Jump to content

Loneliness in old age: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Jianan99 (talk | contribs)
revised parts below social network
Citation bot (talk | contribs)
Alter: pages, title, journal, last3, last4. Add: pages, doi-access, doi, doi-broken-date, volume, pmc, pmid, authors 1-1. Removed URL that duplicated identifier. Removed parameters. Some additions/deletions were parameter name changes. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Jay8g | Category:CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI | #UCB_Category 9/31
Line 7: Line 7:
''--Loneliness exhibits a U-shaped distribution across the life course, with heightened prevalence during both adolescence and late adulthood, and lower levels observed in middle adulthood.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Qualter |first1=Pamela |last2=Vanhalst |first2=Janne |last3=Harris |first3=Rebecca |last4=Van Roekel |first4=Eeske |last5=Lodder |first5=Gerine |last6=Bangee |first6=Munirah |last7=Maes |first7=Marlies |last8=Verhagen |first8=Maaike |date=2015-03-11 |title=Loneliness Across the Life Span |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1745691615568999 |journal=Perspectives on Psychological Science |volume=10 |issue=2 |pages=250–264 |doi=10.1177/1745691615568999 |issn=1745-6916 |pmid=25910393}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Lasgaard |first1=Mathias |last2=Friis |first2=Karina |last3=Shevlin |first3=Mark |date=2016-08-29 |title="Where are all the lonely people?" A population-based study of high-risk groups across the life span |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00127-016-1279-3 |journal=Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology |volume=51 |issue=10 |pages=1373–1384 |doi=10.1007/s00127-016-1279-3 |issn=0933-7954 |pmid=27571769}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Luhmann |first1=Maike |last2=Hawkley |first2=Louise C. |date=2016-05-05 |title=Age differences in loneliness from late adolescence to oldest old age. |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/dev0000117 |journal=Developmental Psychology |volume=52 |issue=6 |pages=943–959 |doi=10.1037/dev0000117 |issn=1939-0599 |pmc=8015413 |pmid=27148782}}</ref> Unlike loneliness experienced at younger ages, which is often transitional and linked to life changes such as entering adulthood or starting a career, loneliness in older age tends to be more persistent. For older adults, loneliness can stem from various life circumstances, including the loss of loved ones or close family members, living in assisted living or nursing homes, facing greater financial hardships, or experiencing lower socioeconomic standing, which collectively limit opportunities for meaningful social interactions.<ref name=":03">{{Cite journal |last1=Lim |first1=Michelle H. |last2=Eres |first2=Robert |last3=Vasan |first3=Shradha |date=2020-06-10 |title=Understanding loneliness in the twenty-first century: an update on correlates, risk factors, and potential solutions |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00127-020-01889-7 |journal=Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology |volume=55 |issue=7 |pages=793–810 |doi=10.1007/s00127-020-01889-7 |issn=0933-7954 |pmid=32524169}}</ref> Furthermore, risk factors for loneliness, including chronic illnesses, limited mobility, and reduced financial resources, are predominantly linked to older age.<ref>{{Citation |last1=Wethington |first1=Elaine |title=Social Isolation among Older People |date=2013-12-23 |work=The Handbook of Solitude |pages=242–259 |editor-last=Coplan |editor-first=Robert J. |edition=1 |publisher=Wiley |language=en |doi=10.1155/2023/7726692 |isbn=978-1-118-42736-1 |last2=Pillemer |first2=Karl |editor2-last=Bowker |editor2-first=Julie C. |doi-access=free}}</ref>''
''--Loneliness exhibits a U-shaped distribution across the life course, with heightened prevalence during both adolescence and late adulthood, and lower levels observed in middle adulthood.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Qualter |first1=Pamela |last2=Vanhalst |first2=Janne |last3=Harris |first3=Rebecca |last4=Van Roekel |first4=Eeske |last5=Lodder |first5=Gerine |last6=Bangee |first6=Munirah |last7=Maes |first7=Marlies |last8=Verhagen |first8=Maaike |date=2015-03-11 |title=Loneliness Across the Life Span |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1745691615568999 |journal=Perspectives on Psychological Science |volume=10 |issue=2 |pages=250–264 |doi=10.1177/1745691615568999 |issn=1745-6916 |pmid=25910393}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Lasgaard |first1=Mathias |last2=Friis |first2=Karina |last3=Shevlin |first3=Mark |date=2016-08-29 |title="Where are all the lonely people?" A population-based study of high-risk groups across the life span |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00127-016-1279-3 |journal=Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology |volume=51 |issue=10 |pages=1373–1384 |doi=10.1007/s00127-016-1279-3 |issn=0933-7954 |pmid=27571769}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Luhmann |first1=Maike |last2=Hawkley |first2=Louise C. |date=2016-05-05 |title=Age differences in loneliness from late adolescence to oldest old age. |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/dev0000117 |journal=Developmental Psychology |volume=52 |issue=6 |pages=943–959 |doi=10.1037/dev0000117 |issn=1939-0599 |pmc=8015413 |pmid=27148782}}</ref> Unlike loneliness experienced at younger ages, which is often transitional and linked to life changes such as entering adulthood or starting a career, loneliness in older age tends to be more persistent. For older adults, loneliness can stem from various life circumstances, including the loss of loved ones or close family members, living in assisted living or nursing homes, facing greater financial hardships, or experiencing lower socioeconomic standing, which collectively limit opportunities for meaningful social interactions.<ref name=":03">{{Cite journal |last1=Lim |first1=Michelle H. |last2=Eres |first2=Robert |last3=Vasan |first3=Shradha |date=2020-06-10 |title=Understanding loneliness in the twenty-first century: an update on correlates, risk factors, and potential solutions |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00127-020-01889-7 |journal=Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology |volume=55 |issue=7 |pages=793–810 |doi=10.1007/s00127-020-01889-7 |issn=0933-7954 |pmid=32524169}}</ref> Furthermore, risk factors for loneliness, including chronic illnesses, limited mobility, and reduced financial resources, are predominantly linked to older age.<ref>{{Citation |last1=Wethington |first1=Elaine |title=Social Isolation among Older People |date=2013-12-23 |work=The Handbook of Solitude |pages=242–259 |editor-last=Coplan |editor-first=Robert J. |edition=1 |publisher=Wiley |language=en |doi=10.1155/2023/7726692 |isbn=978-1-118-42736-1 |last2=Pillemer |first2=Karl |editor2-last=Bowker |editor2-first=Julie C. |doi-access=free}}</ref>''


<u>Loneliness follows a U-shaped distribution across the life course, peaking in adolescence and late adulthood while being less common in middle adulthood.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Caron |first=Christina |date=2024-05-21 |title=The Loneliness Curve |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/06/well/loneliness-mental-health-age.html |access-date=2024-11-29 |work=The New York Times}}</ref> Unlike the transient nature of loneliness during younger ages—often associated with life transitions like entering adulthood or starting a career—loneliness in older adulthood tends to persist. It is often driven by life circumstances such as the loss of loved ones, residence in assisted living or nursing homes, financial hardships, and lower socioeconomic status, all of which can reduce opportunities for meaningful social connections.<ref name=":252">{{Cite journal |last1=Hawkley |first1=Louise C. |last2=Cacioppo |first2=John T. |date=2010-07-22 |title=Loneliness Matters: A Theoretical and Empirical Review of Consequences and Mechanisms |journal=Annals of Behavioral Medicine |language=en |volume=40 |issue=2 |pages=218–227 |doi=10.1007/s12160-010-9210-8 |issn=0883-6612 |pmc=3874845 |pmid=20652462}}</ref> Additionally, risk factors such as chronic illness, limited mobility, and economic constraints become more prevalent with age, further exacerbating loneliness.<ref name=":262">{{Cite journal |last1=Holt-Lunstad |first1=Julianne |last2=Smith |first2=Timothy B. |last3=Baker |first3=Mark |last4=Harris |first4=Tyler |last5=Stephenson |first5=David |date=2015-03-11 |title=Loneliness and Social Isolation as Risk Factors for Mortality |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1745691614568352 |journal=Perspectives on Psychological Science |volume=10 |issue=2 |pages=227–237 |doi=10.1177/1745691614568352 |issn=1745-6916}}</ref></u>
<u>Loneliness follows a U-shaped distribution across the life course, peaking in adolescence and late adulthood while being less common in middle adulthood.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Caron |first=Christina |date=2024-05-21 |title=The Loneliness Curve |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/06/well/loneliness-mental-health-age.html |access-date=2024-11-29 |work=The New York Times}}</ref> Unlike the transient nature of loneliness during younger ages—often associated with life transitions like entering adulthood or starting a career—loneliness in older adulthood tends to persist. It is often driven by life circumstances such as the loss of loved ones, residence in assisted living or nursing homes, financial hardships, and lower socioeconomic status, all of which can reduce opportunities for meaningful social connections.<ref name=":252">{{Cite journal |last1=Hawkley |first1=Louise C. |last2=Cacioppo |first2=John T. |date=2010-07-22 |title=Loneliness Matters: A Theoretical and Empirical Review of Consequences and Mechanisms |journal=Annals of Behavioral Medicine |language=en |volume=40 |issue=2 |pages=218–227 |doi=10.1007/s12160-010-9210-8 |issn=0883-6612 |pmc=3874845 |pmid=20652462}}</ref> Additionally, risk factors such as chronic illness, limited mobility, and economic constraints become more prevalent with age, further exacerbating loneliness.<ref name=":262">{{Cite journal |last1=Holt-Lunstad |first1=Julianne |last2=Smith |first2=Timothy B. |last3=Baker |first3=Mark |last4=Harris |first4=Tyler |last5=Stephenson |first5=David |date=2015-03-11 |title=Loneliness and Social Isolation as Risk Factors for Mortality |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1745691614568352 |journal=Perspectives on Psychological Science |volume=10 |issue=2 |pages=227–237 |doi=10.1177/1745691614568352 |pmid=25910392 |issn=1745-6916}}</ref></u>


''--The prevalence of loneliness among older people varies regionally. Meta-analyses of studies in high-income countries reveal that moderate loneliness affects about 25.9% of older individuals, while severe loneliness is reported by approximately 7.9%.<ref name=":272">{{Cite journal |last1=Chawla |first1=Kavita |last2=Kunonga |first2=Tafadzwa Patience |last3=Stow |first3=Daniel |last4=Barker |first4=Robert |last5=Craig |first5=Dawn |last6=Hanratty |first6=Barbara |date=2021-07-26 |title=Prevalence of loneliness amongst older people in high-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis |journal=PLOS ONE |volume=16 |issue=7 |pages=e0255088 |bibcode=2021PLoSO..1655088C |doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0255088 |issn=1932-6203 |doi-access=free}}</ref> Estimates range from 4.2% to 6.5% in northern Europe, 7.3% to 10.5% in western Europe, 13.2% to 18.7% in southern Europe, 18.7% to 24.2% in eastern Europe, <ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Surkalim |first1=Daniel L |last2=Luo |first2=Mengyun |last3=Eres |first3=Robert |last4=Gebel |first4=Klaus |last5=van Buskirk |first5=Joseph |last6=Bauman |first6=Adrian |last7=Ding |first7=Ding |date=2022-02-09 |title=The prevalence of loneliness across 113 countries: systematic review and meta-analysis |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2021-067068 |journal=BMJ |volume=376 |pages=e067068 |doi=10.1136/bmj-2021-067068 |issn=1756-1833 |pmc=8826180 |pmid=35140066}}</ref>19.3% in United States,<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Theeke |first=Laurie A. |date=2009-01-15 |title=Predictors of Loneliness in U.S. Adults Over Age Sixty-Five |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apnu.2008.11.002 |journal=Archives of Psychiatric Nursing |volume=23 |issue=5 |pages=387–396 |doi=10.1016/j.apnu.2008.11.002 |issn=0883-9417}}</ref> and about 30% in China.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=YANG |first1=KEMING |last2=VICTOR |first2=CHRISTINA R. |date=2008-11-03 |title=The prevalence of and risk factors for loneliness among older people in China |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0144686x07006848 |journal=Ageing and Society |volume=28 |issue=3 |pages=305–327 |doi=10.1017/s0144686x07006848 |issn=0144-686X}}</ref><ref name=":111">{{Cite journal |last1=Chen |first1=Yu |last2=Hicks |first2=Allan |last3=While |first3=Alison E. |date=2013-05-28 |title=Loneliness and social support of older people in China: a systematic literature review |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12051 |journal=Health & Social Care in the Community |volume=22 |issue=2 |pages=113–123 |doi=10.1111/hsc.12051 |issn=0966-0410 |pmid=23714357}}</ref>''
''--The prevalence of loneliness among older people varies regionally. Meta-analyses of studies in high-income countries reveal that moderate loneliness affects about 25.9% of older individuals, while severe loneliness is reported by approximately 7.9%.<ref name=":272">{{Cite journal |last1=Chawla |first1=Kavita |last2=Kunonga |first2=Tafadzwa Patience |last3=Stow |first3=Daniel |last4=Barker |first4=Robert |last5=Craig |first5=Dawn |last6=Hanratty |first6=Barbara |date=2021-07-26 |title=Prevalence of loneliness amongst older people in high-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis |journal=PLOS ONE |volume=16 |issue=7 |pages=e0255088 |bibcode=2021PLoSO..1655088C |doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0255088 |issn=1932-6203 |doi-access=free|pmid=34310643 |pmc=8312979 }}</ref> Estimates range from 4.2% to 6.5% in northern Europe, 7.3% to 10.5% in western Europe, 13.2% to 18.7% in southern Europe, 18.7% to 24.2% in eastern Europe, <ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Surkalim |first1=Daniel L |last2=Luo |first2=Mengyun |last3=Eres |first3=Robert |last4=Gebel |first4=Klaus |last5=van Buskirk |first5=Joseph |last6=Bauman |first6=Adrian |last7=Ding |first7=Ding |date=2022-02-09 |title=The prevalence of loneliness across 113 countries: systematic review and meta-analysis |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2021-067068 |journal=BMJ |volume=376 |pages=e067068 |doi=10.1136/bmj-2021-067068 |issn=1756-1833 |pmc=8826180 |pmid=35140066}}</ref>19.3% in United States,<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Theeke |first=Laurie A. |date=2009-01-15 |title=Predictors of Loneliness in U.S. Adults Over Age Sixty-Five |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apnu.2008.11.002 |journal=Archives of Psychiatric Nursing |volume=23 |issue=5 |pages=387–396 |doi=10.1016/j.apnu.2008.11.002 |pmid=19766930 |issn=0883-9417}}</ref> and about 30% in China.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=YANG |first1=KEMING |last2=VICTOR |first2=CHRISTINA R. |date=2008-11-03 |title=The prevalence of and risk factors for loneliness among older people in China |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0144686x07006848 |journal=Ageing and Society |volume=28 |issue=3 |pages=305–327 |doi=10.1017/s0144686x07006848 |issn=0144-686X}}</ref><ref name=":111">{{Cite journal |last1=Chen |first1=Yu |last2=Hicks |first2=Allan |last3=While |first3=Alison E. |date=2013-05-28 |title=Loneliness and social support of older people in China: a systematic literature review |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12051 |journal=Health & Social Care in the Community |volume=22 |issue=2 |pages=113–123 |doi=10.1111/hsc.12051 |issn=0966-0410 |pmid=23714357}}</ref>''


<u>In some countries and regions, including China, Europe, Latin America, and the United States, up to one-third of older adults experience loneliness.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Reducing Social Isolation and Loneliness among Older People |url=https://www.who.int/activities/reducing-social-isolation-and-loneliness-among-older-people |access-date=2024-12-04 |website=World Health Organization |language=en}}</ref> Meta-analyses of studies in high-income countries estimate that 25.9% of older adults experience moderate loneliness, while 7.9% experience severe loneliness.<ref name=":272" /></u>
<u>In some countries and regions, including China, Europe, Latin America, and the United States, up to one-third of older adults experience loneliness.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Reducing Social Isolation and Loneliness among Older People |url=https://www.who.int/activities/reducing-social-isolation-and-loneliness-among-older-people |access-date=2024-12-04 |website=World Health Organization |language=en}}</ref> Meta-analyses of studies in high-income countries estimate that 25.9% of older adults experience moderate loneliness, while 7.9% experience severe loneliness.<ref name=":272" /></u>
Line 33: Line 33:
To reduce the risk of exposure, older adults were widely encouraged to self-isolate, while long-term care facilities implemented strict protocols, including restricting visits from family and friends. Although these measures were essential for minimizing virus transmission, they significantly affected older adults' mental health, increasing social isolation and loneliness.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Wu |first=Bei |date=2020-06-05 |title=Social isolation and loneliness among older adults in the context of COVID-19: a global challenge |journal=Global Health Research and Policy |volume=5 |issue=1 |page=27 |doi=10.1186/s41256-020-00154-3 |issn=2397-0642 |pmc=7272234 |pmid=32514427 |doi-access=free}}</ref>
To reduce the risk of exposure, older adults were widely encouraged to self-isolate, while long-term care facilities implemented strict protocols, including restricting visits from family and friends. Although these measures were essential for minimizing virus transmission, they significantly affected older adults' mental health, increasing social isolation and loneliness.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Wu |first=Bei |date=2020-06-05 |title=Social isolation and loneliness among older adults in the context of COVID-19: a global challenge |journal=Global Health Research and Policy |volume=5 |issue=1 |page=27 |doi=10.1186/s41256-020-00154-3 |issn=2397-0642 |pmc=7272234 |pmid=32514427 |doi-access=free}}</ref>


Studies conducted during the pandemic revealed elevated levels of loneliness among older adults, with prevalence rates ranging from 23.4% to 59.3%.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Dziedzic |first1=Beata |last2=Idzik |first2=Anna |last3=Kobos |first3=Ewa |last4=Sienkiewicz |first4=Zofia |last5=Kryczka |first5=Tomasz |last6=Fidecki |first6=Wiesław |last7=Wysokiński |first7=Mariusz |date=2021-11-02 |title=Loneliness and mental health among the elderly in Poland during the COVID-19 pandemic |journal=BMC Public Health |language=en |volume=21 |issue=1 |doi=10.1186/s12889-021-12029-4 |issn=1471-2458 |doi-access=free}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=O’Shea |first1=Brendan Q. |last2=Finlay |first2=Jessica M. |last3=Kler |first3=Jasdeep |last4=Joseph |first4=Carly A. |last5=Kobayashi |first5=Lindsay C. |date=2021-07-20 |title=Loneliness Among US Adults Aged ≥55 Early in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Findings From the COVID-19 Coping Study |url=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00333549211029965 |journal=Public Health Reports |language=en |volume=136 |issue=6 |pages=754–764 |doi=10.1177/00333549211029965 |issn=0033-3549 |pmid=34283657}}</ref> According to a meta-analysis of 30 studies conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, 28.6% of older persons reported feeling lonely during the pooled time.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Su |first1=Yingying |last2=Rao |first2=Wenwang |last3=Li |first3=Muzi |last4=Caron |first4=Gabriel |last5=D’Arcy |first5=Carl |last6=Meng |first6=Xiangfei |date=2022-03-31 |title=Prevalence of loneliness and social isolation among older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1041610222000199 |journal=International Psychogeriatrics |volume=35 |issue=5 |pages=229–241 |doi=10.1017/s1041610222000199 |issn=1041-6102 |pmid=35357280}}</ref>  Prevalence estimates were notably higher in studies conducted three months after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic compared to those conducted within the three months preceding it. This highlights the impact of the pandemic and associated lockdown policies on loneliness among older adults.
Studies conducted during the pandemic revealed elevated levels of loneliness among older adults, with prevalence rates ranging from 23.4% to 59.3%.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Dziedzic |first1=Beata |last2=Idzik |first2=Anna |last3=Kobos |first3=Ewa |last4=Sienkiewicz |first4=Zofia |last5=Kryczka |first5=Tomasz |last6=Fidecki |first6=Wiesław |last7=Wysokiński |first7=Mariusz |date=2021-11-02 |title=Loneliness and mental health among the elderly in Poland during the COVID-19 pandemic |journal=BMC Public Health |language=en |volume=21 |issue=1 |doi=10.1186/s12889-021-12029-4 |issn=1471-2458 |doi-access=free|pmid=34727897 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=O’Shea |first1=Brendan Q. |last2=Finlay |first2=Jessica M. |last3=Kler |first3=Jasdeep |last4=Joseph |first4=Carly A. |last5=Kobayashi |first5=Lindsay C. |date=2021-07-20 |title=Loneliness Among US Adults Aged ≥55 Early in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Findings From the COVID-19 Coping Study |journal=Public Health Reports |language=en |volume=136 |issue=6 |pages=754–764 |doi=10.1177/00333549211029965 |issn=0033-3549 |pmid=34283657|pmc=8579390 }}</ref> According to a meta-analysis of 30 studies conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, 28.6% of older persons reported feeling lonely during the pooled time.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Su |first1=Yingying |last2=Rao |first2=Wenwang |last3=Li |first3=Muzi |last4=Caron |first4=Gabriel |last5=D’Arcy |first5=Carl |last6=Meng |first6=Xiangfei |date=2022-03-31 |title=Prevalence of loneliness and social isolation among older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1041610222000199 |journal=International Psychogeriatrics |volume=35 |issue=5 |pages=229–241 |doi=10.1017/s1041610222000199 |issn=1041-6102 |pmid=35357280}}</ref>  Prevalence estimates were notably higher in studies conducted three months after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic compared to those conducted within the three months preceding it. This highlights the impact of the pandemic and associated lockdown policies on loneliness among older adults.


These increases were particularly pronounced in individuals who were already lonely before the pandemic, highlighting their vulnerability to further mental health deterioration during prolonged isolation.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Creese |first1=Jennifer |last2=Byrne |first2=John-Paul |last3=Conway |first3=Edel |last4=Barrett |first4=Elizabeth |last5=Prihodova |first5=Lucia |last6=Humphries |first6=Niamh |date=2021-02-19 |title="We All Really Need to just Take a Breath": Composite Narratives of Hospital Doctors' Well-Being during the COVID-19 Pandemic |journal=International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health |language=en |volume=18 |issue=4 |pages=2051 |doi=10.3390/ijerph18042051 |issn=1660-4601 |pmid=33669828 |doi-access=free}}</ref> The pandemic emphasized the critical importance of addressing loneliness as a public health issue, particularly among older populations.
These increases were particularly pronounced in individuals who were already lonely before the pandemic, highlighting their vulnerability to further mental health deterioration during prolonged isolation.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Creese |first1=Jennifer |last2=Byrne |first2=John-Paul |last3=Conway |first3=Edel |last4=Barrett |first4=Elizabeth |last5=Prihodova |first5=Lucia |last6=Humphries |first6=Niamh |date=2021-02-19 |title="We All Really Need to just Take a Breath": Composite Narratives of Hospital Doctors' Well-Being during the COVID-19 Pandemic |journal=International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health |language=en |volume=18 |issue=4 |pages=2051 |doi=10.3390/ijerph18042051 |issn=1660-4601 |pmid=33669828 |doi-access=free|pmc=7921910 }}</ref> The pandemic emphasized the critical importance of addressing loneliness as a public health issue, particularly among older populations.


== Why Older Adults Feel So Lonely? ==
== Why Older Adults Feel So Lonely? ==
Line 47: Line 47:


==== Relationship Level ====
==== Relationship Level ====
The reduced number of social partners and frequency of social contacts lead to higher risks of loneliness.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Lang |first1=F. R. |last2=Staudinger |first2=U. M. |last3=Carstensen |first3=L. L. |date=1998-01-01 |title=Perspectives on Socioemotional Selectivity in Late Life: How Personality and Social Context Do (and Do Not) Make a Difference |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geronb/53b.1.p21 |journal=The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences |volume=53B |issue=1 |pages=P21–P30 |doi=10.1093/geronb/53b.1.p21 |issn=1079-5014}}</ref><ref name=":33" /> Changes in relationships, such as bereavement, divorce, or the loss of close companions (including pets), reduce the size and quality of older adults’ social networks. These shifts can erode emotional support systems and increase the risk of loneliness. Research shows that diminished contact with family members and friends significantly correlates with feelings of social disconnection.<ref name=":33" /><ref name=":43">{{Cite journal |last1=Vrkljan |first1=Brenda |last2=Montpetit |first2=Ariane |last3=Naglie |first3=Gary |last4=Rapoport |first4=Mark |last5=Mazer |first5=Barbara |date=2018-07-11 |title=Interventions that support major life transitions in older adulthood: a systematic review |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1041610218000972 |journal=International Psychogeriatrics |volume=31 |issue=3 |pages=393–415 |doi=10.1017/s1041610218000972 |issn=1041-6102 |pmid=29991365}}</ref>
The reduced number of social partners and frequency of social contacts lead to higher risks of loneliness.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Lang |first1=F. R. |last2=Staudinger |first2=U. M. |last3=Carstensen |first3=L. L. |date=1998-01-01 |title=Perspectives on Socioemotional Selectivity in Late Life: How Personality and Social Context Do (and Do Not) Make a Difference |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geronb/53b.1.p21 |journal=The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences |volume=53B |issue=1 |pages=P21–P30 |doi=10.1093/geronb/53b.1.p21 |pmid=9469168 |issn=1079-5014}}</ref><ref name=":33" /> Changes in relationships, such as bereavement, divorce, or the loss of close companions (including pets), reduce the size and quality of older adults’ social networks. These shifts can erode emotional support systems and increase the risk of loneliness. Research shows that diminished contact with family members and friends significantly correlates with feelings of social disconnection.<ref name=":33" /><ref name=":43">{{Cite journal |last1=Vrkljan |first1=Brenda |last2=Montpetit |first2=Ariane |last3=Naglie |first3=Gary |last4=Rapoport |first4=Mark |last5=Mazer |first5=Barbara |date=2018-07-11 |title=Interventions that support major life transitions in older adulthood: a systematic review |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1041610218000972 |journal=International Psychogeriatrics |volume=31 |issue=3 |pages=393–415 |doi=10.1017/s1041610218000972 |issn=1041-6102 |pmid=29991365}}</ref>


==== Community Level ====
==== Community Level ====
Line 53: Line 53:


==== Societal Level ====
==== Societal Level ====
Widespread ageism, including negative stereotypes and discriminatory practices, intensifies loneliness. The World Health Organization (WHO) highlights that ageism is a pervasive issue that undermines older adults’ sense of worth. In healthcare, for instance, the prioritization of younger individuals’ needs often marginalizes older adults, perpetuating feelings of social exclusion. Moreover, societal assumptions about older adults’ technological capabilities hinder their access to digital tools that could alleviate loneliness.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Lloyd-Sherlock |first1=Peter G |last2=Ebrahim |first2=Shah |last3=McKee |first3=Martin |last4=Prince |first4=Martin James |date=2016-08-31 |title=Institutional ageism in global health policy |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4514 |journal=BMJ |pages=i4514 |doi=10.1136/bmj.i4514 |issn=1756-1833}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Reese |first1=Peter P. |last2=Caplan |first2=Arthur L. |last3=Bloom |first3=Roy D. |last4=Abt |first4=Peter L. |last5=Karlawish |first5=Jason H. |date=2010-09-09 |title=How Should We Use Age to Ration Health Care? Lessons from the Case of Kidney Transplantation |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03031.x |journal=Journal of the American Geriatrics Society |volume=58 |issue=10 |pages=1980–1986 |doi=10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03031.x |issn=0002-8614 |pmc=4570233 |pmid=20831719}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Perrin |first=Monica Anderson and Andrew |date=2017-05-17 |title=Tech Adoption Climbs Among Older Adults |url=https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2017/05/17/tech-adoption-climbs-among-older-adults/ |access-date=2024-11-25 |website=Pew Research Center |language=en-US}}</ref>
Widespread ageism, including negative stereotypes and discriminatory practices, intensifies loneliness. The World Health Organization (WHO) highlights that ageism is a pervasive issue that undermines older adults’ sense of worth. In healthcare, for instance, the prioritization of younger individuals’ needs often marginalizes older adults, perpetuating feelings of social exclusion. Moreover, societal assumptions about older adults’ technological capabilities hinder their access to digital tools that could alleviate loneliness.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Lloyd-Sherlock |first1=Peter G |last2=Ebrahim |first2=Shah |last3=McKee |first3=Martin |last4=Prince |first4=Martin James |date=2016-08-31 |title=Institutional ageism in global health policy |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4514 |journal=BMJ |volume=354 |pages=i4514 |doi=10.1136/bmj.i4514 |pmid=27582131 |issn=1756-1833}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Reese |first1=Peter P. |last2=Caplan |first2=Arthur L. |last3=Bloom |first3=Roy D. |last4=Abt |first4=Peter L. |last5=Karlawish |first5=Jason H. |date=2010-09-09 |title=How Should We Use Age to Ration Health Care? Lessons from the Case of Kidney Transplantation |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03031.x |journal=Journal of the American Geriatrics Society |volume=58 |issue=10 |pages=1980–1986 |doi=10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03031.x |issn=0002-8614 |pmc=4570233 |pmid=20831719}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Perrin |first=Monica Anderson and Andrew |date=2017-05-17 |title=Tech Adoption Climbs Among Older Adults |url=https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2017/05/17/tech-adoption-climbs-among-older-adults/ |access-date=2024-11-25 |website=Pew Research Center |language=en-US}}</ref>


=== Individual Perspective ===
=== Individual Perspective ===
Line 98: Line 98:


==== '''Marriage and Widowhood''' ====
==== '''Marriage and Widowhood''' ====
Marriage is widely regarded as protective against loneliness in old age, offering emotional, psychological, financial, and physical benefits.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Carr |first1=Deborah |last2=Springer |first2=Kristen W. |date=2010-06-18 |title=Advances in Families and Health Research in the 21st Century |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00728.x |journal=Journal of Marriage and Family |language=en |volume=72 |issue=3 |pages=743–761 |doi=10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00728.x |issn=0022-2445}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Proulx |first1=Christine M. |last2=Helms |first2=Heather M. |last3=Buehler |first3=Cheryl |date=2007-07-05 |title=Marital Quality and Personal Well-Being: A Meta-Analysis |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00393.x |journal=Journal of Marriage and Family |language=en |volume=69 |issue=3 |pages=576–593 |doi=10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00393.x |issn=0022-2445}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=England |first1=Paula |last2=Waite |first2=Linda J. |last3=Gallagher |first3=Maggie |date=2001-11-01 |title=The Case for Marriage: Why Married People Are Happier, Healthier, and Better off Financially |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3088984 |journal=Contemporary Sociology |volume=30 |issue=6 |pages=564 |doi=10.2307/3088984 |issn=0094-3061 |jstor=3088984}}</ref> However, the quality of the marital relationship is critical; dissatisfaction with a spouse can exacerbate feelings of loneliness, while emotionally fulfilling and supportive marital relationships can mitigate it.<ref name=":143" /><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=de Jong Gierveld |first1=J. |last2=Broese van Groenou |first2=M. |last3=Hoogendoorn |first3=A. W. |last4=Smit |first4=J. H. |date=2009-07-01 |title=Quality of Marriages in Later Life and Emotional and Social Loneliness |url=https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/geronb/gbn043 |journal=The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences |language=en |volume=64B |issue=4 |pages=497–506 |doi=10.1093/geronb/gbn043 |issn=1079-5014 |pmid=19213848}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Ayalon |first1=Liat |last2=Shiovitz-Ezra |first2=Sharon |last3=Palgi |first3=Yuval |date=2012-07-13 |title=Associations of loneliness in older married men and women |url=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13607863.2012.702725 |journal=Aging & Mental Health |language=en |volume=17 |issue=1 |pages=33–39 |doi=10.1080/13607863.2012.702725 |issn=1360-7863}}</ref> Meanwhile, having a spouse with loneliness increases the risk of loneliness, which reflects dyadic partner effects and can be explained by the [[emotion-in-relationships model]] and [[Emotional contagion|emotional contagion theory]].<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Stokes |first=Jeffrey E. |date=2016-07-09 |title=Marital quality and loneliness in later life |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407515626309 |journal=Journal of Social and Personal Relationships |volume=34 |issue=1 |pages=114–135 |doi=10.1177/0265407515626309 |issn=0265-4075}}</ref>
Marriage is widely regarded as protective against loneliness in old age, offering emotional, psychological, financial, and physical benefits.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Carr |first1=Deborah |last2=Springer |first2=Kristen W. |date=2010-06-18 |title=Advances in Families and Health Research in the 21st Century |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00728.x |journal=Journal of Marriage and Family |language=en |volume=72 |issue=3 |pages=743–761 |doi=10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00728.x |issn=0022-2445}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Proulx |first1=Christine M. |last2=Helms |first2=Heather M. |last3=Buehler |first3=Cheryl |date=2007-07-05 |title=Marital Quality and Personal Well-Being: A Meta-Analysis |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00393.x |journal=Journal of Marriage and Family |language=en |volume=69 |issue=3 |pages=576–593 |doi=10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00393.x |issn=0022-2445}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=England |first1=Paula |last2=Waite |first2=Linda J. |last3=Gallagher |first3=Maggie |date=2001-11-01 |title=The Case for Marriage: Why Married People Are Happier, Healthier, and Better off Financially |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3088984 |journal=Contemporary Sociology |volume=30 |issue=6 |pages=564 |doi=10.2307/3088984 |issn=0094-3061 |jstor=3088984}}</ref> However, the quality of the marital relationship is critical; dissatisfaction with a spouse can exacerbate feelings of loneliness, while emotionally fulfilling and supportive marital relationships can mitigate it.<ref name=":143" /><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=de Jong Gierveld |first1=J. |last2=Broese van Groenou |first2=M. |last3=Hoogendoorn |first3=A. W. |last4=Smit |first4=J. H. |date=2009-07-01 |title=Quality of Marriages in Later Life and Emotional and Social Loneliness |url=https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/geronb/gbn043 |journal=The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences |language=en |volume=64B |issue=4 |pages=497–506 |doi=10.1093/geronb/gbn043 |issn=1079-5014 |pmid=19213848}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Ayalon |first1=Liat |last2=Shiovitz-Ezra |first2=Sharon |last3=Palgi |first3=Yuval |date=2012-07-13 |title=Associations of loneliness in older married men and women |url=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13607863.2012.702725 |journal=Aging & Mental Health |language=en |volume=17 |issue=1 |pages=33–39 |doi=10.1080/13607863.2012.702725 |pmid=22788950 |issn=1360-7863}}</ref> Meanwhile, having a spouse with loneliness increases the risk of loneliness, which reflects dyadic partner effects and can be explained by the [[emotion-in-relationships model]] and [[Emotional contagion|emotional contagion theory]].<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Stokes |first=Jeffrey E. |date=2016-07-09 |title=Marital quality and loneliness in later life |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407515626309 |journal=Journal of Social and Personal Relationships |volume=34 |issue=1 |pages=114–135 |doi=10.1177/0265407515626309 |issn=0265-4075}}</ref>


Having a spouse has been found to be significant not only as a close emotional connection but also in promoting engagement with a broader social network.<ref name=":143" /> As a result, the loss of a partner substantially heightens the risk of loneliness.<ref name=":153">{{Cite journal |last1=Victor |first1=Christina R. |last2=Bowling |first2=Ann |date=2012-03-19 |title=A Longitudinal Analysis of Loneliness Among Older People in Great Britain |url=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00223980.2011.609572 |journal=The Journal of Psychology |language=en |volume=146 |issue=3 |pages=313–331 |doi=10.1080/00223980.2011.609572 |issn=0022-3980}}</ref><ref name=":163">{{Cite journal |last1=Nicolaisen |first1=Magnhild |last2=Thorsen |first2=Kirsten |date=2014-02-17 |title=Loneliness among men and women – a five-year follow-up study |url=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13607863.2013.821457 |journal=Aging & Mental Health |language=en |volume=18 |issue=2 |pages=194–206 |doi=10.1080/13607863.2013.821457 |issn=1360-7863 |pmid=23895066}}</ref><ref name=":53" />  Many older individuals consider the death of a spouse the primary cause of their loneliness.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Heikkinen |first1=Riitta-Liisa |last2=Kauppinen |first2=Markku |date=2011-03-06 |title=Mental well-being: A 16-year follow-up among older residents in Jyväskylä |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2010.01.017 |journal=Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics |volume=52 |issue=1 |pages=33–39 |doi=10.1016/j.archger.2010.01.017 |issn=0167-4943}}</ref> Among widowed older adults, men tend to experience greater loneliness after the loss of a spouse, but women often benefit from stronger social networks with family and friends, which provide more opportunities for emotional support. Furthermore, older women are more likely to share the experience of widowhood with others due to the typical age gap between spouses and their higher involvement in social activities. In contrast, older men often have fewer social connections and may face greater challenges with loneliness after losing a spouse. However, men tend to have better prospects for remarrying in later life, which could reduce their loneliness.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Gerson |first1=Ann C. |last2=Perlman |first2=Daniel |date=1979 |title=Loneliness and expressive communication. |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0021-843x.88.3.258 |journal=Journal of Abnormal Psychology |volume=88 |issue=3 |pages=258–261 |doi=10.1037/0021-843x.88.3.258 |issn=0021-843X}}</ref><ref name=":163" />
Having a spouse has been found to be significant not only as a close emotional connection but also in promoting engagement with a broader social network.<ref name=":143" /> As a result, the loss of a partner substantially heightens the risk of loneliness.<ref name=":153">{{Cite journal |last1=Victor |first1=Christina R. |last2=Bowling |first2=Ann |date=2012-03-19 |title=A Longitudinal Analysis of Loneliness Among Older People in Great Britain |url=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00223980.2011.609572 |journal=The Journal of Psychology |language=en |volume=146 |issue=3 |pages=313–331 |doi=10.1080/00223980.2011.609572 |pmid=22574423 |issn=0022-3980}}</ref><ref name=":163">{{Cite journal |last1=Nicolaisen |first1=Magnhild |last2=Thorsen |first2=Kirsten |date=2014-02-17 |title=Loneliness among men and women – a five-year follow-up study |url=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13607863.2013.821457 |journal=Aging & Mental Health |language=en |volume=18 |issue=2 |pages=194–206 |doi=10.1080/13607863.2013.821457 |issn=1360-7863 |pmid=23895066}}</ref><ref name=":53" />  Many older individuals consider the death of a spouse the primary cause of their loneliness.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Heikkinen |first1=Riitta-Liisa |last2=Kauppinen |first2=Markku |date=2011-03-06 |title=Mental well-being: A 16-year follow-up among older residents in Jyväskylä |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2010.01.017 |journal=Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics |volume=52 |issue=1 |pages=33–39 |doi=10.1016/j.archger.2010.01.017 |issn=0167-4943}}</ref> Among widowed older adults, men tend to experience greater loneliness after the loss of a spouse, but women often benefit from stronger social networks with family and friends, which provide more opportunities for emotional support. Furthermore, older women are more likely to share the experience of widowhood with others due to the typical age gap between spouses and their higher involvement in social activities. In contrast, older men often have fewer social connections and may face greater challenges with loneliness after losing a spouse. However, men tend to have better prospects for remarrying in later life, which could reduce their loneliness.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Gerson |first1=Ann C. |last2=Perlman |first2=Daniel |date=1979 |title=Loneliness and expressive communication. |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0021-843x.88.3.258 |journal=Journal of Abnormal Psychology |volume=88 |issue=3 |pages=258–261 |doi=10.1037/0021-843x.88.3.258 |pmid=500953 |issn=0021-843X}}</ref><ref name=":163" />


=== '''Social-Economic Status''' ===
=== '''Social-Economic Status''' ===
Line 106: Line 106:


=== '''Health''' ===
=== '''Health''' ===
Health problems are major contributors to loneliness in older adults.<ref name=":123" /> Both chronic physical conditions and mental health issues, such as depression, are linked to increased loneliness. Studies have shown that difficulty performing activities of daily living, functional limitations, mobility issues and chronic disease are associated with loneliness among older adults. These health challenges hinder older adults' ability to sustain social connections and participate in social activities, which intensifies their loneliness.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Hawkley |first1=Louise C. |last2=Capitanio |first2=John P. |date=2015-05-26 |title=Perceived social isolation, evolutionary fitness and health outcomes: a lifespan approach |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0114 |journal=Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences |volume=370 |issue=1669 |pages=20140114 |doi=10.1098/rstb.2014.0114 |issn=0962-8436 |pmc=4410380 |pmid=25870400}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Cohen-Mansfield |first1=Jiska |last2=Parpura-Gill |first2=Aleksandra |date=2006-09-28 |title=Loneliness in older persons: a theoretical model and empirical findings |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1041610206004200 |journal=International Psychogeriatrics |volume=19 |issue=2 |pages=279 |doi=10.1017/s1041610206004200 |issn=1041-6102 |pmid=17005067}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Luo |first1=Ye |last2=Hawkley |first2=Louise C. |last3=Waite |first3=Linda J. |last4=Cacioppo |first4=John T. |date=2012-01-25 |title=Loneliness, health, and mortality in old age: A national longitudinal study |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.11.028 |journal=Social Science & Medicine |volume=74 |issue=6 |pages=907–914 |doi=10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.11.028 |issn=0277-9536 |pmc=3303190 |pmid=22326307}}</ref> Depression can either result from prolonged isolation or contribute to the development of loneliness, creating a cyclical relationship between the two.<ref name=":252" /><ref name=":173" />
Health problems are major contributors to loneliness in older adults.<ref name=":123" /> Both chronic physical conditions and mental health issues, such as depression, are linked to increased loneliness. Studies have shown that difficulty performing activities of daily living, functional limitations, mobility issues and chronic disease are associated with loneliness among older adults. These health challenges hinder older adults' ability to sustain social connections and participate in social activities, which intensifies their loneliness.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Hawkley |first1=Louise C. |last2=Capitanio |first2=John P. |date=2015-05-26 |title=Perceived social isolation, evolutionary fitness and health outcomes: a lifespan approach |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0114 |journal=Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences |volume=370 |issue=1669 |pages=20140114 |doi=10.1098/rstb.2014.0114 |issn=0962-8436 |pmc=4410380 |pmid=25870400}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Cohen-Mansfield |first1=Jiska |last2=Parpura-Gill |first2=Aleksandra |date=2006-09-28 |title=Loneliness in older persons: a theoretical model and empirical findings |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1041610206004200 |journal=International Psychogeriatrics |volume=19 |issue=2 |pages=279–294 |doi=10.1017/s1041610206004200 |doi-broken-date=5 December 2024 |issn=1041-6102 |pmid=17005067}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Luo |first1=Ye |last2=Hawkley |first2=Louise C. |last3=Waite |first3=Linda J. |last4=Cacioppo |first4=John T. |date=2012-01-25 |title=Loneliness, health, and mortality in old age: A national longitudinal study |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.11.028 |journal=Social Science & Medicine |volume=74 |issue=6 |pages=907–914 |doi=10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.11.028 |issn=0277-9536 |pmc=3303190 |pmid=22326307}}</ref> Depression can either result from prolonged isolation or contribute to the development of loneliness, creating a cyclical relationship between the two.<ref name=":252" /><ref name=":173" />


evidence supported the association between loneliness and incident dementia, prevalent paranoia and prevalent psychotic symptoms. factors cross-sectionally associated with loneliness were medical chronic conditions.
evidence supported the association between loneliness and incident dementia, prevalent paranoia and prevalent psychotic symptoms. factors cross-sectionally associated with loneliness were medical chronic conditions.
Line 117: Line 117:
=== '''Living Arrangement''' ===
=== '''Living Arrangement''' ===
==== Aging in Place ====
==== Aging in Place ====
Different living arrangements lead to different loneliness outcomes in old age. Research shows that living alone is often linked to higher levels of loneliness compared to other living situations. Having a partner in the household tends to reduce loneliness, while living with children does not seem to have the same effect. Some studies suggest that older adults living with one other person may feel the least lonely. Although research on changes in living arrangements over time is limited, findings suggest that loneliness might influence living arrangements, with lonelier individuals being more likely to live alone.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Barjaková |first=Martina |last2=Garnero |first2=Andrea |last3=d’Hombres |first3=Béatrice |date=2023-08-09 |title=Risk Factors for Loneliness: A Literature Review |url=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116163 |journal=Social Science and Medicine |volume=334 |pages=116163 |doi=10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116163 |issn=0277-9536}}</ref>
Different living arrangements lead to different loneliness outcomes in old age. Research shows that living alone is often linked to higher levels of loneliness compared to other living situations. Having a partner in the household tends to reduce loneliness, while living with children does not seem to have the same effect. Some studies suggest that older adults living with one other person may feel the least lonely. Although research on changes in living arrangements over time is limited, findings suggest that loneliness might influence living arrangements, with lonelier individuals being more likely to live alone.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Barjaková |first1=Martina |last2=Garnero |first2=Andrea |last3=d’Hombres |first3=Béatrice |date=2023-08-09 |title=Risk Factors for Loneliness: A Literature Review |url=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116163 |journal=Social Science and Medicine |volume=334 |pages=116163 |doi=10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116163 |issn=0277-9536}}</ref>


==== Institutionalization ====
==== Institutionalization ====
Loneliness is highly prevalent in institutional settings, such as nursing homes. Residents in long-term care facilities often experience loneliness due to loss of autonomy, limited familial contact, reduced social networks, and declines in physical and cognitive capacities.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Sedlackova |first=Katerina Beji |last2=Bartova |first2=Alzbeta |last3=Holmerova |first3=Iva |date=2024-09-23 |title=Feeling Lonely, Isolated and Depressed. Older Adults’ Feelings in Long-term Term Facilities: A Scoping Review |url=https://doi.org/10.1007/s12062-024-09463-8 |journal=Journal of Population Ageing |volume=17 |issue=4 |pages=861–914 |doi=10.1007/s12062-024-09463-8 |issn=1874-7884}}</ref><ref name=":282">{{Cite journal |last=Quan |first=Nicolas G. |last2=Lohman |first2=Matthew C. |last3=Resciniti |first3=Nicholas V. |last4=Friedman |first4=Daniela B. |date=2019-10-11 |title=A systematic review of interventions for loneliness among older adults living in long-term care facilities |url=https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2019.1673311 |journal=Aging &amp; Mental Health |volume=24 |issue=12 |pages=1945–1955 |doi=10.1080/13607863.2019.1673311 |issn=1360-7863}}</ref> Additionally, the institutional environment may lack opportunities for meaningful social engagement and emotional support, which are crucial for mitigating loneliness. These challenges are compounded by superficial social interactions and limited opportunities for forming deep connections with peers, particularly when cognitive abilities differ among residents.<ref name=":292">{{Cite journal |last1=Boamah |first1=Sheila A. |last2=Weldrick |first2=Rachel |last3=Lee |first3=Tin-Suet Joan |last4=Taylor |first4=Nicole |date=2021-03-27 |title=Social Isolation Among Older Adults in Long-Term Care: A Scoping Review |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/08982643211004174 |journal=Journal of Aging and Health |volume=33 |issue=7–8 |pages=618–632 |doi=10.1177/08982643211004174 |issn=0898-2643 |pmid=33779366}}</ref>
Loneliness is highly prevalent in institutional settings, such as nursing homes. Residents in long-term care facilities often experience loneliness due to loss of autonomy, limited familial contact, reduced social networks, and declines in physical and cognitive capacities.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Sedlackova |first1=Katerina Beji |last2=Bartova |first2=Alzbeta |last3=Holmerova |first3=Iva |date=2024-09-23 |title=Feeling Lonely, Isolated and Depressed. Older Adults' Feelings in Long-term Term Facilities: A Scoping Review |url=https://doi.org/10.1007/s12062-024-09463-8 |journal=Journal of Population Ageing |volume=17 |issue=4 |pages=861–914 |doi=10.1007/s12062-024-09463-8 |issn=1874-7884}}</ref><ref name=":282">{{Cite journal |last1=Quan |first1=Nicolas G. |last2=Lohman |first2=Matthew C. |last3=Resciniti |first3=Nicholas V. |last4=Friedman |first4=Daniela B. |date=2019-10-11 |title=A systematic review of interventions for loneliness among older adults living in long-term care facilities |url=https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2019.1673311 |journal=Aging & Mental Health |volume=24 |issue=12 |pages=1945–1955 |doi=10.1080/13607863.2019.1673311 |pmid=31602993 |issn=1360-7863}}</ref> Additionally, the institutional environment may lack opportunities for meaningful social engagement and emotional support, which are crucial for mitigating loneliness. These challenges are compounded by superficial social interactions and limited opportunities for forming deep connections with peers, particularly when cognitive abilities differ among residents.<ref name=":292">{{Cite journal |last1=Boamah |first1=Sheila A. |last2=Weldrick |first2=Rachel |last3=Lee |first3=Tin-Suet Joan |last4=Taylor |first4=Nicole |date=2021-03-27 |title=Social Isolation Among Older Adults in Long-Term Care: A Scoping Review |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/08982643211004174 |journal=Journal of Aging and Health |volume=33 |issue=7–8 |pages=618–632 |doi=10.1177/08982643211004174 |issn=0898-2643 |pmid=33779366|pmc=8236667 }}</ref>


=== Disruptive Life Events ===
=== Disruptive Life Events ===
Line 130: Line 130:


==== Culture ====
==== Culture ====
Cultural factors further shape the experience of loneliness in old age. In collectivist cultures, where the needs of the family or community are prioritized over individual desires, social cohesion is maintained through cultural norms and social control. These societies often provide stronger support systems, reducing the likelihood of physical isolation for older adults. In contrast, individualistic cultures emphasize personal independence, which can lead to greater freedom in forming and maintaining social relationships but may also contribute to higher levels of loneliness, as the focus on individual needs can sometimes result in weaker social ties.<ref>{{Citation |last=Burholt |first=Vanessa |title=Culture, social isolation and loneliness in later life |date=2023-08-07 |work=Loneliness and Social Isolation in Old Age |pages=50–60 |url=https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003289012-8 |access-date=2024-12-04 |place=London |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-003-28901-2}}</ref>
Cultural factors further shape the experience of loneliness in old age. In collectivist cultures, where the needs of the family or community are prioritized over individual desires, social cohesion is maintained through cultural norms and social control. These societies often provide stronger support systems, reducing the likelihood of physical isolation for older adults. In contrast, individualistic cultures emphasize personal independence, which can lead to greater freedom in forming and maintaining social relationships but may also contribute to higher levels of loneliness, as the focus on individual needs can sometimes result in weaker social ties.<ref>{{Citation |last=Burholt |first=Vanessa |title=Culture, social isolation and loneliness in later life |date=2023-08-07 |work=Loneliness and Social Isolation in Old Age |pages=50–60 |url=https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003289012-8 |access-date=2024-12-04 |place=London |publisher=Routledge |doi=10.4324/9781003289012-8 |isbn=978-1-003-28901-2}}</ref>


For example, older adults in eastern, southern, and central European countries, where familism is more prominent, often report higher levels of loneliness compared to their counterparts in northern and western Europe. In these collectivist societies, strong family involvement is expected, and when familial ties weaken or are lost, loneliness is frequently amplified. This suggests that while strong family connections can provide support, societal expectations surrounding them may also increase loneliness when those connections are not met.<ref name=":183" />
For example, older adults in eastern, southern, and central European countries, where familism is more prominent, often report higher levels of loneliness compared to their counterparts in northern and western Europe. In these collectivist societies, strong family involvement is expected, and when familial ties weaken or are lost, loneliness is frequently amplified. This suggests that while strong family connections can provide support, societal expectations surrounding them may also increase loneliness when those connections are not met.<ref name=":183" />
Line 139: Line 139:
'''Longitudinal Factors'''
'''Longitudinal Factors'''


Some conditions affect older adults' loneliness over a period of time, rather than just at a single point. The loss of a spouse or partner, a limited social network, and low levels of social activity, often have lasting effects, gradually shaping or worsening loneliness as people age. Poor health or depression may start as minor issues but can lead to increased isolation and loneliness over the years if not addressed. Similarly, the loss of a spouse or reduced social activity might initially cause loneliness, but their impact can grow as time passes, making older adults more vulnerable to chronic loneliness.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Dahlberg |first1=Lena |last2=McKee |first2=Kevin J. |last3=Frank |first3=Amanda |last4=Naseer |first4=Mahwish |date=2021-02-10 |title=A systematic review of longitudinal risk factors for loneliness in older adults |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2021.1876638 |journal=Aging & Mental Health |volume=26 |issue=2 |pages=225–249 |doi=10.1080/13607863.2021.1876638 |issn=1360-7863}}</ref>
Some conditions affect older adults' loneliness over a period of time, rather than just at a single point. The loss of a spouse or partner, a limited social network, and low levels of social activity, often have lasting effects, gradually shaping or worsening loneliness as people age. Poor health or depression may start as minor issues but can lead to increased isolation and loneliness over the years if not addressed. Similarly, the loss of a spouse or reduced social activity might initially cause loneliness, but their impact can grow as time passes, making older adults more vulnerable to chronic loneliness.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Dahlberg |first1=Lena |last2=McKee |first2=Kevin J. |last3=Frank |first3=Amanda |last4=Naseer |first4=Mahwish |date=2021-02-10 |title=A systematic review of longitudinal risk factors for loneliness in older adults |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2021.1876638 |journal=Aging & Mental Health |volume=26 |issue=2 |pages=225–249 |doi=10.1080/13607863.2021.1876638 |pmid=33563024 |issn=1360-7863}}</ref>


== Effects ==
== Effects ==
Line 156: Line 156:
'''Mental Health'''
'''Mental Health'''


Loneliness is a well-documented independent risk factor for depression in old age.<ref name=":0" /> It has been linked to heightened anxiety, psychological distress, and lower overall emotional well-being, often exacerbating depression and anxiety in a bidirectional relationship.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Courtin |first1=Emilie |last2=Knapp |first2=Martin |date=2015-12-28 |title=Social isolation, loneliness and health in old age: a scoping review |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12311 |journal=Health & Social Care in the Community |volume=25 |issue=3 |pages=799–812 |doi=10.1111/hsc.12311 |issn=0966-0410 |pmid=26712585}}</ref> Perceived social support, a key predictor of loneliness, has been linked to mental health conditions such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and anxiety disorders in older adults.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Wang |first=Jingyi |last2=Mann |first2=Farhana |last3=Lloyd-Evans |first3=Brynmor |last4=Ma |first4=Ruimin |last5=Johnson |first5=Sonia |date=2018-05-29 |title=Associations between loneliness and perceived social support and outcomes of mental health problems: a systematic review |url=https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1736-5 |journal=BMC Psychiatry |volume=18 |issue=1 |doi=10.1186/s12888-018-1736-5 |issn=1471-244X}}</ref>
Loneliness is a well-documented independent risk factor for depression in old age.<ref name=":0" /> It has been linked to heightened anxiety, psychological distress, and lower overall emotional well-being, often exacerbating depression and anxiety in a bidirectional relationship.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Courtin |first1=Emilie |last2=Knapp |first2=Martin |date=2015-12-28 |title=Social isolation, loneliness and health in old age: a scoping review |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12311 |journal=Health & Social Care in the Community |volume=25 |issue=3 |pages=799–812 |doi=10.1111/hsc.12311 |issn=0966-0410 |pmid=26712585}}</ref> Perceived social support, a key predictor of loneliness, has been linked to mental health conditions such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and anxiety disorders in older adults.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Wang |first1=Jingyi |last2=Mann |first2=Farhana |last3=Lloyd-Evans |first3=Brynmor |last4=Ma |first4=Ruimin |last5=Johnson |first5=Sonia |date=2018-05-29 |title=Associations between loneliness and perceived social support and outcomes of mental health problems: a systematic review |journal=BMC Psychiatry |volume=18 |issue=1 |doi=10.1186/s12888-018-1736-5 |doi-access=free |issn=1471-244X}}</ref>


'''Cognitive Health'''
'''Cognitive Health'''


Loneliness is linked to declines in several areas of cognitive functioning, including overall [[cognitive ability]], [[Intelligence quotient|intelligence quotient (IQ)]], processing speed, and both immediate and delayed memory recall.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Boss |first=Lisa |last2=Kang |first2=Duck-Hee |last3=Branson |first3=Sandy |date=2015-01-02 |title=Loneliness and cognitive function in the older adult: a systematic review |url=https://doi.org/10.1017/s1041610214002749 |journal=International Psychogeriatrics |volume=27 |issue=4 |pages=541–553 |doi=10.1017/s1041610214002749 |issn=1041-6102}}</ref>
Loneliness is linked to declines in several areas of cognitive functioning, including overall [[cognitive ability]], [[Intelligence quotient|intelligence quotient (IQ)]], processing speed, and both immediate and delayed memory recall.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Boss |first1=Lisa |last2=Kang |first2=Duck-Hee |last3=Branson |first3=Sandy |date=2015-01-02 |title=Loneliness and cognitive function in the older adult: a systematic review |url=https://doi.org/10.1017/s1041610214002749 |journal=International Psychogeriatrics |volume=27 |issue=4 |pages=541–553 |doi=10.1017/s1041610214002749 |issn=1041-6102}}</ref>


Research suggests that loneliness can contribute to inflammation and immune system dysregulation, both of which negatively impact cognitive function. At the same time, cognitive impairments can exacerbate feelings of loneliness by hindering social interactions. The a bidirectional relationship between loneliness and cognitive decline highlights how loneliness and cognitive health are closely interconnected, with each influencing the other over time.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Kara-Yakoubian |first=Mane |date=2024-06-11 |title=Loneliness linked to cognitive decline in older adults, study finds |url=https://www.psypost.org/loneliness-linked-to-cognitive-decline-in-older-adults-study-finds/#google_vignette |access-date=2024-12-04 |website=PsyPost - Psychology News |language=en-US}}</ref>
Research suggests that loneliness can contribute to inflammation and immune system dysregulation, both of which negatively impact cognitive function. At the same time, cognitive impairments can exacerbate feelings of loneliness by hindering social interactions. The a bidirectional relationship between loneliness and cognitive decline highlights how loneliness and cognitive health are closely interconnected, with each influencing the other over time.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Kara-Yakoubian |first=Mane |date=2024-06-11 |title=Loneliness linked to cognitive decline in older adults, study finds |url=https://www.psypost.org/loneliness-linked-to-cognitive-decline-in-older-adults-study-finds/#google_vignette |access-date=2024-12-04 |website=PsyPost - Psychology News |language=en-US}}</ref>
Line 177: Line 177:
* Psychological therapies: Interventions based on therapeutic approaches, such as [[reminiscence therapy]], [[mindfulness]], exercise-talk discussions, social engagement-directed discussions, coaching, and [[stress reduction]] techniques, aim to address emotional and psychological aspects of loneliness. These therapies have been found to significantly reduce loneliness and improve social support, happiness, and life satisfaction.<ref name=":223">{{Cite journal |last1=Poscia |first1=Andrea |last2=Stojanovic |first2=Jovana |last3=La Milia |first3=Daniele Ignazio |last4=Duplaga |first4=Mariusz |last5=Grysztar |first5=Marcin |last6=Moscato |first6=Umberto |last7=Onder |first7=Graziano |last8=Collamati |first8=Agnese |last9=Ricciardi |first9=Walter |last10=Magnavita |first10=Nicola |date=2017-12-02 |title=Interventions targeting loneliness and social isolation among the older people: An update systematic review |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2017.11.017 |journal=Experimental Gerontology |volume=102 |pages=133–144 |doi=10.1016/j.exger.2017.11.017 |issn=0531-5565 |pmid=29199121}}</ref><ref name=":213" />
* Psychological therapies: Interventions based on therapeutic approaches, such as [[reminiscence therapy]], [[mindfulness]], exercise-talk discussions, social engagement-directed discussions, coaching, and [[stress reduction]] techniques, aim to address emotional and psychological aspects of loneliness. These therapies have been found to significantly reduce loneliness and improve social support, happiness, and life satisfaction.<ref name=":223">{{Cite journal |last1=Poscia |first1=Andrea |last2=Stojanovic |first2=Jovana |last3=La Milia |first3=Daniele Ignazio |last4=Duplaga |first4=Mariusz |last5=Grysztar |first5=Marcin |last6=Moscato |first6=Umberto |last7=Onder |first7=Graziano |last8=Collamati |first8=Agnese |last9=Ricciardi |first9=Walter |last10=Magnavita |first10=Nicola |date=2017-12-02 |title=Interventions targeting loneliness and social isolation among the older people: An update systematic review |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2017.11.017 |journal=Experimental Gerontology |volume=102 |pages=133–144 |doi=10.1016/j.exger.2017.11.017 |issn=0531-5565 |pmid=29199121}}</ref><ref name=":213" />
* Health and social care provision: For older adults who are homebound or frail, formal health and social care interventions can help reduce isolation and improve well-being. These interventions often involve health professionals and may be delivered through nursing homes, community settings, or geriatric rehabilitation programs.<ref name=":213" />
* Health and social care provision: For older adults who are homebound or frail, formal health and social care interventions can help reduce isolation and improve well-being. These interventions often involve health professionals and may be delivered through nursing homes, community settings, or geriatric rehabilitation programs.<ref name=":213" />
* Animal-assisted interventions: The interactions with living dogs or robotic animals help older adults relieve loneliness by offering companionship and emotional support.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Hoang |first=Peter |last2=King |first2=James A. |last3=Moore |first3=Sarah |last4=Moore |first4=Kim |last5=Reich |first5=Krista |last6=Sidhu |first6=Harman |last7=Tan |first7=Chin Vern |last8=Whaley |first8=Colin |last9=McMillan |first9=Jacqueline |date=2022-10-17 |title=Interventions Associated With Reduced Loneliness and Social Isolation in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |url=https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.36676 |journal=JAMA Network Open |volume=5 |issue=10 |pages=e2236676 |doi=10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.36676 |issn=2574-3805}}</ref> These interventions are thought to work by fostering a bond between the individual and the animal, creating opportunities for social interaction with others. Research suggests that pet attachment can alleviate loneliness by providing both emotional comfort and social connections. Companion robots like [[Paro (robot)|Paro]], a robotic seal, have been developed to simulate the emotional benefits of animal companionship, providing a viable alternative for older adults who may not be able to care for live animals.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Gilbert |first=Ben |title=The adorable robotic seal from 'Master of None' is real and you can buy one |url=https://www.businessinsider.com/paro-from-master-of-none-is-real-2015-11 |access-date=2024-12-04 |website=Business Insider |language=en-US}}</ref>
* Animal-assisted interventions: The interactions with living dogs or robotic animals help older adults relieve loneliness by offering companionship and emotional support.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Hoang |first1=Peter |last2=King |first2=James A. |last3=Moore |first3=Sarah |last4=Moore |first4=Kim |last5=Reich |first5=Krista |last6=Sidhu |first6=Harman |last7=Tan |first7=Chin Vern |last8=Whaley |first8=Colin |last9=McMillan |first9=Jacqueline |date=2022-10-17 |title=Interventions Associated With Reduced Loneliness and Social Isolation in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |url=https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.36676 |journal=JAMA Network Open |volume=5 |issue=10 |pages=e2236676 |doi=10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.36676 |pmid=36251294 |pmc=9577679 |issn=2574-3805}}</ref> These interventions are thought to work by fostering a bond between the individual and the animal, creating opportunities for social interaction with others. Research suggests that pet attachment can alleviate loneliness by providing both emotional comfort and social connections. Companion robots like [[Paro (robot)|Paro]], a robotic seal, have been developed to simulate the emotional benefits of animal companionship, providing a viable alternative for older adults who may not be able to care for live animals.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Gilbert |first=Ben |title=The adorable robotic seal from 'Master of None' is real and you can buy one |url=https://www.businessinsider.com/paro-from-master-of-none-is-real-2015-11 |access-date=2024-12-04 |website=Business Insider |language=en-US}}</ref>
* Befriending interventions: These interventions focus on forming new social connections, usually through one-on-one interactions facilitated by trained volunteers. Unlike social facilitation programs, befriending interventions are specifically designed to support the lonely individual, helping them establish friendships that can reduce feelings of isolation. For example, the [[AmeriCorps Seniors|AmeriCorps Senior]] Companion Program pairs volunteers, who are typically older adults themselves (age 55 and older), with older adults who may be isolated or have special needs.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2022-09-16 |title=AmeriCorps Seniors Senior Companion Program {{!}} AmeriCorps |url=https://americorps.gov/serve/americorps-seniors/americorps-seniors-senior-companion-program |access-date=2024-12-04 |website=americorps.gov |language=en}}</ref> Volunteers, known as Senior Companions, provide friendly visits, assist with basic activities of daily living, and offer companionship to reduce loneliness and promote well-being among older adults.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2019-12-18 |title=Seniors Helping Seniors - The NYCHA Journal |url=https://nychajournal.nyc/seniors-helping-seniors/ |access-date=2024-12-04 |website=nychajournal.nyc |language=en-US}}</ref>
* Befriending interventions: These interventions focus on forming new social connections, usually through one-on-one interactions facilitated by trained volunteers. Unlike social facilitation programs, befriending interventions are specifically designed to support the lonely individual, helping them establish friendships that can reduce feelings of isolation. For example, the [[AmeriCorps Seniors|AmeriCorps Senior]] Companion Program pairs volunteers, who are typically older adults themselves (age 55 and older), with older adults who may be isolated or have special needs.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2022-09-16 |title=AmeriCorps Seniors Senior Companion Program {{!}} AmeriCorps |url=https://americorps.gov/serve/americorps-seniors/americorps-seniors-senior-companion-program |access-date=2024-12-04 |website=americorps.gov |language=en}}</ref> Volunteers, known as Senior Companions, provide friendly visits, assist with basic activities of daily living, and offer companionship to reduce loneliness and promote well-being among older adults.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2019-12-18 |title=Seniors Helping Seniors - The NYCHA Journal |url=https://nychajournal.nyc/seniors-helping-seniors/ |access-date=2024-12-04 |website=nychajournal.nyc |language=en-US}}</ref>
* Leisure and skill development interventions: Activities that encourage personal growth and social engagement can help reduce loneliness among older adults by offering meaningful opportunities for connection. Programs centered around hobbies such as gardening, computer use, or volunteering, as well as those focused on skill development, have been shown to engage older adults in social networks and alleviate feelings of isolation. These interventions not only facilitate the formation of new relationships but also promote a sense of purpose and fulfillment.<ref name=":223" />
* Leisure and skill development interventions: Activities that encourage personal growth and social engagement can help reduce loneliness among older adults by offering meaningful opportunities for connection. Programs centered around hobbies such as gardening, computer use, or volunteering, as well as those focused on skill development, have been shown to engage older adults in social networks and alleviate feelings of isolation. These interventions not only facilitate the formation of new relationships but also promote a sense of purpose and fulfillment.<ref name=":223" />


=== '''Technology-Based Interventions''' ===
=== '''Technology-Based Interventions''' ===
In recent years, technological advancements have provided new ways to address loneliness among older adults. Technology-based interventions, including video calls, online communities, and virtual reality, are increasingly used to enhance communication and social connection.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Balki |first1=Eric |last2=Hayes |first2=Niall |last3=Holland |first3=Carol |date=2022-10-24 |title=Effectiveness of Technology Interventions in Addressing Social Isolation, Connectedness, and Loneliness in Older Adults: Systematic Umbrella Review |journal=JMIR Aging |volume=5 |issue=4 |pages=e40125 |doi=10.2196/40125 |issn=2561-7605 |pmid=36279155 |doi-access=free}}</ref> These tools enable individuals to stay connected with family, friends, and healthcare providers, helping to overcome barriers such as geographical distance and physical limitations that contribute to isolation. Several reviews have highlighted the effectiveness of these technologies in improving communication and offering new social interaction opportunities for older adults.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Fakoya |first1=Olujoke A. |last2=McCorry |first2=Noleen K. |last3=Donnelly |first3=Michael |date=2020-02-14 |title=Loneliness and social isolation interventions for older adults: a scoping review of reviews |journal=BMC Public Health |volume=20 |issue=1 |page=129 |doi=10.1186/s12889-020-8251-6 |issn=1471-2458 |pmc=7020371 |pmid=32054474 |doi-access=free}}</ref> Additionally, innovations in [[Artificial intelligence|artificial intelligence (AI)]] and robotics, such as virtual companions and digital assistants, offer further support by providing social engagement and emotional care. These technologies have the potential to supplement social support, especially for older adults with mobility challenges or limited local connections. As technology continues to evolve, its role in combating loneliness among older adults is expected to grow.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Shah |first1=Syed Ghulam Sarwar |last2=Nogueras |first2=David |last3=van Woerden |first3=Hugo Cornelis |last4=Kiparoglou |first4=Vasiliki |date=2021-06-04 |title=Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Digital Technology Interventions to Reduce Loneliness in Older Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |journal=Journal of Medical Internet Research |volume=23 |issue=6 |pages=e24712 |doi=10.2196/24712 |issn=1438-8871 |doi-access=free}}</ref>
In recent years, technological advancements have provided new ways to address loneliness among older adults. Technology-based interventions, including video calls, online communities, and virtual reality, are increasingly used to enhance communication and social connection.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Balki |first1=Eric |last2=Hayes |first2=Niall |last3=Holland |first3=Carol |date=2022-10-24 |title=Effectiveness of Technology Interventions in Addressing Social Isolation, Connectedness, and Loneliness in Older Adults: Systematic Umbrella Review |journal=JMIR Aging |volume=5 |issue=4 |pages=e40125 |doi=10.2196/40125 |issn=2561-7605 |pmid=36279155 |doi-access=free|pmc=9641519 }}</ref> These tools enable individuals to stay connected with family, friends, and healthcare providers, helping to overcome barriers such as geographical distance and physical limitations that contribute to isolation. Several reviews have highlighted the effectiveness of these technologies in improving communication and offering new social interaction opportunities for older adults.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Fakoya |first1=Olujoke A. |last2=McCorry |first2=Noleen K. |last3=Donnelly |first3=Michael |date=2020-02-14 |title=Loneliness and social isolation interventions for older adults: a scoping review of reviews |journal=BMC Public Health |volume=20 |issue=1 |page=129 |doi=10.1186/s12889-020-8251-6 |issn=1471-2458 |pmc=7020371 |pmid=32054474 |doi-access=free}}</ref> Additionally, innovations in [[Artificial intelligence|artificial intelligence (AI)]] and robotics, such as virtual companions and digital assistants, offer further support by providing social engagement and emotional care. These technologies have the potential to supplement social support, especially for older adults with mobility challenges or limited local connections. As technology continues to evolve, its role in combating loneliness among older adults is expected to grow.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Shah |first1=Syed Ghulam Sarwar |last2=Nogueras |first2=David |last3=van Woerden |first3=Hugo Cornelis |last4=Kiparoglou |first4=Vasiliki |date=2021-06-04 |title=Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Digital Technology Interventions to Reduce Loneliness in Older Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |journal=Journal of Medical Internet Research |volume=23 |issue=6 |pages=e24712 |doi=10.2196/24712 |issn=1438-8871 |doi-access=free|pmid=34085942 |pmc=8214187 }}</ref>


The use of technology to combat loneliness among older adults raises ethical concerns despite its potential benefits. For instance, ElliQ, an AI-powered robotic companion distributed to hundreds of older residents in New York State, has been praised for reducing boredom, maintaining social skills, and assisting with grief. However, critics highlight significant issues, including data privacy, the protection of sensitive user information, and the potential for such technology to diminish human relationships. Some experts warn that overreliance on robotic companions could discourage older adults from engaging in meaningful, reciprocal interactions with friends and family, undermining the very social connections these tools aim to enhance.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Erin |first=Nolan |date=2024-07-06 |title=For Older People Who Are Lonely, Is the Solution a Robot Friend? |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/06/nyregion/ai-robot-elliq-loneliness.html |access-date=2024-12-04 |work=New York Times}}</ref>
The use of technology to combat loneliness among older adults raises ethical concerns despite its potential benefits. For instance, ElliQ, an AI-powered robotic companion distributed to hundreds of older residents in New York State, has been praised for reducing boredom, maintaining social skills, and assisting with grief. However, critics highlight significant issues, including data privacy, the protection of sensitive user information, and the potential for such technology to diminish human relationships. Some experts warn that overreliance on robotic companions could discourage older adults from engaging in meaningful, reciprocal interactions with friends and family, undermining the very social connections these tools aim to enhance.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Erin |first=Nolan |date=2024-07-06 |title=For Older People Who Are Lonely, Is the Solution a Robot Friend? |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/06/nyregion/ai-robot-elliq-loneliness.html |access-date=2024-12-04 |work=New York Times}}</ref>
Line 202: Line 202:
* Effective leadership is vital for creating lasting and impactful change, and no alternative can replace it.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2020-07-12 |title=Intervention models for nursing homes (I): The Eden Alternative {{!}} CENIE |url=https://cenie.eu/en/blogs/age-society/intervention-models-nursing-homes-i-eden-alternative |access-date=2024-12-04 |website=cenie.eu |language=en}}</ref>
* Effective leadership is vital for creating lasting and impactful change, and no alternative can replace it.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2020-07-12 |title=Intervention models for nursing homes (I): The Eden Alternative {{!}} CENIE |url=https://cenie.eu/en/blogs/age-society/intervention-models-nursing-homes-i-eden-alternative |access-date=2024-12-04 |website=cenie.eu |language=en}}</ref>


Another innovative approach in facilities involves the use of animals, which has been demonstrated to alleviate loneliness.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Franklin |first=Mitchell |last2=Parnell |first2=Tracey |last3=Versi |first3=Natasha |last4=Pope |first4=Rodney |date=2022 |title=Animal Assisted Therapy for Older Adults in Aged Care Facilities: A Rapid Review |url=https://doi.org/10.46743/1540-580x/2022.2052 |journal=Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice |doi=10.46743/1540-580x/2022.2052 |issn=1540-580X}}</ref> Dog-assisted interventions (DAI) are among the most widely used forms of animal-assisted interventions, largely because of dogs' strong emotional bonds with humans and their ability to be trained for specific behaviors. Research has shown that DAI can lead to various positive outcomes for residents, including enhanced social functioning, reduced depression, and decreased feelings of loneliness. Notably, the greatest impact of DAI appears to be on improving social interactions and engagement.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Jain |first=Briony |last2=Syed |first2=Shabeer |last3=Hafford‐Letchfield |first3=Trish |last4=O’Farrell‐Pearce |first4=Sioban |date=2020-05-11 |title=Dog‐assisted interventions and outcomes for older adults in residential long‐term care facilities: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |url=https://doi.org/10.1111/opn.12320 |journal=International Journal of Older People Nursing |volume=15 |issue=3 |doi=10.1111/opn.12320 |issn=1748-3735}}</ref> Moreover, interactive robotic animals, like the [[AIBO|AIBO robotic dog]], also have been used as as a source of companionship and emotional support.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2023-09-11 |title=Sony will repair aging Aibo robot dogs to help them find their forever homes |url=https://www.yahoo.com/news/sony-will-repair-aging-aibo-robot-dogs-to-help-them-find-their-forever-homes-103303488.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAJP2In3wZRxrVb-M6btwb6oCy1DcwrYPGR0-bliBswmZaUosji4OJbe7H64M17ISO6F4zjlbcrMjWbfc-Md8VPXApEGZMX-t5F02Yh7MwgOaFarqdY0gplEgVKMRdby_Y8wamAGn1Uy4PcMtBawXaZFeohr-clCfH17kg7jJ2Vni |access-date=2024-12-04 |website=Yahoo News |language=en-US}}</ref>
Another innovative approach in facilities involves the use of animals, which has been demonstrated to alleviate loneliness.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Franklin |first1=Mitchell |last2=Parnell |first2=Tracey |last3=Versi |first3=Natasha |last4=Pope |first4=Rodney |date=2022 |title=Animal Assisted Therapy for Older Adults in Aged Care Facilities: A Rapid Review |url=https://doi.org/10.46743/1540-580x/2022.2052 |journal=Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice |doi=10.46743/1540-580x/2022.2052 |issn=1540-580X}}</ref> Dog-assisted interventions (DAI) are among the most widely used forms of animal-assisted interventions, largely because of dogs' strong emotional bonds with humans and their ability to be trained for specific behaviors. Research has shown that DAI can lead to various positive outcomes for residents, including enhanced social functioning, reduced depression, and decreased feelings of loneliness. Notably, the greatest impact of DAI appears to be on improving social interactions and engagement.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Jain |first1=Briony |last2=Syed |first2=Shabeer |last3=Hafford-Letchfield |first3=Trish |last4=O’Farrell-Pearce |first4=Sioban |date=2020-05-11 |title=Dog-assisted interventions and outcomes for older adults in residential long-term care facilities: A systematic review and meta-analysis |url=https://doi.org/10.1111/opn.12320 |journal=International Journal of Older People Nursing |volume=15 |issue=3 |pages=e12320 |doi=10.1111/opn.12320 |pmid=32394594 |issn=1748-3735}}</ref> Moreover, interactive robotic animals, like the [[AIBO|AIBO robotic dog]], also have been used as as a source of companionship and emotional support.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2023-09-11 |title=Sony will repair aging Aibo robot dogs to help them find their forever homes |url=https://www.yahoo.com/news/sony-will-repair-aging-aibo-robot-dogs-to-help-them-find-their-forever-homes-103303488.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAJP2In3wZRxrVb-M6btwb6oCy1DcwrYPGR0-bliBswmZaUosji4OJbe7H64M17ISO6F4zjlbcrMjWbfc-Md8VPXApEGZMX-t5F02Yh7MwgOaFarqdY0gplEgVKMRdby_Y8wamAGn1Uy4PcMtBawXaZFeohr-clCfH17kg7jJ2Vni |access-date=2024-12-04 |website=Yahoo News |language=en-US}}</ref>


Studies suggest that both living animals, such as dogs, and interactive robotic animals, like the AIBO robotic dog, have a positive impact on reducing loneliness.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Jain |first=Briony |last2=Syed |first2=Shabeer |last3=Hafford‐Letchfield |first3=Trish |last4=O’Farrell‐Pearce |first4=Sioban |date=2020-05-11 |title=Dog‐assisted interventions and outcomes for older adults in residential long‐term care facilities: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |url=https://doi.org/10.1111/opn.12320 |journal=International Journal of Older People Nursing |volume=15 |issue=3 |doi=10.1111/opn.12320 |issn=1748-3735}}</ref> Residents develop attachments to these animals, which can serve as a source of companionship and emotional support. Some research even suggests that robotic animals may offer advantages over live pets in terms of engagement, with residents interacting more frequently with robotic dogs and expressing greater emotional attachment, though the underlying mechanisms for loneliness reduction remain complex.<ref name=":233">{{Cite journal |last1=Robinson |first1=Hayley |last2=MacDonald |first2=Bruce |last3=Kerse |first3=Ngaire |last4=Broadbent |first4=Elizabeth |date=2013-03-30 |title=The Psychosocial Effects of a Companion Robot: A Randomized Controlled Trial |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2013.02.007 |journal=Journal of the American Medical Directors Association |volume=14 |issue=9 |pages=661–667 |doi=10.1016/j.jamda.2013.02.007 |issn=1525-8610 |pmid=23545466}}</ref>
Studies suggest that both living animals, such as dogs, and interactive robotic animals, like the AIBO robotic dog, have a positive impact on reducing loneliness.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Jain |first1=Briony |last2=Syed |first2=Shabeer |last3=Hafford-Letchfield |first3=Trish |last4=O’Farrell-Pearce |first4=Sioban |date=2020-05-11 |title=Dog-assisted interventions and outcomes for older adults in residential long-term care facilities: A systematic review and meta-analysis |url=https://doi.org/10.1111/opn.12320 |journal=International Journal of Older People Nursing |volume=15 |issue=3 |pages=e12320 |doi=10.1111/opn.12320 |pmid=32394594 |issn=1748-3735}}</ref> Residents develop attachments to these animals, which can serve as a source of companionship and emotional support. Some research even suggests that robotic animals may offer advantages over live pets in terms of engagement, with residents interacting more frequently with robotic dogs and expressing greater emotional attachment, though the underlying mechanisms for loneliness reduction remain complex.<ref name=":233">{{Cite journal |last1=Robinson |first1=Hayley |last2=MacDonald |first2=Bruce |last3=Kerse |first3=Ngaire |last4=Broadbent |first4=Elizabeth |date=2013-03-30 |title=The Psychosocial Effects of a Companion Robot: A Randomized Controlled Trial |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2013.02.007 |journal=Journal of the American Medical Directors Association |volume=14 |issue=9 |pages=661–667 |doi=10.1016/j.jamda.2013.02.007 |issn=1525-8610 |pmid=23545466}}</ref>


=== '''Common Characteristics of Effective Interventions''' ===
=== '''Common Characteristics of Effective Interventions''' ===
Effective interventions to reduce loneliness among older adults share a few key features<ref name=":213" />. First, they must be adaptable, allowing for adjustments based on the specific needs of the local population. This flexibility ensures that programs resonate with the target group's demographic and cultural context, making them more engaging.<ref name=":203" /> In long-term care settings, this means considering factors like age, mobility, and cognitive abilities to ensure activities are accessible and relevant.
Effective interventions to reduce loneliness among older adults share a few key features<ref name=":213" />. First, they must be adaptable, allowing for adjustments based on the specific needs of the local population. This flexibility ensures that programs resonate with the target group's demographic and cultural context, making them more engaging.<ref name=":203" /> In long-term care settings, this means considering factors like age, mobility, and cognitive abilities to ensure activities are accessible and relevant.


Second, a community development approach, where older adults participate in designing and delivering interventions, has proven effective. This involvement fosters a sense of ownership, increases participation, and strengthens long-term engagement. It also helps ensure that interventions remain responsive to residents' evolving needs.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=CATTAN |first1=MIMA |last2=WHITE |first2=MARTIN |last3=BOND |first3=JOHN |last4=LEARMOUTH |first4=ALISON |date=2005-01-10 |title=Preventing social isolation and loneliness among older people: a systematic review of health promotion interventions |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0144686x04002594 |journal=Ageing and Society |volume=25 |issue=1 |pages=41–67 |doi=10.1017/s0144686x04002594 |issn=0144-686X}}</ref>
Second, a community development approach, where older adults participate in designing and delivering interventions, has proven effective. This involvement fosters a sense of ownership, increases participation, and strengthens long-term engagement. It also helps ensure that interventions remain responsive to residents' evolving needs.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=CATTAN |first1=MIMA |last2=WHITE |first2=MARTIN |last3=BOND |first3=JOHN |last4=LEARMOUTH |first4=ALISON |date=2005-01-10 |title=Preventing social isolation and loneliness among older people: a systematic review of health promotion interventions |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0144686x04002594 |journal=Ageing and Society |volume=25 |issue=1 |pages=41–67 |doi=10.1017/s0144686x04002594 |doi-broken-date=5 December 2024 |issn=0144-686X}}</ref>


Lastly, interventions promoting productive engagement—activities that encourage active participation—are more effective than passive ones. These activities, whether group-based or individual, provide opportunities for meaningful connections and a sense of achievement.<ref name=":243" /> In residential care facilities, where autonomy and social interaction may be limited, productive engagement can significantly improve residents' social well-being.
Lastly, interventions promoting productive engagement—activities that encourage active participation—are more effective than passive ones. These activities, whether group-based or individual, provide opportunities for meaningful connections and a sense of achievement.<ref name=":243" /> In residential care facilities, where autonomy and social interaction may be limited, productive engagement can significantly improve residents' social well-being.

Revision as of 03:41, 5 December 2024

Loneliness in Old Age

Prevalence

--Loneliness exhibits a U-shaped distribution across the life course, with heightened prevalence during both adolescence and late adulthood, and lower levels observed in middle adulthood.[1][2][3] Unlike loneliness experienced at younger ages, which is often transitional and linked to life changes such as entering adulthood or starting a career, loneliness in older age tends to be more persistent. For older adults, loneliness can stem from various life circumstances, including the loss of loved ones or close family members, living in assisted living or nursing homes, facing greater financial hardships, or experiencing lower socioeconomic standing, which collectively limit opportunities for meaningful social interactions.[4] Furthermore, risk factors for loneliness, including chronic illnesses, limited mobility, and reduced financial resources, are predominantly linked to older age.[5]

Loneliness follows a U-shaped distribution across the life course, peaking in adolescence and late adulthood while being less common in middle adulthood.[6] Unlike the transient nature of loneliness during younger ages—often associated with life transitions like entering adulthood or starting a career—loneliness in older adulthood tends to persist. It is often driven by life circumstances such as the loss of loved ones, residence in assisted living or nursing homes, financial hardships, and lower socioeconomic status, all of which can reduce opportunities for meaningful social connections.[7] Additionally, risk factors such as chronic illness, limited mobility, and economic constraints become more prevalent with age, further exacerbating loneliness.[8]

--The prevalence of loneliness among older people varies regionally. Meta-analyses of studies in high-income countries reveal that moderate loneliness affects about 25.9% of older individuals, while severe loneliness is reported by approximately 7.9%.[9] Estimates range from 4.2% to 6.5% in northern Europe, 7.3% to 10.5% in western Europe, 13.2% to 18.7% in southern Europe, 18.7% to 24.2% in eastern Europe, [10]19.3% in United States,[11] and about 30% in China.[12][13]

In some countries and regions, including China, Europe, Latin America, and the United States, up to one-third of older adults experience loneliness.[14] Meta-analyses of studies in high-income countries estimate that 25.9% of older adults experience moderate loneliness, while 7.9% experience severe loneliness.[9]

Certain subgroups of older adults experience disproportionately high levels of loneliness. Vulnerable populations, including those with chronic illnesses or disabilities, and those living in rural areas or minority communities, report greater loneliness than their healthier or more socially integrated counterparts. A scoping review study reported five categories of vulnerable subgroups have higher prevalences of loneliness than the general aging population, including: (1) those living in specific communities (e.g., retirement village), (2) those with impairment/diseases, (3) nursing home residents, (4) minority older adults, and (5) those living in rural areas. Such disparities underscore the need to consider individual and contextual factors when addressing loneliness among older adults.[15]

Community-Dwelling vs. Institutionalized Older Adults

Most current research on loneliness in old age focuses on community-dwelling older adults, which represents the vast majority of older population. Among community-dwelling older adults, loneliness prevalence rates varying across regions. In the United Kingdom, nearly 40% of older adults reported some degree of loneliness, according to a representative sample.[16] Similar figures were observed in Finland among individuals aged 75 and older.[17] In the United States, approximately 17% of the people aged 50 and above experience loneliness, while 25% of older adults over 70 felt lonely.[18][19] Regarding severe loneliness, the prevalence among community-dwelling older adults ranges between 5-10% in regions like Northern Europe and North America, 10-18% in Southern Europe, and 25-30% in parts of Asia.[20][13][21] Also, approximately 10% of older adults suffer from chronic loneliness, which is a condition that lasts for extended periods of time.[22]

Approximately one in three older adults will spend time living in a nursing home during their lifetime.[23] These settings can address health and safety needs effectively, but they often fall short in meeting residents' social needs, leading to lower quality of life and life satisfaction.

For some older adults, the need for physical care or safety leads them to move into long-term care (LTC) facilities. In developed countries, approximately 2% to 5% of older adults live in long-term care facilities.[24] These settings can address health and safety needs effectively, but they often fall short in meeting residents' social needs, leading to lower quality of life and life satisfaction.[25][26][27]  Despite being surrounded by staff, fellow residents, and visitors, many older adults in long-term care facilities experience high levels of loneliness. Studies have shown that loneliness in residential care facilities estimated roughly 61% of residents may be moderately lonely and approximately 35% severely lonely, at least twice as high as among those living in the community.[28]

[21]

This disparity arises from several factors. Relationships in LTC settings are often superficial, and residents may feel disconnected from those around them, especially if mental capacities vary significantly among peers.[29] Limited autonomy, such as restricted personal decision-making and lack of meaningful activities, further exacerbates feelings of loneliness.[30] Additionally, many residents enter LTC facilities with pre-existing loneliness due to the loss of a partner, diminished social networks, or increased dependency.[31] Consequently, the social environment in care homes, while appearing communal, frequently lacks the depth and connection necessary to prevent loneliness, highlighting a critical gap compared to community living.

Special Context: COVID-19

Older adults faced heightened vulnerability during the COVID-19 pandemic due to weakened immune systems and a higher prevalence of chronic conditions such as heart disease, diabetes, lung disease, and cancer. This vulnerability was exacerbated by lockdowns and social distancing measures, which intensified loneliness.[32][33] For those in long-term care facilities, the isolation caused by these measures contributed to increased rates of depression, anxiety, and irritability.[34]

A 2020 University of Michigan National Poll on Healthy Aging (NPHA) revealed that loneliness among U.S. adults aged 50–80 doubled during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic.[35]

To reduce the risk of exposure, older adults were widely encouraged to self-isolate, while long-term care facilities implemented strict protocols, including restricting visits from family and friends. Although these measures were essential for minimizing virus transmission, they significantly affected older adults' mental health, increasing social isolation and loneliness.[36]

Studies conducted during the pandemic revealed elevated levels of loneliness among older adults, with prevalence rates ranging from 23.4% to 59.3%.[37][38] According to a meta-analysis of 30 studies conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, 28.6% of older persons reported feeling lonely during the pooled time.[39]  Prevalence estimates were notably higher in studies conducted three months after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic compared to those conducted within the three months preceding it. This highlights the impact of the pandemic and associated lockdown policies on loneliness among older adults.

These increases were particularly pronounced in individuals who were already lonely before the pandemic, highlighting their vulnerability to further mental health deterioration during prolonged isolation.[40] The pandemic emphasized the critical importance of addressing loneliness as a public health issue, particularly among older populations.

Why Older Adults Feel So Lonely?

Loneliness in older adulthood is a multifaceted phenomenon shaped by individual, relational, community, and societal factors. These dimensions can be understood through various theoretical frameworks, such as the Social-Ecological Model (SEM), the individual perspective of loneliness, and broader societal contexts.

Social-Ecological Model

The Social-Ecological Model (SEM) highlights how loneliness stems from interactions between individual, relationship, community, and societal factors. Transitions in later life—such as retirement, health decline, or loss of loved ones—heighten vulnerability to loneliness by disrupting identity, relationships, and a sense of belonging. While some transitions are anticipated (e.g., retirement), others, such as impairments, are less desirable. Regardless, these changes can affect older adults' self-perception and how society views them, often leading to feelings of irrelevance or being a burden.[41]

Individual Level

Physical and cognitive changes, such as mobility loss or cognitive decline, often limit older adults' ability to engage socially, exacerbating feelings of isolation. Additionally, financial strain and reduced access to resources can further diminish self-perception, leading some older adults to view themselves—and be viewed by others—as burdensome. This self-perception can amplify emotional distress and deepen feelings of loneliness.[4][42][43]

Relationship Level

The reduced number of social partners and frequency of social contacts lead to higher risks of loneliness.[44][43] Changes in relationships, such as bereavement, divorce, or the loss of close companions (including pets), reduce the size and quality of older adults’ social networks. These shifts can erode emotional support systems and increase the risk of loneliness. Research shows that diminished contact with family members and friends significantly correlates with feelings of social disconnection.[43][45]

Community Level

The transition away from traditional roles—like employee or active community member—can lead to reduced self-esteem, purpose, and belonging. A lack of community engagement and diminishing opportunities for older adults to contribute meaningfully to society can further compound their loneliness.[45][43]

Societal Level

Widespread ageism, including negative stereotypes and discriminatory practices, intensifies loneliness. The World Health Organization (WHO) highlights that ageism is a pervasive issue that undermines older adults’ sense of worth. In healthcare, for instance, the prioritization of younger individuals’ needs often marginalizes older adults, perpetuating feelings of social exclusion. Moreover, societal assumptions about older adults’ technological capabilities hinder their access to digital tools that could alleviate loneliness.[46][47][48]

Individual Perspective

From an individual perspective, loneliness is driven by unmet social needs, unfulfilled expectations, and poor living conditions.[49] This framework underscores the psychological and contextual underpinnings of loneliness.

Unfulfilled Social Needs

Humans are inherently social, and loneliness arises when basic needs for connection—whether with family or broader networks—are unmet. Older adults living alone or with diminished social integration are particularly at risk. Socio-emotional selectivity theory suggests that as people age, they prioritize emotionally fulfilling relationships, making losses in close ties especially detrimental.[50][51]

Unmet Social Expectations

Loneliness also emerges when the reality of social networks falls short of personal expectations. For instance, older adults with high standards for intimacy or companionship may feel lonelier if these are unmet. Cognitive perspectives suggest that loneliness can perpetuate itself by making individuals more sensitive to perceived social threats, further hindering successful interactions.[52][53]

Poor Living Conditions

Socioeconomic disadvantage—manifested through financial strain, health challenges, or deprived neighborhoods—reduces access to quality social networks and exacerbates loneliness. Limited resources often trigger stress and conflict, undermining well-being. Furthermore, financial and social hardships are linked to negative self-evaluations, deepening feelings of isolation.[54][55]

Societal Perspective

Cultural norms, demographic composition, and societal welfare shape the structural environment for loneliness in old age:

Cultural Norms

Cultural norms influence how older adults perceive their social roles and relationships. For example, filial norms emphasizing family support, such as living with adult children, might buffer loneliness in some cultures, while in societies valuing autonomy, similar arrangements could create feelings of dependency and isolation. These cultural differences demonstrate how societal values mediate the relationship between individual experiences and loneliness.[56]

Demographic Composition

The availability of close ties—such as spouses or children—is critical to social integration. Societal trends like increased childlessness or widowhood reshape opportunities for connection and can amplify loneliness in certain cultural contexts, such as familism.[57][58]

Societal Welfare

Socio-economic inequalities and weak welfare systems exacerbate loneliness by limiting access to resources and creating conditions of stress and exclusion. In less affluent societies, the lack of robust social safety nets often correlates with higher levels of loneliness, as individuals face greater barriers to social integration.[59][60]

Factors

A considerable body of research has identified numerous factors associated with loneliness in older adults, as summarized in meta-analyses and review studies. A synthesis of 218 studies highlights sociodemographic, psychosocial, and health-related predictors of loneliness. These include being female, widowed, divorced, or never married; having limited or low-quality social ties; poor physical health, such as chronic illnesses or mobility impairments; and constrained socioeconomic resources, such as low income or education levels.[61][62][63][64] More recent cross-national studies corroborate these findings and further emphasize the protective roles of frequent social contact with children and parents, social participation, and providing support to family members in mitigating loneliness among older adults.[65]

Demographics

Age

The U-shaped pattern of loneliness across the lifespan underscores the role of age in shaping loneliness among older adults, with advanced age—particularly beyond 80—emerging as a significant risk factor.[57][66][67][68] For younger older adults, factors such as being married and maintaining good health often help protect against loneliness. In contrast, advanced age is commonly linked to heightened loneliness due to sensory and physical impairments, loss of a spouse, and shrinking social networks.[69][70][71]

Despite these risks, some theories suggest that older adults may experience less loneliness under certain circumstances. According to socioemotional selectivity theory, older individuals tend to prioritize emotionally fulfilling relationships, which can help alleviate loneliness.[72] Among the oldest-old, relationships that foster self-esteem are often maintained, while those less beneficial for psychological well-being are allowed to fade. Furthermore, compared to younger counterparts, the oldest-old are more likely to report satisfaction with the quality of their interactions with adult children and with the mutual exchange of support in these relationships. This may reflect more realistic social expectations, enabling these individuals to find greater satisfaction in fewer but higher-quality connections.[73][74][75]

Gender

Gender is a significant yet complex factor in older adults' experiences of loneliness. Older women generally report higher levels of loneliness than older men.[50][76][77]

Theoretical perspectives suggest that early life socialization processes shape how individuals experience loneliness in later life. Chodorow proposed that women, due to their socialization, develop a personality that places greater emphasis on relationships and connections with others, particularly within the family, where they often assume roles like kin keepers.[78] This relational focus may make them more vulnerable to loneliness when these bonds are disrupted. In contrast, men’s traditional roles tend to emphasize instrumental activities, with less emphasis placed on interpersonal relationships, which could contribute to different patterns of loneliness in older adulthood.[79]

Several factors contribute to women’s higher levels of loneliness in older age. One major factor is the increased likelihood of widowhood among women. Women, on average, live longer than men and often marry older partners, meaning they are more likely to experience widowhood at a younger age.[80][81]  The loss of a partner can lead to significant loneliness, particularly for women who may have been more reliant on their partner for companionship. Moreover, women often bear caregiving responsibilities, which can limit their social interactions with others. Many women become primary caregivers for disabled spouses, which can restrict their ability to engage in non-family social activities, further contributing to feelings of loneliness.[82] This caregiving role can also create challenges in establishing and maintaining friendships outside the family sphere, as women may be more confined to their household roles compared to men, who often form social networks through employment. Additionally, women are socialized to be more open about their feelings, which may lead them to report higher levels of loneliness compared to men. Research has shown that women are more likely to admit to negative emotions and to seek help for emotional difficulties, whereas men are often less willing to disclose loneliness, particularly in their later years.[83][84][85]

However, gender alone may not be a significant predictor of loneliness. Gender differences in loneliness seem to be largely driven by associated factors (e.g., widowhood) rather than inherent gender traits.[86] For instance, women’s larger social networks and greater tendency to seek social support may offset some of the loneliness experienced due to widowhood or caregiving duties. Women are more likely to have a confidant, which contributes to greater satisfaction with their social networks.[87][88][89]

Marriage and Widowhood

Marriage is widely regarded as protective against loneliness in old age, offering emotional, psychological, financial, and physical benefits.[90][91][92] However, the quality of the marital relationship is critical; dissatisfaction with a spouse can exacerbate feelings of loneliness, while emotionally fulfilling and supportive marital relationships can mitigate it.[77][93][94] Meanwhile, having a spouse with loneliness increases the risk of loneliness, which reflects dyadic partner effects and can be explained by the emotion-in-relationships model and emotional contagion theory.[95]

Having a spouse has been found to be significant not only as a close emotional connection but also in promoting engagement with a broader social network.[77] As a result, the loss of a partner substantially heightens the risk of loneliness.[96][97][50]  Many older individuals consider the death of a spouse the primary cause of their loneliness.[98] Among widowed older adults, men tend to experience greater loneliness after the loss of a spouse, but women often benefit from stronger social networks with family and friends, which provide more opportunities for emotional support. Furthermore, older women are more likely to share the experience of widowhood with others due to the typical age gap between spouses and their higher involvement in social activities. In contrast, older men often have fewer social connections and may face greater challenges with loneliness after losing a spouse. However, men tend to have better prospects for remarrying in later life, which could reduce their loneliness.[99][97]

Social-Economic Status

Higher socio-economic status (SES) is generally associated with lower levels of loneliness.[100] Older adults with greater financial resources are better equipped to engage in activities that provide social interaction, such as dining out or participating in group activities, thereby reducing feelings of isolation. Furthermore, higher SES tends to lead to broader social network, encompassing not only family members but also friends and acquaintances, further decreasing the likelihood of loneliness. Conversely, lower SES can limit opportunities for social engagement, as financial constraints restrict access to social spaces and caregiving resources. Moreover, lower SES is often associated with lower self-esteem, which may hinder an individual’s ability to form or sustain social relationships.[101][62] Low educational attainment also increases the risk of loneliness in later life. Older adults with limited education are less likely to engage in social participation and often have smaller social networks, which intensifies their feelings of loneliness.[102][103][58][104]

Health

Health problems are major contributors to loneliness in older adults.[68] Both chronic physical conditions and mental health issues, such as depression, are linked to increased loneliness. Studies have shown that difficulty performing activities of daily living, functional limitations, mobility issues and chronic disease are associated with loneliness among older adults. These health challenges hinder older adults' ability to sustain social connections and participate in social activities, which intensifies their loneliness.[105][106][107] Depression can either result from prolonged isolation or contribute to the development of loneliness, creating a cyclical relationship between the two.[7][102]

evidence supported the association between loneliness and incident dementia, prevalent paranoia and prevalent psychotic symptoms. factors cross-sectionally associated with loneliness were medical chronic conditions.

Social Network

Social networks, particularly confidant networks, play a significant role in mitigating loneliness among older adults. Both family and non-family relationships contribute to alleviating loneliness, but their effects vary. Family ties, especially with children, are often a key source of emotional support for older adults. However, these relationships can sometimes involve caregiving responsibilities or obligations that create emotional strain. Friendships, by contrast, are usually voluntary and reciprocal, offering emotional support without the complexities of familial obligations. Research suggests that friendships formed by choice may be particularly effective in reducing loneliness.[108]

The physical proximity of friends and family can influence social connectedness, as frequent and close interactions provide emotional support to counter loneliness. However, excessive proximity or overly frequent interactions can sometimes lead to emotional fatigue, potentially fostering negative emotions. Confidant networks—close, supportive relationships with individuals who provide understanding and reassurance—are also critical in addressing loneliness. Older adults who lack a confidant or have strained relationships within their confidant network are more likely to report loneliness. Conversely, having a strong and supportive confidant network characterized by frequent, emotionally close interactions can significantly reduce feelings of isolation. However, overly strained or dependent relationships within a confidant network may contribute to emotional stress, highlighting the complex dynamics of social connections in later life.[62]

Living Arrangement

Aging in Place

Different living arrangements lead to different loneliness outcomes in old age. Research shows that living alone is often linked to higher levels of loneliness compared to other living situations. Having a partner in the household tends to reduce loneliness, while living with children does not seem to have the same effect. Some studies suggest that older adults living with one other person may feel the least lonely. Although research on changes in living arrangements over time is limited, findings suggest that loneliness might influence living arrangements, with lonelier individuals being more likely to live alone.[109]

Institutionalization

Loneliness is highly prevalent in institutional settings, such as nursing homes. Residents in long-term care facilities often experience loneliness due to loss of autonomy, limited familial contact, reduced social networks, and declines in physical and cognitive capacities.[110][111] Additionally, the institutional environment may lack opportunities for meaningful social engagement and emotional support, which are crucial for mitigating loneliness. These challenges are compounded by superficial social interactions and limited opportunities for forming deep connections with peers, particularly when cognitive abilities differ among residents.[112]

Disruptive Life Events

Disruptive life events can affect interpersonal relationships and influence perceptions of life, isolation, and loneliness at any age. While such experiences are not exclusive to older adults, certain events—such as bereavement, illness or declining health, and retirement—are more common or occur with greater frequency after the age of 50. These events often reshape social networks and emotional well-being, highlighting the vulnerabilities associated with aging.[113]

Societal Factors

Societal Changes

Societal changes have played a significant role in increasing loneliness among older adults. The shift from traditional, tight-knit communities to more mobile and fragmented societies has contributed to heightened isolation. Factors such as the decline in intergenerational living, increased geographic mobility, and weaker community ties have all exacerbated loneliness. Furthermore, while life expectancy has risen globally, many older adults face extended lives without sufficient social support, leading to more individuals living alone and without the familial or social connections that once helped alleviate feelings of isolation.[114]

Culture

Cultural factors further shape the experience of loneliness in old age. In collectivist cultures, where the needs of the family or community are prioritized over individual desires, social cohesion is maintained through cultural norms and social control. These societies often provide stronger support systems, reducing the likelihood of physical isolation for older adults. In contrast, individualistic cultures emphasize personal independence, which can lead to greater freedom in forming and maintaining social relationships but may also contribute to higher levels of loneliness, as the focus on individual needs can sometimes result in weaker social ties.[115]

For example, older adults in eastern, southern, and central European countries, where familism is more prominent, often report higher levels of loneliness compared to their counterparts in northern and western Europe. In these collectivist societies, strong family involvement is expected, and when familial ties weaken or are lost, loneliness is frequently amplified. This suggests that while strong family connections can provide support, societal expectations surrounding them may also increase loneliness when those connections are not met.[108]

Ageism

Ageism is another significant factor contributing to loneliness in old age, as it involves discriminatory attitudes and stereotypes based on age, such as viewing older adults as “out of touch” or “unproductive.” These biases can lead to social exclusion in various areas, including social activities, workplaces, and even within families, fostering feelings of isolation. Additionally, internalized ageism can lead older adults to self-impose isolation, believing they have little to contribute or fearing rejection, which further exacerbates loneliness. The combination of ageism and loneliness can intensify psychological distress, making it essential to address both issues to improve the well-being of older adults.[116]

Longitudinal Factors

Some conditions affect older adults' loneliness over a period of time, rather than just at a single point. The loss of a spouse or partner, a limited social network, and low levels of social activity, often have lasting effects, gradually shaping or worsening loneliness as people age. Poor health or depression may start as minor issues but can lead to increased isolation and loneliness over the years if not addressed. Similarly, the loss of a spouse or reduced social activity might initially cause loneliness, but their impact can grow as time passes, making older adults more vulnerable to chronic loneliness.[117]

Effects

Loneliness has wide-ranging effects on older adults, influencing their health behaviors, physical health, mental well-being, and cognitive abilities. While this section focuses on these specific impacts in later life, see “Loneliness” for a comprehensive overview of loneliness and its effects across all age groups.

Health Behaviors

Loneliness in older adults is associated with various negative health behaviors, including substance use and sleep disturbances. An estimated 1 million older adults in the United States face substance use challenges, with loneliness acting as a significant risk factor. Despite being as likely to benefit from treatment as other age groups, older adults are less likely to seek help for substance use.[118] Loneliness can also lead to sleep problems, such as difficulty falling asleep, maintaining sleep, early-morning awakenings, and feeling unrefreshed after sleep.[119] Studies have shown that lonely individuals experience more insomnia symptoms and shorter sleep durations, further impacting their overall health and well-being.[120]

Physical Health

Loneliness poses serious risks to the physical health of older adults, contributing to conditions such as high blood pressure, heart disease, and obesity.[121] Studies have linked loneliness to cardiovascular problems, including elevated systolic blood pressure and peripheral vascular disease. Additionally, it is associated with immune system dysregulation, marked by increased systemic inflammation and reduced immune function. Although research specific to older populations remains limited, these findings highlight potential mechanisms through which loneliness undermines physical health.[122]

Loneliness may contribute to higher mortality risks among older adults. A study by the University of California, San Francisco, involving 1,600 participants with an average age of 71, found that loneliness significantly increased mortality risk among older adults. Over six years, 23% of those who reported feeling lonely died, compared to 14% of their non-lonely counterparts, even after accounting for socioeconomic and health factors.[123]

Mental Health

Loneliness is a well-documented independent risk factor for depression in old age.[67] It has been linked to heightened anxiety, psychological distress, and lower overall emotional well-being, often exacerbating depression and anxiety in a bidirectional relationship.[124] Perceived social support, a key predictor of loneliness, has been linked to mental health conditions such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and anxiety disorders in older adults.[125]

Cognitive Health

Loneliness is linked to declines in several areas of cognitive functioning, including overall cognitive ability, intelligence quotient (IQ), processing speed, and both immediate and delayed memory recall.[126]

Research suggests that loneliness can contribute to inflammation and immune system dysregulation, both of which negatively impact cognitive function. At the same time, cognitive impairments can exacerbate feelings of loneliness by hindering social interactions. The a bidirectional relationship between loneliness and cognitive decline highlights how loneliness and cognitive health are closely interconnected, with each influencing the other over time.[127]

Relief

Older adults can take practical steps to relieve the feeling of loneliness and foster social connections. Building intergenerational friendships can provide meaningful relationships and promote a positive outlook on aging. Practicing gratitude daily and staying present during interactions, such as by putting away phones during conversations, can enhance emotional connections. Volunteering offers both social engagement and personal fulfillment, with activities like delivering meals or participating in community projects benefiting both physical and mental health. Caring for pets can provide valuable companionship for older adults. Integrating enjoyable and practical social activities into daily routines can help foster healthier social habits. Grief support programs, such as support groups, offer emotional assistance and social connection during periods of loss. Addressing health issues, such as untreated hearing loss, can prevent isolation by improving communication and social participation. Joining senior activity centers or community programs provides opportunities for education, exercise, and shared hobbies, fostering a sense of belonging. Pursuing hobbies, especially those shared with others, like pottery or gardening, can also help older adults connect with like-minded individuals and strengthen their social networks.[128][129]

Interventions

A wide variety of interventions have been developed to reduce social isolation and loneliness among older people. The interventions generally focus on four areas: improving social skills, strengthening social support, fostering more social interaction, and dealing with maladaptive social cognition.[130]

Among these, addressing distorted social cognition stands out as the most successful, particularly with the use of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT). More recently, integrated interventions that combine CBT with medication have emerged as a promising avenue for reducing loneliness.[131]

Interventions to address loneliness in older adults fall into the following six main categories:[132]

  • Social facilitation interventions: These interventions primarily aim to increase social interaction and often involve group-based activities. Examples include charity-funded friendship clubs, shared interest groups, day care centers, and friendship enrichment programs. Social facilitation encourages reciprocal relationships, where both participants benefit from mutual companionship. Group-based activities can help older adults form connections, alleviate feelings of loneliness, and promote a sense of belonging.[132]
  • Psychological therapies: Interventions based on therapeutic approaches, such as reminiscence therapy, mindfulness, exercise-talk discussions, social engagement-directed discussions, coaching, and stress reduction techniques, aim to address emotional and psychological aspects of loneliness. These therapies have been found to significantly reduce loneliness and improve social support, happiness, and life satisfaction.[133][132]
  • Health and social care provision: For older adults who are homebound or frail, formal health and social care interventions can help reduce isolation and improve well-being. These interventions often involve health professionals and may be delivered through nursing homes, community settings, or geriatric rehabilitation programs.[132]
  • Animal-assisted interventions: The interactions with living dogs or robotic animals help older adults relieve loneliness by offering companionship and emotional support.[134] These interventions are thought to work by fostering a bond between the individual and the animal, creating opportunities for social interaction with others. Research suggests that pet attachment can alleviate loneliness by providing both emotional comfort and social connections. Companion robots like Paro, a robotic seal, have been developed to simulate the emotional benefits of animal companionship, providing a viable alternative for older adults who may not be able to care for live animals.[135]
  • Befriending interventions: These interventions focus on forming new social connections, usually through one-on-one interactions facilitated by trained volunteers. Unlike social facilitation programs, befriending interventions are specifically designed to support the lonely individual, helping them establish friendships that can reduce feelings of isolation. For example, the AmeriCorps Senior Companion Program pairs volunteers, who are typically older adults themselves (age 55 and older), with older adults who may be isolated or have special needs.[136] Volunteers, known as Senior Companions, provide friendly visits, assist with basic activities of daily living, and offer companionship to reduce loneliness and promote well-being among older adults.[137]
  • Leisure and skill development interventions: Activities that encourage personal growth and social engagement can help reduce loneliness among older adults by offering meaningful opportunities for connection. Programs centered around hobbies such as gardening, computer use, or volunteering, as well as those focused on skill development, have been shown to engage older adults in social networks and alleviate feelings of isolation. These interventions not only facilitate the formation of new relationships but also promote a sense of purpose and fulfillment.[133]

Technology-Based Interventions

In recent years, technological advancements have provided new ways to address loneliness among older adults. Technology-based interventions, including video calls, online communities, and virtual reality, are increasingly used to enhance communication and social connection.[138] These tools enable individuals to stay connected with family, friends, and healthcare providers, helping to overcome barriers such as geographical distance and physical limitations that contribute to isolation. Several reviews have highlighted the effectiveness of these technologies in improving communication and offering new social interaction opportunities for older adults.[139] Additionally, innovations in artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics, such as virtual companions and digital assistants, offer further support by providing social engagement and emotional care. These technologies have the potential to supplement social support, especially for older adults with mobility challenges or limited local connections. As technology continues to evolve, its role in combating loneliness among older adults is expected to grow.[140]

The use of technology to combat loneliness among older adults raises ethical concerns despite its potential benefits. For instance, ElliQ, an AI-powered robotic companion distributed to hundreds of older residents in New York State, has been praised for reducing boredom, maintaining social skills, and assisting with grief. However, critics highlight significant issues, including data privacy, the protection of sensitive user information, and the potential for such technology to diminish human relationships. Some experts warn that overreliance on robotic companions could discourage older adults from engaging in meaningful, reciprocal interactions with friends and family, undermining the very social connections these tools aim to enhance.[141]

Long-Term Care Settings

Loneliness in long-term care settings presents distinct challenges, as interventions effective in community settings may not always be practical in institutional environments. These settings often restrict the feasibility of certain interventions due to factors like limited physical space, institutional routines, and residents' varied physical and cognitive abilities.[142] One intervention that has shown promise is implementing The Eden Alternative (TEA) model, proposed by Dr. Bill Thomas in 1991. This model emphasizes social rather than medical care and encourages family and community involvement, aiming to transform institutional environments into more homelike settings.[143] The Eden Alternative has been adopted by the Texas Department of Aging and Disability Services to assist Texas nursing homes in promoting residents' quality of life.[144]

TEA principles include:

  • Loneliness, helplessness, and boredom are harmful and can negatively impact our overall health and quality of life.
  • A compassionate and inclusive community, where individuals of all ages and abilities are supported, fosters well-being for everyone.
  • We flourish when we can easily connect with others, as this helps alleviate feelings of loneliness.
  • A sense of purpose and the chance to both give and receive are essential for overcoming helplessness and promoting well-being.
  • Our well-being is enhanced when we experience variety, spontaneity, and the unexpected in our daily lives, which combats boredom.
  • Activities without meaning can diminish our spirit, and personal meaning is crucial for maintaining health and well-being.
  • We are more than our diagnoses, and medical care should empower us to lead a fulfilling and meaningful life.
  • Decision-making should actively involve those who are most affected by the decisions, as empowerment fosters autonomy and influence.
  • Cultivating a resilient and collaborative culture is an ongoing process that requires continuous learning, growth, and adaptability.
  • Effective leadership is vital for creating lasting and impactful change, and no alternative can replace it.[145]

Another innovative approach in facilities involves the use of animals, which has been demonstrated to alleviate loneliness.[146] Dog-assisted interventions (DAI) are among the most widely used forms of animal-assisted interventions, largely because of dogs' strong emotional bonds with humans and their ability to be trained for specific behaviors. Research has shown that DAI can lead to various positive outcomes for residents, including enhanced social functioning, reduced depression, and decreased feelings of loneliness. Notably, the greatest impact of DAI appears to be on improving social interactions and engagement.[147] Moreover, interactive robotic animals, like the AIBO robotic dog, also have been used as as a source of companionship and emotional support.[148]

Studies suggest that both living animals, such as dogs, and interactive robotic animals, like the AIBO robotic dog, have a positive impact on reducing loneliness.[149] Residents develop attachments to these animals, which can serve as a source of companionship and emotional support. Some research even suggests that robotic animals may offer advantages over live pets in terms of engagement, with residents interacting more frequently with robotic dogs and expressing greater emotional attachment, though the underlying mechanisms for loneliness reduction remain complex.[150]

Common Characteristics of Effective Interventions

Effective interventions to reduce loneliness among older adults share a few key features[132]. First, they must be adaptable, allowing for adjustments based on the specific needs of the local population. This flexibility ensures that programs resonate with the target group's demographic and cultural context, making them more engaging.[32] In long-term care settings, this means considering factors like age, mobility, and cognitive abilities to ensure activities are accessible and relevant.

Second, a community development approach, where older adults participate in designing and delivering interventions, has proven effective. This involvement fosters a sense of ownership, increases participation, and strengthens long-term engagement. It also helps ensure that interventions remain responsive to residents' evolving needs.[151]

Lastly, interventions promoting productive engagement—activities that encourage active participation—are more effective than passive ones. These activities, whether group-based or individual, provide opportunities for meaningful connections and a sense of achievement.[142] In residential care facilities, where autonomy and social interaction may be limited, productive engagement can significantly improve residents' social well-being.

References

  1. ^ Qualter, Pamela; Vanhalst, Janne; Harris, Rebecca; Van Roekel, Eeske; Lodder, Gerine; Bangee, Munirah; Maes, Marlies; Verhagen, Maaike (2015-03-11). "Loneliness Across the Life Span". Perspectives on Psychological Science. 10 (2): 250–264. doi:10.1177/1745691615568999. ISSN 1745-6916. PMID 25910393.
  2. ^ Lasgaard, Mathias; Friis, Karina; Shevlin, Mark (2016-08-29). ""Where are all the lonely people?" A population-based study of high-risk groups across the life span". Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 51 (10): 1373–1384. doi:10.1007/s00127-016-1279-3. ISSN 0933-7954. PMID 27571769.
  3. ^ Luhmann, Maike; Hawkley, Louise C. (2016-05-05). "Age differences in loneliness from late adolescence to oldest old age". Developmental Psychology. 52 (6): 943–959. doi:10.1037/dev0000117. ISSN 1939-0599. PMC 8015413. PMID 27148782.
  4. ^ a b Lim, Michelle H.; Eres, Robert; Vasan, Shradha (2020-06-10). "Understanding loneliness in the twenty-first century: an update on correlates, risk factors, and potential solutions". Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 55 (7): 793–810. doi:10.1007/s00127-020-01889-7. ISSN 0933-7954. PMID 32524169.
  5. ^ Wethington, Elaine; Pillemer, Karl (2013-12-23), Coplan, Robert J.; Bowker, Julie C. (eds.), "Social Isolation among Older People", The Handbook of Solitude (1 ed.), Wiley, pp. 242–259, doi:10.1155/2023/7726692, ISBN 978-1-118-42736-1
  6. ^ Caron, Christina (2024-05-21). "The Loneliness Curve". The New York Times. Retrieved 2024-11-29.
  7. ^ a b Hawkley, Louise C.; Cacioppo, John T. (2010-07-22). "Loneliness Matters: A Theoretical and Empirical Review of Consequences and Mechanisms". Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 40 (2): 218–227. doi:10.1007/s12160-010-9210-8. ISSN 0883-6612. PMC 3874845. PMID 20652462.
  8. ^ Holt-Lunstad, Julianne; Smith, Timothy B.; Baker, Mark; Harris, Tyler; Stephenson, David (2015-03-11). "Loneliness and Social Isolation as Risk Factors for Mortality". Perspectives on Psychological Science. 10 (2): 227–237. doi:10.1177/1745691614568352. ISSN 1745-6916. PMID 25910392.
  9. ^ a b Chawla, Kavita; Kunonga, Tafadzwa Patience; Stow, Daniel; Barker, Robert; Craig, Dawn; Hanratty, Barbara (2021-07-26). "Prevalence of loneliness amongst older people in high-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis". PLOS ONE. 16 (7): e0255088. Bibcode:2021PLoSO..1655088C. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0255088. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 8312979. PMID 34310643.
  10. ^ Surkalim, Daniel L; Luo, Mengyun; Eres, Robert; Gebel, Klaus; van Buskirk, Joseph; Bauman, Adrian; Ding, Ding (2022-02-09). "The prevalence of loneliness across 113 countries: systematic review and meta-analysis". BMJ. 376: e067068. doi:10.1136/bmj-2021-067068. ISSN 1756-1833. PMC 8826180. PMID 35140066.
  11. ^ Theeke, Laurie A. (2009-01-15). "Predictors of Loneliness in U.S. Adults Over Age Sixty-Five". Archives of Psychiatric Nursing. 23 (5): 387–396. doi:10.1016/j.apnu.2008.11.002. ISSN 0883-9417. PMID 19766930.
  12. ^ YANG, KEMING; VICTOR, CHRISTINA R. (2008-11-03). "The prevalence of and risk factors for loneliness among older people in China". Ageing and Society. 28 (3): 305–327. doi:10.1017/s0144686x07006848. ISSN 0144-686X.
  13. ^ a b Chen, Yu; Hicks, Allan; While, Alison E. (2013-05-28). "Loneliness and social support of older people in China: a systematic literature review". Health & Social Care in the Community. 22 (2): 113–123. doi:10.1111/hsc.12051. ISSN 0966-0410. PMID 23714357.
  14. ^ "Reducing Social Isolation and Loneliness among Older People". World Health Organization. Retrieved 2024-12-04.
  15. ^ Armitage, Richard; Nellums, Laura B (2020-03-20). "COVID-19 and the consequences of isolating the elderly". The Lancet Public Health. 5 (5): e256. doi:10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30061-X. PMC 7104160. PMID 32199471.
  16. ^ VICTOR, CHRISTINA R.; SCAMBLER, SASHA J.; BOWLING, ANN; BOND, JOHN (2005-04-22). "The prevalence of, and risk factors for, loneliness in later life: a survey of older people in Great Britain". Ageing and Society. 25 (6): 357–375. doi:10.1017/s0144686x04003332. ISSN 0144-686X.
  17. ^ Savikko, N.; Routasalo, P.; Tilvis, R.S.; Strandberg, T.E.; Pitkälä, K.H. (2005-05-23). "Predictors and subjective causes of loneliness in an aged population". Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics. 41 (3): 223–233. doi:10.1016/j.archger.2005.03.002. ISSN 0167-4943. PMID 15908025.
  18. ^ Theeke, Laurie A. (2010-11-03). "Sociodemographic and Health-Related Risks for Loneliness and Outcome Differences by Loneliness Status in a Sample of U.S. Older Adults". Research in Gerontological Nursing. 3 (2): 113–125. doi:10.3928/19404921-20091103-99. ISSN 1940-4921. PMID 20415360.
  19. ^ Anderson, G. Oscar (2010-09-01). "Loneliness Among Older Adults: A National Survey of Adults 45+: Dataset". AARP Research Data. doi:10.26419/res.00064.003. Retrieved 2024-11-25.
  20. ^ Yang, Keming; Victor, Christina (2011-02-09). "Age and loneliness in 25 European nations". Ageing and Society. 31 (8): 1368–1388. doi:10.1017/S0144686X1000139X. ISSN 0144-686X.
  21. ^ a b Victor, Christina R (2012-12-14). "Loneliness in Care Homes: A Neglected Area of Research?". Aging Health. 8 (6): 637–646. doi:10.2217/ahe.12.65. ISSN 1745-509X.
  22. ^ N, Metwally; AP, Macken; C, McDonnell; CS, O’Gorman; EJ, Molloy; EF, Roche (2021-09-09). "Endothelial Dysfunction and Diabetes Related Complications in Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes". Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology. 6 (2). doi:10.26420/jpediatriendocrinol.2021.1045. ISSN 2768-6094.
  23. ^ "Most Older Adults Are Likely to Need and Use Long-Term Services and Supports Issue Brief". Office of The Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. 2021-01-31. Retrieved 2024-12-04.
  24. ^ Ribbe, M. W.; Ljunggren, G.; Steel, K.; Topinkova, E.; Hawes, C.; Ikegami, N.; Henrard, J.-C.; JONnson, P. V (1997-01-01). "Nursing Homes in 10 Nations: A Comparison Between Countries and Settings". Age and Ageing. 26 (suppl 2): 3–12. doi:10.1093/ageing/26.suppl_2.3. ISSN 0002-0729. PMID 9464548.
  25. ^ Berry, Lisa (2010-02-25). "Stroke knowledge among care home staff is poor". Nursing Older People. 22 (2): 7. doi:10.7748/nop.22.2.7.s6. ISSN 1472-0795. PMID 27320268.
  26. ^ Borowiak, Ewa; Kostka, Tomasz (2003-10-13). "Predictors of quality of life in older people living at home and in institutions". Aging Clinical and Experimental Research. 16 (3): 212–220. doi:10.1007/bf03327386. ISSN 1594-0667. PMID 15462464.
  27. ^ Ho, Han Kwee; Matsubayashi, Kozo; Wada, Taizo; Kimura, Miyuki; Yano, Shoki; Otsuka, Kuniaki; Fujisawa, Michiko; Kita, Toru; Saijoh, Kiyofumi (2003-07-22). "What determines the life satisfaction of the elderly? Comparative study of residential care home and community in Japan". Geriatrics & Gerontology International. 3 (2): 79–85. doi:10.1046/j.1444-1586.2003.00067.x. hdl:2297/15883. ISSN 1444-1586.
  28. ^ Gardiner, Clare; Laud, Pete; Heaton, Tim; Gott, Merryn (2020-05-12). "What is the prevalence of loneliness amongst older people living in residential and nursing care homes? A systematic review and meta-analysis". Age and Ageing. 49 (5): 748–757. doi:10.1093/ageing/afaa049. ISSN 0002-0729. PMID 32396600.
  29. ^ Buckley, Catherine; McCarthy, Geraldine (2009-12-04). "An Exploration of Social Connectedness as Perceived by Older Adults in a Long-Term Care Setting in Ireland". Geriatric Nursing. 30 (6): 390–396. doi:10.1016/j.gerinurse.2009.09.001. ISSN 0197-4572. PMID 19963148.
  30. ^ Russell, Daniel W.; Cutrona, Carolyn E.; de la Mora, Arlene; Wallace, Robert B. (1997). "Loneliness and nursing home admission among rural older adults". Psychology and Aging. 12 (4): 574–589. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.12.4.574. ISSN 0882-7974. PMID 9416627.
  31. ^ Brownie, Sonya; Horstmanshof, Louise (2011-08-10). "The Management of Loneliness in Aged Care Residents: An Important Therapeutic Target for Gerontological Nursing". Geriatric Nursing. 32 (5): 318–325. doi:10.1016/j.gerinurse.2011.05.003. ISSN 0197-4572. PMID 21831481.
  32. ^ a b Schroyen, S.; Janssen, N.; Duffner, L. A.; Veenstra, M.; Pyrovolaki, E.; Salmon, E.; Adam, S. (2023-09-14). "Prevalence of Loneliness in Older Adults: A Scoping Review". Health & Social Care in the Community. 2023: 1–12. doi:10.1155/2023/7726692. ISSN 1365-2524.
  33. ^ Ruiz-Callado, Raúl; Jareño-Ruiz, Diana; Fabregat-Cabrera, María Elena; Penalva-Lorca, María Manuela (2023-03-30). "Ageing and Loneliness in Times of Pandemic: A Scoping Review". International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 20 (7): 5337. doi:10.3390/ijerph20075337. ISSN 1660-4601.
  34. ^ "How to Navigate Social Isolation and Loneliness as an Older Adult". National Council on Aging. 2022-05-03. Retrieved 2024-12-04.
  35. ^ "Loneliness Among Older Adults Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic | National Poll on Healthy Aging". www.healthyagingpoll.org. 2020-09-14. Retrieved 2024-12-04.
  36. ^ Wu, Bei (2020-06-05). "Social isolation and loneliness among older adults in the context of COVID-19: a global challenge". Global Health Research and Policy. 5 (1): 27. doi:10.1186/s41256-020-00154-3. ISSN 2397-0642. PMC 7272234. PMID 32514427.
  37. ^ Dziedzic, Beata; Idzik, Anna; Kobos, Ewa; Sienkiewicz, Zofia; Kryczka, Tomasz; Fidecki, Wiesław; Wysokiński, Mariusz (2021-11-02). "Loneliness and mental health among the elderly in Poland during the COVID-19 pandemic". BMC Public Health. 21 (1). doi:10.1186/s12889-021-12029-4. ISSN 1471-2458. PMID 34727897.
  38. ^ O’Shea, Brendan Q.; Finlay, Jessica M.; Kler, Jasdeep; Joseph, Carly A.; Kobayashi, Lindsay C. (2021-07-20). "Loneliness Among US Adults Aged ≥55 Early in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Findings From the COVID-19 Coping Study". Public Health Reports. 136 (6): 754–764. doi:10.1177/00333549211029965. ISSN 0033-3549. PMC 8579390. PMID 34283657.
  39. ^ Su, Yingying; Rao, Wenwang; Li, Muzi; Caron, Gabriel; D’Arcy, Carl; Meng, Xiangfei (2022-03-31). "Prevalence of loneliness and social isolation among older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis". International Psychogeriatrics. 35 (5): 229–241. doi:10.1017/s1041610222000199. ISSN 1041-6102. PMID 35357280.
  40. ^ Creese, Jennifer; Byrne, John-Paul; Conway, Edel; Barrett, Elizabeth; Prihodova, Lucia; Humphries, Niamh (2021-02-19). ""We All Really Need to just Take a Breath": Composite Narratives of Hospital Doctors' Well-Being during the COVID-19 Pandemic". International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 18 (4): 2051. doi:10.3390/ijerph18042051. ISSN 1660-4601. PMC 7921910. PMID 33669828.
  41. ^ Ogrin, Rajna; Cyarto, Elizabeth V.; Harrington, Karra D.; Haslam, Catherine; Lim, Michelle H.; Golenko, Xanthe; Bush, Matiu; Vadasz, Danny; Johnstone, Georgina; Lowthian, Judy A. (2021-03-30). "Loneliness in older age: What is it, why is it happening and what should we do about it in Australia?". Australasian Journal on Ageing. 40 (2): 202–207. doi:10.1111/ajag.12929. ISSN 1440-6381. PMID 33783951.
  42. ^ Schirmer, Werner; Michailakis, Dimitris (2016-10-25). "Inclusion/Exclusion as the Missing Link. A Luhmannian Analysis of Loneliness Among Older People". Systems Research and Behavioral Science. 35 (1): 76–89. doi:10.1002/sres.2441. ISSN 1092-7026.
  43. ^ a b c d Cohen-Mansfield, Jiska; Hazan, Haim; Lerman, Yaffa; Shalom, Vera (2015-10-01). "Correlates and predictors of loneliness in older-adults: a review of quantitative results informed by qualitative insights". International Psychogeriatrics. 28 (4): 557–576. doi:10.1017/s1041610215001532. ISSN 1041-6102. PMID 26424033.
  44. ^ Lang, F. R.; Staudinger, U. M.; Carstensen, L. L. (1998-01-01). "Perspectives on Socioemotional Selectivity in Late Life: How Personality and Social Context Do (and Do Not) Make a Difference". The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences. 53B (1): P21 – P30. doi:10.1093/geronb/53b.1.p21. ISSN 1079-5014. PMID 9469168.
  45. ^ a b Vrkljan, Brenda; Montpetit, Ariane; Naglie, Gary; Rapoport, Mark; Mazer, Barbara (2018-07-11). "Interventions that support major life transitions in older adulthood: a systematic review". International Psychogeriatrics. 31 (3): 393–415. doi:10.1017/s1041610218000972. ISSN 1041-6102. PMID 29991365.
  46. ^ Lloyd-Sherlock, Peter G; Ebrahim, Shah; McKee, Martin; Prince, Martin James (2016-08-31). "Institutional ageism in global health policy". BMJ. 354: i4514. doi:10.1136/bmj.i4514. ISSN 1756-1833. PMID 27582131.
  47. ^ Reese, Peter P.; Caplan, Arthur L.; Bloom, Roy D.; Abt, Peter L.; Karlawish, Jason H. (2010-09-09). "How Should We Use Age to Ration Health Care? Lessons from the Case of Kidney Transplantation". Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 58 (10): 1980–1986. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03031.x. ISSN 0002-8614. PMC 4570233. PMID 20831719.
  48. ^ Perrin, Monica Anderson and Andrew (2017-05-17). "Tech Adoption Climbs Among Older Adults". Pew Research Center. Retrieved 2024-11-25.
  49. ^ de Jong Gierveld, Jenny; Tesch-Römer, Clemens (2012-10-13). "Loneliness in old age in Eastern and Western European societies: theoretical perspectives". European Journal of Ageing. 9 (4): 285–295. doi:10.1007/s10433-012-0248-2. ISSN 1613-9372. PMC 5549113. PMID 28804428.
  50. ^ a b c Aartsen, Marja; Jylhä, Marja (2011-02-05). "Onset of loneliness in older adults: results of a 28 year prospective study". European Journal of Ageing. 8 (1): 31–38. doi:10.1007/s10433-011-0175-7. ISSN 1613-9372. PMC 3047676. PMID 21475393.
  51. ^ Petrova, Kate; Gross, James J. (2023-11-30), "Emotion Regulation in Self and Others", Emotion Regulation and Parenting, Cambridge University Press, pp. 35–54, doi:10.1017/9781009304368.004, ISBN 978-1-009-30436-8, retrieved 2024-11-25
  52. ^ HEYLEN, LEEN (2010-05-07). "The older, the lonelier? Risk factors for social loneliness in old age". Ageing and Society. 30 (7): 1177–1196. doi:10.1017/s0144686x10000292. ISSN 0144-686X.
  53. ^ Dykstra, Pearl A.; Fokkema, Tineke (2007-04-13). "Social and Emotional Loneliness Among Divorced and Married Men and Women: Comparing the Deficit and Cognitive Perspectives". Basic and Applied Social Psychology. 29 (1): 1–12. doi:10.1080/01973530701330843. ISSN 0197-3533.
  54. ^ HALLERÖD, BJÖRN (2009-04-21). "Ill, worried or worried sick? Inter-relationships among indicators of wellbeing among older people in Sweden". Ageing and Society. 29 (4): 563–584. doi:10.1017/s0144686x09008502. ISSN 0144-686X.
  55. ^ KRAUSE, NEAL; NEWSOM, JASON T.; ROOK, KAREN S. (2008-11-03). "Financial strain, negative social interaction, and self-rated health: evidence from two United States nationwide longitudinal surveys". Ageing and Society. 28 (7): 1001–1023. doi:10.1017/s0144686x0800740x. ISSN 0144-686X.
  56. ^ LOWENSTEIN, ARIELA; DAATLAND, SVEIN OLAV (2006-02-27). "Filial norms and family support in a comparative cross-national context: evidence from the OASIS study". Ageing and Society. 26 (2): 203–223. doi:10.1017/s0144686x05004502. ISSN 0144-686X.
  57. ^ a b Dykstra, Pearl A. (2009-04-04). "Older adult loneliness: myths and realities". European Journal of Ageing. 6 (2): 91–100. doi:10.1007/s10433-009-0110-3. ISSN 1613-9372. PMC 2693783. PMID 19517025.
  58. ^ a b Sundström, Gerdt; Fransson, Eleonor; Malmberg, Bo; Davey, Adam (2009-11-06). "Loneliness among older Europeans". European Journal of Ageing. 6 (4): 267–275. doi:10.1007/s10433-009-0134-8. ISSN 1613-9372. PMC 5547349. PMID 28798610.
  59. ^ ORAND, A (2006), Stratification and the Life CourseLife Course Capital, Life Course Risks, and Social Inequality, Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences, Elsevier, pp. 145–162, doi:10.1016/b9-78-012088-3/88250-0122, ISBN 978-0-12-088388-2, retrieved 2024-11-25
  60. ^ Deeg, Dorly J. H.; Thomése, G. C. Fleur (2005-06-28). "Discrepancies between personal income and neighbourhood status: effects on physical and mental health". European Journal of Ageing. 2 (2): 98–108. doi:10.1007/s10433-005-0027-4. ISSN 1613-9372. PMC 5547679. PMID 28794722.
  61. ^ Ong, Anthony D.; Uchino, Bert N.; Wethington, Elaine (2015-11-06). "Loneliness and Health in Older Adults: A Mini-Review and Synthesis". Gerontology. 62 (4): 443–449. doi:10.1159/000441651. ISSN 0304-324X. PMC 6162046. PMID 26539997.
  62. ^ a b c Pinquart, Martin; Sorensen, Silvia (2001-06-07). "Influences on Loneliness in Older Adults: A Meta-Analysis". Basic and Applied Social Psychology. 23 (4): 245–266. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp2304_2. ISSN 0197-3533.
  63. ^ Perissinotto, Carla M.; Stijacic Cenzer, Irena; Covinsky, Kenneth E. (2012-07-23). "Loneliness in Older Persons". Archives of Internal Medicine. 172 (14): 1078–1083. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2012.1993. ISSN 0003-9926. PMC 4383762. PMID 22710744.
  64. ^ Nicolaisen, Magnhild; Thorsen, Kirsten (2014-07-16). "Who are Lonely? Loneliness in Different Age Groups (18–81 Years Old), Using Two Measures of Loneliness". The International Journal of Aging and Human Development. 78 (3): 229–257. doi:10.2190/ag.78.3.b. ISSN 0091-4150. PMID 25265679.
  65. ^ Fokkema, Tineke; De Jong Gierveld, Jenny; Dykstra, Pearl A. (2011-12-05). "Cross-National Differences in Older Adult Loneliness". The Journal of Psychology. 146 (1–2): 201–228. doi:10.1080/00223980.2011.631612. ISSN 0022-3980. PMID 22303621.
  66. ^ Jylhä, Marja (2004). "Old Age and Loneliness: Cross-sectional and Longitudinal Analyses in the Tampere Longitudinal Study on Aging". Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement. 23 (2): 157–168. doi:10.1353/cja.2004.0023. ISSN 0714-9808. PMID 15334815.
  67. ^ a b Luanaigh, Conor Ó; Lawlor, Brian A. (2008-06-09). "Loneliness and the health of older people". International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 23 (12): 1213–1221. doi:10.1002/gps.2054. ISSN 0885-6230. PMID 18537197.
  68. ^ a b Dahlberg, Lena; Andersson, Lars; McKee, Kevin J.; Lennartsson, Carin (2014-08-15). "Predictors of loneliness among older women and men in Sweden: A national longitudinal study". Aging & Mental Health. 19 (5): 409–417. doi:10.1080/13607863.2014.944091. ISSN 1360-7863. PMID 25126996.
  69. ^ Hobbs, Frank B.; Damon, Bonnie L. (1996). "65 in the United States". PsycEXTRA Dataset. doi:10.1037/e401512005-001. Retrieved 2024-11-25.
  70. ^ MCKEE, KEVIN (1997-05-01). "James E. Birren and K. Warner Schaie (eds), Handbook of the Psychology of Aging, Academic, San Diego, California, 4th edn, 1996, 416 pp., hbk no price, ISBN 0 121 01260 3, pbk £12.99, ISBN 121 01261 1". Ageing and Society. 17 (3): 353–371. doi:10.1017/s0144686x97226413. ISSN 0144-686X.
  71. ^ Adams, Rebecca G. (1986-06-09). "Secondary Friendship Networks and Psychological Well-Being Among Elderly Women". Activities, Adaptation & Aging. 8 (2): 59–72. doi:10.1300/j016v08n02_06. ISSN 0192-4788.
  72. ^ Ferrucci, Luigi; Guralnik, Jack M. (2013-02-01). "Mobility in Human Aging<BR> <I>A Multidisciplinary Life Span Conceptual Framework</I>". Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics. 33 (1): 171–192. doi:10.1891/0198-8794.33.171. ISSN 0198-8794.
  73. ^ Ryff, Carol D. (1991). "Possible selves in adulthood and old age: A tale of shifting horizons". Psychology and Aging. 6 (2): 286–295. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.6.2.286. ISSN 0882-7974. PMID 1863398.
  74. ^ Rook, Karen S. (1987). "Reciprocity of social exchange and social satisfaction among older women". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 52 (1): 145–154. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.145. ISSN 0022-3514.
  75. ^ Okun, M. A.; Keith, V. M. (1998-01-01). "Effects of Positive and Negative Social Exchanges with Various Sources on Depressive Symptoms in Younger and Older Adults". The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences. 53B (1): P4 – P20. doi:10.1093/geronb/53b.1.p4. ISSN 1079-5014. PMID 9469167.
  76. ^ Cohen-Mansfield, Jiska; Shmotkin, Dov; Goldberg, Shira (2009-09-29). "Loneliness in old age: longitudinal changes and their determinants in an Israeli sample". International Psychogeriatrics. 21 (6): 1160–1170. doi:10.1017/S1041610209990974. ISSN 1041-6102. PMID 19785916.
  77. ^ a b c Dykstra, Pearl A.; van Tilburg, Theo G.; Gierveld, Jenny de Jong (2005-11-01). "Changes in Older Adult Loneliness: Results From a Seven-Year Longitudinal Study". Research on Aging. 27 (6): 725–747. doi:10.1177/0164027505279712. ISSN 0164-0275.
  78. ^ Rosenthal, Carolyn J. (November 1985). "Kinkeeping in the Familial Division of Labor". Journal of Marriage and the Family. 47 (4): 965–974. doi:10.2307/352340. ISSN 0022-2445. JSTOR 352340.
  79. ^ Gonzalez, Nancie L. (1974-10-04). "Sex Roles and Cultural Domains:Woman, Culture, and Society". Science. 186 (4158): 43–44. doi:10.1126/science.186.4158.43. ISSN 0036-8075.
  80. ^ Lennartsson, Carin; Lundberg, Olle (2006-12-04). "'What's marital status got to do with it?': gender inequalities in economic resources, health and functional abilities among older adults". Health Inequalities and Welfare Resources: 179–198. doi:10.46692/9781847421739.010. ISBN 978-1-84742-173-9.
  81. ^ Dahlberg, Lena; McKee, Kevin J. (2014-05-19). "Correlates of social and emotional loneliness in older people: evidence from an English community study". Aging & Mental Health. 18 (4): 504–514. doi:10.1080/13607863.2013.856863. ISSN 1360-7863. PMC 3979439. PMID 24251626.
  82. ^ Chappell, Neena L. (1983-03-01). "Informal Support Networks among the Elderly". Research on Aging. 5 (1): 77–99. doi:10.1177/0164027583005001005. ISSN 0164-0275.
  83. ^ Prokop, Ernst (1967-05-26). "Reinhard und Anne-Marie Tausch: Erziehungspsychologie, Psychologische Vorgänge In Erziehung und Unterricht. Verlag Hogrefe, Göttingen, 1963 XIl/240 Seiten, .22,– DM". Vierteljahrsschrift für wissenschaftliche Pädagogik. 43 (1): 69–71. doi:10.30965/25890581-04301014. ISSN 0507-7230.
  84. ^ Borys, Shelley; Perlman, Daniel (1985-03-01). "Gender Differences in Loneliness". Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 11 (1): 63–74. doi:10.1177/0146167285111006. ISSN 0146-1672.
  85. ^ Josselson, Ruthellen (1988-04-01). "Finding Herself". Family Relations. 37 (2): 238. doi:10.2307/584328. ISSN 0197-6664. JSTOR 584328.
  86. ^ Victor, Christina R.; Scambler, Sasha J.; Marston, Louise; Bond, John; Bowling, Ann (2006-01-23). "Older People's Experiences of Loneliness in the UK: Does Gender Matter?". Social Policy and Society. 5 (1): 27–38. doi:10.1017/s1474746405002733. ISSN 1474-7464.
  87. ^ KONDRATOWITZ, HANS-JOACHIM (2009-12-11). "K. Warner Schaie and Ronald P. Abeles (eds), Social Structures and Aging Individuals: Continuing Challenges, Springer Publishing Company, New York, 2008, 412 pp., hbk US $85.00, ISBN 13: 978 0 8261 2408 1". Ageing and Society. 30 (1): 183–184. doi:10.1017/s0144686x09990419. ISSN 0144-686X.
  88. ^ Antonucci, Toni C.; Fuhrer, Rebecca; Jackson, James S. (1990-11-01). "Social Support and Reciprocity: A Cross-Ethnic and Cross-National Perspective". Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 7 (4): 519–530. doi:10.1177/0265407590074008. hdl:2027.42/68332. ISSN 0265-4075.
  89. ^ Mullins, Larry C.; Mushel, Mary (1992-12-01). "The Existence and Emotional Closeness of Relationships with Children, Friends, and Spouses". Research on Aging. 14 (4): 448–470. doi:10.1177/0164027592144002. ISSN 0164-0275.
  90. ^ Carr, Deborah; Springer, Kristen W. (2010-06-18). "Advances in Families and Health Research in the 21st Century". Journal of Marriage and Family. 72 (3): 743–761. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00728.x. ISSN 0022-2445.
  91. ^ Proulx, Christine M.; Helms, Heather M.; Buehler, Cheryl (2007-07-05). "Marital Quality and Personal Well-Being: A Meta-Analysis". Journal of Marriage and Family. 69 (3): 576–593. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00393.x. ISSN 0022-2445.
  92. ^ England, Paula; Waite, Linda J.; Gallagher, Maggie (2001-11-01). "The Case for Marriage: Why Married People Are Happier, Healthier, and Better off Financially". Contemporary Sociology. 30 (6): 564. doi:10.2307/3088984. ISSN 0094-3061. JSTOR 3088984.
  93. ^ de Jong Gierveld, J.; Broese van Groenou, M.; Hoogendoorn, A. W.; Smit, J. H. (2009-07-01). "Quality of Marriages in Later Life and Emotional and Social Loneliness". The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences. 64B (4): 497–506. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbn043. ISSN 1079-5014. PMID 19213848.
  94. ^ Ayalon, Liat; Shiovitz-Ezra, Sharon; Palgi, Yuval (2012-07-13). "Associations of loneliness in older married men and women". Aging & Mental Health. 17 (1): 33–39. doi:10.1080/13607863.2012.702725. ISSN 1360-7863. PMID 22788950.
  95. ^ Stokes, Jeffrey E. (2016-07-09). "Marital quality and loneliness in later life". Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 34 (1): 114–135. doi:10.1177/0265407515626309. ISSN 0265-4075.
  96. ^ Victor, Christina R.; Bowling, Ann (2012-03-19). "A Longitudinal Analysis of Loneliness Among Older People in Great Britain". The Journal of Psychology. 146 (3): 313–331. doi:10.1080/00223980.2011.609572. ISSN 0022-3980. PMID 22574423.
  97. ^ a b Nicolaisen, Magnhild; Thorsen, Kirsten (2014-02-17). "Loneliness among men and women – a five-year follow-up study". Aging & Mental Health. 18 (2): 194–206. doi:10.1080/13607863.2013.821457. ISSN 1360-7863. PMID 23895066.
  98. ^ Heikkinen, Riitta-Liisa; Kauppinen, Markku (2011-03-06). "Mental well-being: A 16-year follow-up among older residents in Jyväskylä". Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics. 52 (1): 33–39. doi:10.1016/j.archger.2010.01.017. ISSN 0167-4943.
  99. ^ Gerson, Ann C.; Perlman, Daniel (1979). "Loneliness and expressive communication". Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 88 (3): 258–261. doi:10.1037/0021-843x.88.3.258. ISSN 0021-843X. PMID 500953.
  100. ^ Sánchez-Moreno, Esteban; Gallardo-Peralta, Lorena; Barrón López de Roda, Ana; Rivera Álvarez, Joaquín M. (2024-04-23). "Socioeconomic status, loneliness, and depression among older adults: a cross-sectional study in Spain". BMC Geriatrics. 24 (1). doi:10.1186/s12877-024-04978-3. ISSN 1471-2318.
  101. ^ Shankar, Aparna; McMunn, Anne; Demakakos, Panayotes; Hamer, Mark; Steptoe, Andrew (February 2017). "Social isolation and loneliness: Prospective associations with functional status in older adults". Health Psychology. 36 (2): 179–187. doi:10.1037/hea0000437. ISSN 1930-7810. PMID 27786518.
  102. ^ a b Jylhä, Marja; Saarenheimo, Marja (2010), "Loneliness and Ageing: Comparative Perspectives", The SAGE Handbook of Social Gerontology, London: SAGE Publications Ltd, pp. 317–328, doi:10.4135/9781446200933.n24, ISBN 978-1-4129-3464-0, retrieved 2024-11-25
  103. ^ Savikko, N.; Routasalo, P.; Tilvis, R.S.; Strandberg, T.E.; Pitkälä, K.H. (2005-05-23). "Predictors and subjective causes of loneliness in an aged population". Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics. 41 (3): 223–233. doi:10.1016/j.archger.2005.03.002. ISSN 0167-4943. PMID 15908025.
  104. ^ Routasalo, Pirkko; Pitkala, Kaisu H (2004-08-11). "Loneliness among older people". Reviews in Clinical Gerontology. 13 (4): 303–311. doi:10.1017/S095925980400111X. ISSN 0959-2598.
  105. ^ Hawkley, Louise C.; Capitanio, John P. (2015-05-26). "Perceived social isolation, evolutionary fitness and health outcomes: a lifespan approach". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 370 (1669): 20140114. doi:10.1098/rstb.2014.0114. ISSN 0962-8436. PMC 4410380. PMID 25870400.
  106. ^ Cohen-Mansfield, Jiska; Parpura-Gill, Aleksandra (2006-09-28). "Loneliness in older persons: a theoretical model and empirical findings". International Psychogeriatrics. 19 (2): 279–294. doi:10.1017/s1041610206004200 (inactive 5 December 2024). ISSN 1041-6102. PMID 17005067.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of December 2024 (link)
  107. ^ Luo, Ye; Hawkley, Louise C.; Waite, Linda J.; Cacioppo, John T. (2012-01-25). "Loneliness, health, and mortality in old age: A national longitudinal study". Social Science & Medicine. 74 (6): 907–914. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.11.028. ISSN 0277-9536. PMC 3303190. PMID 22326307.
  108. ^ a b Shiovitz-Ezra, Sharon (2013-06-14), "30 Confidant networks and loneliness", Active ageing and solidarity between generations in Europe, DE GRUYTER, pp. 349–358, doi:10.1515/9783110295467.349, ISBN 978-3-11-029545-0, retrieved 2024-11-25
  109. ^ Barjaková, Martina; Garnero, Andrea; d’Hombres, Béatrice (2023-08-09). "Risk Factors for Loneliness: A Literature Review". Social Science and Medicine. 334: 116163. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116163. ISSN 0277-9536.
  110. ^ Sedlackova, Katerina Beji; Bartova, Alzbeta; Holmerova, Iva (2024-09-23). "Feeling Lonely, Isolated and Depressed. Older Adults' Feelings in Long-term Term Facilities: A Scoping Review". Journal of Population Ageing. 17 (4): 861–914. doi:10.1007/s12062-024-09463-8. ISSN 1874-7884.
  111. ^ Quan, Nicolas G.; Lohman, Matthew C.; Resciniti, Nicholas V.; Friedman, Daniela B. (2019-10-11). "A systematic review of interventions for loneliness among older adults living in long-term care facilities". Aging & Mental Health. 24 (12): 1945–1955. doi:10.1080/13607863.2019.1673311. ISSN 1360-7863. PMID 31602993.
  112. ^ Boamah, Sheila A.; Weldrick, Rachel; Lee, Tin-Suet Joan; Taylor, Nicole (2021-03-27). "Social Isolation Among Older Adults in Long-Term Care: A Scoping Review". Journal of Aging and Health. 33 (7–8): 618–632. doi:10.1177/08982643211004174. ISSN 0898-2643. PMC 8236667. PMID 33779366.
  113. ^ National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Institute of Medicine; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; National Research Council; National Research Council; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, eds. (2020). Social Isolation and Loneliness in Older Adults: Opportunities for the Health Care System. A consensus study report of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Medicine. Washington, D.C: National Academies Press. ISBN 978-0-309-67100-2.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: editors list (link)
  114. ^ Bongaarts, John; Greenhalgh, Susan; Hewett, Paul; McNicoll, Geoffrey; Todaro, Michael P.; Zimmer, Zachary (2004-01-27). "SHORT REVIEWS". Population and Development Review. 28 (4): 809–816. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2002.00809.x. ISSN 0098-7921.
  115. ^ Burholt, Vanessa (2023-08-07), "Culture, social isolation and loneliness in later life", Loneliness and Social Isolation in Old Age, London: Routledge, pp. 50–60, doi:10.4324/9781003289012-8, ISBN 978-1-003-28901-2, retrieved 2024-12-04
  116. ^ "The Impact of Ageism on Elders' Mental Health". American Society on Aging. 2024-04-24. Retrieved 2024-12-04.
  117. ^ Dahlberg, Lena; McKee, Kevin J.; Frank, Amanda; Naseer, Mahwish (2021-02-10). "A systematic review of longitudinal risk factors for loneliness in older adults". Aging & Mental Health. 26 (2): 225–249. doi:10.1080/13607863.2021.1876638. ISSN 1360-7863. PMID 33563024.
  118. ^ Russell, Ray (2022-07-21). "Substance Use Challenges in Older Adults". National Council for Mental Wellbeing. Retrieved 2024-12-04.
  119. ^ Hedrih, Vladimir (2023-07-25). "Lonely individuals tend to develop sleep problems, study finds". PsyPost - Psychology News. Retrieved 2024-12-04.
  120. ^ "Loneliness and Social Isolation Linked to Poor Sleep Quality in Older Adults". Psychiatry Advisor. 2020-09-21. Retrieved 2024-12-04.
  121. ^ "How to Navigate Social Isolation and Loneliness as an Older Adult". National Council on Aging. 2022-05-03. Retrieved 2024-12-04.
  122. ^ James Alexander Crewdson (2016). "The Effect of Loneliness in the Elderly Population: A Review". Healthy Aging & Clinical Care in the Elderly. 8: 1–8. doi:10.4137/hacce.s35890. ISSN 1179-0601.
  123. ^ Span, Paula (2016-12-30). "Loneliness Can Be Deadly for Elders; Friends Are the Antidote". New York Times. Retrieved 2024-12-04.
  124. ^ Courtin, Emilie; Knapp, Martin (2015-12-28). "Social isolation, loneliness and health in old age: a scoping review". Health & Social Care in the Community. 25 (3): 799–812. doi:10.1111/hsc.12311. ISSN 0966-0410. PMID 26712585.
  125. ^ Wang, Jingyi; Mann, Farhana; Lloyd-Evans, Brynmor; Ma, Ruimin; Johnson, Sonia (2018-05-29). "Associations between loneliness and perceived social support and outcomes of mental health problems: a systematic review". BMC Psychiatry. 18 (1). doi:10.1186/s12888-018-1736-5. ISSN 1471-244X.
  126. ^ Boss, Lisa; Kang, Duck-Hee; Branson, Sandy (2015-01-02). "Loneliness and cognitive function in the older adult: a systematic review". International Psychogeriatrics. 27 (4): 541–553. doi:10.1017/s1041610214002749. ISSN 1041-6102.
  127. ^ Kara-Yakoubian, Mane (2024-06-11). "Loneliness linked to cognitive decline in older adults, study finds". PsyPost - Psychology News. Retrieved 2024-12-04.
  128. ^ "Loneliness can hit older adults hard. This aging expert says there are simple ways to stay socially connected". Yahoo Life. 2024-07-31. Retrieved 2024-12-04.
  129. ^ "8 ways older adults can reduce loneliness and social isolation | Michigan Medicine". www.michiganmedicine.org. 2023-11-21. Retrieved 2024-12-04.
  130. ^ Masi, Christopher M.; Chen, Hsi-Yuan; Hawkley, Louise C.; Cacioppo, John T. (2010-08-17). "A Meta-Analysis of Interventions to Reduce Loneliness". Personality and Social Psychology Review. 15 (3): 219–266. doi:10.1177/1088868310377394. ISSN 1088-8683. PMC 3865701. PMID 20716644.
  131. ^ Cacioppo, Stephanie; Grippo, Angela J.; London, Sarah; Goossens, Luc; Cacioppo, John T. (2015-03-11). "Loneliness". Perspectives on Psychological Science. 10 (2): 238–249. doi:10.1177/1745691615570616. ISSN 1745-6916. PMC 4391342. PMID 25866548.
  132. ^ a b c d e Gardiner, Clare; Geldenhuys, Gideon; Gott, Merryn (2016-07-13). "Interventions to reduce social isolation and loneliness among older people: an integrative review". Health & Social Care in the Community. 26 (2): 147–157. doi:10.1111/hsc.12367. ISSN 0966-0410.
  133. ^ a b Poscia, Andrea; Stojanovic, Jovana; La Milia, Daniele Ignazio; Duplaga, Mariusz; Grysztar, Marcin; Moscato, Umberto; Onder, Graziano; Collamati, Agnese; Ricciardi, Walter; Magnavita, Nicola (2017-12-02). "Interventions targeting loneliness and social isolation among the older people: An update systematic review". Experimental Gerontology. 102: 133–144. doi:10.1016/j.exger.2017.11.017. ISSN 0531-5565. PMID 29199121.
  134. ^ Hoang, Peter; King, James A.; Moore, Sarah; Moore, Kim; Reich, Krista; Sidhu, Harman; Tan, Chin Vern; Whaley, Colin; McMillan, Jacqueline (2022-10-17). "Interventions Associated With Reduced Loneliness and Social Isolation in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis". JAMA Network Open. 5 (10): e2236676. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.36676. ISSN 2574-3805. PMC 9577679. PMID 36251294.
  135. ^ Gilbert, Ben. "The adorable robotic seal from 'Master of None' is real and you can buy one". Business Insider. Retrieved 2024-12-04.
  136. ^ "AmeriCorps Seniors Senior Companion Program | AmeriCorps". americorps.gov. 2022-09-16. Retrieved 2024-12-04.
  137. ^ "Seniors Helping Seniors - The NYCHA Journal". nychajournal.nyc. 2019-12-18. Retrieved 2024-12-04.
  138. ^ Balki, Eric; Hayes, Niall; Holland, Carol (2022-10-24). "Effectiveness of Technology Interventions in Addressing Social Isolation, Connectedness, and Loneliness in Older Adults: Systematic Umbrella Review". JMIR Aging. 5 (4): e40125. doi:10.2196/40125. ISSN 2561-7605. PMC 9641519. PMID 36279155.
  139. ^ Fakoya, Olujoke A.; McCorry, Noleen K.; Donnelly, Michael (2020-02-14). "Loneliness and social isolation interventions for older adults: a scoping review of reviews". BMC Public Health. 20 (1): 129. doi:10.1186/s12889-020-8251-6. ISSN 1471-2458. PMC 7020371. PMID 32054474.
  140. ^ Shah, Syed Ghulam Sarwar; Nogueras, David; van Woerden, Hugo Cornelis; Kiparoglou, Vasiliki (2021-06-04). "Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Digital Technology Interventions to Reduce Loneliness in Older Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis". Journal of Medical Internet Research. 23 (6): e24712. doi:10.2196/24712. ISSN 1438-8871. PMC 8214187. PMID 34085942.
  141. ^ Erin, Nolan (2024-07-06). "For Older People Who Are Lonely, Is the Solution a Robot Friend?". New York Times. Retrieved 2024-12-04.
  142. ^ a b Dickens, Andy P; Richards, Suzanne H; Greaves, Colin J; Campbell, John L (2011-08-15). "Interventions targeting social isolation in older people: a systematic review". BMC Public Health. 11 (1): 647. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-11-647. ISSN 1471-2458. PMC 3170621. PMID 21843337.
  143. ^ "The Eden Alternative Philosophy". Sherbrooke Community Centre. Retrieved 2024-12-04.
  144. ^ "Eden Alternative Grant Project Calls on Texas Nursing Homes to Leverage Leadership". Texas Health Care Association. 2016-02-10. Retrieved 2024-12-04.
  145. ^ "Intervention models for nursing homes (I): The Eden Alternative | CENIE". cenie.eu. 2020-07-12. Retrieved 2024-12-04.
  146. ^ Franklin, Mitchell; Parnell, Tracey; Versi, Natasha; Pope, Rodney (2022). "Animal Assisted Therapy for Older Adults in Aged Care Facilities: A Rapid Review". Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice. doi:10.46743/1540-580x/2022.2052. ISSN 1540-580X.
  147. ^ Jain, Briony; Syed, Shabeer; Hafford-Letchfield, Trish; O’Farrell-Pearce, Sioban (2020-05-11). "Dog-assisted interventions and outcomes for older adults in residential long-term care facilities: A systematic review and meta-analysis". International Journal of Older People Nursing. 15 (3): e12320. doi:10.1111/opn.12320. ISSN 1748-3735. PMID 32394594.
  148. ^ "Sony will repair aging Aibo robot dogs to help them find their forever homes". Yahoo News. 2023-09-11. Retrieved 2024-12-04.
  149. ^ Jain, Briony; Syed, Shabeer; Hafford-Letchfield, Trish; O’Farrell-Pearce, Sioban (2020-05-11). "Dog-assisted interventions and outcomes for older adults in residential long-term care facilities: A systematic review and meta-analysis". International Journal of Older People Nursing. 15 (3): e12320. doi:10.1111/opn.12320. ISSN 1748-3735. PMID 32394594.
  150. ^ Robinson, Hayley; MacDonald, Bruce; Kerse, Ngaire; Broadbent, Elizabeth (2013-03-30). "The Psychosocial Effects of a Companion Robot: A Randomized Controlled Trial". Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. 14 (9): 661–667. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2013.02.007. ISSN 1525-8610. PMID 23545466.
  151. ^ CATTAN, MIMA; WHITE, MARTIN; BOND, JOHN; LEARMOUTH, ALISON (2005-01-10). "Preventing social isolation and loneliness among older people: a systematic review of health promotion interventions". Ageing and Society. 25 (1): 41–67. doi:10.1017/s0144686x04002594 (inactive 5 December 2024). ISSN 0144-686X.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of December 2024 (link)

Loneliness

Social Isolation

Aging