User talk:Adamu Abubakar Sadiq

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Adamu Abubakar Sadiq (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I believe I should be unblocked because I now fully understand the mistake I made by creating an article about myself, which was a violation of Wikipedia’s guidelines. I regret this action and recognize the importance of adhering to Wikipedia’s policies on neutrality and conflict of interest. As someone who is in the film industry, i have alot of information in expanding articles from reliable sources about the industry and practitioners and I am committed to contributing positively to the platform and have learned from this experience. I am eager to follow Wikipedia’s guidelines and engage in meaningful contributions. I kindly ask for your understanding and reconsideration of the block. Adamu Abubakar Sadiq (talk) 08:50, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I believe I should be unblocked because I now fully understand the mistake I made by creating an article about myself, which was a violation of Wikipedia’s guidelines. I regret this action and recognize the importance of adhering to Wikipedia’s policies on neutrality and conflict of interest. As someone who is in the film industry, i have alot of information in expanding articles from reliable sources about the industry and practitioners and I am committed to contributing positively to the platform and have learned from this experience. I am eager to follow Wikipedia’s guidelines and engage in meaningful contributions. I kindly ask for your understanding and reconsideration of the block. [[User:Adamu Abubakar Sadiq|Adamu Abubakar Sadiq]] ([[User talk:Adamu Abubakar Sadiq#top|talk]]) 08:50, 8 December 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I believe I should be unblocked because I now fully understand the mistake I made by creating an article about myself, which was a violation of Wikipedia’s guidelines. I regret this action and recognize the importance of adhering to Wikipedia’s policies on neutrality and conflict of interest. As someone who is in the film industry, i have alot of information in expanding articles from reliable sources about the industry and practitioners and I am committed to contributing positively to the platform and have learned from this experience. I am eager to follow Wikipedia’s guidelines and engage in meaningful contributions. I kindly ask for your understanding and reconsideration of the block. [[User:Adamu Abubakar Sadiq|Adamu Abubakar Sadiq]] ([[User talk:Adamu Abubakar Sadiq#top|talk]]) 08:50, 8 December 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I believe I should be unblocked because I now fully understand the mistake I made by creating an article about myself, which was a violation of Wikipedia’s guidelines. I regret this action and recognize the importance of adhering to Wikipedia’s policies on neutrality and conflict of interest. As someone who is in the film industry, i have alot of information in expanding articles from reliable sources about the industry and practitioners and I am committed to contributing positively to the platform and have learned from this experience. I am eager to follow Wikipedia’s guidelines and engage in meaningful contributions. I kindly ask for your understanding and reconsideration of the block. [[User:Adamu Abubakar Sadiq|Adamu Abubakar Sadiq]] ([[User talk:Adamu Abubakar Sadiq#top|talk]]) 08:50, 8 December 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Disambiguation pages

Please note that disambiguation pages like Garble are meant to help readers find a specific existing article quickly and easily. For that reason, they have guidelines that are different from articles. From the Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts you should:

• Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
• Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
• Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry that mentions the title being disambiguated
• Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
• Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
• Do not insert external links or references - Wikipedia is not a business directory

Please do not over-write an existing disambiguation page with article information. If you would like to write an article on the film Garble, please read wp:Your First Article.

Thank you. Leschnei (talk) 13:48, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Garble (2022) (September 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Garble (2022) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Garble (2022), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 14:17, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Adamu Abubakar Sadiq! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 14:17, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Adamu Abubakar Sadiq

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Adamu Abubakar Sadiq, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 14:11, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Garble (2022)

Hello, Adamu Abubakar Sadiq. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Garble (2022), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Guest Of The Woods moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Guest Of The Woods, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Lopifalko (talk) 07:43, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Abu-bakr Adamu

The article Abu-bakr Adamu has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:04, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

February 2022

Hello. You recently removed a Biographies of Living Persons PROD, from Abu-bakr Adamu, without adding a reliable source. Please don't remove these Biographies of Living Persons PRODs from articles unless they contain at least one reliable source. If this was a mistake, don't worry, it has been replaced. If you oppose the deletion of an article under this process, please consider adding reliable sources to the article or commenting at the respective talk page. Thank you. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:25, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Abu-bakr Adamu

Hello, Adamu Abubakar Sadiq. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Abu-bakr Adamu, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:01, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Abu-bakr Adamu

Hello, Adamu Abubakar Sadiq. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Abu-bakr Adamu".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:48, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

Abu-bakr Adamu moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Abu-bakr Adamu, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 13:55, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abu-bakr Adamu (October 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheAafi was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Abu-bakr Adamu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

─ The Aafī (talk) 14:05, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Guest Of The Woods

The article Guest Of The Woods has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability. No in-depth coverage. Fails GNG and NFILM. Would redirect to director, but their article has been draftified. Was moved to draft for improvement, then returned to article space.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:34, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Please I would like to know why my article was deleted. Adamu Abubakar Sadiq (talk) 08:14, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Guest of the Woods for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Guest of the Woods is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guest of the Woods until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

VickKiang (talk) 00:57, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

File:Guest Of The Woods.jpg

Please do not upload pictures of copyrighted film posters to Wikimedia Commons unless you have permission from the copyright haver Trade (talk) 18:02, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

I have permissions as i am the copyright owner Adamu Abubakar Sadiq (talk) 07:47, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Abu-bakr Adamu

Hello, Adamu Abubakar Sadiq. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Abu-bakr Adamu".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 19:12, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abu-bakr Adamu (June 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Abu-bakr Adamu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 10:20, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Adamu Abubakar Sadiq. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 13:47, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Guest of the Woods

Hello, Adamu Abubakar Sadiq. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Guest of the Woods, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:03, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Guest of the Woods

Hello, Adamu Abubakar Sadiq. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Guest of the Woods".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:18, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abu-bakr Adamu (July 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Mcmatter were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Abu-bakr Adamu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 03:38, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Abu-bakr S. Adamu moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Abu-bakr S. Adamu. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 23:54, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

August 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ... discospinster _talk 23:56, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Adamu Abubakar Sadiq (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

An article i haven’t edited was mistakenly published and my account was blocked for that, please i need this account back to continue contributing and sharing information for the goodness of wikipedia Adamu Abubakar Sadiq (talk) 00:02, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I don't think your editing was a mistake, as what you did requires several deliberate actions, and I don't think you are here for "sharing information for the goodness of wikipedia"; all of your edits have been about either yourself or your film, to promote your film. Wikipedia is not for merely sharing information, it is for summarizing what independent reliable sources say about topics that meet Wikipedia's special definition of notability(like notable films or notable creative professionals). You won't be unblocked to edit about yourself or your film, so if you want to contribute to our goodness, you will need to tell us what topics you will edit about. 331dot (talk) 08:36, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Adamu Abubakar Sadiq (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I would like to continue contributing to this community, i accept that i disobeyed the the rules and i am willing to fix that and i promise it won’t happen again Adamu Abubakar Sadiq (talk) 21:20, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 21:25, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Adamu Abubakar Sadiq (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was blocked for using my account to write articles about myself and my film, the block is no longer necessary because i understand what i have been blocked for, and will make useful contributions instead. Henceforth i would contribute on writing articles on notable people, films, events and places. Adamu Abubakar Sadiq (talk) 15:51, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

What types of articles are you planning to edit? - UtherSRG (talk) 16:29, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Adamu Abubakar Sadiq (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have taken my time to understand the wikipedia guidelines and henceforth i would be respecting that and contributing with verified information. The block is no longer necessary so i am appealing that the block should be lifted. Thank you. Adamu Abubakar Sadiq (talk) 12:51, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

No response to below in ten days. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:08, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

From what I can see, all of your contributions have been to advertise yourself, which is absolutely not what Wikipedia is for. If unblocked, how will you participate in this encyclopedia? What topics or articles are you interested in editing? – bradv 01:55, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Note that you have several times said you want to edit "articles" and that your general intersts are "notable people, films...". Those unblock-requests have been declined several times. You will have to be much more specific. Name a few actual articles and the exact edits you would make to them. That way, you can demonstrate you actually do understand what you say you understand. DMacks (talk) 19:59, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Adamu Abubakar Sadiq (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I appeal that my block on wikipedia should be reversed. I stated earlier that henceforth i would be editing articles on notable people and films. To be specific, i am interested in editing articles about notable islamic scholars like Dr. Zakir Naik and others. Also i would be editing articles on notable africa filmmakers. Adamu Abubakar Sadiq (talk) 07:17, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I don't think you will be unblocked to edit in those topic areas. 331dot (talk) 09:39, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Noting for the record Zakir Naik is ECP. DMacks (talk) 07:23, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Abu-bakr S. Adamu

Hello, Adamu Abubakar Sadiq. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Abu-bakr S. Adamu, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:07, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Adamu Abubakar Sadiq (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Subject: Request for Unblock on Wikipedia Account

Dear Wikipedia Administrators,

I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to appeal for the unblocking of my Wikipedia account Adamu Abubakar Sadiq. I understand that my account was blocked due to my actions that goes against wikipedia’s policy, and I would like to provide additional information and context to address the concerns that led to the block.

I acknowledge the importance of maintaining a collaborative and respectful environment on Wikipedia. I assure you that I am committed to adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines and policies moving forward. I have reviewed the reasons for the block and taken steps to ensure that any previous issues will not reoccur.

If there are specific actions or changes that need to be made to rectify the situation, please guide me, and I will promptly address them. I value the principles of open knowledge and community collaboration that Wikipedia stands for, and I am eager to continue contributing positively to the platform.

I appreciate your time and consideration of my appeal. Thank you for your dedication to maintaining the integrity of Wikipedia.

Sincerely, Adamu Abubakar Sadiq Adamu Abubakar Sadiq (talk) 03:04, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Now that you're using AI chat bots to write unblock requests, I think we're done. Six unblock requests is enough. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:30, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Speedy deletion of Draft:Abu-bakr Adamu

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Draft:Abu-bakr Adamu has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:56, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Guest Of The Woods.jpeg

The file File:Guest Of The Woods.jpeg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Photo accompanying an article deleted through AFD. Indie movie by an editor, unlikely to be needed for future articles.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:17, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

UTRS appeal #97542

Considering restoration of talk page access. What we have is weak, but it is an improvement. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:44, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

After careful consideration, I am restoring talk page access so appellant can request unblock here. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:52, 7 December 2024 (UTC)