Taniyama's problems: Difference between revisions
Family27390 (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit |
|||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
During the 1955 international symposium on [[algebraic number theory]] at [[Tokyo]] and [[Nikkō]], Taniyama compiled his 36 problems in a document titled ''"Problems of Number Theory"'' and distributed mimeographs of his collection to the symposium's participants – these problems would become well-known in [[mathematical folklore]]. |
During the 1955 international symposium on [[algebraic number theory]] at [[Tokyo]] and [[Nikkō]], Taniyama compiled his 36 problems in a document titled ''"Problems of Number Theory"'' and distributed mimeographs of his collection to the symposium's participants – these problems would become well-known in [[mathematical folklore]]. |
||
The most influential Taniyama's problems led to the formulation of the [[Taniyama–Shimura conjecture]] (now known as the [[modularity theorem]]), which states that every elliptic curve over the rational numbers is [[modular]]. This conjecture became central to modern number theory and played a crucial role in [[Andrew Wiles]]' proof of [[Fermat's Last Theorem]] in 1995. |
The most influential Taniyama's problems led to the formulation of the [[Taniyama–Shimura conjecture]] (now known as the [[modularity theorem]]), which states that every elliptic curve over the rational numbers is [[modular]]. This conjecture became central to modern number theory and played a crucial role in [[Andrew Wiles]]' [[Wiles's proof of Fermat's Last Theorem|proof]] of [[Fermat's Last Theorem]] in 1995. |
||
Taniyama's problems influenced the development of modern [[number theory]] and [[algebraic geometry]], including the [[Langlands program]], the theory of [[modular form]]s, and the study of [[elliptic curve]]s. |
Taniyama's problems influenced the development of modern [[number theory]] and [[algebraic geometry]], including the [[Langlands program]], the theory of [[modular form]]s, and the study of [[elliptic curve]]s. |
Revision as of 19:53, 26 December 2024
Taniyama's problems are a set of 36 mathematical problems posed by Japanese mathematician Yutaka Taniyama in 1955. The problems primarily focused on algebraic geometry, number theory, and the connections between modular forms and elliptic curves.
History
During the 1955 international symposium on algebraic number theory at Tokyo and Nikkō, Taniyama compiled his 36 problems in a document titled "Problems of Number Theory" and distributed mimeographs of his collection to the symposium's participants – these problems would become well-known in mathematical folklore.
The most influential Taniyama's problems led to the formulation of the Taniyama–Shimura conjecture (now known as the modularity theorem), which states that every elliptic curve over the rational numbers is modular. This conjecture became central to modern number theory and played a crucial role in Andrew Wiles' proof of Fermat's Last Theorem in 1995.
Taniyama's problems influenced the development of modern number theory and algebraic geometry, including the Langlands program, the theory of modular forms, and the study of elliptic curves.
Problems
The most famous of Taniyama's problems are his twelfth and thirteenth problems.
Let be an elliptic curve defined over an algebraic number field , and the L-function of over in the sense that is the zeta function of over . If the Hasse–Weil conjecture is true for , then the Fourier series obtained from by the inverse Mellin transformation must be an automorphic form of dimension -2 of a special type (see Hecke[a]). If so, it is very plausible that this form is an ellipic differential of the field of associated automorphic functions. Now, going through these observations backward, is it possible to prove the Hasse-Weil conjecture by finding a suitable automorphic form from which can be obtained?
In particular, fellow Japanese mathematician Goro Shimura noted that Taniyama's formulation in his twelfth problem was unclear: the proposed Mellin transform method would only work for elliptic curves over rational numbers. For curves over number fields, the situation is substantially more complex and remains unclear even at a conjectural level today.
To characterize the field of elliptic modular functions of Stufe[clarification needed] , and especially to decompose the Jacobian variety of this function field into simple factors up to isogeny. Also it is well known that if , a prime, and , then contains elliptic curves with complex multiplication. What can one say for general ?
Notes
- ^ The reference to Hecke in Problem 12 was to his paper, "fiber die Bestimmung Dirichletscher Reihen durch ihre Funktionalgleichung", which involves not only congruence subgroups of but also some Fuchsian groups not commensurable with it.
See also
References
- Shimura, Goro (1989), "Yutaka Taniyama and his time. Very personal recollections", The Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society, 21 (2): 186–196, doi:10.1112/blms/21.2.186, ISSN 0024-6093, MR 0976064
- Taniyama, Yutaka (1956), "Problem 12", Sugaku (in Japanese), 7: 269
- Mazur, B. (1991), "Number Theory as Gadfly", The American Mathematical Monthly, 98 (7): 593–610