Talk:Keiki Province: Difference between revisions
Tag: |
Seefooddiet (talk | contribs) Proposing move to Keiki Province |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{WikiProject Korea |importance=low}} |
{{WikiProject Korea |importance=low}} |
||
}} |
}} |
||
== Requested move 17 November 2024 == |
|||
{{requested move/dated|Keiki Province}} |
|||
[[:Keiki-dō]] → {{no redirect|Keiki Province}} – This move would affect all the {{cl|Former prefectures of Japan in Korea}}, as well as that category name. |
|||
I think "Provinces" may be more appropriate, but still not sure. I moved all the other Korea prefecture pages from "-dō" to " Prefecture" following the category name, but @[[User:Robertsky|robertsky]] pointed out " Province" may be more appropriate. |
|||
"Prefecture" has kind of a loose definition, per [[Prefecture]] and [[Prefectures of Japan]]. The nature of prefectures in various countries differs; it's not really clear to me how these differ from provinces, esp given that colonial Korea was governed differently from Japan. |
|||
Both "prefecture" and "province" seem to be variously attested to for Korean provinces (as well as the use of transliterations of Korean names for Korean places during the colonial period). English terminology for Korean history is notoriously inconsistent. |
|||
Reading [[Prefectures of Japan]], it seems like "道" is also used for prefectures, but that doesn't necessarily guarantee that it would extend to Korea. [[Provinces of Japan]] seems to suggest that Japan itself adopted the prefecture system in the late 19th century, but that doesn't necessarily cover Korea. |
|||
However, recent RS on the colonial period seem to use "province" for this period (although these all seem to write from Korea-centric perspectives; using Korean-language terms for concepts during the colonial period). |
|||
* [https://www.google.com/books/edition/Korea_1905_1945/wkxfzgEACAAJ?hl=en] |
|||
* [https://www.google.com/books/edition/Japanese_Assimilation_Policies_in_Coloni/oj_IhRConN8C?hl=en&gbpv=1&printsec=frontcover] is less explicit, but same as above |
|||
* [https://www.google.com/books/edition/Korea_s_Twentieth_Century_Odyssey/GLHtAAAAMAAJ?hl=en] |
|||
* [https://uwapress.uw.edu/book/9780295992167/colonial-rule-and-social-change-in-korea-1910-1945/] |
|||
In short, I think there's a [[WP:COMMONNAME]] argument to use "Province" instead of "Prefecture". Either of the two is certainly better than the previous "-dō". [[User:seefooddiet|seefooddiet]] ([[User talk:seefooddiet|talk]]) 05:25, 17 November 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:25, 17 November 2024
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 17 November 2024
The request to rename this article to Keiki Province has been carried out.
If the page title has consensus, be sure to close this discussion using {{subst:RM top|'''page moved'''.}} and {{subst:RM bottom}} and remove the {{Requested move/dated|…}} tag, or replace it with the {{subst:Requested move/end|…}} tag. |
Keiki-dō → Keiki Province – This move would affect all the Category:Former prefectures of Japan in Korea, as well as that category name.
I think "Provinces" may be more appropriate, but still not sure. I moved all the other Korea prefecture pages from "-dō" to " Prefecture" following the category name, but @robertsky pointed out " Province" may be more appropriate.
"Prefecture" has kind of a loose definition, per Prefecture and Prefectures of Japan. The nature of prefectures in various countries differs; it's not really clear to me how these differ from provinces, esp given that colonial Korea was governed differently from Japan.
Both "prefecture" and "province" seem to be variously attested to for Korean provinces (as well as the use of transliterations of Korean names for Korean places during the colonial period). English terminology for Korean history is notoriously inconsistent.
Reading Prefectures of Japan, it seems like "道" is also used for prefectures, but that doesn't necessarily guarantee that it would extend to Korea. Provinces of Japan seems to suggest that Japan itself adopted the prefecture system in the late 19th century, but that doesn't necessarily cover Korea.
However, recent RS on the colonial period seem to use "province" for this period (although these all seem to write from Korea-centric perspectives; using Korean-language terms for concepts during the colonial period).
In short, I think there's a WP:COMMONNAME argument to use "Province" instead of "Prefecture". Either of the two is certainly better than the previous "-dō". seefooddiet (talk) 05:25, 17 November 2024 (UTC)