Jump to content

Talk:Nova music festival massacre: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Bedouin victims: place reftalk at bottom
Line 100: Line 100:


{{reftalk}}
{{reftalk}}

== "Civilians", "murder" and "hostages" ==

Since some of my edits were undone I think it's prudent to talk about the POV, editorialized and inaccurate language used in this article at present. Right in the lead we have the following:

:As part of the attack, 364 civilians were murdered and many more wounded

None of the cited news articles call these 364 dead "civilians". Only some individual cases are called civilians. [https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-67054825 The BBC states] that of the killed, 9 were US citizens, 1 a Canadian citizen, up to 10 UK citizens, 2 French citizens, 20 Thai citizens, 10 Nepalese citizens, 2 Filipino citizens, 1 German citizen, 1 Cambodian citizen, 1 Chinese-Israeli (let's count her as Chinese for this purpose). In total 57. I have excluded the mere missing cases. Therefore around 300 of those killed were Israelis. Do any sources say whether these people were members of the IDF or not? Due to the high conscription rate in Israel, of which only ultra-Orthodox and Arab Israelis are exempt, it would be false to label all 300 of these dead Israels "civilians" when, as members of the IDF, they were not civilians.

The second point here is on the use of the word "murder". Murder is a civilian crime, not a military one. Al-Qassam is Hamas' military wing, and Hamas is at present the only legitimate government of Gaza, having won [[2006 Palestinian legislative election|the 2006 election]]. And again, a significant number of those killed were not civilians, but members of the IDF. Such killings are not murder. More importantly, we need RS that calls these killings "murders", not US-aligned editorialized newspaper articles.

Finally the word "hostages". Again, when it comes to military personnel, the correct term is ''prisoners of war''. [[User:KetchupSalt|KetchupSalt]] ([[User talk:KetchupSalt|talk]]) 09:26, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:26, 18 September 2024

Apache Helicopters and Hellfire Missiles

No mention of these being used at any time - not even as a "debunked" accusation. There's a shock.Ianbrettcooper (talk) 21:51, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It would be nice if there was something more than “The investigation didn’t comment” on it. I’d like to see some sort of overview of that controversy. 2600:6C50:427F:CAFE:4437:7C7E:D180:F6FB (talk) 22:27, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We have notable media figures (https://x.com/ryangrim/status/1802786111724360124) commenting that Israel knew about the attack and did nothing (they actually reduced festival security). Censorship over corporate media is tight in America, but that should not be allowed to affect this site. We need a Hanibal section, because the comfortable view - there are things too evil for any human to do - is just flat wrong. Potato 888 (talk) 02:26, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
From my understanding, wasn't the Apache Helicopter video of Israelis supposedly killing their own civilians debunked as misinformation? 66.75.251.16 (talk) 03:21, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Because there’s no evidence.
These articles should be policed in the same way as articles subject to Holocaust-denialists are policed. KronosAlight (talk) 21:54, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the topic of the subsection § Were there any victims hit by fire from Israeli security forces?
Are there any suggestions for how we can expand and/or improve this subsection? The Mountain of Eden (talk) 19:53, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ambiguity in the video

  1. Why don't most of the dead have bullet marks on their bodies in the video?
  2. Why can't blood be seen on the ground near the dead (the human body has 5 liters of blood)?
  3. Why did most of the dead die facing the ground? مصطفی کوهستانی (talk) 21:14, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    1. The entering wound from a bullet in a human body is a very small thing. The exit wound (IF the bullet went out) is bigger and can be seen easily. If you are looking for a gunshot wound as seen in the movies, it doesn't look like that at all.
    2. Most of them laying on the ground which is sandy, and can absorb a lot of blood. Plus it mostly depends which organs and blood pipes the bullet hit. Again, it's not like in the movies. Gunshot wound doesn't drain all the blood from the human body like opening a tap.
    3. Tried to run in the opposite direction\Gave up and let the terrorists capture them and then Executed on site\Just fell that way. Remember most of them were probably moving before they got shot, that last motion they did before they got shot effected how they fell on the ground. 2A00:A041:E193:5D00:D4F3:4D5A:E924:D600 (talk) 19:28, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    You can look at the gallery in https://www.hamas.com/, I'm quite certain you won't see any ambiguity after that YedidyaPopper (talk) 07:24, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Why are Neo-Nazi, Holocaust-denial comments like this even allowed to remain up on Wikipedia?
    We wouldn’t tolerate such comments on pages about Auschwitz.
    So why leave these up? KronosAlight (talk) 21:59, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"Why are Neo-Nazi, Holocaust-denial comments like this even allowed to remain up on Wikipedia?" Because we are not talking about a genocide or Nazi concentration camps, we are talking about film footage. Dimadick (talk) 01:01, 9 September 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 1 September 2024

To avoid WP:SANDWICH, please move picture with caption "Montage of photos of all the killed Nova festival participants" from section Re'im music festival massacre#Aftermath to section Re'im music festival massacre#Hostages taken from the music festival (also there won't be a need for picture to be on the left side). Thanks.--Steven Homan (talk) 14:09, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: Sorry but I don't see why a picture about people that were murdered at the music venue should be moved to a section about victims that were taken live by the terrorists instead. Besides, the section "Aftermath" did mention the dead victims while the section for "Hostages taken from the music festival" did not. Ilovefood123123 (talk) 09:19, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Good point about the WP:SANDWICH. I moved some of the photos around to avoid it. The Mountain of Eden (talk) 19:47, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bedouin victims


This mass killing of Jews -> This mass killing of Israelis

Not all victims of the Re'im music festival massacre were Jewish.

"Twenty-one Bedouin Israelis were murdered in the Hamas massacre of October 7... the rest were murdered from zero distance during Hamas’s lethal raid on Israeli towns and at the Nova festival in Re’im." [1]

Bitspectator (talk) 21:15, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Rainsage (talk) 03:25, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My suggestion was unambiguous.
This mass killing of Jews -> This mass killing of Israelis
I wanted to change the statement on the left side of the arrow to the statement on the right side of the arrow. I provided an RS and justification for why I wanted to make this change.
My suggestion was already completed by the time you labeled it Not Done. User Dylanvt made the change: [1]
Please tell me why you labeled this Not Done. Bitspectator (talk) 13:12, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
it doesn't say "This mass killing of Jews" or "This mass killing of Israelis" anywhere in the article Rainsage (talk) 19:04, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My suggestion was already completed by the time you labeled it Not Done. User Dylanvt made the change: [1]
What part of that did you not understand? Bitspectator (talk) 20:02, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As noted previously, the phrase in question was removed by another editor, so I am closing this request. Anon126 (notify me of responses! / talk / contribs) 06:06, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

"Civilians", "murder" and "hostages"

Since some of my edits were undone I think it's prudent to talk about the POV, editorialized and inaccurate language used in this article at present. Right in the lead we have the following:

As part of the attack, 364 civilians were murdered and many more wounded

None of the cited news articles call these 364 dead "civilians". Only some individual cases are called civilians. The BBC states that of the killed, 9 were US citizens, 1 a Canadian citizen, up to 10 UK citizens, 2 French citizens, 20 Thai citizens, 10 Nepalese citizens, 2 Filipino citizens, 1 German citizen, 1 Cambodian citizen, 1 Chinese-Israeli (let's count her as Chinese for this purpose). In total 57. I have excluded the mere missing cases. Therefore around 300 of those killed were Israelis. Do any sources say whether these people were members of the IDF or not? Due to the high conscription rate in Israel, of which only ultra-Orthodox and Arab Israelis are exempt, it would be false to label all 300 of these dead Israels "civilians" when, as members of the IDF, they were not civilians.

The second point here is on the use of the word "murder". Murder is a civilian crime, not a military one. Al-Qassam is Hamas' military wing, and Hamas is at present the only legitimate government of Gaza, having won the 2006 election. And again, a significant number of those killed were not civilians, but members of the IDF. Such killings are not murder. More importantly, we need RS that calls these killings "murders", not US-aligned editorialized newspaper articles.

Finally the word "hostages". Again, when it comes to military personnel, the correct term is prisoners of war. KetchupSalt (talk) 09:26, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]