Jump to content

Talk:Cato Institute: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Cato Institute/Archive 2) (bot
m Removed deprecated parameters in {{Talk header}} that are now handled automatically (Task 30)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{talk header}}
{{talk header|bot=lowercase sigmabot III|age=2|units=years|minthreadsleft=1}}
{{Contentious topics/talk notice|cc|brief}}
{{Contentious topics/talk notice|cc|brief}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|1=
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|1=

Revision as of 20:34, 7 October 2024

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Regarding the "International" subsection of the "Cato positions on political issues and policies" section

I have marked this section as being written like an advertisement, since it makes no effort to rework Cato's stated positions in an encyclopedic, neutral way. 64.203.244.11 (talk) 14:46, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Severe NPOV Problem

There exists no section on criticism, even though many have commented on contributions to climate denialism and smoking lobbying, etc. Onhand I have no specific examples but I’m sure they could be found rather easily. 2600:4041:5804:2500:6056:CFD4:8105:DB7 (talk) 01:36, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism is good, especially on this anti-science organization, but criticism sections are not. See WP:CSECTION. --Hob Gadling (talk) 07:57, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]