Jump to content

Talk:Citrus/GA1: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
ping
Line 22: Line 22:
| colspan="3" | '''1.''' {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|1}}: <!-- Well written. Add comments to the ends of the lines below. -->
| colspan="3" | '''1.''' {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|1}}: <!-- Well written. Add comments to the ends of the lines below. -->
<!-- The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct. -->
<!-- The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct. -->
{{GATable/item|1a|pass|[[User:Stivushka|Stivushka]] ([[User talk:Stivushka|talk]]) 10:30, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
{{GATable/item|1a|pass|Well written. Article has a nice flow and is easy to understand.[[User:Stivushka|Stivushka]] ([[User talk:Stivushka|talk]]) 07:33, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
}}
}}
<!-- it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. -->
<!-- it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. -->
{{GATable/item|1b|pass|[[User:Stivushka|Stivushka]] ([[User talk:Stivushka|talk]]) 10:30, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
{{GATable/item|1b|pass|Fully complies. Similar layout and prose style to other fruit related articles which have been reviewed and accepted as GA.[[User:Stivushka|Stivushka]] ([[User talk:Stivushka|talk]]) 07:33, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
}}
}}
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
| colspan="3" | '''2.''' {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|2}}, as shown by a [[WP:GAN/I#R3|source spot-check]]: <!-- Verifiable. Add comments to the ends of the lines below (after |). -->
| colspan="3" | '''2.''' {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|2}}, as shown by a [[WP:GAN/I#R3|source spot-check]]: <!-- Verifiable. Add comments to the ends of the lines below (after |). -->
<!-- It provides references to all sources of information in the section(s) dedicated to the attribution of these sources according to the guide to layout. -->
<!-- It provides references to all sources of information in the section(s) dedicated to the attribution of these sources according to the guide to layout. -->
{{GATable/item|2a|pass|[[User:Stivushka|Stivushka]] ([[User talk:Stivushka|talk]]) 10:30, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
{{GATable/item|2a|pass| Confirmed
}}
}}
<!-- All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines. -->
<!-- All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines. -->
Line 49: Line 49:
}}
}}
<!-- It contains no original research. -->
<!-- It contains no original research. -->
{{GATable/item|2c|pass|[[User:Stivushka|Stivushka]] ([[User talk:Stivushka|talk]]) 10:30, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
{{GATable/item|2c|pass|No original research found
}}
}}
<!-- It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism. -->
<!-- It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism. -->
{{GATable/item|2d|pass|[[User:Stivushka|Stivushka]] ([[User talk:Stivushka|talk]]) 10:30, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
{{GATable/item|2d|pass|No copyright violations
}}
}}
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
| colspan="3" | '''3.''' {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|3}}: <!-- Broad. Add comments to the ends of the lines below (after |). -->
| colspan="3" | '''3.''' {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|3}}: <!-- Broad. Add comments to the ends of the lines below (after |). -->
<!-- Coverage. It addresses the [[Wikipedia:Out of scope|main aspects of the topic]]. -->
<!-- Coverage. It addresses the [[Wikipedia:Out of scope|main aspects of the topic]]. -->
{{GATable/item|3a|pass|A blend of history, science, art and culture as these topics related to the Citrus plants.
{{GATable/item|3a|pass|[[User:Stivushka|Stivushka]] ([[User talk:Stivushka|talk]]) 10:30, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
}}
}}
<!-- Focus. It stays [[Wikipedia:Article size|focused on the topic]] without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). -->
<!-- Focus. It stays [[Wikipedia:Article size|focused on the topic]] without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). -->
{{GATable/item|3b|pass|[[User:Stivushka|Stivushka]] ([[User talk:Stivushka|talk]]) 10:30, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
{{GATable/item|3b|pass|Its subjective but I think the article strikes a good balance.
}}
}}
<!-- Neutral. Add comments to the end of the line below (after |). -->
<!-- Neutral. Add comments to the end of the line below (after |). -->
{{GATable/item|4|pass|[[User:Stivushka|Stivushka]] ([[User talk:Stivushka|talk]]) 10:30, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
{{GATable/item|4|pass|Article has neutral tone throughout.
}}
}}
<!-- Stable. Add comments to the end of the line below (after |). -->
<!-- Stable. Add comments to the end of the line below (after |). -->
{{GATable/item|5|pass|[[User:Stivushka|Stivushka]] ([[User talk:Stivushka|talk]]) 10:30, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
{{GATable/item|5|pass|Stable article, no edit warring or other similar
}}
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
|- style="vertical-align:top;"
| colspan="3" | '''6.''' {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|6}}: <!-- Images. Add comments to the ends of the lines below (after |). -->
| colspan="3" | '''6.''' {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|6}}: <!-- Images. Add comments to the ends of the lines below (after |). -->
<!-- Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content. -->
<!-- Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content. -->
{{GATable/item|6a|pass|[[User:Stivushka|Stivushka]] ([[User talk:Stivushka|talk]]) 10:30, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
{{GATable/item|6a|pass|All images are either public domain or share-alike with appropriate commons tags. [[User:Stivushka|Stivushka]] ([[User talk:Stivushka|talk]]) 07:33, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
}}
}}
<!-- Images are [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Images#Pertinence and encyclopedic nature|relevant]] to the topic, and have [[Wikipedia:CAP|suitable captions]]. -->
<!-- Images are [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Images#Pertinence and encyclopedic nature|relevant]] to the topic, and have [[Wikipedia:CAP|suitable captions]]. -->
{{GATable/item|6b|pass|Excellent use of images. Diagrams made by Article's authors are of notably high quality and add positively to the article.[[User:Stivushka|Stivushka]] ([[User talk:Stivushka|talk]]) 10:30, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
{{GATable/item|6b|pass|Excellent use of images. Diagrams made by Article's authors are of notably high quality and add positively to the article. [[User:Stivushka|Stivushka]] ([[User talk:Stivushka|talk]]) 10:30, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
}}
}}
<!-- Overall. Add comments to the end of the line below (after |). -->
<!-- Overall. Add comments to the end of the line below (after |). -->
{{GATable/item|7|hold|Some changes made as part of GA review process. These can be reviewed in history section.
{{GATable/item|7|hold|Some changes made as part of GA review process. These can be reviewed in history section.


Well researched and written article.
Well researched and written article. A pleasant read with a good balance between the citrus plants history and taxonomy along with its uses in food and culture.


Some references need fixed. See section 3b.
<s>Some references need fixed. See section 3b. </s>


Once references fixed article will meet GA standard.
* {{u|Stivushka}} all done to date.
}}
}}
|}
|}

Revision as of 07:33, 29 October 2024

GA Review

GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Chiswick Chap (talk · contribs) 12:08, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Stivushka (talk · contribs) 06:26, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Review started

Many thanks for taking this on. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:33, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Review

Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. Well written. Article has a nice flow and is easy to understand.Stivushka (talk) 07:33, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. Fully complies. Similar layout and prose style to other fruit related articles which have been reviewed and accepted as GA.Stivushka (talk) 07:33, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check:
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. Confirmed
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).

Some documents referenced need the specific page or page ranges added. Ref numbers 32, 45, 48, 55, 64

  • 32: cited to a single chapter of the book already.
  • 45: Page and quote added.
  • 48: Pages added.
  • 55: Pages added.
  • 64: Pages added.

Ref 63 has range of 20 pages. Can specific page or narrower range of pages be given?

  • Done.

Ref 36 - Dead link

  • URL updated.
2c. it contains no original research. No original research found
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. No copyright violations
3. Broad in its coverage:
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. A blend of history, science, art and culture as these topics related to the Citrus plants.
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). Its subjective but I think the article strikes a good balance.
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. Article has neutral tone throughout.

{{GATable/item|5|pass|Stable article, no edit warring or other similar

6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. All images are either public domain or share-alike with appropriate commons tags. Stivushka (talk) 07:33, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. Excellent use of images. Diagrams made by Article's authors are of notably high quality and add positively to the article. Stivushka (talk) 10:30, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
7. Overall assessment. Some changes made as part of GA review process. These can be reviewed in history section.

Well researched and written article. A pleasant read with a good balance between the citrus plants history and taxonomy along with its uses in food and culture.

Some references need fixed. See section 3b.


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Citrus/GA1&oldid=1254063902"