Jump to content

User:Wtmitchell/sandbox: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
save new sandbox content
checkpoint
Line 1: Line 1:


■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■-->
THIS IS A SANDBOX FOR THE '''[[Second Philippine Commission]]''' ARTICLE
THIS IS A SANDBOX FOR THE '''[[Second Philippine Commission]]''' ARTICLE



Revision as of 23:48, 3 December 2024

THIS IS A SANDBOX FOR THE Second Philippine Commission ARTICLE

Philippine Commission
Type
Type
From 1901–07
Unicameral

From 1907–16
Upper house
of the Philippine Legislature
History
FoundedMarch 16, 1900 (1900-03-16)
DisbandedOctober 16, 1916 (1916-10-16)
Preceded byU.S. military government
Succeeded byU.S. insular government
Leadership
Seats5

The Taft Commission, also known as the Second Philippine Commission (Filipino: Ikalawang Komisyon ng Pilipinas), was established by United States President William McKinley on March 16, 1900, following the recommendations of the First Philippine Commission, using presidential war powers while the U.S. was engaged in the Philippine–American War.

McKinley's letter of instruction to the commission defined American policies and intentions which make cultural and economic progress, acquire skill in self-government, and eventually progress to national independence. Emilio Aguinaldo, who led the Philippine war against America, wrote retrospectively in 1957 that McKinley's instructions to the commission would "prove one of the most important documents in the history of international relations."[1][2]

The Second Commission was at first the sole legislative body of the Philippines, then known as the Philippine Islands under the sovereign control of the United States. After the passage of the Philippine Organic Act in 1902, the Commission functioned as the house of a bicameral legislature until it was supplanted by an elected legislature established in 1916 by the Philippine Autonomy Act.

William Howard Taft was the first head of the Philippine Commission from March 16, 1900 until July 4, 1901, after which the commission's head also became the Civil Governor of the Philippines.[3] Taft served in that office until January 31, 1904, when he was appointed Secretary of War by President Theodore Roosevelt.[4] Taft was succeeded by vice-governor Luke Edward Wright and the Philippine Commission was subsequently headed by a number of persons, but is often mentioned informally and collectively as the "Taft Commission".

Background

The Second Philippine Commission (the Taft Commission), established by President William McKinley on March 16, 1900, and headed by William Howard Taft, was granted legislative as well as limited executive powers.[5] Between September 1900 and August 1902, it issued 499 laws, established a judicial system, including a Supreme Court, drew up a legal code, and organized a civil service.[6] The 1901 municipal code provided for popularly elected presidentes, vicepresidentes, and councilors to serve on municipal boards. The municipal board members were responsible for collecting taxes, maintaining municipal properties, and undertaking necessary construction projects; they also elected provincial governors.[7]

Commission membership

Members of the Philippine Commission
1900–1916[8]
Original members[a] Period of service
William Howard Taft* March 16, 1900 – January 31, 1904
Henry Clay Ide* March 16, 1900 – September 19, 1906
Luke Edward Wright* March 16, 1900 – March 30, 1906
Dean Conant Worcester March 16, 1900 – September 15, 1913
Bernard Moses March 16, 1900 – December 31, 1902
Subsequent Members Period of service
Benito Legarda September 1, 1901 – October 31, 1907
Trinidad Pardo de Tavera September 1, 1901 – February 1909
Jose de Luzuriaga September 1, 1901 – October 27, 1913
James Francis Smith* January 1, 1903 – November 10, 1909
William Cameron Forbes* June 5, 1904 – September 1, 1913
William Morgan Shuster September 26, 1906 – February 28, 1909
Newton W. Gilbert* July 6, 1908 – December 1, 1913
Rafael Palma July 6, 1908 – October 16, 1916
Gregorio S. Araneta February 25, 1909 – October 27, 1913
Juan Sumulong March 1, 1909 – October 26, 1913
Frank Branagan March 2, 1909 – October 26, 1913
Charles Burke Elliott February 14, 1910 – February 1, 1913
Francis Burton Harrison* September 2, 1913 – October 16, 1916
Victorino Mapa October 27, 1913 – October 16, 1916
Jaime C. de Veyra October 27, 1913 – April 7, 1916
Vicente Ilustre October 27, 1913 – October 16, 1916
Vicente Singson Encarnacion October 27, 1913 – October 16, 1916
Henderson Martin November 29, 1913 – October 16, 1916
Clinton L. Riggs November 29, 1913 – October 31, 1915
Eugene Elliott Reed May 24, 1916 – October 16, 1916
Winfred Thaxter Denison January 27, 1914 – March 31, 1916
  1. ^ An asterisk by the name denotes members who served in the Insular Government as Governor-General of the Philippines

Timeline

Eugene Elliott ReedWilford DenisonClinton L. RiggsHenderson MartinVicente Singson EncarnacionVicente IlustreJaime C. de VeyraVictorino MapaFrancis Burton HarrisonFrank BranaganJuan SumulongGregorio S. AranetaRafael PalmaNewton W. GilbertWilliam Morgan ShusterWilliam Cameron ForbesJames Francis SmithJose de LuzuriagaTrinidad Pardo de TaveraBenito LegardaDean Conant WorcesterHenry Clay IdeLuke Edward WrightBernard MosesWilliam Howard Taft

Legislative powers

Sultan Jamalul Kiram II with William Howard Taft of the Philippine Commission in Jolo, Sulu (March 27, 1901)

Background

Article 1, Section 1 of the United States Constitution specifies that the U.S. Congress exercises legislative power. Since the Philippines was in a state of war, however, the Executive Branch ran affairs there without much congressional intervention. President McKinley's instruction to the Philippine Commission in April 1900 directed that, "... Beginning with the 1st day of September 1900, the authority to exercise that part of the power of government in the Philippine Islands which is legislative, is to be transferred from the Military Governor to this commission." The instruction also gave the Commission the power to appoint officers under the judicial, educational, and civil service systems and in the municipal and departmental governments. The instruction charged the Commission, "... In all the forms of government and administrative provisions which they are authorized to proscribe, the Commission should bear in mind that the government which they are establishing is designed not for our satisfaction, or the expression of our theoretical views, but for the happiness, peace, and prosperity of the people of the Philippine islands, and measures adopted should be made to conform to their customs, their habits, and even their prejudices, to the fullest extent consistent with the accomplishment of just and effective government.".[5]

In a statement published on September 1, 1900, the commissioners announced the holding of public meetings every Wednesday and Friday to allow interested parties to comment and make suggestions on proposed legislative matters. The open sessions were mainly conducted in English and Spanish. As the Americans became familiar with Spanish, the commissioners allowed their guests to use the language of their choice.[9] William Forbes, later Governor General of the Philippines, wrote that he could not remember any instance where a commissioner protested because he could not understand an issue on linguistic grounds.[10]

The Spooner Amendment (U.S.)

A few months before the inauguration of Taft as governor-general, Senator John Spooner filed a bill giving unprecedented powers to the executive branch in the development of colonial policy in the Philippines.[11] The Democrats ferociously attacked the bill, resurrecting anti-imperialist arguments they had employed at the time of the Treaty of Paris. By February 1900, a filibuster was in full cry, with the Democrats determined to curb the powers of the Philippine Commission and reserve for Congress the right to grant franchises and sell lands in the Philippines.[12] The Spooner bill was rejected on September 1, 1900, but McKinley nevertheless granted the Taft commission legislative powers.[13] Legislators repackaged it as an amendment to the 1901 Army Appropriation Bill.[14]

The passage of the Spooner amendment was a significant milestone in the development of U.S.–Philippine policy because it allowed the president to govern the Philippines by the authority of Congress and not by his wartime authority as commander in chief.[15] Emilio Aguinaldo wrote in 1957 that the Spooner Amendment had laid the basis of a far-sighted and enlightened economic policy in the Philippines.[16]

The Philippine Organic Act (U.S.)

Historical marker near the Baden Powell Hotel on Governor Pack Road in Baguio commemorating the first summer session of the Taft Commission to be held in Baguio, the "Summer Capital of the Philippines."

The Philippine Organic Act of July 1902 was a basic law for the Insular Government (1901–1935). (The term "insular" refers to an unincorporated island territory.) The act provided that future appointments of the civil governor, vice-governor, members the Philippine Commission, and heads of Executive Departments shall be made by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. The act also provided for the establishment of a bicameral legislature composed of a lower house, the Philippine Assembly, which would be popularly elected, and an upper house consisting of the Philippine Commission. The two houses would share legislative powers, although the upper house alone would pass laws relating to the Moros and other non-Christian peoples. The act also provided for extending the United States Bill of Rights to Filipinos and sending two Filipino resident commissioners to Washington to attend sessions of the United States Congress. The Philippine Assembly elections of 1907 were held on July 30, 1907 and the 1st Philippine Legislature opened its first session on October 16, 1907.[7][17][18]

Legislation

The Taft Commission promulgated a total of 157 laws between September 1900 and July 4, 1901, when Taft became Civil Governor, classified as follows:[19]

Classification of Laws Passed by the Philippine Commission
Classification Quantity Percent
Local Government 46 29.30
Reorganization of Government Agencies 40 25.48
Appropriations for Government Expenditures 33 21.02
Judicial Reforms 12 7.65
Economic and Tariff 9 5.73
Public Works Projects 7 4.46
Public Health 4 2.55
Anti-Sedition 2 1.27
Church 2 1.27
Education 2 1.27
Totals 157 100.00

Following the advice of McKinley to start at the bottom and gradually move upward, over seventy percent of the laws dealt with local government and the bureaucracy; with more than half of these being acts extending the provision of the Provincial Government Act to the different provinces. Others were acts establishing municipalities, and the rest concerned the local police.[20]

The thirty-three appropriations laws passed were appropriations to pay certain expenses not covered by the General Appropriations Act, including salaries of government employees, burial benefits for victims of the war, funds for the construction of roads and bridges, and other miscellaneous expenses.[20]

Specific major items of legislation

Reorganization of local government units

The Commission created and reorganized government offices, including the following:[21][22]

Act Office
Act No. 7[23] Bureau of Statistics
Act No. 16[24] Bureau of Forestry
Act No. 17[25] Bureau of Mining
Act No. 20[26] Office of the Auditor
Act No. 46[27] Inspectors of Customs
Act No. 157[28] Board of Health

President McKinley had declared in his message to Congress in December 1899 that Philippine reconstruction should proceed by building up from the bottom.[29] McKinley's instruction to the Commission stressed that the establishment of civilian government should start from the smallest unit of political organization and gradually move towards Manila. In compliance with this, on January 31, 1901, the Commission enacted Act No. 82, a Municipal Code to guide the formation and management of towns, and six days later, Act No. 83, a which dealt with the procedure for the creation of provincial governments.[30] Both acts were titled A General Act for the Organization of Municipal Governments in the Philippines.[31][32]

In some instances, the Commission doled out government offices to persuade leaders of the resistance movement to give up the fight. General Martin Delgado, for example, was appointed the governor of Iloilo and similar moves were done in Cavite, Bulacan, and Laguna with the appointment of Mariano Trias, Pablo Tecson, and Juan Cailles, respectively.[33]

Members of the Revolutionary Government who later joined the Taft administration[34]
Name Position under the
Aguinaldo Administration
Position under the
Taft Administration
Cayetano Arellano Secretary of State Chief Justice
Victorino Mapa Counselor of the Revolutionary Government Associate Justice
T.H. Pardo de Tavera Assistant Secretary of State Commissioner
Benito Lagarda Vice President of the Malalos Congress Commissioner
Jose Luzuriaga President of the Reverend Congress of Panay Commissioner
Felipe Buencamino Secretary of State Civil Service Board
Felix Roxas Member of the Filipino Junta in Paris Governor of Batangas
Ignacio Villamor Malolos Congress delegate Judge
Gregorio S. Araneta Secretary of Justice Solicitor General
Martin Teofilo Delgado Commanding General of Panay Governor of Iloilo
Ambrosio Flores Assistant Secretary of War Governor of Rizal
Mariano Trias Secretary of War Governor of Cavite
Jose Serapio Colonel of the Revolutionary Army Governor of Bulacan
Gracio Gonzaga Secretary of the Interior Governor of Cagayan
Arsenio Cruz Herrera Assistant Secretary of Interior President of the Municipal Board of Manila
Jose Alejandrino General of the Revolutionary Army City Engineer of Manila
Modesto Reyes Member of the Filipino Junta in Paris City Attorney of Manila
Daniel Tirona Secretary of War Provincial Secretary of Cavite
Mariano Cunanan Major in the Revolutionary Army Principal Secretary of Pampanga
Mariano Crisostomo Malolos Congress Delegate Provincial Fiscal of Bulacan

The Civil Service Act

The first major legislation passed by the commission was Act No. 5, the Civil Service Act, enacted on September 19, 1900. From the passage of this act until the departure of Taft from the Philippines, the number of Americans and Filipinos applying to serve the government continued to increase, as follows:[21]

Period covered Examined Passed Appointed Percentage
appointed
English Spanish English Spanish English Spanish English Spanish
Up to July 2, 1901 550 821 314 383 126 157 23 19
July 3, 1901 –
September 30, 1901
154 259 68 79 89 75 58 29
October 1, 1901 –
September 30, 1902
1,267 2,072 794 916 558 515 44 25
October 1, 1902 –
September 30, 1903
1,248 3,105 828 1,633 579 820 46 27
Totals 3,219 6,167 2,004 3,011 1,352 1,567 42.00 25.41

The Education Act of 1901

General Elwell Otis had taken the initiative on September 1, 1898, of establishing a public school system, organizing seven schools in Manila. While the war was raging, American soldiers took time out to organize schools, and to teach classes. When General MacArthur assumed command, he continued the public education project and increased its budget. When the Taft Commission arrived in Manila, the Army had organized 39 schools in Manila with a daily attendance of between 4,500 and 5,000 students.[35]

Commissioner Bernard Moses, who had been an educator at the University of California, worked with Captain Albert Todd and Dr. Fred Atkinson to draft Act No. 74, also known as the Education Act of 1901.[36] The act was largely based on a report which Todd submitted to the Commission on April 17, 1900. Some of the recommendations in the Todd Report were:[37]

  • That a comprehensive modern school system for the teaching of elementary English be inaugurated at the earliest possible moment.
  • That industrial schools for manual training be established as soon as a fair knowledge of English has been acquired.
  • That all schools under government control be conducted in the English language so far as in any way practicable, and that the use of Spanish and the dialects be only for a period of transition.
  • That English teachers, well trained in primary instruction, be brought over from the U.S. in sufficient numbers to take charge of the schools of the larger towns at least.
  • That a well-equipped normal school be established for instructing natives to be teachers of English.
  • That in the larger towns a portion, at least, of the schoolhouse must be made of a modern structure, plainly but well and properly equipped.
  • That the school supported by the Government be divorced from the Church. If the natives desire schools in which religious instruction is to be given, that they furnish the entire support for the same from private sources, but attendance from the latter schools shall not excuse the children from attendance at the public school where English is taught. Also, the Parochial Church school, if such are maintained, shall be required to be equal in character of the general instruction to the public school.

On January 21, 1901, the commission enacted Act No. 74, establishing the Department of Public Instruction. Section One of the act provided that primary instruction should be free of charge and open to all Filipinos.[36] Commissioner Bernard Moses became Secretary of Public Instruction and Dr. Atkinson became General Superintendent of Public Instruction. Atkinson was tasked to put up a school in every pueblo and empowered to fix the salaries of teachers, formulate curricula, purchase school supplies, construct school buildings, and disburse the funds of the Department. A Superior Advisory Board assisted Atkinson in policy-making concerning educational needs and the condition of the islands. Act 74 divided the archipelago into divisions composed of school districts and ordered the creation of Normal and Trade schools in Manila and a School of Agriculture in Negros.[38]

At the time Taft arrived in the Philippines, the student-teacher ratio was one teacher for 4,179 students.[39] Section 15 of Act 74 empowered the general superintendent to import 1,000 teachers from the U.S. The first batch of 48 American teachers arrived in June 1901. The second batch of 509 teachers (386 men and 141 women, accompanied by 4 nurses, 13 spouses) arrived in August, and became known as the Thomasites, after the United States Army Transport Thomas, one of the ships which transported them.

From the very start, serious problems threatened the success of the educational program. Problems encountered included opposition from Catholic clerics, language difficulties, health problems and difficulty in adjusting to the tropical climate, financial problems brought on by delayed salary payments, lack of school buildings (many of the 2,167 primary schools existing before the war had either been destroyed or pressed into use by the army as barracks, prisons, or hospitals[40]), etc.[41] Cultural values which had developed under Spanish rule also posed a severe hindrance. The Thomasites had a difficult time convincing their students to give more importance to activities that developed critical thinking than to those which simply required rote memorization, or that coming an hour late or being absent to attend a town fiesta was a big shortcoming.[42]

Another problem encountered was difficulty in promoting equality among the students, as children of wealthy families thought they were entitled to special privileges. Some wealthy parents openly opposed the American educational system because of the insecurities it created. For them, education was a privilege of their class and should not be extended to the common people. They believed that general education would create an imbalance in the country's workforce, with the labor market having a surplus of people seeking white-collars and a shortage of people willing to engage in manual work. To address this concern, education officials propagated the trade and agricultural schools, explaining that graduates of these schools were at par with those earning degrees from the normal school and universities.[43]

As the years went by, the Thomasites won the respect and admiration not only of their students but also of their parents. The parents admired the way the American teachers treated their children and managed classroom activities. Specifically, they lauded the abolition of corporal punishment. The Thomasites' friendliness, informality, and approachability were admired by many Filipinos, who still remembered bad experiences with the aristocratic Spanish.[44]

Friar lands

The instructions of President McKinley to the commission stipulated that it was their duty to make a thorough investigation into the titles of large tracts of land held or claimed by individuals or by religious orders.[45] The commission conducted a series of public hearings into the matter beginning on July 31, 1900, and lasting until November.[46] On November 30, 1900, a 604-page report submitted by the commission discussed the friar lands in detail, recommending that "... the insular government buy the large haciendas of the friars and sell them out as small holdings to the present tenants."[47] In 1902, testifying in the U.S. before the House Committee on Insular Affairs, Taft repeated this recommendation, appraising the market value of the friar lands as between $2,500,000 to $7,000,000 in gold, and proposing that the Insular Government be allowed to float bonds for the purchase of the lands and use the proceeds from the sale of the lands to settle the bonds.[48]

The Philippine Organic Act, enacted in July 1902, authorized the Insular Government to purchase the friar lands, empowering it to issue bonds for the purpose.[49] Taft traveled to Rome in May 1902, meeting with Pope Leo XIII and proposing to buy the lands. The Pope promised to study the issue and expressed support for the American pacification program.[50] On November 18, 1902, Papal representative Jean Baptiste Guidi arrived in Manila to negotiate the sale of the lands. Taft commissioned a survey to determine their market value, and a purchase price of $7,239,784.66 was paid in December 1903 by the Insular Government.[51] The holdings amounted to some 166,000 hectares (410,000 acres), of which one-half was in the vicinity of Manila. The land was eventually resold to Filipinos, some of them tenants but the majority were estate owners.[52]

This was the first program of modern land reform in the Philippines.

See also

References

  1. ^ Aguinaldo 2016, pp. 133–134.
  2. ^ United States. President William McKinley (April 7, 1900). "Instructions of the President to the Philippine commission". The United States and its Territorieed : 1870 - 1925 " The Age of Imperialism. University of Michigan.
  3. ^ U.S. War Department 1901, p. 11.
  4. ^ "American President: A Reference Resource" Archived August 7, 2013, at the Wayback Machine. University of Virginia Miller Center. Retrieved on August 7, 2013.
  5. ^ a b Kalaw 1927, pp. 452–459 (Appendix F).
  6. ^ Chronology for the Philippine Islands and Guam in the Spanish–American War, U.S. Library of Congress, retrieved February 16, 2008.
  7. ^ a b "Philippines – United States rule". U.S. Library of Congress. Retrieved August 20, 2007..
  8. ^ Escalante 2007, pp. 132–133, citing Worcester 1930, pp. 62–63.
  9. ^ Escalante 2007, p. 88.
  10. ^ Escalante 2007, p. 88, citing Forbes 1945, p. 90.
  11. ^ Escalante 2007, p. 91, remarking that Secretary Root's biographer alleged that Root wrote the first paragraph of Spooner's bill in which the executive was empowered to establish civilian rule in the Philippines, citing Leopold 1954, p. 36.
  12. ^ Escalante 2007, p. 91, referencing Francisco & Fast 1985, pp. 221–237.
  13. ^ Blitz 2000, pp. 39–40.
  14. ^ United States. War Department (1901). Annual Reports of the War Department. U.S. Government Printing Office. p. 11.
  15. ^ Escalante 2007, p. 92; Blitz 2000, p. 41.
  16. ^ Aguinaldo 2016, p. 141.
  17. ^ "The Philippine Organic Act of July 1902". July 1, 1902. Retrieved July 5, 2007..
  18. ^ Zaide 1994, p. 285
  19. ^ Escalante 2007, pp. 122–123.
  20. ^ a b Escalante 2007, p. 123.
  21. ^ a b Escalante 2007, p. 98, citing Willis 1905, p. 54.
  22. ^ "Legislative Issuances of the Philippine Commission". Philippine Senate: Legislative Issuances. n.d.
  23. ^ "Act No. 7". Philippine Senate: Legislative Issuances. September 25, 1900.
  24. ^ "Act No. 16". Philippine Senate: Legislative Issuances. October 9, 1900.
  25. ^ "Act No. 17". Philippine Senate: Legislative Issuances. October 9, 1900.
  26. ^ "Act No. 20". Philippine Senate: Legislative Issuances. October 10, 1900.
  27. ^ "Act No. 46". Philippine Senate: Legislative Issuances. November 12, 1900.
  28. ^ "Act No. 157". Supreme Court E-Library. July 1, 1901.
  29. ^ Escalante 2007, p. 103, citing quote in Blount 1913, pp. 288–289.
  30. ^ Escalante 2007, pp. 103–106
  31. ^ "Act No. 82". Official Gazette of the Philippine government. January 30, 1901.
  32. ^ "Act No. 83". Official Gazette of the Philippine government. February 6, 1901.
  33. ^ Delgado, along with 30 officers and 140 riflemen, surrendered on January 10, 1901. Trias and 200 of his followers did the same thing on March 15, 1901. Escalante 2007, p. 109, citing Linn 2000, pp. 215, 295.
  34. ^ Escalante 2007, p. 110, citing U.S. Congress, House (1903), R.B. Horton (ed.), Committee on Insular Affairs: Committee Reports, Hearings and Acts of Congress Pertaining Thereto 1901–1903, Washington: Government Printing Office, pp. 26–27.
  35. ^ Escalante 2007, pp. 99–100.
  36. ^ a b Act No. 74[permanent dead link] (Enacted January 21, 1901), lawph.com.
  37. ^ Escalante 2007, pp. 100–101, citing U.S. Bureau of Census (1905), 1903 Census of the Philippine Islands, vol. III, Washington: Government Printing Office, p. 640.
  38. ^ Escalante 2007, p. 101.
  39. ^ Escalante 2007, p. 142.
  40. ^ Escalante 2007, p. 144, citing Willis 1905, pp. 228–229.
  41. ^ Escalante 2007, pp. 143–144
  42. ^ Escalante 2007, pp. 144–145
  43. ^ Escalante 2007, p. 145.
  44. ^ Escalante 2007, pp. 145–146.
  45. ^ Kalaw 1927, pp. 456–457.
  46. ^ Escalante 2007, p. 80.
  47. ^ Escalante 2007, pp. 83–84.
  48. ^ Escalante 2007, pp. 190–192.
  49. ^ Escalante 2007, pp. 198–199.
  50. ^ Escalante 2007, pp. 202–203
  51. ^ Escalante 2007, pp. 221–226.
  52. ^ Seekins 1993

Sources

Further reading

Books

Other items

  • Philippine House of Representatives Congressional Library

/* rm cats while editing in userspace

  • /