Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2024 December 16: Difference between revisions
No edit summary Tag: Reverted |
No edit summary Tag: Reverted |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
====[[Nicolás Atanes]]==== |
====[[Nicolás Atanes]]==== |
||
:{{DRV links|Nicolás Atanes|xfd_page=Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicolás Atanes (2nd nomination)|article=Nicolás Atanes}} |
:{{DRV links|Nicolás Atanes|xfd_page=Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicolás Atanes (2nd nomination)|article=Nicolás Atanes}} |
||
Article was deleted despite being notable and relevant based on reliable sources. It cannot be said that reliable and independent sources were used that prove that the subject is notable and the information provided is verifiable. I read the deletion log—I think this is the name—and it says: "Multiple reasons: speedy deletion criteria G4, G5. User: Remitbuber." For instance, G4 does not apply. G4 says "This applies to sufficiently identical copies, having any title, of a page deleted via its most recent deletion discussion." I do not know how was the past article to know if I should do it different. What I researched is that it was deleted in 2022 and many sources come from 2023 or 2024. And G5 neither, is about "Creations by banned or blocked users, or in violation of general sanctions", and I don't understand why that applies to myself? I understand what may be the past of this article, but it is objectively (as far as I asked and got answer) deserving a Wikipedia entry. I request the article to be undeleted and consider all the underlying problems later. I said it in the Talk page of the article as a contest to the speedy deletion. [[Special:Contributions/188.77.39.132|188.77.39.132]] ([[User talk:188.77.39.132|talk]]) 18:38, 16 December 2024 (UTC) |
Article was deleted despite being notable and relevant based on reliable sources. It cannot be not said that reliable and independent sources were used that prove that the subject is notable and the information provided is verifiable. I read the deletion log—I think this is the name—and it says: "Multiple reasons: speedy deletion criteria G4, G5. User: Remitbuber." For instance, G4 does not apply. G4 says "This applies to sufficiently identical copies, having any title, of a page deleted via its most recent deletion discussion." I do not know how was the past article to know if I should do it different. What I researched is that it was deleted in 2022 and many sources come from 2023 or 2024. And G5 neither, is about "Creations by banned or blocked users, or in violation of general sanctions", and I don't understand why that applies to myself? I understand what may be the past of this article, but it is objectively (as far as I asked and got answer) deserving a Wikipedia entry. I request the article to be undeleted and consider all the underlying problems later. I said it in the Talk page of the article as a contest to the speedy deletion. [[Special:Contributions/188.77.39.132|188.77.39.132]] ([[User talk:188.77.39.132|talk]]) 18:38, 16 December 2024 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 18:46, 16 December 2024
Article was deleted despite being notable and relevant based on reliable sources. It cannot be not said that reliable and independent sources were used that prove that the subject is notable and the information provided is verifiable. I read the deletion log—I think this is the name—and it says: "Multiple reasons: speedy deletion criteria G4, G5. User: Remitbuber." For instance, G4 does not apply. G4 says "This applies to sufficiently identical copies, having any title, of a page deleted via its most recent deletion discussion." I do not know how was the past article to know if I should do it different. What I researched is that it was deleted in 2022 and many sources come from 2023 or 2024. And G5 neither, is about "Creations by banned or blocked users, or in violation of general sanctions", and I don't understand why that applies to myself? I understand what may be the past of this article, but it is objectively (as far as I asked and got answer) deserving a Wikipedia entry. I request the article to be undeleted and consider all the underlying problems later. I said it in the Talk page of the article as a contest to the speedy deletion. 188.77.39.132 (talk) 18:38, 16 December 2024 (UTC)