Jump to content

Mitchell Miller (philosopher): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Mitchell H. Miller, Jr.''' is Professor of [[Philosophy]] at [[Vassar College]]. The majority of his work concerns the late [[dialogue]]s of [[Plato]], but he has also written on [[Hesiod]], [[Parmenides]], and [[Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel|Hegel]].
'''Mitchell H. Miller, Jr.''' is Professor of [[Philosophy]] at [[Vassar College]]. The majority of his work concerns the late [[dialogue]]s of [[Plato]], but he has also written on [[Hesiod]], [[Parmenides]], and [[Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel|Hegel]].


Miller is an exponent of the existence of the so-called "unwritten teachings" of Plato: the controversial idea that Plato taught advanced concepts to his students at the [[Academy]] beyond those explicitly discussed by [[Socrates]] in Plato's dialogues. The idea, which has been dismissed by some Plato scholars, is based on a brief description of such teachings by [[Aristotle]] in his ''[[Metaphysics]]''. The ''[[Seventh Letter (Plato)|Seventh Letter]]'', which was attributed to Plato in antiquity and is now regarded by many scholars as, even if not authentic, nonetheless valuable evidence of Plato's thinking, also includes indications of such teachings. Miller has argued that evidence of these teachings can be found in the dialogues, but only through careful reading of structure and irony within them.
Miller is an exponent of the existence of the so-called "unwritten teachings" of Plato: the controversial idea that Plato taught advanced concepts to his students at the [[Academy]] beyond those explicitly discussed by [[Socrates]] in Plato's dialogues. The idea, which is dismissed by many Plato scholars, is based on a brief description of such teachings by [[Aristotle]] in his ''[[Metaphysics]]''. The ''[[Seventh Letter (Plato)|Seventh Letter]]'', which was attributed to Plato in antiquity, was later considered inauthentic for a time, and is now regarded by most scholars as genuine, also includes indications of such teachings. Miller has argued that evidence of these teachings can be found in the dialogues, but only through careful reading of structure and irony within them.


Miller's work has focused on several of the late dialogues, notably the ''[[Parmenides (dialogue)|Parmenides]]'', ''[[Statesman (dialogue)|Statesman]]'', and ''[[Philebus]]'', as well as the ''[[Republic (dialogue)|Republic]]''. In his book on the ''Parmenides'', Miller argues that the eight bewildering and contradictory hypotheses that end the dialogue form an ironic guide that allows the informed reader to interpret the whole, revealing through what Miller has called "psychagogy"—a transformation of the philosophical disciple's soul—the true nature of Plato's conception of [[The Forms|the forms]].
Miller's work has focused on several of the late dialogues, notably the ''[[Parmenides (dialogue)|Parmenides]]'', ''[[Statesman (dialogue)|Statesman]]'', and ''[[Philebus]]'', as well as the ''[[Republic (dialogue)|Republic]]''. In his book on the ''Parmenides'', Miller argues that the eight bewildering and contradictory hypotheses that end the dialogue form an ironic guide that allows the informed reader to interpret the whole, revealing through what Miller has called "psychagogy"—a transformation of the philosophical disciple's soul—the true nature of Plato's conception of [[The Forms|the forms]]. That is, the ultimate purpose of the text is not to teach the reader didactically but to draw them into a different kind of thinking.


==Books==
==Books==

Revision as of 16:56, 9 May 2007

Mitchell H. Miller, Jr. is Professor of Philosophy at Vassar College. The majority of his work concerns the late dialogues of Plato, but he has also written on Hesiod, Parmenides, and Hegel.

Miller is an exponent of the existence of the so-called "unwritten teachings" of Plato: the controversial idea that Plato taught advanced concepts to his students at the Academy beyond those explicitly discussed by Socrates in Plato's dialogues. The idea, which is dismissed by many Plato scholars, is based on a brief description of such teachings by Aristotle in his Metaphysics. The Seventh Letter, which was attributed to Plato in antiquity, was later considered inauthentic for a time, and is now regarded by most scholars as genuine, also includes indications of such teachings. Miller has argued that evidence of these teachings can be found in the dialogues, but only through careful reading of structure and irony within them.

Miller's work has focused on several of the late dialogues, notably the Parmenides, Statesman, and Philebus, as well as the Republic. In his book on the Parmenides, Miller argues that the eight bewildering and contradictory hypotheses that end the dialogue form an ironic guide that allows the informed reader to interpret the whole, revealing through what Miller has called "psychagogy"—a transformation of the philosophical disciple's soul—the true nature of Plato's conception of the forms. That is, the ultimate purpose of the text is not to teach the reader didactically but to draw them into a different kind of thinking.

Books

  • The Philosopher in Plato's Statesman. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1980. Reprinted with additional material, Las Vegas: Parmenides, 2004.
  • Plato's Parmenides: The Conversion of the Soul. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1986. Reprinted University Park: Pennsylvania State UP, 1991.