Talk:Bucerius Law School/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
→How do I grab the GDFL from the German article?: archived using OneClickArchiver) |
→Stub: archived using OneClickArchiver) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
I saw [http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bild:Hh-Bucerius_Law_School.jpg this] free image on the German article and I'd like to use it --is there an easy way to transfer it to the English wikipedia? --[[User:Bobak|Bobak]] 00:11, 10 June 2006 (UTC) |
I saw [http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bild:Hh-Bucerius_Law_School.jpg this] free image on the German article and I'd like to use it --is there an easy way to transfer it to the English wikipedia? --[[User:Bobak|Bobak]] 00:11, 10 June 2006 (UTC) |
||
:Download and reupload to commons. I have done that. [[User:Kusma|Kusma]] [[User_talk:Kusma|(討論)]] 00:19, 10 June 2006 (UTC) |
:Download and reupload to commons. I have done that. [[User:Kusma|Kusma]] [[User_talk:Kusma|(討論)]] 00:19, 10 June 2006 (UTC) |
||
{{Clear}} |
|||
== Stub == |
|||
I attend this school. You call the article a stub - I think it's quite long for a really tiny university like Bucerius. What else would you want to know? --[[User:85.176.0.164|85.176.0.164]] 22:20, 25 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Well that's not true. It is yet the finest school for law in Germany... so I think it deserves some damn good treatment. |
|||
:'''Comment:''' So, why is this called a stub? See: {{Quotation|The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas, and may lack a key element; it has at least one serious element of gathered materials, including any one of the following:<br/>- A particularly useful picture or graphic<br/>- Multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic<br/>- A subheading that fully treats an element of the topic<br/>- Multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article|[[WP:GER/A]]}} |
|||
:This article don't have sections or subheadings. And a major problem there are no reliable, independent sources. Add them and this article will be start class or better. The image and the logo is not a ''"serious element of gathered material"'' IMHO. Greetings. [[User:Sebastian scha.|Sebastian scha.]] ([[User talk:Sebastian scha.|talk]]) 21:12, 27 September 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 02:35, 21 November 2024
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Bucerius Law School. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
How do I grab the GDFL from the German article?
I saw this free image on the German article and I'd like to use it --is there an easy way to transfer it to the English wikipedia? --Bobak 00:11, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
- Download and reupload to commons. I have done that. Kusma (討論) 00:19, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
Stub
I attend this school. You call the article a stub - I think it's quite long for a really tiny university like Bucerius. What else would you want to know? --85.176.0.164 22:20, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Well that's not true. It is yet the finest school for law in Germany... so I think it deserves some damn good treatment.
- Comment: So, why is this called a stub? See:
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas, and may lack a key element; it has at least one serious element of gathered materials, including any one of the following:
- A particularly useful picture or graphic
- Multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic
- A subheading that fully treats an element of the topic
- Multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article— WP:GER/A - This article don't have sections or subheadings. And a major problem there are no reliable, independent sources. Add them and this article will be start class or better. The image and the logo is not a "serious element of gathered material" IMHO. Greetings. Sebastian scha. (talk) 21:12, 27 September 2008 (UTC)