Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Googolplexian: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→[[Googolplexian]]: delete |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
*Its claim, copied from the web site, that this is the "largest number with a name" is, further, false; as [[transfinite number]], which names several larger numbers, explains. There is no evidence that this word is in use by anything other than the referenced web sites, a bunch of submit-your-own-article web sites such as here and [[Urban Dictionary]], and a bunch of "Oh look at what daftness the web has come up with this week!" sites. It has zero Google Groups hits as a mathematical term. Even if it ''were'' a mathematical term, it is so contrived that it would belong in [[list of numbers]] rather than merit its own article. '''Delete'''. [[User:Uncle G|Uncle G]] 01:38, 2005 Apr 17 (UTC) |
*Its claim, copied from the web site, that this is the "largest number with a name" is, further, false; as [[transfinite number]], which names several larger numbers, explains. There is no evidence that this word is in use by anything other than the referenced web sites, a bunch of submit-your-own-article web sites such as here and [[Urban Dictionary]], and a bunch of "Oh look at what daftness the web has come up with this week!" sites. It has zero Google Groups hits as a mathematical term. Even if it ''were'' a mathematical term, it is so contrived that it would belong in [[list of numbers]] rather than merit its own article. '''Delete'''. [[User:Uncle G|Uncle G]] 01:38, 2005 Apr 17 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete'''. What Uncle G said. I was going to list this myself, but thought I would wait for a response on the talk page. This will do fine though. - [[User:Taxman|Taxman]] 03:08, Apr 17, 2005 (UTC) |
*'''Delete'''. What Uncle G said. I was going to list this myself, but thought I would wait for a response on the talk page. This will do fine though. - [[User:Taxman|Taxman]] 03:08, Apr 17, 2005 (UTC) |
||
*'''delete'''. neologism. and false claim, too. I say kilogoogolplexian is 100 times larger. [[User:Mikkalai|Mikkalai]] 04:18, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 04:18, 17 April 2005
- A Wikipedia neologism. Georgia guy 00:44, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Its claim, copied from the web site, that this is the "largest number with a name" is, further, false; as transfinite number, which names several larger numbers, explains. There is no evidence that this word is in use by anything other than the referenced web sites, a bunch of submit-your-own-article web sites such as here and Urban Dictionary, and a bunch of "Oh look at what daftness the web has come up with this week!" sites. It has zero Google Groups hits as a mathematical term. Even if it were a mathematical term, it is so contrived that it would belong in list of numbers rather than merit its own article. Delete. Uncle G 01:38, 2005 Apr 17 (UTC)
- Delete. What Uncle G said. I was going to list this myself, but thought I would wait for a response on the talk page. This will do fine though. - Taxman 03:08, Apr 17, 2005 (UTC)
- delete. neologism. and false claim, too. I say kilogoogolplexian is 100 times larger. Mikkalai 04:18, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)