Talk:Jakarta EE: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 14:15, 22 May 2007

Real-world examples

What are some real world examples that show the J2EE platform in action ? As I do not work in a corporation, I am trying to visualize what is being done with this technology. Does the Apple Music Store, for example use J2EE? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.35.25.31 (talk • contribs) on 22 March 2005.

Apple Music Store

Indeed, the Apple iTunes Music Store is built on J2EE technology. The implementation that ITMS uses is Apple's own WebObjects. And it is fun to use

I also think SAP is built using Java, am I right? --Threner 18:16, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Rename Article

This article should be renamed to Java Standard Edition, in accordance with the change in the naming convention announced at this year's JavaONE convention. [1] aidan_walsh

Non-technical overview

This article could really use an overview that is appropriate for a wider audience. It's not really clear just what this stuff is, who uses it and what they use it for, and also, what they don't use it for. There are too many buzzwords and too much alphabet soup to get a clear idea of what this is.

How about this as a first para and we move the existing stuff to a 'summary' section?

Java Platform, Enterprise Edition or Java EE is a widely used platform for server-side programming in the Java language. Toby Woodwark 14:55, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

History

Somebody should add when J2EE specification were developed.

Peking University Application Server

A new article about the PKUAS or Peking University Application Server has been created. An expert in the subject should check whether a link could be add from Java Platform, Enterprise Edition to this article. Thanks. --Edcolins 11:54, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Certified servers =

The entire section on certified servers appears to be misguided and incorrect. The J2EE 1.3 list, for example, is obviously way too short.

This is probable wrong. http://java.sun.com/javaee/overview/compatibility.jsp lists

Sun Java System Application Server Platform Edition 9
TmaxSoft JEUS 6 (only well known in South Korea)

as "compatible", but I don't know if it's the same as "certified". JBoss 4, witch is long stable, supports EE 5, but is not listed by Sun I would the list name from "certified" to "officialy compatible".

JavaMail

JavaMail needs it's own article. I was hoping it could redirect here, but it isn't mentioned in the article yet either. Mathiastck 20:09, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Active Development Version?

Maybe a note should be added that most development work is done with the (current - 1) version of Java EE, not the most recent release?

@@ Line 35: / Line 35: @@
 JBoss 4, witch is long stable, supports EE 5, but is not listed by Sun
 I would the list name from "certified" to "officialy compatible".
-== "Low cost development" section needs to be renamed ==
-The section titled "Low cost development" must be renamed.  It refers to low cost of assembling a rudimentary development and runtime environment.  This however is a tiny fraction of the total cost of developing a non-trivial system.  No evidence whatsoever is adduced to support the assertion that J2EE development is "low cost" when compared to alternatives.  Indeed, there is ample evidence to the contrary.
 == JavaMail ==