why do you keep removing any mentions of his death in the lead section ??? it's common practice all throughout wikipedia man @[[User:Jkaharper|Jkaharper]] [[User:KabirDH|KabirDH]] ([[User talk:KabirDH|talk]]) 18:56, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
why do you keep removing any mentions of his death in the lead section ??? it's common practice all throughout wikipedia man @[[User:Jkaharper|Jkaharper]] [[User:KabirDH|KabirDH]] ([[User talk:KabirDH|talk]]) 18:56, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
:Hi {{ping|KabirDH}} – his death is already mentioned in the opening brackets of the article lead, in the infobox field, and in the "personal life and death" section of his article. It doesn't get mentioned a fourth time at the end of the article lead. I don't know why you think this is the case, but I suggest you got and read [[WP:MS]] for help with how articles are generally written, laid out, and sourced. Thanks --[[User:Jkaharper|Jkaharper]] ([[User talk:Jkaharper|talk]]) 18:58, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Revision as of 18:58, 9 October 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ratan Tata article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Zoroastrianism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Zoroastrianism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ZoroastrianismWikipedia:WikiProject ZoroastrianismTemplate:WikiProject ZoroastrianismZoroastrianism
Hi @KabirDH: – his death is already mentioned in the opening brackets of the article lead, in the infobox field, and in the "personal life and death" section of his article. It doesn't get mentioned a fourth time at the end of the article lead. I don't know why you think this is the case, but I suggest you got and read WP:MS for help with how articles are generally written, laid out, and sourced. Thanks --Jkaharper (talk) 18:58, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
