Jump to content

Talk:NunatuKavut: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 27: Line 27:
== Validity in Content ==
== Validity in Content ==


Claims from other groups, such as Nunatsiavut and Innu Nation should not be present on this page. The sole purpose of their claim that they do not recognize NCC is merely to demean the legitimacy of NunatuKavut. It has no bearing to take away from the facts at hand and is NOT necessary to be included in this page. The Supreme Court has aproved NunatuKavut to continue their fight for land claims as they DO have legal rights as a group. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/nunatukavut-federal-court-1.7233543 [[User:LabradorNCC|LabradorNCC]] ([[User talk:LabradorNCC|talk]]) 03:32, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Claims from other groups, such as Nunatsiavut and Innu Nation should not be present on this page. The sole purpose of their claim that they do not recognize NCC is merely to demean the legitimacy of NunatuKavut. It has no bearing to take away from the facts at hand and is NOT necessary to be included in this page. The Supreme Court has aproved NunatuKavut to continue their fight for land claims as they DO have legal rights as a group. https://nunatukavut.ca/article/nunatukavut-community-council-celebrates-unequivocal-win-in-federal-court-on-rights-and-recognition-mou/

Revision as of 03:36, 23 September 2024


Inuit, not Metis

This article was edited over by another user, to make the article suggest the people of NunatuKavut were most likely Metis. On the talk page of Inuit-Metis, it was clarified that there is academic consensus that the people of NunatuKavut are Inuit, not Metis. - Oosting (talk) 04:52, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Casing

Could someone knowledgable with Inuit languages explain what's going on with the camel casing? What are the letters used in the alphabetization scheme? -Iceburg Lettuce (talk) 15:46, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See Kra (letter). --Florian Blaschke (talk) 01:33, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Map

Pleas add map NunatuKavut--Kaiyr (talk) 16:56, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"unrecognized" - by whom?

do the people unrecognize themselves? 142.163.195.114 (talk) 01:38, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was covered further down the page in more detail but I've changed the opening. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 17:20, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, other groups have tried to discredit the organization and choose to not recognize the group. However, NCC has legal standing. LabradorNCC (talk) 03:10, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Validity in Content

Claims from other groups, such as Nunatsiavut and Innu Nation should not be present on this page. The sole purpose of their claim that they do not recognize NCC is merely to demean the legitimacy of NunatuKavut. It has no bearing to take away from the facts at hand and is NOT necessary to be included in this page. The Supreme Court has aproved NunatuKavut to continue their fight for land claims as they DO have legal rights as a group. https://nunatukavut.ca/article/nunatukavut-community-council-celebrates-unequivocal-win-in-federal-court-on-rights-and-recognition-mou/