Chapel Hill Conference: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
Feynman suggested during the conference the [[sticky bead argument]] which intuitively demonstrated that gravitational waves must carry energy.<ref name="Preskill" /><ref>{{Cite book |last=Feynman |first=Richard |url=https://www.google.fr/books/edition/Feynman_Lectures_On_Gravitation/AEtnDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=1957+chapel+hill+conference&pg=PT19&printsec=frontcover |title=Feynman Lectures On Gravitation |date=2018-05-04 |publisher=CRC Press |isbn=978-0-429-98248-4 |language=en}}</ref> This argument was published by [[Hermann Bondi]] right after the conference.<ref name="Preskill" /> |
Feynman suggested during the conference the [[sticky bead argument]] which intuitively demonstrated that gravitational waves must carry energy.<ref name="Preskill" /><ref>{{Cite book |last=Feynman |first=Richard |url=https://www.google.fr/books/edition/Feynman_Lectures_On_Gravitation/AEtnDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=1957+chapel+hill+conference&pg=PT19&printsec=frontcover |title=Feynman Lectures On Gravitation |date=2018-05-04 |publisher=CRC Press |isbn=978-0-429-98248-4 |language=en}}</ref> This argument was published by [[Hermann Bondi]] right after the conference.<ref name="Preskill" /> |
||
== Many-worlds interpretation == |
|||
The relative state formulation, better known today as the [[many-worlds interpretation]] of quantum mechanics, was being developed by [[Hugh Everett III]], a student of Wheeler, who submitted a paper for the conference but did not attend.<ref name=":1">{{Cite thesis |last=Moley |first=D. E. |title=A Brief History of the Misinterpretation of the Everett Interpretation |date=2021 |degree=Master Thesis |url=https://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/41306 |language=en}}</ref> Wheeler and [[Charles W. Misner]] presented some of Everett's ideas near the end of the conference.<ref name=":1" /> Feynman publicly criticized the idea of an [[universal wavefunction]], suggested by Wheeler.<ref name=":1" /> Everett's paper was published in the proceedings of the conference.<ref name=":1" /> |
|||
== Wormholes == |
|||
During the conference, Wheeler coined the term [[wormhole]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=Section III |url=https://physics.unc.edu/home/department-history/section-iii/ |access-date=2024-12-16 |website=Department of Physics and Astronomy |language=en-US}}</ref> |
|||
== List of participants == |
== List of participants == |
Revision as of 11:42, 16 December 2024
The Conference on the Role of Gravitation in Physics, also known as the Chapel Hill Conference, was an invitation-only scientific conference held at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States from January 18 to January 23, 1957. It discussed topics in general relativity, including the possible existence of gravitational waves and ways to find a theory of quantum gravity. It was also one of the first large conferences to discuss the many-worlds interpretation.
Organization
The conference was organized by the Institute of Field Physics established a year before the conference in the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill by physicists Cécile DeWitt-Morette and Bryce DeWitt.[1] The institute was financed by bussinessmen Agnew Bahson and Roger Babson.[1] The later had founded the Gravity Research Foundation for looking into anti-gravity research.[1]
Aside from the DeWitts, in the steering comittee there was also Frederik Belinfante, Peter Bergmann, Freeman Dyson and John Archibald Wheeler.[1]
The conference was divided into 4 sessions on unquantized general relativity, 1 session on cosmology, and 3 sessions on quantum gravity.[1]
Energy of gravitational waves
During the conference, the nature of gravitational waves and their ability to transfer energy was discussed. Richard Feynman remembers [2]
I was surprised to find a whole day at the conference devoted to this question, and that ‘experts’ were confused. That is what comes from looking for conserved energy tensors, etc. instead of asking ‘can the waves do work?
Feynman suggested during the conference the sticky bead argument which intuitively demonstrated that gravitational waves must carry energy.[2][3] This argument was published by Hermann Bondi right after the conference.[2]
Many-worlds interpretation
The relative state formulation, better known today as the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics, was being developed by Hugh Everett III, a student of Wheeler, who submitted a paper for the conference but did not attend.[4] Wheeler and Charles W. Misner presented some of Everett's ideas near the end of the conference.[4] Feynman publicly criticized the idea of an universal wavefunction, suggested by Wheeler.[4] Everett's paper was published in the proceedings of the conference.[4]
Wormholes
During the conference, Wheeler coined the term wormhole.[5]
List of participants
The list of participants according to DeWitt-Morette report is:[1]
- From United States:
- James Leroy Anderson (born 1926)
- Valentine Bargmann
- Robert W. Bass (born 1930)
- Frederik Belinfante
- Peter Bergmann
- Dieter R. Brill (born 1933)
- Michael J. Buckingham (born 1933)
- William R. Davis
- Bryce DeWitt
- Cécile DeWitt-Morette
- Robert H. Dicke
- Frederick J. Ernst (born 1932)
- Richard Feynman
- Thomas Gold
- Joshua N. Goldberg
- Arthur Lilley (born 1928)
- Richard W. Lindquist
- Charles W. Misner
- Raymond Mjolsness
- Ezra T. Newman
- Alfred Schild
- Ralph S. Schiller
- Joseph Weber
- John Archibald Wheeler
- Louis Witten
- From United Kingdom:
- From France:
- From Germany:
- From Japan:
- From Denmark:
- From Sweden
- From Turkey
Nathan Rosen was invited but did not participate.
References
- ^ a b c d e f DeWitt, Cécile M.; Dicke, Dean, eds. (2017). The Role of Gravitation in Physics: Report from 1957 Chapel Hill Conference. Edition Open Access.
- ^ a b c Preskill, John and Kip S. Thorne. Foreword to Feynman Lectures On Gravitation. Feynman et al. (Westview Press; 1st ed. (June 20, 2002) p. xxv–xxvi.Link PDF (page 17-18)
- ^ Feynman, Richard (2018-05-04). Feynman Lectures On Gravitation. CRC Press. ISBN 978-0-429-98248-4.
- ^ a b c d Moley, D. E. (2021). A Brief History of the Misinterpretation of the Everett Interpretation (Master Thesis thesis).
- ^ "Section III". Department of Physics and Astronomy. Retrieved 2024-12-16.