Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 May 17: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m adding boolne
πŸ˜‚ (talk | contribs)
β†’Function templates: Strong delete
Line 35: Line 35:


These templates were superseded by parser functions and have been deprecated for ages – nearly a year. Can we finally substitute the remaining uses and get rid of them? It would also be nice to do the same with {{[[Template:Qif|qif]]}}, but that's still protected and it seems people want to keep it indefinitely for some reason – [[User talk:Gurch|Gurch]] 00:30, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
These templates were superseded by parser functions and have been deprecated for ages – nearly a year. Can we finally substitute the remaining uses and get rid of them? It would also be nice to do the same with {{[[Template:Qif|qif]]}}, but that's still protected and it seems people want to keep it indefinitely for some reason – [[User talk:Gurch|Gurch]] 00:30, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
*'''Strong Delete''', I was actually thinking of nominating them myself eventually. <span style="color:red;font-weight:bold">^</span>[[User:^demon|<span style="color:black;font-weight:bold;">demon</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:^demon|<span style="color:red">[omg plz]</span>]]</sup>&nbsp;<em style="font-size:10px;">08:10, 17 May 2007 (UTC)</em>

Revision as of 08:10, 17 May 2007

May 17

Function templates

Information
About TFD's structure
  • If the outcome for this discussion is keep or no consensus, then all templates will continue as they were
  • If the outcome for this discussion is delete, then first all instances of the deleted templates will be replaced, and then they will be deleted.

The purpose of this discussion is to determine whether or not the templates are worth keeping in the long runβ€”and then implementing the solution. While the consensus should be enforced as soon as possible, there is no rush.

These templates were superseded by parser functions and have been deprecated for ages – nearly a year. Can we finally substitute the remaining uses and get rid of them? It would also be nice to do the same with {{qif}}, but that's still protected and it seems people want to keep it indefinitely for some reason – Gurch 00:30, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]