Jump to content

User talk:Jpgordon: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Your edit: new section
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Jpgordon/Archive 10) (bot
Line 16: Line 16:
For older history, check [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jpgordon&oldid=51591073] as well as the archives.
For older history, check [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jpgordon&oldid=51591073] as well as the archives.
__TOC__
__TOC__

== Please take a look at your latest unblock request ==

The history page of that talk page is a mess. [[User talk:FuelTheFuego 24]]. One of the IPs admits to being that user.

(If you don't see this immediately, it's likely another admin cleared it up already) <span style="background:#F1FEFE; border-radius:5px; box-shadow:darkgray 2px 2px 2px; padding:2px 5px;">[[User:Win8x|win8x]] ([[User talk:Win8x|talking]] &#124; [[Special:Contributions/Win8x|spying]])</span> 02:33, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

:I'm more inclined to just delete the whole page as vandalism. But I've rolled it back to the only edit from the actual user account, declined it, removed TPA, and protected the page. What a bore. [[User:Jpgordon|--jpgordon]]<sup><small>[[User talk:Jpgordon|&#x1d122;&#x1d106;&#x1D110;&#x1d107;]]</small></sup> 02:38, 22 October 2024 (UTC)


== Restaurant supplies ==
== Restaurant supplies ==
Line 36: Line 28:


:Clarify, please. Which guys do you mean? [[User:Jpgordon|--jpgordon]]<sup><small>[[User talk:Jpgordon|&#x1d122;&#x1d106;&#x1D110;&#x1d107;]]</small></sup> 20:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
:Clarify, please. Which guys do you mean? [[User:Jpgordon|--jpgordon]]<sup><small>[[User talk:Jpgordon|&#x1d122;&#x1d106;&#x1D110;&#x1d107;]]</small></sup> 20:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

== Invitation to participate in a research ==

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this '''[https://wikimediafoundation.limesurvey.net/294789?lang=en anonymous survey]'''.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its [[m:Special:MyLanguage/Research:Wikipedia Administrator Recruitment, Retention, and Attrition|Meta page]] and view its [[wmf:Special:MyLanguage/Legal:Administrator Experiences 2024 Survey Privacy Statement|privacy statement]] .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

[[mw:Special:MyLanguage/Wikimedia Research|WMF Research Team]]

<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">[[User:BGerdemann (WMF)|BGerdemann (WMF)]] ([[User talk:BGerdemann (WMF)|talk]]) 19:21, 23 October 2024 (UTC) </bdi>
<!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins&oldid=27650221 -->


== Administrators' newsletter – November 2024 ==
== Administrators' newsletter – November 2024 ==

Revision as of 13:56, 12 November 2024




For older history, check [1] as well as the archives.

Restaurant supplies

These guys seem to be rather international, e.g.:

https://ca.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fregidora

https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fritadeira

Is there a way to inform the other language versions of Wikipedia of this stuff? And should they be added to the global spam blacklist? Thanks, Polygnotus (talk) 15:49, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Clarify, please. Which guys do you mean? --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 20:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – November 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2024).

Administrator changes

readded
removed

CheckUser changes

removed Maxim

Oversighter changes

removed Maxim

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Mass deletions done with the Nuke tool now have the 'Nuke' tag. This change will make reviewing and analyzing deletions performed with the tool easier. T366068

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


Unblock/rename

Hi Jpgordon. I'm not an admin and admittedly I don't know much about responding to unblock requests, but I believe this unblock you declined wiped out the user's proposed new name. Just wondering if that was what you intended... I've seen other declined unblocks that preserved the user's new requested name. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 17:05, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, that's a bug to report in unblock reviewed, now under redevelopment. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 20:46, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Max45789

Hi, I have a question about sockpuppet templates. You unblocked Max45789 last December (User_talk:Max45789#Blocked_as_a_sockpuppet). What's the policy regarding the sockpuppet template on the user page User:Max45789 for cases like this? Should it stay or should it go? I noticed the user while trying to do some sock counting. I was looking at accounts that have been assigned to a sockmaster category but have no log entry and are not currently blocked (although they might be globally locked). Sean.hoyland (talk) 13:57, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The user can remove it any time they want. Or you can; they might consider it a favor. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 15:36, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Sean.hoyland (talk) 15:56, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit

This was brilliant. Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:14, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]