Talk:Chern–Weil homomorphism: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Silly rabbit (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Geometry guy (talk | contribs) Add maths rating with importance and field using AWB |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{maths rating |
|||
|field= geometry |
|||
|importance= high |
|||
|class= |
|||
|historical= |
|||
}} |
|||
==References?== |
==References?== |
||
I can't seem to locate a good reference for this theorem. The Narasimhan and Ramanan paper cites some lecture notes by Chern, but these notes are unavailable to me. I have an unsettling feeling that there may be no definitive reference, but that it is one of those theorems of mathematical folklore -- passed from teacher to student by word of mouth. [[User:Silly rabbit|Silly rabbit]] 16:00, 16 June 2006 (UTC) |
I can't seem to locate a good reference for this theorem. The Narasimhan and Ramanan paper cites some lecture notes by Chern, but these notes are unavailable to me. I have an unsettling feeling that there may be no definitive reference, but that it is one of those theorems of mathematical folklore -- passed from teacher to student by word of mouth. [[User:Silly rabbit|Silly rabbit]] 16:00, 16 June 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:04, 14 May 2007
Mathematics Unassessed High‑priority | ||||||||||
|
References?
I can't seem to locate a good reference for this theorem. The Narasimhan and Ramanan paper cites some lecture notes by Chern, but these notes are unavailable to me. I have an unsettling feeling that there may be no definitive reference, but that it is one of those theorems of mathematical folklore -- passed from teacher to student by word of mouth. Silly rabbit 16:00, 16 June 2006 (UTC)