User talk:Mikey551415

Re: WEPN-FM

What objections do you have to what I've been doing? There are a lot of things that are seemingly and deliberately unclear as to the nature of this TJ stunt, but one has to look at the URL of the station's current website to tell what's going on: "gemini13media". Gemini XIII is the current owner of United Stations Radio Networks, which distributes The TJ Show. That does not change the fact that Emmis may still be shopping the station in the background, and this is just an interim agreement.

Also the heading I had for the TJ section was more clear as to the current situation. ViperSnake151  Talk  00:21, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Hey Viper,

the Current owner is Emmis, please see this: [1]

Emmis is in process of trying To sell station but right now been unsuccessful they launched TJ 98.7 a pop up radio station Mikey551415 (talk) 00:25, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

The field operator is meant for situations when a station is being operated by someone other than its licensee (which in this case is Emmis), under a lease or local marketing agreement. Prior to this, the operator was Good Karma Brands and that was listed as such in the infobox. The owner field still lists the rightful, licensed owner as Emmis Communications. ViperSnake151  Talk  00:31, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Okay, however edit as citations were missing re-verting causes those missing citations that were added to disappear Mikey551415 (talk) 00:34, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Also kinda don’t matter @ViperSnake151 BlueboyLINY will keep reverting like he did before. He got me banned for a week rn Nick B (talk) 02:59, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

September 2024

Please refrain from abusing warning or blocking templates, as you did to User talk:BlueboyLINY. Doing so is a violation of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you. BlueboyLINY (talk) 00:46, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Nope you been reported doing what I need to Mikey551415 (talk) 00:53, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 01:22, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Mikey551415 (talk) 01:47, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Also @Bbb23 please see BlueboyLINY page as well they have been doing disruptive editing as well. I have attempted to resolve matter in the WEPN-FM talks page and it was resolved with a semi-Protection BlueboyLINY keeps editing it with wrong information. Mikey551415 (talk) 01:51, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

For BlueboyLINY Please stop Spamming my wall and personally attacking me appreciate it. I feel like you’re acting like a “Know it all” and it’s very annoying and absurd. You left wiki before cause of people kept editing stuff and you didn’t like it.. Get over it my man it’s Wikipedia  Mikey551415 (talk) 01:53, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

You also need to stop your disruptive editing I was told by Admin to give you the warnings and you kept clearing them form your talk page… @BlueboyLINY@Bbb23 Mikey551415 ALSO Bbb23 please note BlueBoy reverted WEPN-FM back to the way he had last.. How is that not Disruptive editing?!

Nick B (talk) 02:58, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

@ScottishFinnishRadish really could use your help..

here the situations;

Reaching out cause I was falsely banned by a report by user BlueboyLINY Bbb23 blocked me reason disruptive editing when BlueboyLINY on WEPN-FM PAGE Which you did semi protect cause of the war between the user and i (I appreciate that help btw!) the user kept reverting the changes and has done so again. I fixed the missing citation and removed that heading BlueboyLINY reverted now they are gone again, I have tried to peacefully settle matter as advised on The talk page but user still didn’t accept that. User continues to warn my Talk page for editing and reverting what they had. To me they are know it alls and are very controlling and if they can’t have it there way they have a fit and do anything to stop the other person from being able to edit. Which has been done… (me I been blocked) I feel Blue should be blocked. They will not let others edit other radio stations Wikipedia’s he keeps reverting them too. It’s like he wants full control over all the radio stations such as

WEPN FM WKTU WNEW AND Z100. This is not fair to other Wikipedia users, he has left wiki in past due to others always editing and stated when he removed it “I don’t need this shit”  this is unacceptable can you help at all?

top it off Blueboy has reverted the Page WEPN-FM back to the way he had it.. this is really getting out of hand and he removed the warnings I gave him and all… Daniel semi protected page due to this I requested it im tired of fighting and Blue reported me and gave me warnings for whatever reasons and got me blocked too.. this is ridiculous Nick B (talk) 03:15, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

@ScottishFinnishRadish can’t even edit my own user page either Nick B (talk) 03:19, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

@Bbb23, @ScottishFinnishRadish to also prove my point about this case please see his former profile as well: User:BlueboyLI And I quote “ I took a break from editing tv pages for about 6 months due to stubborn Wikipedia editors who don't seem to get what Wikipedia is, a collaboration. I'm back now in an effort to make Wikipedia better by adding information that I know to be factual.” -BlueboyLI @BlueboyLINY…. Nick B (talk) 03:23, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

{{Admin help}} Nick B (talk) 03:29, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

== Question for administrator ==

{{Admin help}}

Please see above Nick B (talk) 03:31, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

{{unblock}} Nick B (talk) 03:32, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

{{unblock}} Nick B (talk) 03:48, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Nick B (talk) 03:52, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

You have an open unblock request below, so an admin help tag is unnecessary. Please be patient. 331dot (talk) 07:38, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mikey551415 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Reaching out cause I was falsely banned by a report by user BlueboyLINY Bbb23 blocked me reason disruptive editing when BlueboyLINY on WEPN-FM PAGE Which you did semi protect cause of the war between the user and i (I appreciate that help btw!) the user kept reverting the changes and has done so again. I fixed the missing citation and removed that heading BlueboyLINY reverted now they are gone again, I have tried to peacefully settle matter as advised on The talk page but user still didn’t accept that. User continues to warn my Talk page for editing and reverting what they had. To me they are know it alls and are very controlling and if they can’t have it there way they have a fit and do anything to stop the other person from being able to edit. Which has been done… (me I been blocked) I feel Blue should be blocked. They will not let others edit other radio stations Wikipedia’s he keeps reverting them too. It’s like he wants full control over all the radio stations such as WEPN FM WKTU WNEW AND Z100. This is not fair to other Wikipedia users, he has left wiki in past due to others always editing and stated when he removed it “I don’t need this shit” this is unacceptable can you help at all? top it off Blueboy has reverted the Page WEPN-FM back to the way he had it.. this is really getting out of hand and he removed the warnings I gave him and all… Daniel semi protected page due to this I requested it im tired of fighting and Blue reported me and gave me warnings for whatever reasons and got me blocked too.. this is ridiculous! to also prove my point about this case please see his former profile as well: User:BlueboyLI And I quote “ I took a break from editing tv pages for about 6 months due to stubborn Wikipedia editors who don't seem to get what Wikipedia is, a collaboration. I'm back now in an effort to make Wikipedia better by adding information that I know to be factual.” -BlueboyLI @BlueboyLINY…. The funny thing is I have attempted to resolve matter peacefully on WEPN-FM talk page and was unsuccessful. Blue continued to keep reverting the page. It got very annoying. I requested a semi protective of page and got it.. Blue got me blocked and yet again reverted the page to where they wanted it.. Like this is Wikipedia we all should be able to edit things freely without this nonetheless. I am the victim here. I also feel like I am the target to Blue and I honestly have no idea as to why. Nick B (talk) 04:05, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Only your actions are relevant here, not those of other editors. Nothing here addresses your violations of WP:EW, nor your violations of WP:NPA. If you make a new unblock request, you need to talk only about your own actions. Yamla (talk) 10:15, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Mikey, you are disrupting this page. I removed the auto-block section you added. Stop signing as "Nick B". It's very close to the username of an administrator, and it's grossly misleading to editors looking at this page. If you continue in this manner, I will revoke your access to this page.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:16, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Signature is Nick B for following

@Bbb23 my signature is Nick B as that’s my real name. I don’t use my full last name on wiki you can’t tell me to stop signing as “Nick B” as it’s my real name Nick B (talk) 16:53, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

I suggest that when your block expires, you request that your username be changed to "Nick B".--Bbb23 (talk) 17:02, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

It will let me do that now I can look if you would like. Also can you send me source to do so Nick B (talk) 17:09, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

New Unblock request

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Mikey551415 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Firstly I would like to address the Editing warning myself and another member were not in agreement in a wiki page. I have attempted several times to resolve matter by using the pages Talk page. Please see this: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:WEPN-FM

However results didn’t go as expected. I requested semi protection of the page which was approved. I fixed page again to where it was suppose to be. Other User kept reverting it back to the way they wanted it. I had to fix it and keep re adding the missing citations too. User kept reverting it stills also started spamming my page with warnings. I was adviced by a Wiki administrator to warn them on there talk page which I did.

The user kept removing them.

I feel like the editing war could of been avoided if instead user used talk page on the section that I had to discuss matter more instead of reverting it non stop and making me having to go back and fix it too many times.. I feel personally attacked by the user.

For the personal attack issue: I did read over it. I feel like I did not violate those rules or standards. And if I did it was a mistake and I am sorry for that mistake. As much as I may disagree. I believe Wikipedia should be able to used by everyone and as long as we don’t have to have fights about a page I don’t see why we can’t have good time here. I do feel like the other user as well should be spoken too as I should have to feel when editing any radio station Wikipedia page that they will revert it to the way they had cause they disagree with it when there is a talk page and a section added that i added to discuss the matter but instead of the communication user just kept reverting which made me frustrated Project space I don’t think I violated if I did I apologize.

Editing Archives yes I do admit to do that on WEPN-FM page thus because in the archive of my edit the missing citations were there and it was easier doing it that way then having to re add them non stop.

The disruptive editing If I did violate I apologize I followed what admins advice was given which was report user which I did do and warned them and did the talk page on WEPN FM like advised. However, I don’t think I’m only one who violated this during this situation and if an admin can Email me a Guide on reporting user if I ever had to that be great the templates do confuse me and I had hard time filling them out or using correct usage command. So that’s my fault there. And I apologize will make sure not to do it again

If unblock request is approved I will react appropriately and do what’s best for Wikipedia community and it’s guidelines. I will request admin if we can’t come to resolution on matters too.

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Firstly I would like to address the Editing warning myself and another member were not in agreement in a wiki page. I have attempted several times to resolve matter by using the pages Talk page. Please see this: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:WEPN-FM However results didn’t go as expected. I requested semi protection of the page which was approved. I fixed page again to where it was suppose to be. Other User kept reverting it back to the way they wanted it. I had to fix it and keep re adding the missing citations too. User kept reverting it stills also started spamming my page with warnings. I was adviced by a Wiki administrator to warn them on there talk page which I did. The user kept removing them. I feel like the editing war could of been avoided if instead user used talk page on the section that I had to discuss matter more instead of reverting it non stop and making me having to go back and fix it too many times.. I feel personally attacked by the user. For the personal attack issue: I did read over it. I feel like I did not violate those rules or standards. And if I did it was a mistake and I am sorry for that mistake. As much as I may disagree. I believe Wikipedia should be able to used by everyone and as long as we don’t have to have fights about a page I don’t see why we can’t have good time here. I do feel like the other user as well should be spoken too as I should have to feel when editing any radio station Wikipedia page that they will revert it to the way they had cause they disagree with it when there is a talk page and a section added that i added to discuss the matter but instead of the communication user just kept reverting which made me frustrated Project space I don’t think I violated if I did I apologize. Editing Archives yes I do admit to do that on WEPN-FM page thus because in the archive of my edit the missing citations were there and it was easier doing it that way then having to re add them non stop. The disruptive editing If I did violate I apologize I followed what admins advice was given which was report user which I did do and warned them and did the talk page on WEPN FM like advised. However, I don’t think I’m only one who violated this during this situation and if an admin can Email me a Guide on reporting user if I ever had to that be great the templates do confuse me and I had hard time filling them out or using correct usage command. So that’s my fault there. And I apologize will make sure not to do it again If unblock request is approved I will react appropriately and do what’s best for Wikipedia community and it’s guidelines. I will request admin if we can’t come to resolution on matters too. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Firstly I would like to address the Editing warning myself and another member were not in agreement in a wiki page. I have attempted several times to resolve matter by using the pages Talk page. Please see this: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:WEPN-FM However results didn’t go as expected. I requested semi protection of the page which was approved. I fixed page again to where it was suppose to be. Other User kept reverting it back to the way they wanted it. I had to fix it and keep re adding the missing citations too. User kept reverting it stills also started spamming my page with warnings. I was adviced by a Wiki administrator to warn them on there talk page which I did. The user kept removing them. I feel like the editing war could of been avoided if instead user used talk page on the section that I had to discuss matter more instead of reverting it non stop and making me having to go back and fix it too many times.. I feel personally attacked by the user. For the personal attack issue: I did read over it. I feel like I did not violate those rules or standards. And if I did it was a mistake and I am sorry for that mistake. As much as I may disagree. I believe Wikipedia should be able to used by everyone and as long as we don’t have to have fights about a page I don’t see why we can’t have good time here. I do feel like the other user as well should be spoken too as I should have to feel when editing any radio station Wikipedia page that they will revert it to the way they had cause they disagree with it when there is a talk page and a section added that i added to discuss the matter but instead of the communication user just kept reverting which made me frustrated Project space I don’t think I violated if I did I apologize. Editing Archives yes I do admit to do that on WEPN-FM page thus because in the archive of my edit the missing citations were there and it was easier doing it that way then having to re add them non stop. The disruptive editing If I did violate I apologize I followed what admins advice was given which was report user which I did do and warned them and did the talk page on WEPN FM like advised. However, I don’t think I’m only one who violated this during this situation and if an admin can Email me a Guide on reporting user if I ever had to that be great the templates do confuse me and I had hard time filling them out or using correct usage command. So that’s my fault there. And I apologize will make sure not to do it again If unblock request is approved I will react appropriately and do what’s best for Wikipedia community and it’s guidelines. I will request admin if we can’t come to resolution on matters too. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Firstly I would like to address the Editing warning myself and another member were not in agreement in a wiki page. I have attempted several times to resolve matter by using the pages Talk page. Please see this: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:WEPN-FM However results didn’t go as expected. I requested semi protection of the page which was approved. I fixed page again to where it was suppose to be. Other User kept reverting it back to the way they wanted it. I had to fix it and keep re adding the missing citations too. User kept reverting it stills also started spamming my page with warnings. I was adviced by a Wiki administrator to warn them on there talk page which I did. The user kept removing them. I feel like the editing war could of been avoided if instead user used talk page on the section that I had to discuss matter more instead of reverting it non stop and making me having to go back and fix it too many times.. I feel personally attacked by the user. For the personal attack issue: I did read over it. I feel like I did not violate those rules or standards. And if I did it was a mistake and I am sorry for that mistake. As much as I may disagree. I believe Wikipedia should be able to used by everyone and as long as we don’t have to have fights about a page I don’t see why we can’t have good time here. I do feel like the other user as well should be spoken too as I should have to feel when editing any radio station Wikipedia page that they will revert it to the way they had cause they disagree with it when there is a talk page and a section added that i added to discuss the matter but instead of the communication user just kept reverting which made me frustrated Project space I don’t think I violated if I did I apologize. Editing Archives yes I do admit to do that on WEPN-FM page thus because in the archive of my edit the missing citations were there and it was easier doing it that way then having to re add them non stop. The disruptive editing If I did violate I apologize I followed what admins advice was given which was report user which I did do and warned them and did the talk page on WEPN FM like advised. However, I don’t think I’m only one who violated this during this situation and if an admin can Email me a Guide on reporting user if I ever had to that be great the templates do confuse me and I had hard time filling them out or using correct usage command. So that’s my fault there. And I apologize will make sure not to do it again If unblock request is approved I will react appropriately and do what’s best for Wikipedia community and it’s guidelines. I will request admin if we can’t come to resolution on matters too. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Nick B (talk) 17:06, 7 September 2024 (UTC)