Jump to content

User:Jiayingchi.lucie: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
starting to write. added prompt and general info
adding paragraph1
Line 6: Line 6:
# Provide detailed, concrete, and actionable advice to the Wikipedia community and the Wikimedia Foundation. What should Wikipedia think about doing? What should they think about changing?
# Provide detailed, concrete, and actionable advice to the Wikipedia community and the Wikimedia Foundation. What should Wikipedia think about doing? What should they think about changing?
# Justify your recommendations regarding the theories and principles we've covered. Why should your recommendations be taken more seriously than just random advice from a user?
# Justify your recommendations regarding the theories and principles we've covered. Why should your recommendations be taken more seriously than just random advice from a user?
# To the extent it is relevant, feel free to comment directly on your experience in Wikipedia. When you do so, connect your experiences in Wikipedia explicitly to the concepts in the course material we have covered.
# To the extent it is relevant, feel free to comment directly on your experience in Wikipedia. When you do so, connect your experiences in Wikipedia explicitly to the concepts in the course material we have covered
To my colleagues of Wikimedia foundation,

I'm honored to have the opportunity to help the Wikipedia Community become a more convenient, practical, and warmer community for the users. Acknowledged by the public, Wikipedia is a widely used encyclopedia containing information across subjects and heavily relies on volunteering human contributors. In addition, the decision of incorporating Generative AI into Wikipedia should be made carefully. In my point of view, I support the idea of using Generative AI but also would like to add moderation and regulatory policies for it use. In the following paragraphs, I would like to provide two detailed and actionable suggestions and one concern for Generative AI incorporation, and hopefully the advice provides a new perspecitive for my colleagues on what should we think about doing and changing.

First of all, introducing Generative AI to Wikipedia is a good news for both old users and new users by benefiting them in multiple aspects. Having the AI as a teaching assistant can help the new comers get familiar with Wikipedia pages and tool bars in a short time. It serves as a tutorial assistant and guides the new comers to navigate the pages such as how to edit an article and how to use the 'talk page' to communicate with other users. Covered in class discussions, we learned that a big challenge for new comers is the nervous of using non-familiar websites, struggling with how And, once they get familiar with the online community, they are more likely to stay.

Moreover, Having AI act as a regulatory service that holds all the rules and regulations can provide uses with things like a chatbot, to ask questions to, or as a site manager, that can easily detect and advise users on rules or copyright and regulations. New Wikipedians, can easily join the challenging discipline of researching articles, finding references, and making connections, all with the help AI.


it's a good news for new users!


Secondly, my concern is money!

Thirdly, controling trolls and

- '''Policing The Trolls: The Ins and Outs of Comment Moderation'''

'''NPR System:'''

* '''Multi-layered Filtering''': It combines software (Disqus), external robot filters, and human moderators, ensuring robust content moderation.
* '''Human Oversight''': Having external human moderators adds nuance to moderation, which algorithms might miss.

'''Specialized Moderation''': For sensitive topics like race (Code Switch), in-house staff provide more thoughtful curation.

'''Civil System:'''

* '''Machine Learning''': It improves over time, adapting to user behavior and becoming more efficient at detecting trolls and spammers.
* '''Community Feedback''': By engaging users in the moderation process (through voting), it encourages a self-regulating community.

'''Adaptive''': The system flags suspicious behavior like disingenuous voting and comments.




The platform relies on reliable sources and community guidelines to ensure information accuracy, making it a valuable resource for general knowledge and research, although users are encouraged to verify its content through primary sources.

Revision as of 02:43, 11 November 2024

Advising Wikipedians on AI (Artificial Intelligence)

Questions to answer in the writing

  1. Provide detailed, concrete, and actionable advice to the Wikipedia community and the Wikimedia Foundation. What should Wikipedia think about doing? What should they think about changing?
  2. Justify your recommendations regarding the theories and principles we've covered. Why should your recommendations be taken more seriously than just random advice from a user?
  3. To the extent it is relevant, feel free to comment directly on your experience in Wikipedia. When you do so, connect your experiences in Wikipedia explicitly to the concepts in the course material we have covered

To my colleagues of Wikimedia foundation,

I'm honored to have the opportunity to help the Wikipedia Community become a more convenient, practical, and warmer community for the users. Acknowledged by the public, Wikipedia is a widely used encyclopedia containing information across subjects and heavily relies on volunteering human contributors. In addition, the decision of incorporating Generative AI into Wikipedia should be made carefully. In my point of view, I support the idea of using Generative AI but also would like to add moderation and regulatory policies for it use. In the following paragraphs, I would like to provide two detailed and actionable suggestions and one concern for Generative AI incorporation, and hopefully the advice provides a new perspecitive for my colleagues on what should we think about doing and changing.

First of all, introducing Generative AI to Wikipedia is a good news for both old users and new users by benefiting them in multiple aspects. Having the AI as a teaching assistant can help the new comers get familiar with Wikipedia pages and tool bars in a short time. It serves as a tutorial assistant and guides the new comers to navigate the pages such as how to edit an article and how to use the 'talk page' to communicate with other users. Covered in class discussions, we learned that a big challenge for new comers is the nervous of using non-familiar websites, struggling with how And, once they get familiar with the online community, they are more likely to stay.

Moreover, Having AI act as a regulatory service that holds all the rules and regulations can provide uses with things like a chatbot, to ask questions to, or as a site manager, that can easily detect and advise users on rules or copyright and regulations. New Wikipedians, can easily join the challenging discipline of researching articles, finding references, and making connections, all with the help AI.


it's a good news for new users!


Secondly, my concern is money!

Thirdly, controling trolls and

- Policing The Trolls: The Ins and Outs of Comment Moderation

NPR System:

  • Multi-layered Filtering: It combines software (Disqus), external robot filters, and human moderators, ensuring robust content moderation.
  • Human Oversight: Having external human moderators adds nuance to moderation, which algorithms might miss.

Specialized Moderation: For sensitive topics like race (Code Switch), in-house staff provide more thoughtful curation.

Civil System:

  • Machine Learning: It improves over time, adapting to user behavior and becoming more efficient at detecting trolls and spammers.
  • Community Feedback: By engaging users in the moderation process (through voting), it encourages a self-regulating community.

Adaptive: The system flags suspicious behavior like disingenuous voting and comments.



The platform relies on reliable sources and community guidelines to ensure information accuracy, making it a valuable resource for general knowledge and research, although users are encouraged to verify its content through primary sources.