Jump to content

User talk:24.136.230.38: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Thanks!
Line 140: Line 140:
[[Image:WikiThanks.png|40px|left]] Dunno who you are (hey, get an account :-) ) but you're doing a great job around here. Well done! - [[User:Alison|<span style="color:#558; font-family: comic sans ms; font-variant: small-caps">'''A<font color= "#7070a0">l<font color= "#9090c0">is</font>o</font>n'''</span>]] [[User talk:Alison|☺]] 21:56, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
[[Image:WikiThanks.png|40px|left]] Dunno who you are (hey, get an account :-) ) but you're doing a great job around here. Well done! - [[User:Alison|<span style="color:#558; font-family: comic sans ms; font-variant: small-caps">'''A<font color= "#7070a0">l<font color= "#9090c0">is</font>o</font>n'''</span>]] [[User talk:Alison|☺]] 21:56, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
:Everyone's saying that - I wish you would too! [[User:Refsworldlee|Refsworldlee]]<sup>[[User talk:Refsworldlee|(chew-fat)]]</sup>[[Special:Contributions/Refsworldlee|<small>(eds)</small>]] 21:58, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
:Everyone's saying that - I wish you would too! [[User:Refsworldlee|Refsworldlee]]<sup>[[User talk:Refsworldlee|(chew-fat)]]</sup>[[Special:Contributions/Refsworldlee|<small>(eds)</small>]] 21:58, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

All these wonderful contributions should have something more personal than an ip address attached. :P [[User:Vladsinger|vLaDsINgEr]] 23:59, 1 May 2007 (UTC)


== Indefblock ==
== Indefblock ==

Revision as of 23:59, 1 May 2007

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions.

Currently, you are editing without a username. You can continue to do so, as you are not required to log in to Wikipedia to read and edit articles; however, logging in will result in a username being shown instead of your IP address (yours is 24.136.230.38). Logging in does not require any personal details, and there are many other benefits for logging in.

When you edit pages:

  • Please respect others' copyrights; do not copy and paste the contents from webpages directly.
  • Please use a neutral point of view when editing articles; this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
  • If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
  • Do not add unreasonable contents into any articles, such as copyrighted text, advertisement messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Adding such content or editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism.

The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. For now, if you are stuck, you can click the edit this page tab above, type {{helpme}} in the edit box, and then click Save Page; an experienced Wikipedian will be around shortly to answer any questions you may have. Also feel free to ask a question on my talk page. I will answer your questions as far as I can! Thank you again for contributing to Wikipedia. --AW 22:05, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


About List of BEMANI Musicians

Thanks for helping, but TaQ has nothing to do with FIXX, it is only an alias used for Vanity Angel by NAOKI, if you need proof, check out the song information on the DDR EXTREME Original Soundtrack. Ashura96 01:07, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Triceratops and "analysis"

Hi, and thanks for the punctuation changes on Triceratops. Unfortunately, somehow "anal" got removed from every "analyze"/version thereof, so I fixed them. J. Spencer 20:51, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, my browser was trying to block "inappropriate" words. --24.136.230.38 19:38, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

your edits and quotation marks

wikipedia uses the british standard for punctuation and quotation marks. that is, 'quotes generally belong inside of punctuation'. WP:MOS#Quotation_marks the_undertow talk 00:32, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks! I didn't know that. 24.136.230.38 16:27, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: WP:AIV

Thanks for reverting vandalism to Wikipedia. I'd just like to note that the most recent report you made to WP:AIV, this, was removed without being blocked, because that user had only vandalised once in the past 5 days. Thanks, please continue to help us guard Wikipedia against vandalism. --Deskana (talk) 15:49, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, Wikipedia is not censored, not even to remove profanity or pornography. Please do not remove or censor information that is relevant to the article, as you did to Leet. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Purgatory Fubar Converse or Snafu 00:27, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Welcome!

I see you already have a welcome message, so I won't put in the same thing twice, but do consider signing up for an account, you're doing good work - keep it up! Cheers! xC | 20:27, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

April 04, 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Some of your recent edits, such as those you made to Dred Scott v. Sandford, have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. ck lostsword|queta!|Suggestions? 16:15, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I did not vandalize page Dred Scott v. Sandford. It was 209.66.220.213 who added random letters to the page. I simply undid the edit. --24.136.230.38 16:22, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removed mistaken warning. Sorry! Spellcast 16:57, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't intentionally. I had the wrong person (I copied and pasted hastily)! I'm sorry if I removed content by accident. I'm trying to do the right thing! --24.136.230.38 16:46, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
My humblest apologies. Your edit was indeed just a little mistake. Oh and you don't have to if you don't want to of course, but having an account has benefits. Again, sorry for that. In the meantime, be bold. =) Spellcast 17:06, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Also sorry - edit conflict, methinks. ck lostsword|queta!|Suggestions? 18:49, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Smile!

Removing fair-use justifications

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to [[::Image:Maxheadroomhijack.JPG]], you will be blocked from editing. --Yamla 01:48, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't think that what that user put on the image was needed, since the tag did supply a link about fair use. Maybe I was in error for removing content. I removed it because I haven't seen that list on any other image. Could you explain why you gave me a warning (you escalated it to three, you made it sound like I did it just to be mean, when I was just trying to help), and why the list is needed? --24.136.230.38 19:54, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Account

Hi there, I've seen your contributions are now (I think the above notice for fair use image-ness was an honest mistake) but you really ought to get an account! You seem sharp and on the ball with this Cummings removal-of-her-birth-name thing, and if you had an account you really good get a wikipedia-career moving! Please consider it :) SGGH 12:00, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I also fixed your little mistake on the Calvin and Hobbs article, you didn't delete any content, all you did was that you forgot to end the reference with the </ref> tag, so everything in the article beyond your new reference became part of the footnote and thus (as this included the footnotes section) disappeared from the article. We all do it, it's one of the most common mistakes on wikipedia. As I said I've readded the reference and ended it so that the article is working fine again. SGGH 12:08, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, I thought I had removed content since my browser likes to "censor" certain things (I have a long edit history about that).

Well...

You said: "I didn't think that what that user put on the image was needed, since the tag did supply a link about fair use. Maybe I was in error for removing content. I removed it because I haven't seen that list on any other image. Could you explain why you gave me a warning (you escalated it to three, you made it sound like I did it just to be mean, when I was just trying to help), and why the list is needed?"

WP:FU and the license text itself requires that a detailed fair-use rationale be provided. I gave you a warning because you removed this information and so converted an image suitable for use on the Wikipedia with one that we could no longer use. --Yamla 20:19, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I'm sorry, I didn't mean to do anything harmful. I'm just glad someone corrected me before something happened. I'm not good with copyrights anyway. I think I'll just stay away from them for a while. --24.136.230.38 20:54, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Create an account!

I think you should create an account on Wikipedia. Make sure to let me know what your username is when you do! To do it, click on Sign in/create account on the top of the page, and click "create an account". I think you will do well as a Wikipedia user. ;-) A•N•N•A hi! 01:23, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. You have been a great contributor so far. You would go on to be a good Wikipedian if you created an account. see the benefits here GDonato (talk) 21:04, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
When/If I do, I'll let you know. --24.136.230.38 21:35, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
With a link to your username so I can welcome you properly!? GDonato (talk) 21:38, 13 April 2007 (UTC) PS you're keeping me in suspense[reply]
I suggest that you create an account as well just in case that someone else using this IP vandalizes pages. If this IP is blocked, your account won't get blocked if the block is an anonymous-only block. Amos Han Talk 17:01, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well, actually, the earliest changes this IP used to make was by a different person. Now, only I just edit. He is not particularly fond of Wikipedia's inaccuracies and the way anybody may edit your contributions.
Besides, you won't have to worry about intentional vandalism for now. I'm the only one who edits. --24.136.230.38 19:59, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Can I just add my voice to the throng in hoping you create an account soon - we need as many like you as we can get, and it helps to "have a presence" on here (I know first-hand - I fell unfairly foul while editing as an anon IP, and as soon as the errant block was lifted on my fixed IP, I formalised my editorship). Best wishes and keep up the good work. Refsworldlee(chew-fat)(eds) 00:19, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Answer for you

Hi there,

You had a good question for me, which I answered at User_talk:DerHexer#Vandalism_by_User:142.165.199.10. Cheers, A Traintalk 20:19, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism on Cat

You said: I see your reverting vandalism. Very good, but there is Spam on Cat added by User:CrimiClown (diff). Being an anon, I cannot revert it (semi-protected). Can you revert it, please? Thanks. --24.136.230.38 21:11, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done! Thanks for the heads up. -- LeCourT:C 21:15, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do not touch :68.207.117.147

This user(s) discussion page belongs to 68.207.117.147 an IP address belonging to more than 30+ computers as of April 16, 2007 8:00pm Eastern Standard Time. --68.207.117.147 00:24, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't mean you have the right to remove warnings. If you would like to make useful contributions, please create an account. Thank you! --24.136.230.38 00:15, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I can only give you the same advice, in regards to creating an account. Those warnings are from before this company acquired the IP address. Further harassment can and may be met with legal action. [Removed Personal Opinion] :) --68.207.117.147 00:24, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
(Cross-posted from User talk:68.207.117.147): Warning a user for actions deemed against Wikipedia policy is in no way able to be met with legal action. The user was in no way overstepping their bounds. Unfounded or vindictive threats of legal action are grounds for action against your Wikipedia access using this IP. Please refer to WP:THREAT. -- KirinX 20:43, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Message without header

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my user page. You should get a username someday. Amos Han Talk 01:16, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Personal Attack and Vanalism on Pope Shenouda III of Alexandria page by User:TheLordIsNear

User:TheLordIsNear is personally attacking the Pope on his personal biography page because of his recent excommunication from the church. The events as he has described them is blantantly heiarcy. The Pope is the head of the Church, the professor is not. He is trying to twist around all of the work he has done for many many year because of his excommunication.

Please remove or use the edited version of what he has under the heading: Theological disputes and the 2007 Coptic Church crisis

He did this on March 28, 2007 just before the Holy Pasca Week to cause divisions and discredit the Pope. The Pope's biographical should not contain a personal attack from The Excommunicated Professor Habib Bebawi.

*Replied to* --24.136.230.38 00:03, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanksing You

Thanks a lot for signing my page. :) Goldfritter 09:46, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know anything personally about mr oompapa? Do you know if this is a static of a dynamic IP? -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 20:02, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I've never known this IP to "change." I don't know anything personally about oompapa. All I know is that he is a vandal on wikipedia, who is persistant. --24.136.230.38 20:17, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there

Dunno who you are (hey, get an account :-) ) but you're doing a great job around here. Well done! - Alison 21:56, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Everyone's saying that - I wish you would too! Refsworldlee(chew-fat)(eds) 21:58, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All these wonderful contributions should have something more personal than an ip address attached. :P vLaDsINgEr 23:59, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indefblock

Yes. I invite you to re-read WP:IAR and look at this user's edits. If you still feel compassionate let me know, and I will shorten to six months. Bear in mind that it is not a school.--Anthony.bradbury 23:06, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rolled Back

Hi, I am just wondering why you rolled back "csa-group" I was updating information to make it more accurate and informative as the current information was incorrect? Thank-you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Csainter (talkcontribs) 20:50, 27 April 2007 UTC (UTC)

I didn't rollback anything (only administrators or people with Twinkle can do that). I simply corrected a few headers. Sorry if anything was messed up. --24.136.230.38 20:50, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

Thanks for fixing the formatting error. I also notice that you have been working hard to remove vandalism from WIkipedia so heres a little something that will be sure to make your day!

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
This barnstar is awarded to the user at IP address 24.136.230.38 for his tireless work towards removing vandalism and other nonsense edits on Wikipedia. Keep up the good work! -- Hdt83 Chat 01:13, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe someday you'll create an account but until then, I am happy to see an IP contributing. -- Hdt83 Chat 01:13, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Finally, I got one. I'm really pleased to finally get one (or two). --24.136.230.38 01:22, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

!

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
24.136.230.38, I award you the RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar for your excellant job vandal fighting. Keep it up! Mystytopia (talk) 01:17, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Finally, I got one. I'm really pleased to finally get one (or two). --24.136.230.38 01:22, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fohrecords

Per WP:SPAM, advertising-only accounts can be blocked on sight ... that's why I reported it.Blueboy96 16:27, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't say it can be blocked on-sight (spambots can, though), it says that they must be given proper warning here. --24.136.230.38 16:38, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fine then

The Original Barnstar
well, since you won't take the other one, have this one, and I'm not going to have you decline it either. Whstchy 03:48, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my user page!

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
You do a great job! Keep it up. by the way, it my be useful to get an account! Stwalkerster 20:58, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]