Talk:Vagina: Difference between revisions
→Wording of caption: consensus? |
→Wording of caption: Done |
||
Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
:::I'd agree that "adult human vagina" probably wouldn't work - not just wordy, but would apply to both. "Fertile" and/or "infertile" could work but could also be confusing, since women are only fertile for a few days each month. I don't think "postpubescent" is ideal since "postmenopausal" is also "postpubescent". How about "adult human vagina before (left) and after (right) menopause"? [[User:Jtrevor99|Jtrevor99]] ([[User talk:Jtrevor99|talk]]) 03:58, 18 September 2024 (UTC) |
:::I'd agree that "adult human vagina" probably wouldn't work - not just wordy, but would apply to both. "Fertile" and/or "infertile" could work but could also be confusing, since women are only fertile for a few days each month. I don't think "postpubescent" is ideal since "postmenopausal" is also "postpubescent". How about "adult human vagina before (left) and after (right) menopause"? [[User:Jtrevor99|Jtrevor99]] ([[User talk:Jtrevor99|talk]]) 03:58, 18 September 2024 (UTC) |
||
::::Right, and not all women of reproductive age are even necessarily fertile, or whatever the medical terms would be. Anyway, I think that one is great. Accurate and succinct. [[User:Azn bookworm10|Azn bookworm10]] ([[User talk:Azn bookworm10|talk]]) 04:47, 18 September 2024 (UTC) |
::::Right, and not all women of reproductive age are even necessarily fertile, or whatever the medical terms would be. Anyway, I think that one is great. Accurate and succinct. [[User:Azn bookworm10|Azn bookworm10]] ([[User talk:Azn bookworm10|talk]]) 04:47, 18 September 2024 (UTC) |
||
:::::Done. [[User:Jtrevor99|Jtrevor99]] ([[User talk:Jtrevor99|talk]]) 05:19, 18 September 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:19, 18 September 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Vagina article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
Vagina has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: June 8, 2018. (Reviewed version). |
Wikipedia is not censored. Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image. |
This level-4 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been mentioned by multiple media organizations:
|
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Vagina was copied or moved into Human vagina with this edit on March 30, 2024. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Discussions on this page often lead to previous arguments being restated. Please read recent comments and look in the archives before commenting. |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
"Lower front hole" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Lower front hole has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 22 § Lower front hole until a consensus is reached. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 03:36, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
Bonus hole
I just learned that to avoid offending trans people some people want to start calling the vagina a "bonus hole". Is this really true?? Georgia guy (talk) 14:51, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Some trans men use the term for their own genitals. See relevant content at Transgender sexuality. I am not aware of any effort, by trans men or otherwise, to replace the general term vagina. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 07:25, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- no Aaaspennn (talk) 08:01, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
- The term front hole is sometimes heard. Mathglot (talk) 10:24, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
Categories and link need fixing
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
- What I think should be changed (format using {{textdiff}}):
Please add the category “Category:Sex organs”
− | + | marsupials |
- Why it should be changed:Since the vagina is a sex organ and to correct a link
- References supporting the possible change (format using the "cite" button):
47.189.223.207 (talk) 19:06, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
References
- Partly done: Sex organs added as a category – macaddct1984 (talk | contribs) 11:33, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
Category needed
The category "Sex organs" needs to be added here. 2601:2C5:8484:1C50:AD4C:7AC0:96D5:A18D (talk) 15:24, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Wording of caption
The caption for the first image currently reads
Human vagina; normal canal (left) and canal during menopause (right)
That contrast implies that a menopausal canal is abnormal. Can we substitute a more factual descriptor like pre-menopausal, or otherwise reword? Azn bookworm10 (talk) 23:45, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- I took a shot at updating it. Jtrevor99 (talk) 02:08, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- That looks reasonable to me. Is it obvious from context that it's meant to represent a postpubescent adult? "Adult human vagina" would be getting wordy. Azn bookworm10 (talk) 03:20, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- I'd agree that "adult human vagina" probably wouldn't work - not just wordy, but would apply to both. "Fertile" and/or "infertile" could work but could also be confusing, since women are only fertile for a few days each month. I don't think "postpubescent" is ideal since "postmenopausal" is also "postpubescent". How about "adult human vagina before (left) and after (right) menopause"? Jtrevor99 (talk) 03:58, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Right, and not all women of reproductive age are even necessarily fertile, or whatever the medical terms would be. Anyway, I think that one is great. Accurate and succinct. Azn bookworm10 (talk) 04:47, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- I'd agree that "adult human vagina" probably wouldn't work - not just wordy, but would apply to both. "Fertile" and/or "infertile" could work but could also be confusing, since women are only fertile for a few days each month. I don't think "postpubescent" is ideal since "postmenopausal" is also "postpubescent". How about "adult human vagina before (left) and after (right) menopause"? Jtrevor99 (talk) 03:58, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- That looks reasonable to me. Is it obvious from context that it's meant to represent a postpubescent adult? "Adult human vagina" would be getting wordy. Azn bookworm10 (talk) 03:20, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Natural sciences good articles
- Wikipedia objectionable content
- GA-Class level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in Biology and health sciences
- GA-Class vital articles in Biology and health sciences
- GA-Class Anatomy articles
- High-importance Anatomy articles
- Anatomy articles about gross anatomy
- WikiProject Anatomy articles
- GA-Class Sexology and sexuality articles
- Top-importance Sexology and sexuality articles
- WikiProject Sexology and sexuality articles
- GA-Class women's health articles
- Top-importance women's health articles
- WikiProject Women's Health articles
- Wikipedia pages referenced by the press