Talk:PC World: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
The intro sounds like an advertisement |
|||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
[[User:Fourohfour|Fourohfour]] 14:49, 18 December 2006 (UTC) |
[[User:Fourohfour|Fourohfour]] 14:49, 18 December 2006 (UTC) |
||
:I agree. [[Edge (magazine)|Edge]] is all kept in one article for the different versions, even when in some cases they have nothing in common but name, almost. Everything that there is for an English reader to know about PC Welt magazine is surely no different to this. Of course, for the German Wikipedia, maybe things might be different. --[[User:Dreaded Walrus|Dreaded Walrus]] 04:41, 26 December 2006 (UTC) |
:I agree. [[Edge (magazine)|Edge]] is all kept in one article for the different versions, even when in some cases they have nothing in common but name, almost. Everything that there is for an English reader to know about PC Welt magazine is surely no different to this. Of course, for the German Wikipedia, maybe things might be different. --[[User:Dreaded Walrus|Dreaded Walrus]] 04:41, 26 December 2006 (UTC) |
||
== The intro sounds like an advertisement == |
|||
The intro to this article is too long, contains too much fluff, and sounds like an advertisement. |
Revision as of 05:48, 8 May 2007
Merge proposal (PC Welt (magazine))
Beyond the different name, is PC Welt any more significantly different from the U.S. edition than (e.g.) the Brazilian edition of PC World, which is also published in a foreign language? If not, I think it should be merged. PC Advisor- the British edition- doesn't have (or warrant) a separate article either.
Fourohfour 14:49, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- I agree. Edge is all kept in one article for the different versions, even when in some cases they have nothing in common but name, almost. Everything that there is for an English reader to know about PC Welt magazine is surely no different to this. Of course, for the German Wikipedia, maybe things might be different. --Dreaded Walrus 04:41, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
The intro sounds like an advertisement
The intro to this article is too long, contains too much fluff, and sounds like an advertisement.