Talk:Scopolamine: Difference between revisions
ClueBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 1 discussion to Talk:Scopolamine/Archive 1. (BOT) |
→Change to a label in the diagram: new section |
||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
It would be good to go through this section and clean up citations, redundant information and re-organize for readability. I tried cleaning it up a bit but it really could use a rewrite. [[User:Smarter1|Smarter1]] ([[User talk:Smarter1|talk]]) 05:11, 1 August 2024 (UTC) |
It would be good to go through this section and clean up citations, redundant information and re-organize for readability. I tried cleaning it up a bit but it really could use a rewrite. [[User:Smarter1|Smarter1]] ([[User talk:Smarter1|talk]]) 05:11, 1 August 2024 (UTC) |
||
== Change to a label in the diagram == |
|||
{{edit COI}} |
|||
<!--Don't remove anything above this line.--> |
|||
Someone (not I) has typed in a request for a change to labeling in the diagram. This request is in the Talk page, dated May 2024. |
|||
* '''What I think should be changed''': |
|||
* '''Why it should be changed''': |
|||
* '''References supporting the possible change (format using the "cite" button)''': |
|||
[[Special:Contributions/174.56.8.205|174.56.8.205]] ([[User talk:174.56.8.205|talk]]) 07:27, 20 October 2024 (UTC) |
|||
<!--Don't remove anything below this line--> |
|||
{{reftalk}} |
Revision as of 07:27, 20 October 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Scopolamine article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Scopolamine.
|
Incorrect labelling of enzyme in diagram, 'Biosynthesis in Plants' section
The difference between hyoscyamine and scopolamine is an epoxy (C-O-C) ring on the latter. The reaction to form this ring would, I suppose, be catalysed by an 'epoxidase' rather than a 'hydroxylase' enzyme. Indeed, in the text this enzyme is identified as 6beta-hydroxyhyoscyamine epoxidase. Yet, in this diagram, the enzyme is named as 'hyoscyamine 6beta-hydroxylase'. I think that this is an error in the diagram : I think that this final enzyme of the diagram is mislabelled on the diagram. I do not know how to change this. Please will somebody check and change this Boleslaw (talk) 11:51, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
How is it produced?
How is scopolamine produced for medical use? Is it derived from plants, or completely produced by chemical processes? Can someone add that to the article? Jimhoward72 (talk) 20:28, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Unreliable sources RE: Czech torture and effects?
I've been trying to find any actual evidence that scopolamine was used for the explicit purpose of eliciting confessions, as well as any evidence that it actually has such effects, rather than just the standard psychoactive effects? Ever since the Vice documentary, which perpetuated claims that a single dose of dust blown in your face can turn you into a walking zombie, the information around scopolamine's use in crimes seems sketchy.
The source given here on the article, stating that it has been proven to have been used in Czechoslovakia is from https://www.idnes.cz/, a czech tabloid. Furthermore, its sources are from witnesses who would understandably not be reliable as to the specifics. Its use as a "truth serum" seems to be debated, seemingly used more in robbings and assaults in developing countries like GHB is used in developed countries. Contemporary CIA reports seem to assert that its use was more likely as a sedative or to confuse people - and not as a "truth serum".
https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp65-00756r000400020007-9
"There is no evidence that the Communists have effectively or extensively used amytal interviews as a means of extracting confessions, although it is quite probable that they have experimented with this maneuver. The hypnotic drug which is most frequently mentioned as a Communist tool is Scopolamine, a naturally occuring substance long known in medical science. It is one of the ingredients in the "twilight sleep" medication used by obstetricians on women in labor. It, too, has an intoxicating and befuddling effect in small doses, an effect which would be difficult to distinguish from that of the profound fatigue, sleep loss, undernourishment, anxiety and confusion produced by the usual Communist control techniques. In every instance in which there is direct evidence that Communist police have given hypnotic and sedative drugs to prisoners, they have administered these drugs for the purpose of calming and relaxing excited and fatigued individuals. American physicians would be likely to use these drugs in a similar manner for the same reason."
I think this article needs solid sourcing, or removing the mention if none exist.
https://www.sciencehistory.org/stories/magazine/stranger-than-fiction/ 86.21.49.156 (talk) 10:55, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Use in crime full of speculation and redundant information
It would be good to go through this section and clean up citations, redundant information and re-organize for readability. I tried cleaning it up a bit but it really could use a rewrite. Smarter1 (talk) 05:11, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
Change to a label in the diagram
The user below has a request that an edit be made to Scopolamine. That user has an actual or apparent conflict of interest. The requested edits backlog is low. There are currently 56 requests waiting for review. Please read the instructions for the parameters used by this template for accepting and declining them, and review the request below and make the edit if it is well sourced, neutral, and follows other Wikipedia guidelines and policies. |
Someone (not I) has typed in a request for a change to labeling in the diagram. This request is in the Talk page, dated May 2024.
- What I think should be changed:
- Why it should be changed:
- References supporting the possible change (format using the "cite" button):
174.56.8.205 (talk) 07:27, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
References
- C-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Physical sciences
- C-Class vital articles in Physical sciences
- C-Class pharmacology articles
- High-importance pharmacology articles
- WikiProject Pharmacology articles
- C-Class Altered States of Consciousness articles
- Low-importance Altered States of Consciousness articles
- C-Class medicine articles
- Mid-importance medicine articles
- All WikiProject Medicine pages
- Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests