Talk:Humboldt squid: Difference between revisions
Cruel? |
Mgiganteus1 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Isn't that picture a bit cruel (or perhaps disturbing) to be used as the page's primary picture? Maybe a picture of the squid in the wild would be better ... --[[User:Georgethedecider|Georgethedecider]] 05:23, 7 April 2007 (UTC) |
Isn't that picture a bit cruel (or perhaps disturbing) to be used as the page's primary picture? Maybe a picture of the squid in the wild would be better ... --[[User:Georgethedecider|Georgethedecider]] 05:23, 7 April 2007 (UTC) |
||
:Found one. [[User:Mgiganteus1|Mgiganteus1]] 13:40, 25 April 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 13:40, 25 April 2007
Not sure the removed section was copyright violation. It is a quote from an account, presented as such and attributed. It is also arguably not a "substantial part" of the source. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 195.157.197.108 (talk • contribs) .
I have previously read that the ammonia present in large squid species is to deal with buoyancy issues. However since I don't have the time to look into this and no references to cite, I include this comment only as an aside. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.0.101.131 (talk • contribs) .
It seems a given that the stress of being fished and killed will produce a stress response. The last paragraph doesn't add much to the article. It also questionable to open the article by calling them "agressive predators" and ending with a description of them as "gentle".
I removed the claim that the animals are gentle and curious away from fishing boats. It might be true and if it is, it belongs in the article. However, it was unsupported and unreferenced. Jrkarp 17:02, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Cruel?
Isn't that picture a bit cruel (or perhaps disturbing) to be used as the page's primary picture? Maybe a picture of the squid in the wild would be better ... --Georgethedecider 05:23, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Found one. Mgiganteus1 13:40, 25 April 2007 (UTC)