Talk:2024 Baltic Sea submarine cable disruptions: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 22:25, 22 November 2024

Not sure if Visegrád's Twitter is a reliable enough souce, but they state that the detention of Yi Peng 3 is under Article X of the Submarine Cables Convention. Might be worth mentioning in the article. Mjroots (talk) 07:17, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ==Submarine Cables Convention==
 Not sure if [https://x.com/visegrad24/status/1859187586519978421 Visegrád's Twitter] is a reliable enough souce, but they state that the detention of ''Yi Peng 3'' is under Article X of the [[Submarine Cables Convention]]. Might be worth mentioning in the article. [[User:Mjroots|Mjroots]] ([[User talk:Mjroots|talk]]) 07:17, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
-== Boarding ==
-The statement in the article regarding boarding of the ship is highly questionable. The webpage in the article ref. only refers to Financial Times, "citing sources". The [https://www.ft.com/content/383516a5-02db-46cf-8caa-a7b26a0a1bb2 only Financial Times article] mentioning Yi Peng 3 says nothing about boarding. [https://nyheder.tv2.dk/udland/2024-11-21-kinesisk-skib-har-kastet-anker-taet-ved-afgoerende-havgraense This article] from a Danish newsbroadcaster TV2, updated less then an hour ago, only mentions that the Danish Navy has not taken any other action then shadowing the chinese ship. IMO the statement should be removed from the article. [[User:Znuddel|Znuddel]] ([[User talk:Znuddel|talk]]) 20:08, 21 November 2024 (UTC)