środkowej i Wschodniej (in Polish). Poznań-Wrocław: Wyższa Szkoła Zarządzania i Bankowości w Poznaniu. p. 180. ISBN 83-88544-63-2. Jedyne ugrupowanie ekstremalnej lewicy, które nie jest formacją neokomunistyczną, to polska Samoobrona. W wielu momentach jej program gospodarczy, akcentujący głównie konieczność powstrzymania prywatyzacji oraz ochronę narodowych interesów, jest zbieżny z postulatami partii neokomunistycznych. [The only grouping of the extreme left that is not a neo-communist formation is the Polish Samoobrona. At many points, its economic programme, which mainly emphasises the need to stop privatisation and to protect national interests, coincides with the demands of neo-communist parties.]

[tomas_61-28] Tomasiewicz, Jarosław [in Polish] (2023). "Populiści w poszukiwaniu tożsamości – ideologiczne inspiracje Samoobrony (1991–2007)". Praktyka Teoretyczna (in Polish). 48 (2): 61. doi:10.19195/prt.2023.2.2.

[tomas_55-29] Tomasiewicz, Jarosław [in Polish] (2023). "Populiści w poszukiwaniu tożsamości – ideologiczne inspiracje Samoobrony (1991–2007)". Praktyka Teoretyczna (in Polish). 48 (2): 55. doi:10.19195/prt.2023.2.2.

[30] Mudde, Cas (2005). Racist Extremism in Central and Eastern Europe. London and New York: Taylor & Francis Group. p. 149. ISBN 0-203-00237-7.

[31] "Samoobrona zerwała kolejną samorządową koalicję z SLD". Gazeta Wyborcza (in Polish). 17 March 2003.

[wp_2_f-32] "Łódzka Samoobrona rozwodzi się z SLD". wp.pl (in Polish). 12 March 2003.

[33] "SLD-PSL: Jak się zaczynało, jak kończyło". tygodnikpowszechny.pl (in Polish). 9 March 2003.

[34] Pankowski, Rafał (2010). "Self-Defence: Radical Populism". The Populist Radical Right in Poland: The Patriots. Routledge. pp. 112–125. ISBN 978-0-203-85656-7.

[35] Bachrynowski, Szymon (2012). Populism in Central and Eastern Europe – Challenge for the Future? Documentation of an Expert Workshop (PDF). Heinrich Böll Stifung. p. 12.

[36] Zarycki, Tomasz; Kolankiewicz, George (2003). Regional Issues in Polish Politics. SSEES Occasional Papers. London: School of Slavonic and East European Studies. p. 137. ISBN 0903425718.

[37] Zarycki, Tomasz; Kolankiewicz, George (2003). Regional Issues in Polish Politics. SSEES Occasional Papers. London: School of Slavonic and East European Studies. p. 144. ISBN 0903425718.

[zuba-38] Moroska, Aleksandra; Zuba, Krzysztof (2010). "Two faces of Polish populism: the causes of the success and fall of Self Defence and the League of Polish Families". Totalitarismus und Demokratie. 7 (1). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht: 123–147. ISSN 1612-9008.

[39] "Do parlamentu po raz dziesiąty powraca temat związków partnerskich". 6 June 2018.

[40] Tomasiewicz, Jarosław [in Polish] (2023). "Populiści w poszukiwaniu tożsamości – ideologiczne inspiracje Samoobrony (1991–2007)". Praktyka Teoretyczna (in Polish). 48 (2): 48. doi:10.19195/prt.2023.2.2.

[41] Mateusz Piskorski [in Polish] (2010). Samoobrona RP w polskim systemie partyjnym (in Polish) (Dissertation ed.). Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań. p. 108.

[42] "Lepper i Giertych jednoczą swoje partie". wp.pl (in Polish). 26 January 2006.

[43] "Lepper i Giertych razem". interia.pl (in Polish). 26 January 2006.

[44] "Lepper z Giertychem razem do wyborów?". wp.pl (in Polish). 26 January 2006.

[45] "Lepper: Samoobrona w koalicji, powstaje nowa partia". pb.pl (in Polish). 16 July 2007.

[46] "Samoobrona i Liga przełkną upokorzenie". wp.pl (in Polish). 28 August 2007.

[47] Schuller, Konrad (20 July 2007). "Kaczynski stellt Bedingungen". faz.net (in German).

[gazeta_2-48] "Piskorski i Chruszcz o LiS". gazeta.pl (in Polish). 17 July 2007.

[49] Szacki, Wojciech (17 July 2007). "Uciec LiS-em przed PiS-em". wyborcza.pl (in Polish).

[50] "Experten geben neuer Partei LiS gute Chancen". derstandard.at (in German). 18 July 2007.

[bankier_l-51] "Samoobrona i Liga mogą liczyć na większe poparcie razem niż osobno". bankier.pl (in Polish). 16 July 2007.

[52] J. Miedzińska (16 July 2007). "Osobisty dowód niewinności". Polskie Radio Program I (in Polish). Polskie Radio.

[53] "LiS nie odpowie do piątku PiS". rmf24.pl (in Polish). 24 July 2007.

[54] Szacki, Wojciech; Uhlig, Dominik; Załuska, Wojciech (1 August 2007). "PiS kusi Giertycha". wyborcza.pl (in Polish).

[55] "Giertych: chcemy z Lepperem dalej budować LiS". wp.pl (in Polish). 5 August 2007.

[demonicz-56] Wieczorek, Hanna; Wosik, Magda; Lontkowski, Jan (23 July 2007). "Cień demonicznej kaczki". Nasze Miasto (in Polish). Wrocław.

[57] "Kaczynskis Koalition vor dem Aus - Neuwahlen wahrscheinlich". spiegel.de (in German). 5 August 2007.

[58] "Liga chce nowego premiera". tvn24.pl (in Polish). 5 August 2007.

[59] "Giertych: wiem, co zrobi Samoobrona". tvn24.pl (in Polish). 5 August 2007.

[60] Konicz, Tomasz (8 August 2007). "Die Graue Eminenz". telepolis.de (in German).

[61] "Sondaż: ponad połowa Polaków chce jesiennych wyborów". tvn.pl (in Polish). 22 August 2007.

[62] "Koniec Sejmu V kadencji". money.pl (in Polish). 7 September 2007.

[63] Krzymowski, Michał (20 August 2007). "To LiS a nie PiS szykuje „obyczajówkę" na Tuska". wprost.pl (in Polish).

[ivrp-64] "Andrzej Lepper: To Samoobrona jest twórcą IV RP" (in Polish). 9 June 2007.

[przyz-65] "Będzie LiS - przystawki się jednoczą". money.pl (in Polish). 16 July 2007.

[milosc-66] "LiS, czyli krótka miłość Leppera z Giertychem". dziennik.pl (in Polish). 5 November 2007.

[67] Lis, Tomasz (27 September 2006). "Indispensable Lepper". Courier International (in French).

[68] Drozd-Piasecka, Mirosława [in Polish] (2012). "Wizerunek przywódcy Samoobrony Andrzeja Leppera w przekazie medialnym" (PDF). Ethnografia Polska (in Polish). 56 (1–2): 9. ISSN 0071-1861.

[69] "Samoobrona i LPR zostają w koalicji". interia.pl (in Polish). 16 July 2007.

[pis_173-70] Mateusz Piskorski [in Polish] (2010). Samoobrona RP w polskim systemie partyjnym (in Polish) (Dissertation ed.). Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań. p. 173.

[71] Kolczyński, Mariusz; Mazur, Marek (2009). Broń masowego wrażenia. Kampania wyborcza 2007 r. w Polsce (in Polish). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Sejmowe. p. 174. ISBN 978-83-7059-902-7.

[górka-72] Górka, Marek; Magierek, Dariusz (2012). "Partie populistyczne na przykładzie wyborów parlamentarnych w 2007 roku". Wrocławskie Studia Politologiczne (in Polish). 13. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego: 107–120.

[brat_98-73] Mesežnikov, Grigorij; Gyárfášová, Oľga [in Slovak]; Smilov, Daniel (2008). "Populist Politics and Liberal Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe" (PDF). Working Papers. Bratislava: Institute for Public Affairs: 98.

[lepperiada-74] Kącki, Marcin (2013). Lepperiada (in Polish). Wołowiec: Wydawnictwo Czarne. p. 190. ISBN 978-83-7536-583-2.

[rp_suicide-75] Izabela Kacprzak (27 December 2012). "Jak upadał Andrzej Lepper". rp.pl (in Polish). Retrieved 27 August 2023.

[76] Kacprzak, Izabela (19 March 2024). "Centralne Biuro Antykorupcyjne przechodzi do historii. Rząd chce uzdrowić służbę". rp.pl (in Polish).

[interia-77] "Liga i Samoobrona". interia.pl (in Polish).

[wp_pw-78] "Samoobrona zostaje w koalicji. Powstanie LiS" (in Polish). 16 July 2007.

[79] Zając, Ryszard (15 July 2007). "Mapa drogowa Giertycha" (in Polish).

[80] Bale, Tim; Szczerbiak, Aleks (December 2006). "Why is there no Christian Democracy in Poland (and why does this matter)?". Party Politics. SEI Working Paper. 14 (4). Sussex European Institute: 13. ISSN 1350-4649.

[81] Gorbaniuk, Oleg [in Polish] (2010). "Wpływ katastrofy pod Smoleńskiem na atrybucję cech osobowości ugrupowaniom politycznym" [The Impact of the Smolensk Air Crash on the Attribution of Personality Traits to Political Parties] (PDF). Current Problems of Psychiatry. 11 (2). John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin: 118.

[82] Mateusz Piskorski [in Polish] (2010). Samoobrona RP w polskim systemie partyjnym (in Polish) (Dissertation ed.). Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań. p. 363.

[83] Gabriele Lesser (3 February 1999). "Polens radikaler Bauernführer". taz.de (in German).

[84] "LiS ma sposób na PiS" (in Polish). 6 August 2007.

[85] Uhlig, Dominik; Załuska, Wojciech (17 July 2007). "My sie LiS-u nie boimy". Gazeta Wyborcza (in Polish).

[86] Pellen, Cédric (2010). "Sociologie d'un groupement politique illégitime. Le mouvement Samoobrona (Autodéfense) en Pologne (1991-2010)" (PDF). Science politique (in French). 4. Université de Bordeaux; Université Montesquieu-Bordeaux: 552.

[87] Krzysztof Jasiewicz; Agnieszka Jasiewicz-Betkiewicz (2007). "Poland". European Journal of Political Research. 46 (6–7). European Consortium for Political Research: 1069. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2007.00752.x. In its public statements, Self-Defense has been critical (often harshly) of the legacies of both communism and Solidarity, yet among its leaders there are several individuals formerly associated with the communist regime. Its support for state interventionism and opposition to market mechanisms place it on the political far left.

[88] Wojtkielewicz, Wojciech (19 July 2007). "LiS jest pospolitym zdrajcą". poranny.pl (in Polish).

[89] Schuller, Konrad (16 July 2007). "„Wir wollen den EU-Vertrag verhindern"". faz.net (in German). Warsaw.

[90] Wojciechowska, Joanna (18 July 2007). "LiS zapowiada obronę polskiej ziemi". gazeta.pl (in Polish). Olsztyn.

[91] Kolczyński, Mariusz; Mazur, Marek (2009). Broń masowego wrażenia. Kampania wyborcza 2007 r. w Polsce (in Polish). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Sejmowe. pp. 61–62. ISBN 978-83-7059-902-7.

[92] Wos, Rafal (20 July 2007). "Der polnische Chavez". stern.de (in German).

[93] Kaszuba, Agnieszka (20 July 2007). "Drapieżne Kaczory porwą LiSa?". poranny.pl (in Polish).

[jedynka_1-94] Gosiewski, Przemysław (17 July 2007). "PiS-owi LiS obojętny". polskieradio.pl (in Polish).

[95] Gerrit Voerman [in Dutch]; Dirk Strijker; Ida Terluin (2015). "The Polish Self-Defence party: from agrarian protest to the politics of populism, 1991-2007". In B. Stanley (ed.). Rural Protest Groups and Populist Political Parties. Wageningen Academic Publishers. p. 196. doi:10.3920/978-90-8686-807-0. ISBN 9789086862597.

[96] "LiS chce zakończenia zagranicznych misji". rmf24.pl (in Polish). 14 August 2007.

[97] Pustułka, Witold (23 July 2007). "Czy LiS przestraszy się PiS?" (in Polish).

[98] Kolczyński, Mariusz; Mazur, Marek (2009). Broń masowego wrażenia. Kampania wyborcza 2007 r. w Polsce (in Polish). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Sejmowe. p. 32. ISBN 978-83-7059-902-7.

[99] Kolczyński, Mariusz; Mazur, Marek (2009). Broń masowego wrażenia. Kampania wyborcza 2007 r. w Polsce (in Polish). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Sejmowe. p. 29. ISBN 978-83-7059-902-7.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]

[13]

[A]

[14]

[15]

[16]

[17]

[18]

[19]

[20]

[21]

[22]

[23]

[24]

[25]

[26]

[27]

[28]

[29]

[30]

[31]

[32]

[33]

[34]

[35]

[36]

[37]

[38]

[39]

[40]

[41]

[42]

[43]

[44]

[45]

[46]

[47]

[48]

[49]

[50]

[51]

[52]

[53]

[54]

[55]

[56]

[57]

[58]

[59]

[60]

[61]

[62]

[63]

[64]

[65]

[66]

[67]

[68]

[69]

[70]

[71]

[72]

[73]

[74]

[75]

[76]

[77]

[78]

[79]

[80]

[81]

[82]

[83]

[84]

[85]

[86]

[87]

[88]

[89]

[90]

[91]

[92]

[93]

[94]

[95]

[96]

[97]

[98]

[99]

@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 | slogan           = ''{{nowrap|Strong as a lion, cunning as a fox}}<br>({{lang-pl|Mocny jak lew, chytry jak lis}})''<ref name="gazeta_1">{{cite web |url=https://wyborcza.pl/7,75398,4316256.html |title=Co LiS zrobi PiS? |date=16 July 2007 |first1=Wojciech |last1=Szacki |first2=Renata |last2=Grochal |website=wyborcza.pl |language=pl}}</ref>
 | anthem           =
-| position         = [[Left-wing]]<ref>{{bulleted list|{{cite book |title=Populist Political Parties in East-Central Europe |author1=Vlastimil Havlik |author2=Anete Pinkova |year=2012 |isbn=978-8021061057 |publisher=Masaryk University Press |page=174}}|{{cite book |title=Broń masowego wrażenia. Kampania wyborcza 2007 r. w Polsce |trans-title=Weapons of Mass Impression. The 2007 Election Campaign in Poland |language=pl |year=2009 |isbn=978-83-7059-902-7 |first1=Mariusz |last1=Kolczyński |first2=Marek |last2=Mazur |location=Warszawa |publisher=Wydawnictwo Sejmowe |page=323 |quote="W kontekście budowania tożsamości partia określa się jako lewica, którą charakteryzuje, podobnie jak cały ruch socjalistyczny, oddolny, społeczny sprzeciw wobec krzywdzicieli." |trans-quote="In terms of identity-building, the party defines itself as a left-wing party characterised, like the socialist movement as a whole, by grassroots, social opposition to wrong-doers."}}|{{cite journal |last=van Kessel |first=Stijn |year=2013 |title=A Matter of Supply and Demand: The Electoral Performance of Populist Parties in Three European Countries |journal=Government and Opposition |volume=48 |issue=2 |page=187 |doi=10.1017/gov.2012.14 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |issn=1477-7053 |quote="Whereas Self-Defence clearly complied with the characteristics of a populist party, the League of Polish Families was something of a borderline case. Despite the lack of a clearly developed programme, [League and] Self-Defence could be considered to be a left-wing populist party in terms of socioeconomic policies, and the party mainly attracted support in poorer rural areas."}}}}</ref>{{cref|A}}<br>{{nowrap|'''League of Polish Families:'''}}<br>[[Far-right]]<ref name="fokus">{{cite web |url=https://www.focus.de/politik/ausland/kaczynskis-fordern-neuwahlen-regierungskrise_id_2336422.html |title=Regierungskrise: Kaczynskis fordern Neuwahlen |date=12 November 2007 |language=de |website=fokus.de}}</ref><br>'''Samoobrona:'''<br>[[Far-left]]<ref>{{cite journal |title=Multiple citizenship in Poland |author1=Agata Górny |author2=Aleksandra Grzymała-Kazłowska |author3=Piotr Koryś |author4=Agnieszka Weinar |url=http://pdc.ceu.hu/archive/00001903/01/053.pdf |date=December 2003 |publisher=Institute for Social Studies Warsaw University |journal=Prace Migracyjne |volume=53 |issue=1 |page=45 |quote="We did not consider the populist far-left (Samoobrona) and the nationalistic far right wing (LPR) nor the Polish Peasants’ Party: PSL. There were many reasons for such a decision. None of the two extreme parties had representatives in the parliament of the 3rd term, when the debate over citizenship reached its peak."}}</ref>
+| position         = [[Left-wing]]<ref>{{bulleted list|{{cite book |title=Populist Political Parties in East-Central Europe |author1=Vlastimil Havlik |author2=Anete Pinkova |year=2012 |isbn=978-8021061057 |publisher=Masaryk University Press |page=174}}|{{cite book |title=Broń masowego wrażenia. Kampania wyborcza 2007 r. w Polsce |trans-title=Weapons of Mass Impression. The 2007 Election Campaign in Poland |language=pl |year=2009 |isbn=978-83-7059-902-7 |first1=Mariusz |last1=Kolczyński |first2=Marek |last2=Mazur |location=Warszawa |publisher=Wydawnictwo Sejmowe |page=323 |quote="W kontekście budowania tożsamości partia określa się jako lewica, którą charakteryzuje, podobnie jak cały ruch socjalistyczny, oddolny, społeczny sprzeciw wobec krzywdzicieli." |trans-quote="In terms of identity-building, the party defines itself as a left-wing party characterised, like the socialist movement as a whole, by grassroots, social opposition to wrong-doers."}}|{{cite journal |last=van Kessel |first=Stijn |year=2013 |title=A Matter of Supply and Demand: The Electoral Performance of Populist Parties in Three European Countries |journal=Government and Opposition |volume=48 |issue=2 |page=187 |doi=10.1017/gov.2012.14 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |issn=1477-7053 |quote="Whereas Self-Defence clearly complied with the characteristics of a populist party, the League of Polish Families was something of a borderline case. Despite the lack of a clearly developed programme, [League and] Self-Defence could be considered to be a left-wing populist party in terms of socioeconomic policies, and the party mainly attracted support in poorer rural areas."}}|{{cite journal |title=Partie populistyczne na przykładzie wyborów parlamentarnych w 2007 roku |language=pl |first1=Marek |last1=Górka |first2=Dariusz |last2=Magierek |journal=Wrocławskie Studia Politologiczne |year=2012 |volume=13 |page=113 |publisher=Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego |url=http://cejsh.icm.edu.pl/cejsh/element/bwmeta1.element.desklight-2c910d62-ae42-4469-ad8b-fe3dd5ebfba3 |trans-quote="The leader of LPR did everything to save the PiS—Samoobrona—LPR coalition. And, it seems, the initiative to establish LiS should be seen in this perspective. [...] While populist programme solutions and a demanding attitude towards the state brought the two parties closer together, they grew out of different political ideologies, which is why the fusion of the ultra-Catholic and nationalist rhetoric of the LPR with the left-wing mentality of Samoobrona constituted - in the journalistic language - a ‘genetic engineering procedure’." |quote="Lider LPR robił wszystko, by ocalić koalicję PiS—Samoobrona—LPR. I, jak się wydaje, w tej perspektywie należy postrzegać inicjatywę powołania LiS. [...] Mimo że populistyczne rozwiązania programowe oraz roszczeniowa postawa względem państwa zbliżały do siebie obie partie, to jednak wyrastały z odmiennych ideologii politycznych, dlatego fuzja ultrakatolickiej i narodowej retoryki LPR z lewicową mentalnością Samoobrony stanowiły — mówiąc językiem publicystycznym — „zabieg z zakresu inżynierii genetycznej”."}}}}</ref>{{cref|A}}<br>{{nowrap|'''League of Polish Families:'''}}<br>[[Far-right]]<ref name="fokus">{{cite web |url=https://www.focus.de/politik/ausland/kaczynskis-fordern-neuwahlen-regierungskrise_id_2336422.html |title=Regierungskrise: Kaczynskis fordern Neuwahlen |date=12 November 2007 |language=de |website=fokus.de}}</ref><br>'''Samoobrona:'''<br>[[Far-left]]<ref>{{cite journal |title=Multiple citizenship in Poland |author1=Agata Górny |author2=Aleksandra Grzymała-Kazłowska |author3=Piotr Koryś |author4=Agnieszka Weinar |url=http://pdc.ceu.hu/archive/00001903/01/053.pdf |date=December 2003 |publisher=Institute for Social Studies Warsaw University |journal=Prace Migracyjne |volume=53 |issue=1 |page=45 |quote="We did not consider the populist far-left (Samoobrona) and the nationalistic far right wing (LPR) nor the Polish Peasants’ Party: PSL. There were many reasons for such a decision. None of the two extreme parties had representatives in the parliament of the 3rd term, when the debate over citizenship reached its peak."}}</ref>
-| footnotes        = {{cnote|A|League and Self-Defense was a combination of a far-left and a far-right party, but the dominance of left-wing elements, especially on economic issues, was noted.<ref name="dw"/><ref name="rae"/> The coalition was also considered "not very right-wing".<ref name="sal_10"/><br> The far-left Samoobrona dominated LiS, as it had more recognition, MPs, popularity and was 7 times larger than LPR. Polish media noted that within LiS, the far-right LPR was dependent on Samoobrona.<ref name="bez1"/> International media also commented that Samoobrona held a quasi-hegemonic position in LiS.<ref name="nzz1"/><br>Polish commentator [[:pl:Krzysztof Wołodźko|Krzysztof Wołodźko]] described the party as [[Catholic left]], stating that it followed the tradition of "social[ist] left" as its main message, mixing it with religion and moral conservatism.<ref name=wolodzko>{{cite web |url=https://polskieradio24.pl/artykul/170837,porozumienie-ponad-slabosciami |title=Porozumienie ponad słabościami |date=18 July 2007 |author-link=:pl:Krzysztof Wołodźko |first=Krzysztof |last=Wołodźko |language=pl |website=[[Polskie Radio 24]] |publisher=[[Polskie Radio]]}}</ref>}}
+| footnotes        = {{cnote|A|League and Self-Defense was a combination of a far-left and a far-right party, but the dominance of left-wing elements, especially on economic issues, was noted.<ref name="dw"/><ref name="rae"/> The coalition was also considered "not very right-wing".<ref name="sal_10"/><br> The far-left Samoobrona dominated LiS, as it had more recognition, MPs, popularity and was 7 times larger than LPR. Polish media noted that within LiS, the far-right LPR was dependent on Samoobrona.<ref name="bez1"/> To accentuate it, some referred to LiS as ''Lepper i Spółka'' ("Lepper and others").<ref name="spółka">{{cite web |url=https://archiwum.moja-ostroleka.pl/mamba-z-ostroleki-rozszyfrowala-skrot-lis,1184619230,2.html |title=Mamba z Ostrołęki rozszyfrowała skrót "LiS" |language=pl |location=Ostrołęka |date=16 July 2007 |website=moja-ostroleka.pl}}</ref> International media also observed that Samoobrona held a hegemonic position in LiS.<ref name="nzz1"/><br>Polish commentator [[:pl:Krzysztof Wołodźko|Krzysztof Wołodźko]] described the party as [[Catholic left]], stating that it followed the tradition of "social[ist] left" as its main message, mixing it with religion and moral conservatism.<ref name=wolodzko>{{cite web |url=https://polskieradio24.pl/artykul/170837,porozumienie-ponad-slabosciami |title=Porozumienie ponad słabościami |date=18 July 2007 |author-link=:pl:Krzysztof Wołodźko |first=Krzysztof |last=Wołodźko |language=pl |website=[[Polskie Radio 24]] |publisher=[[Polskie Radio]]}}</ref>}}
  }}
 [[File:Liga_i_Samoobrona_TVN24_logo.png|thumb|right|Logos of LPR and Samoobrona combined together, used by the news channel [[TVN24]] to depict LiS.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://tvn24.pl/polska/lis-nie-odbiera-glosow-innym-partiom-ra29298-ls3602723 |language=pl |date=25 July 2007 |title=LiS nie odbiera głosów innym partiom |website=[[TVN24]]}}</ref>]]
@@ Line 83: / Line 83: @@
 Most decisive behind the dissolution of League and Self-Defense was the executive committee of League of Polish Families, majority of which opted to go to the 2007 elections with the [[Right Wing of the Republic]] of [[Marek Jurek]] and the [[Real Politics Union]] instead of Self-Defence of the Republic of Poland. Later commenting on the dissolution of the coalition, Lepper also stated that no agreement has been found amongst the grassroots members of his party, who argued that the Samoobrona brand cannot disappear from the electoral lists. Lepper claimed that the Samoobrona field activists did not agree to collect signatures for LiS electoral lists. Media generally praised the decision to dissolve the party given how Samoobrona had a radically left-wing program whereas League of Polish Families was the trademark radical right populist party in Poland.<ref name="milosc">{{cite web |url=https://wiadomosci.dziennik.pl/polityka/artykuly/59040,lis-czyli-krotka-milosc-leppera-z-giertychem.html |title=LiS, czyli krótka miłość Leppera z Giertychem |date=5 November 2007 |website=dziennik.pl |language=pl}}</ref>
 ===2007 elections===
-After the coalition was cancelled, Samoobrona moved even further to the left and invited left-wing activists the party, such as [[Leszek Miller]] and a socialist [[Piotr Ikonowicz]].<ref name="pis_173">{{cite book |author1=Mateusz Piskorski |author-link=:pl:Mateusz Piskorski |date=2010 |location=Poznań |title=Samoobrona RP w polskim systemie partyjnym |publisher=Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań |language=pl |edition=Dissertation |page=173}}</ref> In response, LPR condemned its erstwhile coalition partner, accusing Samoobrona of cooperating with "communist apparatchiks".<ref>{{cite book |title=Broń masowego wrażenia. Kampania wyborcza 2007 r. w Polsce |language=pl |year=2009 |isbn=978-83-7059-902-7 |first1=Mariusz |last1=Kolczyński |first2=Marek |last2=Mazur |location=Warszawa |publisher=Wydawnictwo Sejmowe |page=174}}</ref> LPR joined forces with [[Real Politics Union]] and [[Right of the Republic]] to form a new alliance called [[League of the Right of the Republic]] (''Liga Prawicy Rzeczypospolitej''). Elections were held on 21 October 2007, in which the LPR Committee received 209,171 or 1.30% of the vote and did not enter parliament. Polls gave the party a slightly higher support of 3 per cent.<ref name="ploski">{{cite book |title=Liga Polskich Rodzin jako aktor społeczny |language=pl |page=105 |location=Wrocław |year=2016 |isbn=978-83-63322-28-1 |first=Marcin |last=Płoski}}</ref> After losing all their seats in the 2007 election, neither Samoobrona nor LPR regained political relevance. Andrzej Lepper died in August 2011 in unclear circumstances, with some ruling it as assassination and others as suicide.<ref name="rp_suicide">{{cite web |url=https://www.rp.pl/kraj/art5774281-jak-upadal-andrzej-lepper |date=27 December 2012 |title=Jak upadał Andrzej Lepper |author=Izabela Kacprzak |website=rp.pl |language=pl |access-date=27 August 2023}}</ref> The Central Anticorruption Bureau, responsible for the unlawful sting operation against Lepper that ultimately ended his political career, grew unpopular and was disbanded in March 2024.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.rp.pl/sluzby/art40012391-centralne-biuro-antykorupcyjne-przechodzi-do-historii-rzad-chce-uzdrowic-sluzbe |title=Centralne Biuro Antykorupcyjne przechodzi do historii. Rząd chce uzdrowić służbę |date=19 March 2024 |first=Izabela |last=Kacprzak |website=rp.pl |language=pl}}</ref>
+After the coalition was cancelled, Samoobrona moved even further to the left and invited left-wing activists the party, such as [[Leszek Miller]] and a socialist [[Piotr Ikonowicz]].<ref name="pis_173">{{cite book |author1=Mateusz Piskorski |author-link=:pl:Mateusz Piskorski |date=2010 |location=Poznań |title=Samoobrona RP w polskim systemie partyjnym |publisher=Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań |language=pl |edition=Dissertation |page=173}}</ref> In response, LPR condemned its erstwhile coalition partner, accusing Samoobrona of cooperating with "communist apparatchiks".<ref>{{cite book |title=Broń masowego wrażenia. Kampania wyborcza 2007 r. w Polsce |language=pl |year=2009 |isbn=978-83-7059-902-7 |first1=Mariusz |last1=Kolczyński |first2=Marek |last2=Mazur |location=Warszawa |publisher=Wydawnictwo Sejmowe |page=174}}</ref> LPR joined forces with [[Real Politics Union]] and [[Right of the Republic]] to form a new alliance called [[League of the Right of the Republic]] (''Liga Prawicy Rzeczypospolitej''). However, both parties sharply dropped in the polls following the dissolution of LiS. LPR's coalition with Real Politics Union and Right of the Republic was seen as even more ideologically inconsistent than LiS - the League of the Right of the Republic was unable to present an economic program, as the LPR held social and anti-capitalist positions, while the Real Politics Union under [[Janusz Korwin-Mikke]] presented [[Right-libertarianism|capitalist libertarian]] views. This warded off LPR's voters, and the party lost 67% of its 2005 electorate to Law and Justice.<ref name="górka">{{cite journal |title=Partie populistyczne na przykładzie wyborów parlamentarnych w 2007 roku |language=pl |first1=Marek |last1=Górka |first2=Dariusz |last2=Magierek |journal=Wrocławskie Studia Politologiczne |year=2012 |volume=13 |pages=107-120 |publisher=Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego |url=http://cejsh.icm.edu.pl/cejsh/element/bwmeta1.element.desklight-2c910d62-ae42-4469-ad8b-fe3dd5ebfba3}}</ref>
+Elections were held on 21 October 2007, in which the LPR Committee received 209,171 or 1.30% of the vote and did not enter parliament. Polls gave the party a slightly higher support of 3 per cent.<ref name="ploski">{{cite book |title=Liga Polskich Rodzin jako aktor społeczny |language=pl |page=105 |location=Wrocław |year=2016 |isbn=978-83-63322-28-1 |first=Marcin |last=Płoski}}</ref> Samoobrona failed to fare much better, as it won 247,335 votes, which amounted to	1.53% of the popular vote, which meant that it also failed to keep any of its seats.<ref name="brat_98">{{cite journal |page=98 |title=Populist Politics and Liberal Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe |location=Bratislava |year=2008 |first1=Grigorij |last1=Mesežnikov |author-link1=Grigorij Mesežnikov |first2=Oľga |last2=Gyárfášová |author-link2=:sk:Oľga Gyárfášová |first3=Daniel |last3=Smilov |publisher=Institute for Public Affairs |journal=Working Papers |url=http://pdc.ceu.hu/archive/00004891/01/1214822685__populist_politics.pdf}}</ref> This result devastated the party. Lepper and his party faced significant financial issues, and it was reported that Samoobrona's goal was not crossing the 5% electoral threshold in order to win parliamentary seats, but rather to cross at least the 3% threshold needed for state-paid reimbursement of election campaign costs. This escalated the financial problems of Samoobrona.<ref name="lepperiada">{{cite book |title=Lepperiada |language=pl |page=190 |location=Wołowiec |year=2013 |first=Marcin |last=Kącki |isbn=978-83-7536-583-2 |publisher=Wydawnictwo Czarne}}</ref> After losing all their seats in the 2007 election, neither Samoobrona nor LPR regained political relevance. Andrzej Lepper died in August 2011 in unclear circumstances, with some ruling it as assassination and others as suicide.<ref name="rp_suicide">{{cite web |url=https://www.rp.pl/kraj/art5774281-jak-upadal-andrzej-lepper |date=27 December 2012 |title=Jak upadał Andrzej Lepper |author=Izabela Kacprzak |website=rp.pl |language=pl |access-date=27 August 2023}}</ref> The Central Anticorruption Bureau, responsible for the unlawful sting operation against Lepper that ultimately ended his political career, grew unpopular and was disbanded in March 2024.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.rp.pl/sluzby/art40012391-centralne-biuro-antykorupcyjne-przechodzi-do-historii-rzad-chce-uzdrowic-sluzbe |title=Centralne Biuro Antykorupcyjne przechodzi do historii. Rząd chce uzdrowić służbę |date=19 March 2024 |first=Izabela |last=Kacprzak |website=rp.pl |language=pl}}</ref>
 ==Program==
 The main objectives of the coalition were to create a commission of inquiry into the Central Anticorruption Bureau and its operations, blocking the ratification of the European Union reform treaty that both members of the coalition were opposed to, stop the privatization process and "strengthen the constitutional protection of life", which would include introducing additional restrictions on abortion.<ref name="interia">{{cite web |url=https://encyklopedia.interia.pl/nauki-spoleczne-humanistyka/news-liga-i-samoobrona,nId,2133653 |title=Liga i Samoobrona |language=pl |website=interia.pl}}</ref> Both Samoobrona and LPR stressed opposition to the [[European Union]] as one of the main goals of the party, as both parties did not accept the EU Reform Treaty.<ref name="wp_1"/> The coalition was ultimately dominated by Samoobrona which had more Sejm and Senate seats than League of Polish Families,<ref name="cosmo"/> and polled 8% on its own in August 2007, compared to LPR's 3% (which would be below the 5% electoral threshold, thus putting LPR at risk of losing all its seats).<ref name="ostpol"/> According to the polls, Lepper was also preferred to become the leader of League and Self-Defence over LPR's leader Giertych, though a majority preferred the coalition to put forward a new, "fresh face" politician as its leader instead.<ref name="bankier_l">{{cite web |url=https://www.bankier.pl/wiadomosc/Samoobrona-i-Liga-moga-liczyc-na-wieksze-poparcie-razem-niz-osobno-1612353.html |title=Samoobrona i Liga mogą liczyć na większe poparcie razem niż osobno |date=16 July 2007 |website=bankier.pl |language=pl}}</ref> Polish daily [[Dziennik Polska-Europa-Świat]] remarked that "Without Samoobrona there is no LPR".<ref name="bez1"/>

League and Self-Defense Liga i Samoobrona (Polish)
Fox plush toy presented by Lepper and Giertych as the logo of LiS in July 2007.^[1]
Abbreviation	LiS^[2] (Fox)^[3]
Leader	Andrzej Lepper^[4] Roman Giertych^[4]
Presidium	Radosław Parda Mirosław Orzechowski Wojciech Wierzejski Genowefa Wiśniowska Krzysztof Sikora
Founded	16 July 2007^[5]
Registered	17 July 2007^[4]
Dissolved	7 September 2007^[5]
Headquarters	ul. Kinowa 19 U1, 04-030 Warsaw^[6]
Membership (2007)	~100,000^[7] (Samoobrona) ~14,000^[8] (League of Polish Families)
Ideology	National agrarianism^[9] Catholic nationalism^[10] Left-wing populism^[10] Anti-capitalism^[11] Catholic left^[12]
Political position	Left-wing^[13]^[A] League of Polish Families: Far-right^[14] Samoobrona: Far-left^[15]
Religion	Roman Catholic^[10]
Colours	Orange^[1] (customary) Yellow (Samoobrona) Blue (League of Polish Families)
Slogan	Strong as a lion, cunning as a fox (Template:Lang-pl)^[16]
Politics of Poland Political parties Elections ^ A: League and Self-Defense was a combination of a far-left and a far-right party, but the dominance of left-wing elements, especially on economic issues, was noted.^[11]^[17] The coalition was also considered "not very right-wing".^[18] The far-left Samoobrona dominated LiS, as it had more recognition, MPs, popularity and was 7 times larger than LPR. Polish media noted that within LiS, the far-right LPR was dependent on Samoobrona.^[19] To accentuate it, some referred to LiS as Lepper i Spółka ("Lepper and others").^[20] International media also observed that Samoobrona held a hegemonic position in LiS.^[21] Polish commentator Krzysztof Wołodźko described the party as Catholic left, stating that it followed the tradition of "social[ist] left" as its main message, mixing it with religion and moral conservatism.^[12]