Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/College Housing Northwest: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Haemo (talk | contribs)
comment
Haemo (talk | contribs)
m sp
Line 4: Line 4:
* '''Delete''' : does not demonstrate [[WP:CORP|notability]] through [[WP:CITE|sources]]. [[User:Aboutmovies|Aboutmovies]] 23:49, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
* '''Delete''' : does not demonstrate [[WP:CORP|notability]] through [[WP:CITE|sources]]. [[User:Aboutmovies|Aboutmovies]] 23:49, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
* '''Keep''' - Perhaps, users should lean towards spending their time expanding articles, improving them, and making them notable instead of tagging them for deletion. Maybe do a Google search and see if the business exists and then maybe try to establish notability that way. Perhaps, add a stub tag, or expand it and move on. It seems that if peoples' work and contributions are deleted that they will not want to contribute. --[[User:Remi0o|R]][[Special:Emailuser/Remi0o|e]][[User_talk:Remi0o|m]][[Special:Contributions/Remi0o|i]] 01:27, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
* '''Keep''' - Perhaps, users should lean towards spending their time expanding articles, improving them, and making them notable instead of tagging them for deletion. Maybe do a Google search and see if the business exists and then maybe try to establish notability that way. Perhaps, add a stub tag, or expand it and move on. It seems that if peoples' work and contributions are deleted that they will not want to contribute. --[[User:Remi0o|R]][[Special:Emailuser/Remi0o|e]][[User_talk:Remi0o|m]][[Special:Contributions/Remi0o|i]] 01:27, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
:Wait, what? I can't believe you would have the gall to even respond in such a manner. First of all, to assume that the above Wikipedians have NOT looked around for [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] to back up, or support the notability of this topic is a massive violation of [[WP:AGF]]. It's really offensive to even suggest such a thing. Google clearly supports the fact that this business exists - however, I cannot, as I would assume the other two contributors, find any [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] which back up notability! Furthermore, arguing for a "Keep" verdict, based on the fact that you have assumed bad faith about the actions of other Wikipedians is absurd in the extreme. I argue'''Delete''', and urge you to strike your argument out. --[[User:Haemo|Haemo]] 01:47, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
:Wait, what? I can't believe you would have the gall to even respond in such a manner. First of all, to assume that the above Wikipedians have NOT looked around for [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] to back up, or support the notability of this topic is a massive violation of [[WP:AGF]]. It's really offensive to even suggest such a thing. Google clearly supports the fact that this business exists - however, I cannot, as I would assume the other two contributors, find any [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] which back up notability! Furthermore, arguing for a "Keep" verdict, based on the fact that you have assumed bad faith about the actions of other Wikipedians is absurd in the extreme. As a result, I argue '''Delete''', and urge you to strike your argument out. --[[User:Haemo|Haemo]] 01:47, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete''', not to be snarky but the same could be said for creators taking the time to make an attempt to assert notability and provide sources. I found few ghits outside of CHN's websites. I agree they exist, but see no notability.--[[User:Killing sparrows|killing sparrows]] 01:44, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete''', not to be snarky but the same could be said for creators taking the time to make an attempt to assert notability and provide sources. I found few ghits outside of CHN's websites. I agree they exist, but see no notability.--[[User:Killing sparrows|killing sparrows]] 01:44, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:48, 23 April 2007

College Housing Northwest (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
  • Delete : does not demonstrate notability through sources. Aboutmovies 23:49, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Perhaps, users should lean towards spending their time expanding articles, improving them, and making them notable instead of tagging them for deletion. Maybe do a Google search and see if the business exists and then maybe try to establish notability that way. Perhaps, add a stub tag, or expand it and move on. It seems that if peoples' work and contributions are deleted that they will not want to contribute. --Remi 01:27, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Wait, what? I can't believe you would have the gall to even respond in such a manner. First of all, to assume that the above Wikipedians have NOT looked around for reliable sources to back up, or support the notability of this topic is a massive violation of WP:AGF. It's really offensive to even suggest such a thing. Google clearly supports the fact that this business exists - however, I cannot, as I would assume the other two contributors, find any reliable sources which back up notability! Furthermore, arguing for a "Keep" verdict, based on the fact that you have assumed bad faith about the actions of other Wikipedians is absurd in the extreme. As a result, I argue Delete, and urge you to strike your argument out. --Haemo 01:47, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, not to be snarky but the same could be said for creators taking the time to make an attempt to assert notability and provide sources. I found few ghits outside of CHN's websites. I agree they exist, but see no notability.--killing sparrows 01:44, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]