Talk:Shock site: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 07:29, 2 December 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Shock site article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5: 6 months

This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

"Lazy Guide to Net Culture: NSFW". Scotsman.com. June 9, 2004.

Wikipedia is not censored.
Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image.

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

Keep, October 29, 2014, see discussion.
Keep, April 29, 2007, see discussion.
Speedy Keep, October 19, 2006, see discussion.
Keep, May 11, 2004, see discussion.

Internet culture Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

Pornography High‑importance

	Erotica and pornography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

If you are wondering why a certain shock site does not have an entry here, please check the archive index below to be aware of prior discussions. If you want to discuss one of these sites again, leave your message on this page.

We need images for this page

I think it would help a lot 2600:100E:B0A3:F4D6:3CE5:96DE:4988:87EA (talk) 20:27, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What kinds of images?

5.173.180.59 (talk) 08:57, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notable shock images (especially from the "golden age" in the 00s) that have copyright licenses compatible with Wikipedia policy.

Or really anything, even if it's obscure, due to the inherent difficulty in sorting out the copyright issues. Many notable images were taken from copyrighted pornography. Hunting down the licensing, or creators, is like finding hay in a burning needlestack.

Maybe a Wikipedian should make a shock image for demonstrative purposes? LesbianTiamat (She/Her) (troll/pester) 07:27, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 80: / Line 80: @@
 :[[Special:Contributions/5.173.180.59|5.173.180.59]] ([[User talk:5.173.180.59|talk]]) 08:57, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
 ::Notable shock images (especially from the "golden age" in the 00s) that have copyright licenses compatible with Wikipedia policy.
-::Or really anything, even if it's obscure, due to the inherent difficulty in sorting out the copyright issues. Many notable images were taken from copyrighted pornography.
+::Or really anything, even if it's obscure, due to the inherent difficulty in sorting out the copyright issues. Many notable images were taken from copyrighted pornography. Hunting down the licensing, or creators, is like finding hay in a burning needlestack.
 ::Maybe a Wikipedian should make a shock image for demonstrative purposes? [[User:LesbianTiamat|LesbianTiamat (She/Her)]] ([[User_talk:LesbianTiamat|troll/pester]]) 07:27, 2 December 2024 (UTC)