Talk:Beef: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 02:10, 16 October 2024

Food and drink Top‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Top

This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Agriculture: Livestock Low‑importance

	Agriculture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Livestock task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Climate change Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide

Archives

Archive 1

Archive 2

Recent edits involving original research

Recent edits by Superdoggo were adding WP:OR, entirely unsourced content and removing reliable sources from the article, the user did the same at carnivore diet. Please add reliable sources if you want to add content, also on controversial articles like this you shouldn't just start removing massive pieces of well sourced text without a valid reason. Please use an edit summary for large edits so we know what is going on and your reasoning. Psychologist Guy (talk) 13:46, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Etymology

Quote from the article:

After the Norman Conquest, the French-speaking nobles who ruled England naturally used French words to refer to the meats they were served. Thus, various Anglo-Saxon words were used for the animal (such as nēat, or cu for adult females) by the peasants, but the meat was called boef (ox) (Modern French bœuf) by the French nobles — who did not often deal with the live animal — when it was served to them.^{[citation needed]}^{[dubious – discuss]}

This repeats a common myth, that the words for animal meat (like beef) and the words for the animals themselves (like cow) have their origin in social divisions after the Norman conquest. This has been shown numerous times to be an 18th century fabrication,^[1] though it is an extremely prevalent idea online.^[2] I have tagged that section of the article as dubious, and would suggest to replace it with a note about the actual etymology and the myth, and then add a source (I suggest two here, see references linked below), which this entire sentence is currently lacking.

There is one more minor issue, which is that our link boef leads to a Wiktionary page that has no apparent connection to the topic.

I wouldn't be surprised if this made it into more articles on Wikipedia, like those about other types of meat, about the animals, or the history of the English language in general. It may be worth checking those, but maybe let's start with just this one. I have notified WikiProkect Food and drink. Renerpho (talk) 01:24, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Renerpho, thanks for this, and for the note at WT:FOOD. Whenever you see material that is definitely incorrect and also aWP:Glossary#uncited information, please remove it right away. It's sometimes helpful to link to WP:CHALLENGE in the edit summary. WhatamIdoing (talk) 01:33, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@WhatamIdoing: I was thinking about removing it, but given how widespread the false etymology is, I'm afraid I'd get reverted. There are a lot of sources we'd consider reliable who corroborate the myth (the short video linked below does give some examples), so I'd prefer to discuss it first. Renerpho (talk) 01:39, 16 October 2024 (UTC) As anecdotal evidence for the prevalence of this idea, I was taught this as "fact" in school in the early 2000s, and I know they still teach it in school at least in France and Germany (don't know about other countries). Renerpho (talk) 01:53, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Other instances on Wikipedia (or elsewhere)

Middle English says:

A significant number of words of Norman origin began to appear in the English language alongside native English words of similar meaning, giving rise to such Modern English synonyms as pig/pork, chicken/poultry, calf/veal, cow/beef, sheep/mutton, wood/forest, house/mansion, worthy/valuable, bold/courageous, freedom/liberty, sight/vision, and eat/dine.^[3]

The source in this instance is a journal article from 1901. While the statement of the article is technically not wrong (those terms did enter English after the Norman conquest, and existed alongside their Anglo-Saxon counterparts of similar meaning), there is nothing in that article to explain what that "similar meaning" is. In particular, the source corroborates the myth. Renerpho (talk) 02:07, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Owen Barfield's popular History in English Words from 1926 says so as well:^[4]

For the Saxon neatherd who had spent a hard day tending his oxen, sheep, calves, and swine, probably saw little enough of the beef, mutton, veal, pork, and bacon, which were gobbled at night by his Norman masters.

If the myth hadn't taken off by this point, I suspect Barfield's book would have caused it to. Renerpho (talk) 02:07, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Tibor Őrsi (2015). "Cow versus Beef: Terms Denoting Animals and Their Meat in English". Eger Journal of English Studies. XV: 49–59.
^ LetThemTalkTV. COW vs BEEF Busting the Biggest Myth in Linguistic History – via YouTube.
^ https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/periodicals/TPRSNZ1901-34.2.8.1.9 ^{[bare URL]}
^ {{cite book|url=https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/71332/pg71332-images.html%7Cauthor=Owen Barfield|title=History in English Words|year=1926|pages=41}

[1] Tibor Őrsi (2015). "Cow versus Beef: Terms Denoting Animals and Their Meat in English". Eger Journal of English Studies. XV: 49–59.

[2] LetThemTalkTV. COW vs BEEF Busting the Biggest Myth in Linguistic History – via YouTube.

[3] ttps://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/periodicals/TPRSNZ1901-34.2.8.1.9 ^{[bare URL]}

[4] {{cite book|url=https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/71332/pg71332-images.html%7Cauthor=Owen Barfield|title=History in English Words|year=1926|pages=41}

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

@@ Line 25: / Line 25: @@
 === Other instances on Wikipedia (or elsewhere) ===
-* [[Middle English]] corroborates the myth, saying:
+* [[Middle English]] says:
  A significant number of words of [[Norman language|Norman]] origin began to appear in the English language alongside native English words of similar meaning, giving rise to such Modern English synonyms as ''[[pig]]''/''[[pork]]'', ''[[chicken]]''/''[[poultry]]'', ''[[calf (animal)|calf]]''/''[[veal]]'', ''[[cow]]''/''[[beef]]'', ''[[sheep]]''/''[[mutton]]'', ''wood''/''[[forest]]'', ''house''/''[[mansion]]'', ''worthy''/''valuable'', ''bold''/''courageous'', ''freedom''/''[[liberty]]'', ''sight''/''vision'', and ''eat''/''dine''.<ref>https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/periodicals/TPRSNZ1901-34.2.8.1.9 {{Bare URL inline|date=August 2024}}</ref>
-The source in this instance is a journal article from 1901. [[User:Renerpho|Renerpho]] ([[User talk:Renerpho|talk]]) 02:07, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
+The source in this instance is a journal article from 1901. While the statement of the article is technically not wrong (those terms did enter English after the Norman conquest, and existed alongside their Anglo-Saxon counterparts of similar meaning), there is nothing in that article to explain what that "similar meaning" is. In particular, the source corroborates the myth. [[User:Renerpho|Renerpho]] ([[User talk:Renerpho|talk]]) 02:07, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
 * [[Owen Barfield]]'s popular ''History in English Words'' from 1926 says so as well:<ref>{{cite book|url=https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/71332/pg71332-images.html|author=[[Owen Barfield]]|title=History in English Words|year=1926|pages=41}</ref>
  For the Saxon neatherd who had spent a hard day tending his oxen, sheep, calves, and swine, probably saw little enough of the beef, mutton, veal, pork, and bacon, which were gobbled at night by his Norman masters.