Jump to content

User talk:Sam 1123: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Sam 1123 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Your RfA
Line 45: Line 45:
==[[Castle (animation)]]==
==[[Castle (animation)]]==
I have added a "{{[[Template:prod|prod]]}}" template to the article [[Castle (animation)]], suggesting that it be deleted according to the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion]] process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "[[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not|What Wikipedia is not]]" and [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|Wikipedia's deletion policy]]). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the <code><nowiki>{{dated prod}}</nowiki></code> notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on [[Talk:Castle (animation)|its talk page]]. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the [[WP:PROD|proposed deletion process]], the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion criteria]] or it can be sent to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|Articles for Deletion]], where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. [[User:Panser Born|<span style="text-decoration: underline; font-weight: bold; color: darkgreen; border: 1px solid;">-Panser Born-</span>]] <small>[[User_talk:Panser Born|<span style="color: #3399FF; text-decoration: underline;">(talk)</span>]]</small> 16:54, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
I have added a "{{[[Template:prod|prod]]}}" template to the article [[Castle (animation)]], suggesting that it be deleted according to the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion]] process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "[[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not|What Wikipedia is not]]" and [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|Wikipedia's deletion policy]]). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the <code><nowiki>{{dated prod}}</nowiki></code> notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on [[Talk:Castle (animation)|its talk page]]. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the [[WP:PROD|proposed deletion process]], the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion criteria]] or it can be sent to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|Articles for Deletion]], where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. [[User:Panser Born|<span style="text-decoration: underline; font-weight: bold; color: darkgreen; border: 1px solid;">-Panser Born-</span>]] <small>[[User_talk:Panser Born|<span style="color: #3399FF; text-decoration: underline;">(talk)</span>]]</small> 16:54, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

== Your RfA ==

Hello Sam 1123. I hope you'll take this the right way, but I strongly suggest you withdraw your RfA. I would be utterly astonished if you receive more than a few "moral support" type votes. When you come back to RfA ready for it in a few months, it will, in my opinion, look better for you that you chose to end the RfA yourself and everyone will happily chalk it up to your inexperience round here. Yours kindly, --[[User:Dweller|Dweller]] 09:44, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:44, 10 May 2007



Hey, all! Post your comments below. Please don't have conversations, go use your own talk pages. Please don't bitch to me, or I'll hunt you down, then wrap you in a fur coat and nail you to a tree in the forest during grizzly bear mating season.

UK Barnstar

Looks good to me. Can you add it to the commons on commons:Barnstar/Barnstars of National Merit and the related categories? Just a suggestion -- Chris 73 | Talk 12:53, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Veteran Editor IV

Hey, Thanks! Nice star. I added it to my userpage. Many thanks again, best wishes, and happy editing -- Chris 73 | Talk

Image tagging for Image:DjimonHounsou.png

Thanks for uploading Image:DjimonHounsou.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:37, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BoNM - Aus.

Hi. I will be rather busy for the next few days, please feel free to make a transparent background if you wish. Many thanks and happy editing -- Chris 73 | Talk 23:08, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Chosen Space

A tag has been placed on Chosen Space, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

not notable

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. GazMan7 16:56, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:SHL Full award cabinet.png

Thanks for uploading Image:SHL Full award cabinet.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:10, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted that page because it didn't assert any sort of notability. If you can find some reliable sources that prove notability, you could recreate it and use them, though I find it highly unlikely that you could (a quick google search for "Oscar Johansson" castle shows only 400 results). Veinor (talk to me) 16:50, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Castle (animation), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -Panser Born- (talk) 16:54, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your RfA

Hello Sam 1123. I hope you'll take this the right way, but I strongly suggest you withdraw your RfA. I would be utterly astonished if you receive more than a few "moral support" type votes. When you come back to RfA ready for it in a few months, it will, in my opinion, look better for you that you chose to end the RfA yourself and everyone will happily chalk it up to your inexperience round here. Yours kindly, --Dweller 09:44, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]