Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sroheethicloud: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Adding new report for Sroheethicloud. |
Comment, marking case as closed (using spihelper.js) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
{{SPIpriorcases}} |
{{SPIpriorcases}} |
||
===25 November 2024=== |
===25 November 2024=== |
||
{{SPI case status|}} |
{{SPI case status|close}} |
||
====Suspected sockpuppets==== |
====Suspected sockpuppets==== |
||
{{sock list|1=Sroheethicloud|tools_link=yes}}<!-- Add more accounts or IPs to this template as needed --> |
{{sock list|1=Sroheethicloud|tools_link=yes}}<!-- Add more accounts or IPs to this template as needed --> |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
||
* {{adminnote}} Turns out user is using two different signatures pointing to same user id. Closed as report is in error. — [[User:rsjaffe|<b style="font-family:Papyrus;color:DarkSlateGrey;">rsjaffe</b>]] [[User talk:rsjaffe|🗣️]] 17:38, 25 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
||
Revision as of 17:38, 25 November 2024
Sroheethicloud
Sroheethicloud (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
25 November 2024
– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.
Suspected sockpuppets
- Sroheethicloud (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools
Both users created at exact same time. At Special:Permalink/1259481744#Complaint Against User:L5boat for Misrepresenting Historical Facts on the Kannappa, sock started the conversation and puppeteer continued it with "I" as if they were the same person. See rest of the conversation for more evidence. They have not answered direct questions about relationship to each other. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 17:32, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Comments by other users
- Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Administrator note Turns out user is using two different signatures pointing to same user id. Closed as report is in error. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 17:38, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
