Talk:The Grudge (song)/GA1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Checking general criteria |
m Oops! |
||
| Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
=== Veredict === |
=== Veredict === |
||
* I just can this article is excellent, there were only a few small problems. I won't put it '''on hold''' because you're probably busy right now, and that's part of my responsibility for not taking proper advantage of my PC when it was lent to me. Anyway, good job with Rodrigo's songs! [[User:Pollosito|Santi]] ([[User talk:Pollosito|talk]]) 02:58, 12 September 2024 (UTC) |
* I just can say this article is excellent, there were only a few small problems. I won't put it '''on hold''' because you're probably busy right now, and that's part of my responsibility for not taking proper advantage of my PC when it was lent to me. Anyway, good job with Rodrigo's songs! [[User:Pollosito|Santi]] ([[User talk:Pollosito|talk]]) 02:58, 12 September 2024 (UTC) |
||
<!-- Please add all review comments below this comment, and do not alter what is above. So that the review can be kept within a single section, please do not use level 2 headers (==...==) below to break up the review. Use level 3 (===...===), level 4 and so on.--> |
<!-- Please add all review comments below this comment, and do not alter what is above. So that the review can be kept within a single section, please do not use level 2 headers (==...==) below to break up the review. Use level 3 (===...===), level 4 and so on.--> |
||
Revision as of 03:13, 12 September 2024
GA Review
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: MaranoFan (talk · contribs) 15:51, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Pollosito (talk · contribs) 18:32, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
- a (reference section):
b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): 
d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
As said in "Lacy", I'll be reviewing this article soon. This is my favorite song from Guts, that's because I want to do this. Best, Santi (talk) 18:32, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Sounds very cool, Santi! Sad to see you are not around as much, though.--NØ 04:17, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- @MaranoFan: Not for long hehe. I swear I tried to be more active. Since my two parents were so proud of me for having 3 GAs (2 in this Wiki), I think it would be easier. Santi (talk) 20:01, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Pollosito: We are now coming up on 20 days, so I would like to politely request for the review to be completed now. Would you be able to do this within the next 2-3 days or prefer it be made available to other reviewers in case you are busy?--NØ 02:58, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- @MaranoFan: So sorry, my family became more serious with me now for this. However, I'll start my review right now. Santi (talk) 03:18, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- Everything's good! As long as there's some indication that this is being worked on.--NØ 15:17, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- @MaranoFan: So sorry, my family became more serious with me now for this. However, I'll start my review right now. Santi (talk) 03:18, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Pollosito: We are now coming up on 20 days, so I would like to politely request for the review to be completed now. Would you be able to do this within the next 2-3 days or prefer it be made available to other reviewers in case you are busy?--NØ 02:58, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
- @MaranoFan: Not for long hehe. I swear I tried to be more active. Since my two parents were so proud of me for having 3 GAs (2 in this Wiki), I think it would be easier. Santi (talk) 20:01, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
Background and release
- "10th track", hum, I think that from 12 onwards the cardinal numbers should be written with the number as such; It seems to me that the rest would be better written as a word; I mean, "tenth" in this case. Santi (talk) 02:48, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Composition
- Everything's perfect. Santi (talk) 02:48, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Critical reception
- I don't know how serious is this really, but I think you have to replace the "raw, raspy tone" to another word on your own for not repeating the same citation in the article. Santi (talk) 02:48, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Commercial performance
- There's a space between Global 200 and the dot. Santi (talk) 02:58, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- The Greece archive directs to the Guts (Deluxe) entries, so "The Grudge" doesn't appear. Santi (talk) 02:58, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Credits and personnel
- Everything's good. Santi (talk) 02:58, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Charts
- The Greece problem above. Santi (talk) 02:58, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Certifications
- Good. Santi (talk) 02:58, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Veredict
- I just can say this article is excellent, there were only a few small problems. I won't put it on hold because you're probably busy right now, and that's part of my responsibility for not taking proper advantage of my PC when it was lent to me. Anyway, good job with Rodrigo's songs! Santi (talk) 02:58, 12 September 2024 (UTC)