Talk:Democratic backsliding by country: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 13:03, 4 November 2024

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Democratic backsliding by country. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Democratic backsliding by country at the Reference desk.

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.

Politics Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Human rights Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of democratic backsliding was copied or moved into democratic backsliding by country with this edit on 10:09, 20 May 2022 (UTC). The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Copied from template

@Buidhe Can you set the Template:Copied here and fix the refs that aren't copied? ;) — DaxServer (t · m · c) 10:03, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done (t · c) buidhe 10:11, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Open Democracy

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 31 August 2022 and 7 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Rayyan Valaydon (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Rayyan Valaydon (talk) 20:46, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Israel update

One section of the Israeli judicial overhaul has passed that stops the supreme court from overturning government decisions. Monochromemelo1 (talk) 18:43, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pakistan/ Bangladesh

Is it true that no democratic backsliding has happened in Pakistan or Bangladesh? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kpbolumbu (talk • contribs) 14:00, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

They should definitely be included. Charles Essie (talk) 03:14, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

which one should be included first? the one in these countries or the one in Bharat?Kpbolumbu (talk) Kpbolumbu (talk) 15:24, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Repairing insufficient attribution

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Democratic backsliding by country was copied or moved into Democracy in Venezuela with this edit on 25 February 2024‎. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

HudecEmil (talk) 19:26, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Very long

This article is too long to read and navigate comfortably. When the tag was added, its readable prose size was 13,272 words. Consider splitting content into sub-article or condensing it. The article size impacts usability in multiple ways: Reader issues, such as attention span, readability, organization, information saturation, etc. (when articles are large). Total article size should be kept reasonably low, particularly for readers using slow internet connections or mobile devices or who have slow computer loading. Some large articles exist for topics that require depth and detail, but typically articles of such size are split into two or more smaller articles.

Word count	What to do
> 15,000 words	Almost certainly should be divided or trimmed.
this article 13,272 words	Almost certainly should be divided or trimmed
> 9,000 words	Probably should be divided or trimmed.

✦•┈๑⋅⋯ Isaidnoway (talk) ⋯⋅๑┈•✦08:39, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Image

Why is Russia the only country that has a photo of its president in the article? Does Putin's picture somehow help in understanding democratic backsliding? Why don't we have the photos of other president's of countries with democratic backsliding in the article? Nakonana (talk) 12:28, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Germany

No democratic backsliding there despite populist parties like the Alternative for Germany gaining much traction?[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] Concerns about freedom of press? [6] [7] [8] Weren't there even discussions about reintroducing border check points to fellow Schengen countries? [9] [10] Changes to electoral law? [11] [12] Nakonana (talk) 13:03, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 53: / Line 53: @@
 Why is Russia the only country that has a photo of its president in the article? Does Putin's picture somehow help in understanding democratic backsliding? Why don't we have the photos of other president's of countries with democratic backsliding in the article? [[User:Nakonana|Nakonana]] ([[User talk:Nakonana|talk]]) 12:28, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
+== Germany  ==
+No democratic backsliding there despite populist parties like the Alternative for Germany gaining much traction?[https://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/german-democracy-eroding-amid-populist-rise-a-1122271.html] [https://www.democratic-erosion.com/2021/11/30/the-far-right-is-eroding-german-democracy-and-merkel-is-the-catalyst/] [https://www.dw.com/en/germany-moves-to-protect-top-court-against-far-right/a-68403671] [https://www.dw.com/en/angela-merkel-warns-against-erosion-of-democracy/a-45238565] [https://www.hrw.org/news/2021/06/24/germanys-new-surveillance-laws-raise-privacy-concerns] Concerns about freedom of press? [https://rsf.org/en/universal-periodic-review-rsf-regrets-german-government-has-failed-address-steady-press-freedom] [https://kopfzeilemagazin.com/en/2023/05/08/what-is-behind-germanys-descent-in-the-rankings-for-freedom-of-the-press/] [https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/7179] Weren't there even discussions about reintroducing border check points to fellow [[Schengen Area|Schengen countries]]? [https://www.dw.com/en/german-police-reintroduce-spot-controls-at-all-borders/a-70240598] [https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/germanys-tighter-border-controls-take-effect-irking-neighbours-2024-09-16/] Changes to electoral law? [https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/german-court-rejects-electoral-reform-win-smaller-parties-2024-07-30/] [https://www.dw.com/en/top-german-court-finds-fault-with-electoral-law-reform/a-69806049] [[User:Nakonana|Nakonana]] ([[User talk:Nakonana|talk]]) 13:03, 4 November 2024 (UTC)