User talk:Afluent Rider

I agree with you that the article on Night Fox is poorly sourced (and quite possibly a hoax), which is why I restored your minimized version of the article and tagged it as a stub. However, I do feel that as long as the article is still present on Wikipedia, even in a stub form, it is still relevant for inclusion in the list. Nonetheless, I will not revert you again - not because of your "senior member" status or any other similar idle threats, but rather because Wikipedia has a policy on reverting an article more than three times, and because it's honestly not worth edit warring over anyways. I would request that you use a bit more civility in discussing issues such as this in the future, however. I am sorry about the above warning regarding article blanking and vandalism, as it seems apparent to me that your blanking of Night Fox was in good faith. In future, you might try discussing your concerns with other editors, as Wikipedia is largely a collaborative project. Cheers, Afluent Rider 11:46, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

    You have been reported for the abusive statement/s included in the above user talk contrib.

This is your only warning. The next time you make a personal attack as you did at User talk:88.109.9.200, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. 88.109.9.200 13:45, 21 May 2007 (UTC)