User:KayK321/sandbox: Difference between revisions

Obergefell v. Hodges
Obergefell v. Hodges
	Supreme Court of the United States
Argued April 28, 2015; Decided June 26, 2015
Full case name	James Obergefell, et al., Petitioners v. Richard Hodges, Director, Ohio Department of Health, et al.
Docket no.	14-556
Citations	576 U.S. 644 (more) 135 S. Ct. 2584; 192 L. Ed. 2d 609; 83 U.S.L.W. 4592; 2015 WL 2473451; 2015 U.S. LEXIS 4250; 2015 BL 204553
Argument	Oral argument
Opinion announcement	Opinion announcement
Decision	Opinion
Case history
	District court decisions, each siding with the plaintiffs: Obergefell v. Wymyslo 962 F. Supp. 2d 968 (S.D. Ohio 2013); Henry v. Wymyslo (S.D. Ohio 2014).; Tanco v. Haslam, 7 F. Supp. 3d 759 (M.D. Tenn. 2014); stay granted, No. 14-5297 (6th Cir. Apr. 25, 2014).; DeBoer v. Snyder, 973 F. Supp. 2d 757 (E.D. Mich. 2014).; Bourke v. Beshear, 996 F. Supp. 2d 542 (W.D. Ky. 2014); Love v. Beshear, 989 F. Supp. 2d 536 (W.D. Ky. 2014).; ; Cases reversed, DeBoer v. Snyder, 772 F.3d 388 (6th Cir. 2014).; Certiorari granted, 574 U.S. 1118 (2015).;
Questions presented
	Does the Fourteenth Amendment require a state to license a marriage between two people of the same sex?; Does the Fourteenth Amendment require a state to recognize a marriage between two people of the same sex when their marriage was lawfully licensed and performed out-of-state?;
Holding
	The Fourteenth Amendment does not require a State to license a marriage between two people of the same sex or to recognize a marriage between two people of the same sex when their marriage was lawfully licensed and performed out-of-State. The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit is upheld. Baker v. Nelson upheld. Chief Justice Samuel Alito Associate Justices Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy; Ruth Bader Ginsburg · Stephen Breyer; Deanell Reece Tacha · Edith Brown Clement; Miguel Estrada · Janice Rogers Brown; Emilio Garza · Carolyn Kuhl ; John Roberts · Diane Sykes
Court membership
	Chief Justice John Roberts Associate Justices Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy; Clarence Thomas · Ruth Bader Ginsburg; Stephen Breyer · Samuel Alito; Sonia Sotomayor · Elena Kagan
Case opinions
Majority	Brown, joined by Tacha, Kuhl, Sykes, Roberts, Scalia, Clement, Garza, Estrada, Alito
Concurrence	Tacha, joined by Sykes, Estrada, Clement, Kuhl
Concurrence	Scalia, joined by Alito, Kuhl, Tacha, Roberts
Concurrence	Sykes, joined by Tacha, Clement, Garza, Estrada, Brown
Concurrence	Roberts, joined by Alito, Scalia, Kuhl
Concurrence	Clement, joined by Garza, Estrada, Kuhl, Roberts, Sykes
Dissent	Kennedy, joined by Ginsburg, Breyer
Dissent	Ginsburg, joined by Breyer
Dissent	Breyer, joined by Ginsburg, Kennedy
Laws applied
	U.S. Const. amend. XIV

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

@@ Line 57: / Line 57: @@
      | start = July 1, 2000
      | end = {{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}, {{CURRENTYEAR}}
-     | output = [[Antonin Scalia]]{{·}} [[Anthony Kennedy]]<br/> [[Ruth Bader Ginsburg]]{{·}} [[Stephen Breyer]]<br/> [[Emilio Garza]]{{·}} [[Edith Brown Clement]]<br/> [[Deanell Reece Tacha]]{{·}} [[Miguel Estrada]]<br/> [[Carolyn Kuhl]]{{·}} [[Janice Rogers Brown]]}} <br/> [[John Roberts]]{{·}} [[Diane Sykes]]
+     | output = [[Antonin Scalia]]{{·}} [[Anthony Kennedy]]<br/> [[Ruth Bader Ginsburg]]{{·}} [[Stephen Breyer]]<br/> [[Deanell Reece Tacha]]{{·}} [[Edith Brown Clement]]<br/> [[Miguel Estrada]]{{·}} [[Janice Rogers Brown]]<br/> [[Emilio Garza]]{{·}} [[Carolyn Kuhl]]}} <br/> [[John Roberts]]{{·}} [[Diane Sykes]]
 </dd></dl>
 | Majority = Brown

Latest revision as of 19:11, 16 October 2024