Jump to content

Talk:Almas Heshmati: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)
 
Line 12: Line 12:


I do not agree with the argument stated [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Almas_Heshmati&diff=352140537&oldid=351941220 here] that having some articles with 100+ citations demonstrates "significant impact in their scholarly discipline." This argument fails the [[Wikipedia:PROF#General_notes|"Average Professor Test"]] since most professors have articles with as many citations. But maybe I'm wrong. His [http://code.google.com/p/citations-gadget/ Google Scholar h-index] is 27. I guess that's pretty good. Still, I don't agree with the idea that the "top 5%" of economists all belong on Wikipedia. That's thousands of economists. -[[user:Hugetim|Hugetim]] <sup>([[user talk:Hugetim|talk]])</sup> 22:22, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
I do not agree with the argument stated [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Almas_Heshmati&diff=352140537&oldid=351941220 here] that having some articles with 100+ citations demonstrates "significant impact in their scholarly discipline." This argument fails the [[Wikipedia:PROF#General_notes|"Average Professor Test"]] since most professors have articles with as many citations. But maybe I'm wrong. His [http://code.google.com/p/citations-gadget/ Google Scholar h-index] is 27. I guess that's pretty good. Still, I don't agree with the idea that the "top 5%" of economists all belong on Wikipedia. That's thousands of economists. -[[user:Hugetim|Hugetim]] <sup>([[user talk:Hugetim|talk]])</sup> 22:22, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

== Notability of Professor Heshmat ==

I am really stunned by the Wikipedia note that professor Heshmati‘s notability has to be questioned. Please go to Google citations and you will find that currently Professor Heshmati is now cited more than 18,000 times and that his H index is above 60 and on all accounts, he is among the top five % of economists worldwide. what a shame, and what defamation of such an important personality of global research who was full professor of economics in so many countries and who did so much for Kurdish people worldwide [[User:Frete unicolore|Frete unicolore]] ([[User talk:Frete unicolore|talk]]) 18:20, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 18:20, 20 December 2024

Untitled

[edit]

The article was now changes so as to not constitute a copyright violation.

User Weber

Notability

[edit]

I do not agree with the argument stated here that having some articles with 100+ citations demonstrates "significant impact in their scholarly discipline." This argument fails the "Average Professor Test" since most professors have articles with as many citations. But maybe I'm wrong. His Google Scholar h-index is 27. I guess that's pretty good. Still, I don't agree with the idea that the "top 5%" of economists all belong on Wikipedia. That's thousands of economists. -Hugetim (talk) 22:22, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Professor Heshmat

[edit]

I am really stunned by the Wikipedia note that professor Heshmati‘s notability has to be questioned. Please go to Google citations and you will find that currently Professor Heshmati is now cited more than 18,000 times and that his H index is above 60 and on all accounts, he is among the top five % of economists worldwide. what a shame, and what defamation of such an important personality of global research who was full professor of economics in so many countries and who did so much for Kurdish people worldwide Frete unicolore (talk) 18:20, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]