Talk:Ernesto Miranda: Difference between revisions
The story of autographed Miranda rights cards is an artistic invention. |
Post-edit postmortem, and added other sections into further categories for talk page |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
The last few sentences of this article - those describing Miranda's death and the escape of his killer - are so perfectly ironic that they seem possibly an urban myth. Can this be confirmed anywhere? I'd really like to see a reference attached to that last paragraph because it seems almost fictional (and is written in a suitably mythic manner). |
The last few sentences of this article - those describing Miranda's death and the escape of his killer - are so perfectly ironic that they seem possibly an urban myth. Can this be confirmed anywhere? I'd really like to see a reference attached to that last paragraph because it seems almost fictional (and is written in a suitably mythic manner). |
||
:I agree. I can find no references to Miranda giving out autographed cards, and from what I knew of him previously it seems out of line with his character. Secondly, a policeman would not pick up a rights card and read it - that is patently ludicrous. I am rewriting that section, although the whole article should be put up to scrutiny. --[[User:Edwin Herdman|Edwin Herdman]] 10:06, 23 May 2007 (UTC) |
:I agree. I can find no references to Miranda giving out autographed cards, and from what I knew of him previously it seems out of line with his character. Secondly, a policeman would not pick up a rights card and read it - that is patently ludicrous. I am rewriting that section, although the whole article should be put up to scrutiny. --[[User:Edwin Herdman|Edwin Herdman]] 10:06, 23 May 2007 (UTC) |
||
::Alright, I've edited that out. However, sources seem to disagree as to whether there was just one suspect or multiple ones - the American Heritage source I botched into the article says there were suspects, plural, but another source said there was only one. More research is needed. --[[User:Edwin Herdman|Edwin Herdman]] 10:14, 23 May 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Assorted confusion == |
|||
The page says "in November, 2006, the Supreme Court agreed to hear Miranda's case." November '06 hasn't yet begun. Can somebody please correct this? |
The page says "in November, 2006, the Supreme Court agreed to hear Miranda's case." November '06 hasn't yet begun. Can somebody please correct this? |
||
Line 10: | Line 12: | ||
Miranda was convicted again due to a confession made to his wife? I thought he wasn't married? [[User:Keppa|Keppa]] 20:09, 13 June 2006 (UTC) |
Miranda was convicted again due to a confession made to his wife? I thought he wasn't married? [[User:Keppa|Keppa]] 20:09, 13 June 2006 (UTC) |
||
== Possible copyright violation == |
|||
Many parts of this entry appear to be lifted word-for-word from the following article and may violate copyright: http://www.crimelibrary.com/notorious_murders/not_guilty/miranda/. [[User:76.186.26.107|76.186.26.107]] 22:01, 1 November 2006 (UTC) |
Many parts of this entry appear to be lifted word-for-word from the following article and may violate copyright: http://www.crimelibrary.com/notorious_murders/not_guilty/miranda/. [[User:76.186.26.107|76.186.26.107]] 22:01, 1 November 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 10:14, 23 May 2007
Crime and Criminal Biography B‑class High‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Ironic Ending
The last few sentences of this article - those describing Miranda's death and the escape of his killer - are so perfectly ironic that they seem possibly an urban myth. Can this be confirmed anywhere? I'd really like to see a reference attached to that last paragraph because it seems almost fictional (and is written in a suitably mythic manner).
- I agree. I can find no references to Miranda giving out autographed cards, and from what I knew of him previously it seems out of line with his character. Secondly, a policeman would not pick up a rights card and read it - that is patently ludicrous. I am rewriting that section, although the whole article should be put up to scrutiny. --Edwin Herdman 10:06, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- Alright, I've edited that out. However, sources seem to disagree as to whether there was just one suspect or multiple ones - the American Heritage source I botched into the article says there were suspects, plural, but another source said there was only one. More research is needed. --Edwin Herdman 10:14, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Assorted confusion
The page says "in November, 2006, the Supreme Court agreed to hear Miranda's case." November '06 hasn't yet begun. Can somebody please correct this?
Miranda was convicted again due to a confession made to his wife? I thought he wasn't married? Keppa 20:09, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation
Many parts of this entry appear to be lifted word-for-word from the following article and may violate copyright: http://www.crimelibrary.com/notorious_murders/not_guilty/miranda/. 76.186.26.107 22:01, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
See first line for vandalism.
Name
the name in article and the infobox name is different, what is his real full name? Wooyi 17:02, 16 February 2007 (UTC)